BACKGROUND: The hotel industry is an important driver of the European labour market with over 250,000 hotels employing some 2 million people. In Spain, 240 workers were injured by fires in hotels from 2004 to 2008. Fire is considered to be the most important risk in the hotel industry, but the lack of an EU-wide data recording system for hotels makes it difficult to give exact figures for fire events.
OBJECTIVE: We analysed the state of fire prevention systems in hotels in Spain with the aim of proposing strategies to improve fire safety.
METHODS: A 10-item questionnaire was administered from 2007 to 2009 to 15 Spanish experts in fire safety. The questions were measured using a Likert scale and classified into 4 sections: current state of installations, influence of establishment characteristics, application of regulations and priority ranking of actions. Descriptive statistics summarized the data and t-tests evaluated the agreement foreach statement in the questionnaire.
RESULTS: The statistical analysis showed homogeneity in the responses by the experts in all four categories: current state of fire safety installations, influence of establishment characteristics, application of regulations, and priority of actions. There was consensus among the experts over the necessity to improve the enforcement of regulations and also regarding the existence of an association between the hotel category (in Spain they are ranked using a 1 to 5 “star” rating system) and the level of fire safety; hotels with a higher category had higher levels of safety.
CONCLUSIONS: There is a need to identify ways to apply fire safety standards to older hotels so that they comply with new regulations, to standardize regulations for different regions and countries, to improve the maintenance of installations and equipment, to increase the effectiveness of inspections conducted by government bodies, and to raise the general awareness of stakeholders involved in hotel fire prevention.
LarreaJ. Incendios en Hoteles en Verano de 2010. IV International Forum Fire Safety in Hotels. Mallorca (Spain). October 2010.
13.
MárquezFJ, RubioJC, RubioMC. Status of facilities for fire safety in hotels. Safety Science2012;50(1): 1490–1494.
14.
Comisión de las Comunidades Europeas. Informe de 27/06/sobre la aplicación de la recomendación del Consejo de 22 de diciembre de 1986 relativa a la seguridad de los hoteles existentes contra los riesgos de incendio (86/666/CEE).
15.
Public Law 101-391. The United States hotel and motel fire safety Act of 1990. September 1990.
16.
KiddS. “European hotel fire safety: An aná lisis of the 1986 Implementation and Impact of the EC Recomendations on Fire Safety in Existing Hotels” October 2000.
17.
ErffmeyerRC, LaneIM. Quality and acceptance of an evaluative task: The effects of four group decision-making formats. Group & Organization Management1984;9(4): 509–529.
18.
López-ArquillosA, Rubio-RomeroJC, GibbAG, GambateseJA. Safety risk assessment for vertical concrete formwork activities in civil engineering construction. Work (Reading, Mass.)2014;49(2): 183–192.
19.
FischerGW. When oracles fail –A comparison of four procedures for aggregating subjective probability forecasts. Organ Behav Hum Perform1981;28(1): 96–110.
20.
SniezekJA. A comparison of techniques for judgmental forecasting by groups with common information. Group and Organization Management1990;15(1): 5–19.
21.
BestRJ. An experiment in Delphi estimation in marketing decision making. J Market Res1974;448–452.
22.
RoweG, WrightG. The impact of task characteristics on the performance of structured group forecasting techniques. Int J Forecast1996;12(1): 73–89.
23.
MallaFG, ZabalaI. La previsión del futuro en la empresa (III). El método Delphi. Estudios Empresariales1978;39(1): 13–24.
24.
HallowellMR, GambateseJA. Qualitative research: Application of the Delphi method to CEM research. J Constr Eng Manage2009;136(1): 99–107.
25.
IvankovaNV, CreswellJW, StickSL. Using mixed-methods sequential explanatory design: From theory to practice. Field Methods2006;18(1): 3–20.
26.
MorillasRM, Rubio-RomeroJC, FuertesA. A comparative analysis of occupational health and safety riskprevention practices in Sweden and Spain. Journal of Safety Research2013;47(1): 57–65.
27.
LikertR. A technique for the measurement of attitudes. Archives of psychology. 1932.
28.
HassanainMA. Approaches to qualitative fire safety risk assessment in hotel facilities. Structural Survey2009;27(4): 287–300.
29.
CTE (2006). Technical Building Code. Royal Decree 314/of March 17, approving the Technical Building Code is approved. (BOE 28 Mar 2006).
30.
GillenM, KoolsS, SumJ, McCallC, MouldenK. Construction workers’ perceptions of management safety practices: A qualitative investigation. Work (Reading, Mass.)2003;23(3): 245–256.
31.
WiigS, TharaldsenJE. In regulation we trust. Work (Reading, Mass.)2011;41(1): 3043–3050.
32.
BranniganV, SmidtsC. Performance based fire safety regulation under intentional uncertainty. Fire and Materials1999;23(6): 341–347.
33.
ChenYY, ChuangYJ, HuangCH, LinCY, ChienSW. The adoption of fire safety management for upgrading the fire safety level of existing hotel buildings. Building and Environment2012;51(1): 311–319.
