BACKGROUND: Trunk flexion and occupational physical activity are parameters that have been used to assess and characterize jobs with high physical demands.
OBJECTIVE: Characterize the physical load of trunk flexion and physical activity of patient care unit (PCU) workers during a single work shift.
METHODS: Participants wore an accelerometer to measure physical activity and an inclinometer to assess trunk flexion during a single work shift, which was compared using correlation and linear regression analyses.
RESULTS: Participants spent 74% of their work time upright between – 10° to 20° and 19% of their time flexed between 20° to 45°. On average workers spent 3% and 5% of their time, in the extreme postures of less than – 10° and greater than 45°, respectively. Participants spent 99% of their shift below moderate and vigorous activity. The largest correlation found was between the number of forward trunk flexions to 20° degrees per shift and minutes in lifestyle activity (r = 0.6, p < 0.001). No correlations between minutes of moderate or vigorous physical activity and trunk flexion were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that the physical demands of patient care unit workers as measured through trunk flexion are associated with lifestyle and light levels of physical activity.
EriksenW. The prevalence of musculoskeletal pain in Norwegian nurses’ aides. Int Arch Occup Environ Health2003;76:625–630.
2.
AlamgirH, YuS, ChavoshiN, et al. Occupational injury among full-time, part-time and casual health care workers. Occup Med (Lond)2008;58:348–354.
3.
VidemanT, OjajarviA, RiihimakiH, et al. Low back pain among nurses: A follow-up beginning at entry to the nursing school. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2005;30:2334–2341.
4.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine. Musculoskeletal Disorders and the Workplace: Low Back and Upper Extremities, National Academy of Sciences (2001).
5.
JosephsonM, LagerstromM, HagbergM, et al. Musculoskeletal symptoms and job strain among nursing personnel: A study over a three year period. Occup Environ Med1997;54:681–685.
6.
BodenLI, SembajweG, TveitoTH, et al. Occupational injuries among nurses and aides in a hospital setting. Am J Ind Med2012;55:117–126.
7.
Rodriguez-AcostaRL, RichardsonDB, LipscombHJ, et al. Occupational injuries among aides and nurses in acute care. Am J Ind Med2009;52:953–964.
8.
JensenRC. Back injuries among nursing personnel related to exposure. Applied Occupational and Environmental Hygiene1990;5:38–45.
9.
MarrasWS, DavisKG, KirkingBC, et al. A comprehensive analysis of low-back disorder risk and spinal loading during the transferring and repositioning of patients using different techniques. Ergonomics1999;42:904–926.
10.
VillageJ, FrazerM, CohenM, et al. Electromyography as a measure of peak and cumulative workload in intermediate care and its relationship to musculoskeletal injury: An exploratory ergonomic study. Appl Ergon2005;36:609–618.
11.
FathallahFA, MarrasWS, ParnianpourM. An assessment of complex spinal loads during dynamic lifting tasks. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)1998;23:706–716.
12.
FathallahFA, MarrasWS, ParnianpourM. The role of complex, simultaneous trunk motions in the risk of occupation-related low back disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)1998;23:1035–1042.
13.
PunnettL, FineLJ, KeyserlingWM, et al. Back disorders and nonneutral trunk postures of automobile assembly workers. Scand J Work Environ Health1991;17:337–346.
14.
SatoM, TanakaS. Postural effect on the relation between oxygen consumption and heart rate. J Hum Ergol (Tokyo)1973;2:21–30.
15.
LamyS, De GaudemarisR, LepageB, et al. Psychosocial and organizational work factors and incidence of arterial hypertension among female healthcare workers: Results of the Organisation des soins et sante des soignants cohort. J Hypertens2014.
16.
KrauseN. Physical activity and cardiovascular mortality–disentangling the roles of work, fitness, and leisure. Scand J Work Environ Health2010;36:349–355.
17.
KrauseN, BrandRJ, KaplanGA, et al. Occupational physical activity, energy expenditure and 11-year progression of carotid atherosclerosis. Scand J Work Environ Health2007;33:405–424.
18.
AllesoeK, HoltermannA, AadahlM, et al. High occupational physical activity and risk of ischaemic heart disease in women: The interplay with physical activity during leisure time. Eur J Prev Cardiol2015;22:1601–1608.
19.
TeschkeK, TraskC, JohnsonP, et al. Measuring posture for epidemiology: Comparing inclinometry, observations and self-reports. Ergonomics2009;52:1067–1078.
20.
HoltermannA, MortensenOS, BurrH, et al. The interplay between physical activity at work and during leisure time–risk of ischemic heart disease and all-cause mortality in middle-aged Caucasian men. Scand J Work Environ Health2009;35:466–474.
21.
