BACKGROUND: Active Design is a relatively new concept and evaluation on its effects on healthy behaviour is lacking.
OBJECTIVE: To investigate Active Design influence on workplace physical activity, sedentary behaviour, musculoskeletal complaints, and perceptions of the workplace and productivity.
METHODS: Participants (n = 118 adults) moving from 14 workplaces into a new building completed an online questionnaire pre- and post-move. The questions related to health behaviours (physical activity, sitting time and sleep); musculoskeletal issues; perceptions of the office environment; productivity; and engagement.
RESULTS: After the move, 68% of participants were located in an open plan building (21% before the move). In the new workplace participants tended to sit less during their work time (72% – 66%; p < 0.05) and stand more (15% – 19%; p < 0.05) while walking remained unchanged. Participants reported less lower-back pain. The new work environment was perceived as more motivating and providing better light, air quality and temperature, but less storage space. Participants reported looking forward to going to work more than before. No difference was reported in productivity related measures.
CONCLUSIONS: Moving to a new Active Design building can have some physical health-promoting effects on occupants. Satisfaction with environmental characteristics tended to improve in the new building though perceptions of productivity measures were variable.
RobinsonL, MageeC, SafadiM, SharmaR. Health Profile of Australian Employees [Internet]2014 Available from. http://www.workplacehealth.org.au/announcements/whaa-report-on-health-profile-of-australian-workers-released.
2.
WHO. Preventing Noncommunicable Diseases in the Workplace through Diet and Physical Activity/World Economic Forun Report of a Joint Event 2008.
3.
GoetzelRZ, OzminkowskiRJ. The health and cost benefits of work site health-promotion programs. Annu Rev Public Health2008;29:303–323.
4.
NaydeckBL, PearsonJA, OzminkowskiRJ, DayBT, GoetzelRZ. The impact of the highmark employee wellness programs on 4-year healthcare costs. J Occup Environ Med2008;50(2):146–156.
5.
CancelliereC, CassidyJD, AmmendoliaC, CôtéP. Are workplace health promotion programs effective at improving presenteeism in workers? A systematic review and best evidence synthesis of the literature. BMC Public Health2011;11(1):395.
6.
HarterJK, SchmidtFL, HayesTL. Business-unit-level relationship between employee satisfaction, employee engagement, and business outcomes: A meta-analysis. J Appl Psychol2002;87(2):268–279.
7.
ChurchTS, ThomasDM, Tudor-LockeC, KatzmarzykPT, EarnestCP, RodarteRQ, et al. Trends over 5 decades in U.S. occupation-related physical activity and their associations with obesity. Lucia A, editor. PLoS One (Public Library of Science)2011;6(5):e19657.
8.
NgSW, PopkinBM. Time use and physical activity: A shift away from movement across the globe. Obes Rev2012;13(8):659–680.
9.
HeathGW, ParraDC, SarmientoOL, AndersenLB, OwenN, GoenkaS, et al. Evidence-based intervention in physical activity: Lessons from around the world. Lancet2012;380(9838):272–281.
10.
VerweijLM, CoffengJ, van MechelenW, ProperKI. Meta-analyses of workplace physical activity and dietary behaviour interventions on weight outcomes. Obes Rev2011;12(6):406–429.
11.
SailerK, BudgenA, LonsdaleN, PennA. Changing the Architectural Profession - Evidence-Based Design, the New Role of the User and a Process-Based Approach. In: Symposium “Ethics and the Professional Culture.”2007.
12.
MartinCS, GuerinDA. Using research to inform design solutions. J Facil Manag (Emerald Group Publishing Limited)2006;4(3):167–180.
13.
InformeDesign. Available from: www.infromedesign.org.
14.
SailerK, BudgenA, LonsdaleN, TurnerA, PennA. Pre and post occupancy evaluations in workplace environments theoretical reflections and practical implications. J Sp Syntax2010;1(1):199–213.
15.
TokerU, GrayDO. Innovation spaces: Workspace planning and innovation in U.S. university research centers. Res Policy2008;37(2):309–329.
16.
WinemanJD, KaboFW, DavisGF. Spatial and social networks in organizational innovation. Environ Behav2008;41(3):427–442.
17.
