BACKGROUND: The present study uses the RULA method to define the most
favourable working conditions to lower climbing greenhouse plants, the most problematic
task involved in trellising crops.
OBJECTIVE: The aim is to prevent potential musculoskeletal disorders to the
upper limbs in workers performing this task.
METHODS: The variety of scenarios involving this task was simulated in the
laboratory to evaluate different working heights, crop weights, and types of guides
handled.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: From the 2,544 tests made, only some ergonomically
favourable conditions were found to be met when the work was done at a height of 1.4 m,
although heights of between 1.2 and 1.6 m could prove acceptable. Furthermore, the study
shows the importance of the type of hanger needed to perform the work correctly, of the
group of hangers tested; ergonomically acceptable handling was possible only with the
new-generation ones having the lock device. In the case of using other types of hangers,
it is recommended not to support weights greater than 2 kg. In addition to the above
recommendations, it is considered vital to guarantee the correct organization of the
workday to include recovery times from the earliest working hours, given the repetitive
nature of the work, as well as to promote training sessions to avoid incorrect postures,
especially regarding the limbs, trunk, wrist, and neck.
Bianchi.
Tipologie construttive ed impiantistiche nelle colture
protette. Colture Protette1989;7:23–26.
2.
European Committee for standardization CEN.
EN-1-1Greenhouses: Design and construction. Part 1: Commercial production
greenhouses, Brussels, Belgium;
2002;105.
3.
CastillaN, HernándezJ.
Protected cultivation in the Mediterranean area.
Plasticulture1995;107(3):13–20.
4.
MeksawiS, TangtrakulwanichB,
ChongsuvivatwongV.
Musculoskeletal problems and ergonomic risk assessment in rubber tappers:
A community-based study in southern Thailand. Int J Ind
Ergonom2012;42(1):129–135.
doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.08.006
5.
ColombiniD, OcchipintiE.
Preventing upper limb work-related musculoskeletal disorders (UL-WMSDS):
New approaches in job (re)design and current trends in standardization.
Appl Ergon2006;37(4):441–450.
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2006.04.008.
6.
Van
RijnRM, HuisstedeBMA, KoesBW,
BurdorfA.
Associations between work-related factors and specific disorders of the
shoulder-a systematic review of the literature. Scand J Work
Environ Health2010;36(3):189–201.
doi: 10.5271/sjweh.2895.
7.
JakobM, LiebersF, BehrendtS.
The effects of working height and manipulated weights on subjective
strain, body posture and muscular activity of milking parlor operatives-laboratory
study. Appl Ergon2011;43(4):753–761.
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.11.009.
Epub 2011 Dec 5.
8.
HerinF, VezinaM, ThaonI,
SoulatJM, ParisC.
Predictors of chronic shoulder pain after 5 years in a working
population. Pain2012;153(11):2253–2259.
doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2012.07.024.
9.
KwonSC, LeeSJ,
JeongM.
Work-related hazards among farmers. J Korean Med
Assoc2012;55(11):1046–1053.
doi: 10.5124/jkma.2012.55.11.1046.
10.
NagA, VyasH,
ShahP, NagPK.
Risk factors and musculoskeletal disorders among women workers performing
fish processing. Am J Ind Med2012;55(9):833–843.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.22075.
11.
XuYW, ChengASK, Li-TsangCWP.
Prevalence and risk factors of work-related musculoskeletal disorders in
the catering industry: A systematic review. Work: A Journal of
Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation2013;44(2):107–116.
doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-1375.
12.
AndersenJH, HaahrJP, FrostP.
Risk factors for more severe regional musculoskeletal symptoms: A
two-year prospective study of a general working population.
Arthritis Rheum2007;56(4):1355–1364.
doi: 10.1002/art.22513.
13.
CaicoyaM, DelclosGL.
Work demands and musculoskeletal disorders from the Spanish National
Survey. Occup Med-Oxford2010;60(6):447–450.
doi: 10.1093/occmed/kqp191.
14.
BarreroLH, PulidoJA, BerrioS, MonroyM, QuintanaLA, CeballosC, Hoehne-HueckstaedtU,
EllegastR.
Physical workloads of the upper-extremity among workers of the Colombian
flower industry. Am J Ind Med2012;55(10):926–939.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.22102.
15.
Abdoli-EM, DamecourC, PetersenA, PotvinJ.
Investigation of pacing as a control measure for an industrial lifting
task above waist height. Work: A Journal of Prevention,
Assessment and Rehabilitation2014;47:15–22. doi:
10.3233/WOR-131682.
16.
DumasGA, PrestonD, Beaucage-GauvreauE,
LawaniM.
Posture analysis of lifting a load for head carriage and comparison
between pregnant and non-pregnant women. Work: A Journal of
Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation2014;47:63–72. doi:
10.3233/WOR-131686.
17.
MacKenzieJF, GrimshawPN, JonesCDS, ThoirsK, PetkovJ.
Muscle activity during lifting: Examining the effect of core conditioning
of multifidus and transversus abdominis. Work: A Journal of
Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation2014;47:452–462. doi:
10.3233/WOR-131706.
18.
YeungSS, GenaidyA, DeddensJ, AlhemoodA, LeungPC.
Prevalence of musculoskeletal symptoms in single and multiple body
regions and effects of perceived risk of injury among manual handling
workers. Spine2002;27(19):2166–2172.
doi: 10.1097/01.BRS.0000025683.43004.7A.
19.
AndersenJH, GaardboeO.
Prevalence of persistent neck and upper limb pain in a historical cohort
of sewing machine operators. Am J Ind Med1993;24(6):677–687.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.4700240604.
