Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2016-9-27
Effect of the craniocervical brace on craniocervical angle,thoracic kyphosis angle,and trunk extensor muscle activity during typing in subjects with forward head posture
BACKGROUND: The relationship between forward head posture (FHP) and thoracic kyphosis has been a subject of interest in the rehabilitation field for visual display terminal workers.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of the craniocervical brace use on craniocervical angle (CCA), thoracic kyphosis angle (TKA), and trunk extensor muscle activity.
METHODS: Twelve young male subjects with forward head posture (21.6±1.9 years) participated in this study. We compared CCA & TKA and trunk extensor muscle activity between with and without application of the craniocervical brace during visual display terminal work.
RESULTS: When wearing the craniocervical brace, the subjects demonstrated significantly greater CCA at the start and the end of the task and less change in CCA during the task (p < 0.05). While non-significantly less TKA was seen at the start of the task, significantly less TKA was observed at the end of the task when using the craniocervical brace (p < 0.05). The craniocervical brace use also led to significantly less change in TKA (p < 0.05). There was no significant difference in the trunk extensor muscle activity.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the craniocervical brace decreased FHP immediately, lessened thoracic kyphosis over time, and prevented the worsening of FHP and thoracic kyphosis during visual display terminal work.
ShinSJ, YooWG. Changes in cervical range of motion, flexion-relaxation ratio and pain with visual display terminal work. Work2014;47(2):261–5.
2.
YeZ, AbeY, KusanoY, TakamuraN, EidaK, TakemotoTI, et al. The influence of visual display terminal use on the physical and mental conditions of administrative staff in Japan. J Physiol Anthropol2007;26(2):69–73.
3.
YeZ, HondaS, AbeY, KusanoY, TakamuraN, ImamuraY, et al. Influence of work duration or physical symptoms on mental health among Japanese visual display terminal users. Ind Health2007;45(2):328–33.
4.
YooWG, AnDH. The relationship between the active cervical range of motion and changes in head and neck posture after continuous VDT work. Ind Health2009;47(2):183–8.
5.
YooWG, KimMH. Effect of different seat support characteristics on the neck and trunk muscles and forward head posture of visual display terminal workers. Work2010;36(1):3–8.
6.
LeeJH, ParkSY, YooWG. Changes in craniocervical and trunk flexion angles and gluteal pressure during VDT work with continuous cross-legged sitting. J Occup Health2011;53(5):350–5.
7.
ParkSY, YooWG. Effect of EMG-based feedback on posture correction during computer operation. J Occup Health2012;54(4):271–7.
8.
HarrisonDD, HarrisonSO, CroftAC, HarrisonDE, TroyanovichSJ. Sitting biomechanics part I: Review of the literature. J Manipulative Physiol Ther1999;22(9):594–609.
9.
RaineS, TwomeyLT. Head and shoulder posture variations in 160 asymptomatic women and men. Arch Phys Med Rehabil1997;78(11):1215–23.
10.
WebbA, DarekarA, RassoulianH. The influence of age, anthropometrics and range of motion on the morphometry of the synovial folds of the lateral atlanto-axial joints: A pilot study. Eur Spine J2011;20(4):542–9.
11.
Burgess-LimerickR, PlooyA, AnkrumDR. The effect of imposed and self-selected computer monitor height on posture and gaze angle. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)1998;13(8):584–92.
12.
KangJH, ParkRY, LeeSJ, KimJY, YoonSR, JungKI. The effect of the forward head posture on postural balance in long time computer based worker. Ann Rehabil Med2012;36(1):98–104.
13.
FonGJ, PittMJ, ThiesACJr. Thoracic kyphosis: Range in normal subjects. AJR Am J Roentgenol1980;134(5):979–83.
14.
BriggsAM, Van DieënJH, WrigleyTV, GreigAM, PhillipsB, LoSK, et al. Thoracic kyphosis affects spinal loads and trunk muscle force. Phys Ther2007;87(5):595–607.
15.
GreigAM, BennellKL, BriggsAM, HodgesPW. Postural taping decreases thoracic kyphosis but does not influence trunk muscle electromyographic activity or balance in women with osteoporosis. Man Ther2008;13(3):249–57.
16.
Van DieënJH, CholewickiJ, RadeboldA. Trunk muscle recruitment patterns in patients with low back pain enhance the stability of the lumbar spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2003;28(8):834–41.
17.
GreigAM, BennellKL, BriggsAM, HodgesPW. Postural taping decreases thoracic kyphosis but does not influence trunk muscle electromyographic activity or balance in women with osteoporosis. Man Ther2008;13(3):249–57.
18.
LauKT, CheungKY, ChanKB, ChanMH, LoKY, ChiuTT. Relationships between sagittal postures of thoracic and cervical spine, presence of neck pain, neck pain severity and disability. Man Ther2010;15(5):457–62.
19.
QuekJ, PuaYH, ClarkRA, BryantAL. Effects of thoracic kyphosis and forward head posture on cervical range of motion in older adults. Man Ther2013;18(1):65–71.