HuaY, YangE. Building spatial layout that supports healthier behavior of office workers: A new performance mandate for sustainable buildings. Work (IOS Press)2014;49(3):373–380.
18.
EngelenL, DhillonH, ChauJ, HespeD, BaumanA. Do Active Design buildings change health behaviour and workplace perceptions?Occup Med (Lond)2016;66(5):408–11.
19.
Active Design guidelines. NYC 2010. Available from: http://centerforactivedesign.org/guidelines/.
20.
MiltonK, BullFC, BaumanA. Reliability and validity testing of a single-item physical activity measure. Br J Sports Med2011;45(3):203–208.
21.
ChauJ, van der PloegHP, DunnS, KurkoJ, BaumanA. Validity of the occupational sitting and physical activity questionnaire. Med Sci Sport Exerc2012;44(1):188–125.
22.
World Health Organization. Health at Work Survey 2001. Available from: http://www.hcmed.harvard.edu/hpq/ftpdir/HPQEmployeeVersion81810.pdf.
23.
ZagreusL, HuizengaC, ArensE, LehrerD. Listening to the occupants: A Web-based indoor environmental quality survey. Indoor Air2004;14(Suppl 8):65–74.
24.
ShikiarR, HalpernM, RentzA, KhanZ. Development of the Health and Work Questionnaire (HWQ): An instrument for assessing workplace productivity in relation to worker health. Work A J Prev Assess Rehabil2004;22(3):219–229.
25.
DuncanM, RashidM, VandelanotteC, CutumisuN, PlotnikoffR. Development and reliability testing of a self-report instrument to measure the office layout as a correlate of occupational sitting. International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity2013;16.
26.
ScottSC, GoldbergMS, MayoNE. Statistical assessment of ordinal outcomes in comparative studies. J Clin Epidemiol1997;50(1):45–55.
27.
NeuhausM, EakinEG, StrakerL, OwenN, DunstanDW, ReidN, et al. Reducing occupational sedentary time: A systematic review and meta-analysis of evidence on activity-permissive workstations. Obes Rev2014;15(10):822–838.
28.
ChauJY, DaleyM, DunnS, SrinivasanA, DoA, BaumanAE, et al. The effectiveness of sit-stand workstations for changing office workers’ sitting time: Results from the Stand@Work randomized controlled trial pilot. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act2014;11(1):127.
29.
BrownWJ, MillerYD, MillerR. Sitting time and work patterns as indicators of overweight and obesity in Australian adults. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord2003;27(11):1340–1346.
30.
ParryS, StrakerL. The contribution of office work to sedentary behaviour associated risk. BMC Public Health2013;13(1):296.
31.
BaumanAE, ChauJY, DingD, BennieJ. Too much sitting and cardio-metabolic risk: An update of epidemiological evidence. Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep2013;7(4):293–298.
32.
ChauJY, GrunseitAC, CheyT, StamatakisE, BrownWJ, MatthewsCE, et al. Daily sitting time and all-cause mortality: A meta-analysis. Gorlova OY, editor. PLoS One (Public Library of Science)2013;8(11):e80000.
33.
McCormackG, Giles-CortiB, MilliganR. The test-retest reliability of habitual incidental physical activity. Aust N Z J Public Health2003;27(4):428–433.
34.
DunstanDW, KingwellBA, LarsenR, HealyGN, CerinE, HamiltonMT, et al. Breaking up prolonged sitting reduces postprandial glucose and insulin responses. Diabetes Care2012;35(5):976–983.
35.
WomersleyL, MayS. Sitting posture of subjects with postural backache. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2006;29(3):213–218.
36.
MarmotA, EleyJ. Office Space Planning: Designing for Tomorrow’s Workplace. McGraw-Hill2000.
37.
BrillM, WeidemannS. Associates the B. Disproving widespread myths about workplace design. 2001. p. 62.
38.
KimJ, de DearR. Workspace satisfaction: The privacy-communication trade-off in-open-plan offices. J Environ Psychol2013;36:18–26.
39.
BergströmJ, MillerM, HorneijE. Work environment perceptions following relocation to open-plan offices: A twelve-month longitudinal study. Work2015;50(2):221–228.
40.
CooperC, DeweP. Well-being–absenteeism, presenteeism, costs and challenges. Occup Med (Lond)2008;58(8):522–524.
