BACKGROUND: The concept of comfort is one way for the growing airline market to differentiate and build customer loyalty. This work follows the idea that increasing the contact area between human and seat can have a positive effect on comfort [5, 7].
OBJECTIVE: To improve comfort, reduce weight and optimise space used, a human contour shaped seat shell and cushioning was developed.
METHODS: First the most common activities, the corresponding postures and seat inclination angles were defined. The imprints of these postures on a rescue mat were 3D scanned and an average human contour curve was defined. The outcome was transferred to a prototype seat that was used to test the effect on perceived comfort/discomfort and pressure distribution.
RESULTS: The resulting human contour based prototype seat has comfort and discomfort scores comparable to a traditional seat. The prototype seat had a significantly lower average pressure between subjects’ buttocks and the seat pan over a traditional seat.
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that it is possible to design a seat pan and backrest based on the different contours of study subjects using 3D scan technology. However, translating the 3D scans into a prototype seat also showed that this can only be seen as a first step; additionally biomechanical information and calculations are needed to create ergonomic seats. Furthermore, it is not possible to capture all different human shapes and postures and translate these into one human contour shape that fits all activities and all human sizes.
International Air Transport Association. Strong Demand for Air Travel Rises in 2014. www.iata.org/pressroom/pr/Pages/2015-02-05-01.aspx (accessed 14-05-15).
2.
BrauerK. Convenience, comfort, and costs. Presentation at the aircraft interior EXPO;2004.
3.
RichardsLC. On the psychology of passenger comfort. Human Factors in Transport Research (Based on the Proceedings of the International Conference on Ergonomics and Transport)1980;2:15–23.
4.
AhmadpouraN, LindgaardG, RobertaJM, PownalldB. The thematic structure of passenger comfort experience and its relationship to the context features in the aircraft cabin. Ergonomics2014;57(6):801–15.
5.
ZempR, TaylorWR, LorenzettiS. Are pressure measurements effective in the assessment of office chair comfort/discomfort? A review. Applied Ergonomics2015;48:273–82.
6.
De LoozeMP, Kuijt-EversLF, van DieenJ. Sitting comfort and discomfort and the relationships with objective measures. Ergonomics2003;46:985–97.
FranzM, KampI, DurtA, KilincsoyU, BubbH, VinkP. A light weight car seat shaped by human body Contour. Int J Human Factors Modelling and Simulation2011;2(4):314–26.
9.
VinkP, FranzM, KampI, ZenkR. Three experiments to support the design of lightweight comfortabel vehicle seats. Work2012;41:1466–70.
10.
GreghiFM, RossiNT, SouzaGBJ, MenegonLN. Contributions from the activity analysis to the products development project: Case study based on a project of innovation and comfort in aircraft’s cabins. Work2012;41(SUPPL.1):55–60.
11.
KampI, KilincsoyU, VinkP. Chosen postures during specific sitting activities. Ergonomics2011;54(11):1029–42.
12.
HelanderMG, ZhangL. Field studies of comfort and discomfort in sitting. Ergonomics1997;40:895–915.
13.
KilincsoyU, WagnerAS, BenglerK, BubbH, VinkP. Comfortable rear seat postures preferred by car passengers. Based on the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics2014;20:823–31.
14.
ParkSJ, KimCB, KimCJ, LeeJW. Comfortable driving postures for Koreans. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics2000;26:489–97.
15.
FujimakiG, NoroK. Sitting comfort of office chair design. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction2005;22–7.
16.
GoossensRHM. Biomechanics of Body Support, PhD thesis. Rotterdam, the Netherlands: Erasmus Universteit; 1994.
17.
ChowWW, OdellEI. Deformations and stresses in soft body tissues of a sitting person. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering1978;100(2):79–87.
KyungG, NussbaumMA. Driver sitting comfort and discomfort (part II): Relationships with and prediction from interface pressure. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics2008;38:526–38.
20.
HelanderMG, LittleSE, DruryCG. Adaptation and sensitivity to postural change in sitting. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society2000;42:617–29.
21.
Hiemstra-van MastrigtS. Comfortable passenger seats: Recommendations for design and research [PhD Thesis]. Case study: Developing an ideal aircraft seat contour using 3D scanning techniques. Delft: Delft University of Technology; 2015. p196–210. Available from: repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid%3Aeedd25e6-c625-45e9-9d32-f818aa89c19d/.
22.
GroenesteijnL, Hiemstra-van MastrigtS, GallaisC, BlokM, Kuijt-EversL, VinkP. Activities, postures and comfort perception of train passengers as input for train seat design. Ergonomics2014;57(8):1154–65.
23.
NoroK, NaruseT, LuederR, Nao-iN, KozawaM. Application of zen sitting principles to microscopic surgery seating. Applied Ergonomics2012;43(2):308–19.
24.
MolenbroekJF. DINED, Anthropometric database: Delft University of Technology; 2004. Available from: dined.io.tudelft.nl.
