BACKGROUND: Quay crane operators are specialized in moving containers to and from vessels while adopting constrained sitting postures for prolonged periods (4–6 consecutive hours) in a very challenging environment. Thus, they are exposed to discomfort or pain that may result in deterioration of their performance with consequent reduction of operational safety levels. Such discomfort can be indirectly and partially assessed by measuring contact pressure at the body-seat interface.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to assess the feasibility, usefulness, and effectiveness of monitoring the variations in seat-body interface pressure during a regular work shift of 4 hours performed in a simulated environment.
METHODS: Eight professional operators performed a four-hour shift in a realistic control station set inside a quay crane simulator. Seat-body contact pressures were measured at 10 Hz using two pressure-sensitive mats placed on the seat pan and the backrest. Raw pressure data were processed to extract pressure vs. time curves related to the whole seat surface and, for the seat pan only, values associated with four anatomical regions (i.e. left and right thighs and buttocks).
RESULTS: During the work shift, the mean backrest pressure was low and fairly constant. Seat pan pressure increased by 10%, rising from 7.4 (1.5) to 8.2 (2.3) kPa over the simulated shift. Detailed analysis of the four sub-regions revealed that as the trial progressed the mean contact pressure on buttocks decreased (–6% at the end of the trial) while thigh pressures increased (by 10 and 20% for right and left sides, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: Although further studies with larger samples are needed, long-term monitoring of the body-seat contact pressures of crane operators in a simulated environment appears to be a useful tool to identify specific postural strategies to reduce discomfort originated by prolonged sitting posture.
BruzzoneAG, FaddaP, FancelloG, D’ErricoG, BoccaE, MasseiM. A vibration effect as fatigue source in a port crane simulator for training and research: Spectra validation process. Proceedings of the International Conference on Harbor, Maritime and Multimodal Logistics Modeling and Simulation, HMS 2009, Held at the International Mediterranean and Latin American Modeling Multiconference, I3M2009:77–86.
2.
PiginiL, ColombiniD, BriedaS, FantiM. Ergonomic solutions in designing workstations for operators of cranes on harbours. Proceedings of the World Congress of the International Ergonomics Association 2006 (Maastricht, The Netherlands, July 10-14). Available from http://www.epmresearch.org/userfiles/files/%20IEA%-14%20LUGLIO%20MAASTRICHTPIGINI-BRIEDA.pdf 2010.
3.
HuysmansMA, de LoozeMP, HoozemanMJM, van der BeekAJ, van DieënJH. The effect of joystick handle size and gain at two levels of required precision on performance and physical load on crane operators. Ergonomics2006;49(11):1021–35.
4.
PottersD. An ergonomic, safe and healthy work environment for crane operators. Iron & Steel Technology2010;7(2):26–8.
5.
Linder-GanzE, ShabshinN, ItzchakY, GefenA. Assessment of mechanical conditions in sub-dermal tissues during sitting: A combined experimental-MRI and finite element approach. J Biomech2007;40(7):1443–54.
6.
BhatnagerV, DruryCG, SchiroSG. Posture, postural discomfort, and performance. Hum Factors1985;27(2):189–99.
7.
de LoozeMP, Kuijt-EversLF, van DieënJ. Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics2003;46(10):985–97.
8.
TanC, DelbressineF, ChenW, RautbergerM. Subjective and objective measurements for comfortable truck driver’s seat. Proccedings of the 9th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control, 2008 October 6 - 9th, Kobe, Japan. Accessed from http://www.idemployee.id.tue.nl/g.w.m.rauterberg/publications/AVEC2008paper.pdf on February, 26 2016.
9.
ZempR, TaylorWR, LorenzettiS. Are pressure measurements effective in the assessment of office chair comfort/discomfort? A review. Appl Ergon2015;48:273–82.
10.
AndreoniG, SantambrogioGC, RabuffettiM, PedottiA. Method for the analysis of posture and interface pressure of car drivers. Appl Ergon2002;33(6):511–22.
11.
NaS, LimS, ChoiH-S, ChungMK. Evaluation of driver’s discomfort and postural change using dynamic body pressure distribution. Int J Ind Ergon2005;35(12):1085–96.
12.
KyungG, NussbaumMA. Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): Relationships with and prediction from interface pressure. Int J Ind Ergon2008;38(5-6):526–38.
13.
CallaghanJP, CokeSK, BeachTAC. Gender- and time-varying postural and discomfort responses during prolonged driving. Occup Ergon2010;9(1):41–53.
14.
WangB, JinX, ChengB, TaoX. Assessment of driver movements during prolonged driving using seat pressure measurements. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society2011;1568–72.
15.
DaruisDDI, DerosBM, NorNJM, HosseiniFouladi M. Relationship between objective and subjective methods in evaluating static discomfort of car driver seat. Adv Mater Res2012;433-440:4997–5003.
16.
DunkNM, CallaghanJP. Gender-based differences in postural responses to seated exposures. Clin Biomech2005;20(10):1101–10.
17.
MakhsousM, LinF, HanawaltD, KrugerSL, LamantiaA. The effect of chair designs on sitting pressure distribution and tissue perfusion. Hum Factors2012;54(6):1066–74.
18.
JinX, ChengB, WangB, ShenB. Assessment of driver’s seating discomfort using interface pressure distribution IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, Proceedings, 2009, Article number 5164493:1419–24.
19.
AlbertWJ, EversonD, RaeM, CallaghanJP, CrollJ, KurugantiU. Biomechanical and ergonomic assessment of urban transit operators. Work2014;47(1):33–44.
20.
GyiDE, PorterJM. Interface pressure and the prediction of car seat discomfort. Appl Ergon1999;30(2):99–107.
21.
BruzzoneA, FaddaP, FancelloG, MasseiM, BoccaE, TremoriA, TaroneF, D’ErricoG. Logistics node simulator as an enabler for supply chain development: Innovative portainer simulator as the assessment tool for human factors in port cranes. Simulation2011;87(10):857–74.
22.
HansonL, SperlingL, AkselssonR. Preferred car driving posture using 3-D information. Int J Vehicle Des2006;42(1-2):154–69.
