BACKGROUND: Day centers have been criticized for giving attendees a lower social status because they only offer activities that are often work-like although not financially of benefit to attendees.
OBJECTIVES: To explore day center attendees’ perceived social status and to identify associations among the attendees with the center’s orientation with activity, well-being, and psychiatric symptoms.
METHOD: Day center attendees in meeting place-oriented (n = 39) and work-oriented (n = 54) day centers in Sweden were interviewed addressing the targeted factors using both self-rated and interview-based instruments.
RESULT: Attendees rated themselves close to the middle on the social status measure. No difference between groups based on day center orientation was found. Their self-perceived positioning on social status was positively related to the worker role, occupational engagement, self-rated health, self-esteem, self-mastery, and depressive symptoms. Logistic regression models showed better self-rated health was the only predictor of belonging to the group with a higher level of social status when dichotomized according to the median. Self-rated health was the strongest indicator for scoring above the 75th percentile on perceived status, followed by self-esteem, which was also a significant indicator.
CONCLUSION: These findings yielded new knowledge concerning perceived social status in the target group and the importance of health and self-esteem.
KrausMV, TanJJX, TannenbaumMB.
The social ladder: A rank-based perspective on social class. Psychol Inq2013;24(2):81–96.
2.
AhnquistJ, WamalaSP, LindstromD.
Social determinants of health. A question of social or economic capital? Interaction effects of socioeconomic factors on health outcomes. Soc Sci Med2012;74:930–9.
3.
AllenJ, BalfourR, BellR, MarmotM.
Social determinants of mental health. Int Rev Psychiatry2014;26(4):392–407.
4.
McCullochA.
Social environments and health: Cross sectional national survey. BMJ2001;323:208–9.
5.
Socialstyrelsen Nationella riktlinjer för psykosociala insatser vid schizofreni eller schizofreniliknande tillstånd 2011 – stöd för styrning och ledning. Artikelnr: 2011-1-3. [National guidelines for psychosocial interventions for people with schizophrenia or related disorders, 2011 - support for control and management. Final report. In Swedish.]. Stockholm: National Board of Health and Welfare. 2011.
6.
TjörnstrandC, BejerholmU, EklundM.
Participation in day centres for people with psychiatric disabilities: Characteristics of the occupations. Scand J Occup Ther2011;18(4):243–53.
7.
GrönbergME.
Från slutna institutioner till institutionaliserat omhändertagande.
Karlstad: Karlstad University; 2012.
8.
ArgentzellE, LeufstadiusC, EklundM.
Factors influencing subjective perceptions of everyday occupations: Comparing day centre attendees with non-attendees. Scand J Occup Ther2012;19(1):68–77.
9.
TjörnstrandC, BejerholmU, EklundM.
Participation in day centres for people with psychiatric disabilities - A focus on occupational engagement. Br J Occup Ther2013;76(3):144–150.
10.
BryantW, CraikC, McKayE.
Living in a glasshouse: Exploring occupational alienation. Can J Occup Ther2004;71(5):189–282.
11.
AnderssonM, EklundM, SandlundM, MarkströmU.
Freedom of choice or cost efficiency? The implementation of a free-choice market system in community mental health services in Sweden. Scand J Disab Research20151–16.
12.
LeufstadiusC, EklundM, ErlandssonLK.
Meaningfulness in work - experiences among employed individuals with persistent mental illness. Work2009;34(1):21–32.
13.
Araten-BergmanT, SteinMA.
Employment, social capital and community participation among Israelis with disabilities. Work2014;48(3):381–90.
14.
Gahnström-StrandqvistK, LiukkoA, ThamK.
The meaning of the working cooperative for persons with long-term mental illness: A phenomenological study. Am J Occup Ther2003;57(3):262–72.
15.
BryantW, CraikC, McKayE.
Perspectives of day and accommodation services for people with enduring mental illness. J Ment Health2005;14(2):109–20.
16.
BejerholmU, EklundM.
Time use and occupational performance among persons with schizophrenia. Occup Ther Ment Health2004;20(1):27–47.
17.
LeufstadiusC, ErlandssonL-K, BjörkmanT, EklundM.
Meaningfulness in daily occupations among individuals with persistent mental illness. J Occup Sci2008;15(1):27–35.
18.
ShimitrasL, FosseyE, HarveyC.
Time use of people living with schizophrenia living in a north London catchment area. Br J Occup Ther2003;66(2):46–54.
19.
TjörnstrandC, BejerholmU, EklundM.
Factors influencing occupational engagement in day centers for people with psychiatric disabilities. Community Ment Health J2015;51(1):48–53.
20.
BejerholmU, EklundM.
Occupational engagement in persons with schizophrenia: Relationships to self-related variables, psychopathology, and quality of life. Am J Occup Ther2007;61(1):21–32.
21.
ArgentzellE, LeufstadiusC, EklundM.
Social interaction among people with psychiatric disabilities - does day centre matter?Int J Soc Psychiatry2014;60(6):519–27.
22.
ÅslundC, StarrinB, NilssonKW.