HoltermannA, MortensenOS, BurrH, et al. Physical demands at work, physical fitness, and 30-year ischaemic heart disease and all-cause mortality in the Copenhagen Male Study. Scand J Work Environ Health2010;36:357–365.
22.
ClaysE, De BacquerD, JanssensH, et al. The association between leisure time physical activity and coronary heart disease among men with different physical work demands: A prospective cohort study. Eur J Epidemiol2013;28:241–247.
23.
LiG, BuckleP. Current techniques for assessing physical exposure to work-related musculoskeletal risks, with emphasis on posture-based methods. Ergonomics1999;42:674–695.
24.
FaberGS, KingmaI, BruijnSM, et al. Optimal inertial sensor location for ambulatory measurement of trunk inclination. J Biomech2009;42:2406–2409.
25.
van PoppelMN, ChinapawMJ, MokkinkLB, et al. Physical activity questionnaires for adults: A systematic review of measurement properties. Sports Med2010;40:565–600.
26.
HagstromerM, OjaP, SjostromM. Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc2007;39:1502–1508.
27.
ShephardRJ. Limits to the measurement of habitual physical activity by questionnaires. Br J Sports Med2003;37:197–206; discussion.
28.
SchallMCJr, FethkeNB, ChenH. Working postures and physical activity among registered nurses. Appl Ergon2016;54:243–250.
29.
FreitagS, Fincke-JunodI, SeddoukiR, et al. Frequent bending–an underestimated burden in nursing professions. Ann Occup Hyg2012;56:697–707.
30.
FreitagS, SeddoukiR, DulonM, et al. The effect of working position on trunk posture and exertion for routine nursing tasks: An experimental study. Ann Occup Hyg2014;58:317–325.
31.
HodderJN, HolmesMW, KeirPJ. Continuous assessment of work activities and posture in long-term care nurses. Ergonomics2010;53:1097–1107.
32.
UmukoroPE, AriasOE, StoffelSD, et al. Physical Activity at Work Contributes Little to Patient Care Workers’ Weekly Totals. J Occup Environ Med2013.
33.
CaspiCE, DennerleinJT, KenwoodC, et al. Results of a pilot intervention to improve health and safety for health care workers. J Occup Environ Med2013;55:1449–1455.
34.
BorgG. Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion. Scand J Work Environ Health1990;16(Suppl 1):55–58.
35.
GamberaleF. Perceived exertion, heart rate, oxygen uptake and blood lactate in different work operations. Ergonomics1972;15:545–554.
FreedsonPS, MelansonE, SirardJ. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc1998;30:777–781.
38.
KeyserlingM, BrouwerM, SilversteinB. A checklist for evaluating ergonomic risk factors resulting from awkward postures of the legs, trunk and neck. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics1992;9:238–301.
39.
SnookSH, CirielloVM. The design of manual handling tasks: Revised tables of maximum acceptable weights and forces. Ergonomics1991;34:1197–1213.
40.
WatersTRP-AV, GargA, FineLJ. Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks. Ergonomics1993;36:749–776.
41.
HoltermannA, MarottJL, GyntelbergF, et al. Occupational and leisure time physical activity: Risk of all-cause mortality and myocardial infarction in the Copenhagen City Heart Study. A prospective cohort study. BMJ Opene2012;2:e000556.
42.
KorshojM, ClaysE, LidegaardM, et al. Is aerobic workload positively related to ambulatory blood pressure? A cross-sectional field study among cleaners. Eur J Appl Physiol2016;116:145–152.
43.
FaberGS, ChangCC, KingmaI, et al. Lifting style and participant’s sex do not affect optimal inertial sensor location for ambulatory assessment of trunk inclination. J Biomech2013;46:1027–1030.
44.
HoozemansMJ, KingmaI, de VriesWH, et al. Effect of lifting height and load mass on low back loading. Ergonomics2008;51:1053–1063.
45.
TaloniS, CassaviaGC, CiavarroGL, AndreoniG, SantambrogioGC, PedottiA. An index for back pain risk assessment in nursery activities. Occupational Ergonomics2004;4:281–290.
46.
VillageJ, TraskC, LuongN, et al. Development and evaluation of an observational Back-Exposure Sampling Tool (Back-EST) for work-related back injury risk factors. Appl Ergon2009;40:538–544.
47.
NRC/IOM NRCaIoM. Musculoskeletal Disorders and the workplaces: Low Back and Upper Extremities. Washington, D.C: National Academy Press; 2001.
48.
TraskC, MathiassenSE, WahlstromJ, et al. Data collection costs in industrial environments for three occupational posture exposure assessment methods. BMC Med Res Methodol2012;12:89.
49.
MatthewCE. Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc2005;37:S512–S522.
50.
SwartzAM, StrathSJ, BassettDRJr, et al. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports ExercS450-S2000;32:S450–S456.
