BACKGROUND: Neuromuscular diseases (NMD) can affect the ability to be employed and to work, but there is limited knowledge of individuals’ own perspectives of factors that are important for their vocational situation.
OBJECTIVE: To explore the vocational situation among people with NMD that are employed, and to describe their experiences of how their disability, personal and environmental factors influence their ability to continue to work.
METHODS: Nine participants with different NMD were included. A mixed-methods design was used, and data were collected by means of semi-structured and open-ended interviews, and ratings of aspects supporting or interfering with their work performance and the ability to continue to work. Data were analyzed with directed content analysis based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, and with descriptive statistics.
RESULTS: The participants’ personal characteristics, support from others at work and at home, and a flexible work organization were perceived as important factors facilitating work continuation, whereas physically demanding work assignments and factors in the physical environment were perceived as barriers.
CONCLUSIONS: Knowledge of how personal characteristics as well as support from the work organization, managers and family members can facilitate the ability to work is important for employers, staff within different parts of the health care system, and the social security system. Future research should focus on interventions that are best suited to enhance the vocational situation for individuals with NMD.
BlusteinDL. The role of work in psychological health and well-being: A conceptual, historical, and public policy perspective. Am Psychol2008;63(4):228–40.
2.
DetailleSI, HeerkensYF, EngelsJA, van der GuldenJW, van DijkFJ. Common prognostic factors of work disability among employees with a chronic somatic disease: A systematic review of cohort studies. Scand J Work Environ Health2009;35(4):261–81.
3.
van AmelsvoortLG, KantIJ, BeurskensAJ, SchroerCA, SwaenGM. Fatigue as a predictor of work disability. Occup Environ Med2002;59(10):712–3.
4.
McDonaldCM. Physical activity, health impairments, and disability in neuromuscular disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2002;81(11 Suppl):S108–20.
5.
AndriesF, WeversCW, WintzenAR, BuschHF, HöwelerCJ, de JagerAE, PadberbGW, VisserM, WokkeJH. Vocational perspectives and neuromuscular disorders. Int J Rehabil Res1997;20(3):255–73.
6.
FowlerWMJr, AbreschRT, KochTR, BrewerML, BowdenRK, WanlassRL. Employment profiles in neuromuscular diseases. Am J Phys Med Rehabil1997;76(1):26–37.
7.
MinisMA, SatinkT, KinébanianA, EngelsJA, HeerkensYF, van EngelenBG, Nijhuis-van der SandenMW. How persons with a neuromuscular disease perceive employment participation: A qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil2014;24(1):52–67.
8.
CreswellJW, Plano ClarkVL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc; 2011.
9.
HaglundL. WRI-S version 3. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Science, Deparment of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping; 2007.
10.
EkbladhE, HaglundL. WEIS-S version 3. Linköping University, Faculty of Health Science, Department of Social and Welfare Studies, Linköping; 2010.
11.
BravemanB, RobsonM, VelozoC, KielhofnerG, FisherG, ForsythK, KerschbaunJ. Worker Role Interview (WRI). Department of Occupational Therapy, Collage of Applied Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois: Model of Human Occupation: Clearinghouse; 2005.
12.
Moore-CornerRA, KielhofnerG, OlsonL. Work Environment Impact Scale (WEIS). Department of Occupational Therapy, Collage of Applied Health Science, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois: Model of Human Occupation: Clearinghouse; 1998.
13.
KielhofnerG. A model of human occupation: Theory and application. 4th ed. Baltimore: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
14.
EkbladhE, FanCW, SandqvistJ, HemmingssonH, TaylorR. Work environment impact scale: Testing the psychometric properties of the swedish version. Work2014;47(2):213–9.
15.
ForsythK, BravemanB, KielhofnerG, EkbladhE, HaglundL, FengerK, KellerJ. Psychometric properties of the worker role interview. Work2006;27(3):313–8.
16.
EkblandhE, ThorellL, HaglundL. Perceptions of the work environment among people with experience of long term sick leave. Work2010;35(2):125–36.
17.
EkblandhE, ThorellL, HaglundL. Return to work: The predictive value of the Worker Role Interview (WRI) over two years. Work2010;35(2):163–72.
18.
World, Health, Organisation. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health-ICF. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
19.
HsiehH-F, ShannonSE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res2005;15(9):1277–88.
20.
Ten KatenK, BeelenA, NolletF, Frings-DresenMH, SluiterJK. Overcoming barriers to work participation for patients with postpoliomyelitis syndrome. Disabil Rehabil2010;33(6):522–9. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