Psychosomatic symptoms and low psychological well-being in relation to employment status: The influence of social capital in a large cross-sectional study in Sweden. Int Journal Equity Health2014;13(22):1–10.
23.
EklundM, SandlundM.
The life situation of people with persistent mental illness visiting day centers: A comparative study. Community Ment Health J2012;48:592–7.
24.
ArgentzellE, EklundM.
Perceptions of the worker role among people with psychiatric disabilities: Description and investigation of associated factors. Work2013;45:289–98.
25.
MarmotMG.
Status Syndrome. J Am Med Assoc2006;295(11):1304–7.
26.
EatonWW, MuntanerC, BovassoG, SmithC.
Socioeconomic status and depressive syndrome: The role of inter- and intra-generational mobility, government assistance, and work environment. J Health Soc Behav2001;42(3):277–94.
27.
AdlerN, StewartJ.
The MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status. http://www.macses.ucsf.edu2007 [25 februari 2015].
28.
GiattiL, do Valle CameloL, de Castro RodriguesJF, BarretoSM.
Reliability of the MacArthur scale of subjective social status - Brazilian Longitudinal Study of Adult Health (ELSA-Brasil). BMC Public Health2012;12:1096.
29.
EklundM, ErlandssonL-K, HagellP.
Psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Pearlin Mastery Scale in people with mental illness and healthy people. Nord J Psychiatry2012;66:380–8.
30.
PearlinLI, MenaghanEG, LiebermanMA, MullanJT.
The stress process. J Health Soc Behav1981;22:337–56.
31.
RosenbergM.
Society and the Adolescent Self-Image.
Princeton NJ:
Princeton University Press; 1965.
32.
OliverJPJ, HuxleyPJ, PriebeS, KaiserW.
Measuring the quality of life of severely mentally ill people using the Lancashire Quality of Life Profile. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatric Epidemiol1997;32(2):76–83.
33.
SchmittDP, AllikJ.
Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale in 53 nations: Exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global Self-Esteem. J Pers Soc Psychol2005;89(4):623–42.
34.
TorreyWC, MueserKT, McHugoGH, DrakeRE.
Self-Esteem as an outcome measure in studies of vocational rehabilitation for adults with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services2000;51(2):229–33.
35.
BowlingA.
Just one question: If one question works, why ask several?J Epidemiol Community Health2005;59(5):342–5.
36.
TjörnstrandC, BejerholmU, EklundM.
Psychometric properties of the POES-P assessing self-reported engagement in productive occupations. Can J Occup Ther2013;80(2):101–10.
37.
BejerholmU, HanssonL, EklundM.
Profiles of occupational engagement in people with schizophrenia (POES): The development of a new instrument based on time-use diaries. Br J Occup Ther2006;69(2):58–68.
38.
UndénA-L, Orth GomérK.
Development of a social suport instrument for use in population surveys. Soc Sci Med19891387–92.
39.
EklundM, Bengtsson-TopsA, LindstedtH.
Construct and discriminant validity and dimensionality of the Interview Schedule for Social Interaction (ISSI) in three psychiatric samples. Nord J Psychiatry2007;61(3):182–8.
40.
OverallJ, GorhamD.
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale. Psychol Rep1962;10(3):799–812.
41.
CrippaJAS, SanchesRF, HallakJEC, LoureiroSR, ZuardiAW.
A structured interview guide increases Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale reliability in raters with low clinical experience. Acta Psychiatr Scand2001;103(6):465–70.
42.
WästbergB, HaglundL, EklundM.
Psychometric properties of the worker role self- assessment instrument used to evaluate unemployed people in Sweden, Scand J Occup Ther2009;16:238–46.
43.
EklundM, BäckströmM.
Factor structure and construct validity of the Worker Role Self-assessment (WRS) when used for people with psychiatric disabilities in Sweden. Eval Health Prof2016; epub date Apr 21.
44.
Singh-ManouxaA, AdlerbNE, MarmotaMG.
Subjective social status: Its determinants and its association with measures of ill-health in the White hall II study. Soc Sci Med2003;56:1321–33.
45.
RosenbergM, PearlinL.
Social class and self-esteem among children and adults. Am J Sociol1978;84:53–77.
HanssonL, StjernswärdS, SvenssonB.
Perceived and anticipated discrimination in people with mental illness - An interview study. Nord J Psychiatry2014;68(2):100–6.
48.
IwasakiY, CoyleC, ShankJ, MessinaE.
Role of leisure in recovery from mental illness. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil2014;17:147–65.
49.
ToporA, BorgS, GirolamoD, DavidsonL.
Not just an individual journey: Social aspects of recovery. Int J Soc Psychiatry2011;57(1):90–9.
50.
MezzinaR, BorgM, MarinI, SellsD, ToporA, DavidsonL.
From participation to citizenship: How to regain a role, a status, and a life in the process of recovery. Am J Psychiatr Rehabil2006;9(1):39–61.
51.
MirowskyJ, RossC, E.
Creative work and health. J Health Soc Behav2007;48:385–403.