20.
ZepaI, HurmerintaK, KoveroO, NissinenM, KononenM, HuggareJ. Associations between thoracic kyphosis, head posture, and craniofacial morphology in young adults. Acta Odontol Scand2000;58(6):237–42.
21.
ClelandJA, GlynnP, WhitmanJM, EberhartSL, MacDonaldC, ChildsJD. Short-term effects of thrust versus nonthrust mobilization/manipulation directed at the thoracic spine in patients with neck pain: A randomized clinical trial.
Phys Ther2007;87(4):431–40
.
22.
KraussJ, CreightonD, ElyJD, Podlewska-ElyJ. The immediate effects of upper thoracic translatoric spinal manipulation on cervical pain and range of motion: A randomized clinical trial. J Man Manip Ther2008;16(2):93–9.
23.
LauHMC, Wing ChiuTT, LamTH. The effectiveness of thoracic manipulation on patients with chronic mechanical neck pain–A randomized controlled trial. Man Ther2011;16(2):141–7.
24.
MorningstarMW. Cervical hyperlordosis, forward head posture, and lumbar kyphosis correction: A novel treatment for mid-thoracic pain. J Chiropr Med2003;2(3):111–5.
25.
ColeAK, McGrathML, HarringtonSE, PaduaDA, RucinskiTJ, PrenticeWE. Scapular bracing and alteration of posture and muscle activity in overhead athletes with poor posture. J Athl Train2013;48(1):12–24.
26.
HughesT, RochesterP. The effects of proprioceptive exercise and taping on proprioception in subjects with functional ankle instability: A review of the literature. Phys Ther Sport2008;9(3):136–47.
27.
KimDH, KwonH, YooWG. Effect of Assistive device for Neck Retraction (ANR) on neck muscles during neck retraction exercise. J Phys Ther Sci2013;25(5):537–8.
28.
MaruyamaT, GrivasTB, KaspirisA. Effectiveness and outcomes of brace treatment: A systematic review. Physiother Theory Pract2011;27(1):26–42.
29.
IvancicPC. Effects of orthoses on three-dimensional load-displacement properties of the cervical spine. Eur Spine J2013;22(1):169–77.
30.
DellannoR. Forward head posture correction collar. WO Patent2006,069,074;2006.
31.
FallaD, JullG, RussellT, VicenzinoB, HodgesP. Effect of neck exercise on sitting posture in patients with chronic neck pain. Phys Ther2007;87(4):408–17.
32.
FaulF, ErdfelderE, LangAG, BuchnerA. G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods2007;39(2):175–91.
33.
CramJ, KasmanG. Introduction to Surface Electromyography.
1998–Gaithersburg:
Aspen Publishers, Inc.
34.
KuoYL, TullyEA, GaleaMP. Video Analysis of Sagittal Spinal Posture in Healthy Young and Older Adults. J Manipulative Physiol Ther2009;32(3):210–5.
35.
TullyEA, FotoohabadiMR, GaleaMP. Sagittal spine and lower limb movement during sit-to-stand in healthy young subjects. Gait Posture2005;22(4):338–45.
36.
KerryC. Reliability of measuring naturral head posture using the craniovertebral angle. Irish Ergonomics Review2003;2003:37.
37.
YooWG, YiCH, ChoSH, JeonHS, CynnHS, ChoiHS. Effects of the height of ball-backrest on head and shoulder posture and trunk muscle activity in VDT workers. Ind Health2008;46(3):289–97.
38.
MacSweenA, BrydsonG, HamiltonJ. The effect of custom moulded ethyl vinyl acetate foot orthoses on the gait of patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Foot1999;9(3):128–33.
39.
AugustineC, MakofskyHW, BrittC, AdomskyB, DeshlerJM, RamirezP, et al. Use of the occivator for the correction of forward head posture, and the implications for temporomandibular disorders: A pilot study. Cranio2008;26(2):136–43.
40.
MorningstarM. Cervical curve restoration and forward head posture reduction for the treatment of mechanical thoracic pain using the pettibon corrective and rehabilitative procedures. J Chiropr Med2002;1(3):113–5.
41.
FocarileFA, BonaldiA, GiaroloMA, FerrariU, ZilioliE, OttavianiC. Effectiveness of nonsurgical treatment for idiopathic scoliosis: Overview of available evidence. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)1991;16(4):395–401.
42.
O’SullivanPB, DankaertsW, BurnettAF, FarrellGT, JeffordE, NaylorCS, et al. Effect of different upright sitting postures on spinal-pelvic curvature and trunk muscle activation in a pain-free population. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2006;31(19):E707–12.
43.
ClausAP, HidesJA, MoseleyGL, HodgesPW. Different ways to balance the spine: Subtle changes in sagittal spinal curves affect regional muscle activity. Spine (Phila Pa 1976)2009;34(6):E208–14.
44.
MiuraT, SakurabaK. Influence of different spinal alignments in sitting on trunk muscle activity. J Phys Ther Sci2013;25(4):483–7.