20.
BalasubramanianV,
AdalarasuK, RegulapatiR.
Comparing dynamic and stationary standing postures in an assembly
task. Int J Ind Ergonom2009;39(5):649–654.
doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2008.10.017.
21.
MemarpourM, BadakhshS, KhosroshahiSS, VossoughiM.
Work-related musculoskeletal disorders among Iranian
dentists. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and
Rehabilitation2013;43:465–474. doi:
10.3233/WOR-2012-1468.
22.
WaerstedM, WestgaardRH.
Working hours as a risk factor in the development of musculoskeletal
complaints. Ergonomics1991;34(3):265–276.
doi: 10.1080/00140139108967312.
Asensio-CuestaS,
Diego-MasJA, Cremades-OliverLV,
Gonzalez-CruzMC.
A method to design job rotation schedules to prevent work-related
musculoskeletal disorders in repetitive work. Int J Prod
Res2012;50(24):7467–7468.
doi: 10.1080/00207543.2011.653452.
25.
BodinJ, HaC,
ChastangJF, DescathaA, LeclercA, GoldbergM, ImbernonE, RoquelaureY.
Comparison of risk factors for shoulder pain and rotator cuff syndrome in
the working population. Am J Ind Med2012;55(7):605–615.
doi: 10.1002/ajim.22002.
26.
Callejón-FerreAJ,
Perez-AlonsoJ,
Sanchez-HermosillaJ,
Carreño-OrtegaA.
Ergonomics and psycho-sociological quality indices in greenhouses Almeria
(Spain). Span J of Agric Res2009;7(1):50–58.
27.
Callejón-FerreAJ,
Manzano-AgugliaroF,
Díaz-PérezM, Carreño-SánchezJ.
Improving the climate safety of workers in Almería-type greenhouses in
Spain by predicting the periods when they are most likely to suffer thermal
stress. Appl Ergon2011;42(2):391–396.
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.014.
28.
Montoya-GarciaME,
Callejon-FerreAJ,
Perez-AlonsoJ,
Sanchez-HermosillaJ.
Assessment of psychosocial risks faced by workers in Almeria-type
greenhouses, using the Mini Psychosocial Factor method. Appl
Ergon2013;44(2):303–311.
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2012.08.005.
29.
StewartSK, RothmorePR, DodaDVD, HillerJE, MahmoodMA, PisanielloDL.
Musculoskeletal pain and discomfort and associated worker and
organizational factors: A cross-sectional study. Work: A Journal
of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation2014;48:261–271. doi:
10.3233/WOR-131622.
30.
GustafssonB, LundqvistP.
Prevention of occupational injuries in greenhouses.
Ergonomics1982;25(6):576.
31.
LundqvistP.
Occupational health and safety of workers in agriculture and
horticulture. New Solutions2000;10(4):351–365.
doi: 10.2190/CNC5-ECBE-G7L9-PP7.
32.
NTP 175: Evaluación de las condiciones de trabajo:
el método L. E. S.T. Instituto Nacional de Seguridad e Higiene en el Trabajo. Ministerio
de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales. España.
33.
Callejon-FerreAJ,
Perez-AlonsoJ,
Carreno-OrtegaA,
Velazquez-MartiB.
Indices of ergonomic-psycholsociological workplace quality in the
greenhouses of Almeria (Spain): Crops of cucumbers, peppers, aubergines and
melons. Safety Sci2011;49(5):746–750.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.12.009.
34.
Pérez-AlonsoJ,
Carreño-OrtegaA,
Callejón-FerreAJ,
Vázquez-CabreraFJ.
Preventive activity in the greenhouse-construction industry of
south-eastern Spain. Safety Sci.
2011;49(2):345–354.
doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.013.
35.
Pérez-AlonsoJ,
Carreño-OrtegaA,
Vázquez-CabreraFJ,
Callejón-FerreAJ.
Accidents in the greenhouse-construction industry of SE
Spain. Appl Ergon2012;43(1):69–80.
doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2011.03.007.
36.
VázquezFJ, PérezJ,
CallejónAJ, CarreñoA.
Desing of a new multispan greenhouse capital. Inf
Constr2011;63(521):47–56.
doi: 10.3989/ic.09.009.
37.
CarreñoA, PérezJ,
VázquezJ, CallejónAJ.
A safer method of constructing multi-span greenhouses.
Inf Constr2012;64(525):93–102.
doi: 10.3989/ic.09.050.
38.
Pérez-AlonsoJ,
Callejón-FerreAJ,
Carreño-OrtegaA,
Sánchez-HermosillaJ.
Approach to the evaluation of the thermal work environment in the
greenhouse-construction industry of SE Spain. Build.
Environ1725;46(8):1725–1734.
doi: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2011.02.014.
39.
CecchiniM, ColantoniA, MassantiniR, MonarcaD.
The risk of musculoskeletal disorders for workers due to repetitive
movements during tomato harvesting. J Agric Saf Health2010;16(2):87–98.
40.
ColantoniA, MarucciA, MonarcaD, PagnielloB, CecchiniM, BediniR. The
risk of musculoskeletal disorders due to repetitive movements of upper limbs for workers
employed to vegetable grafting. J Food Agric Environ2012;10(3-4):14–18.
41.
RaiA, GandhiS, KumarN,
SharmaDK, GargMK.
Ergonomic intervention in Aonla pricking operation during preserve
preparation in food processing industries. Work: A Journal of
Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation2012;41(1):401–405.
doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0190-401.
42.
ChiassonME, ImbeauD, AubryK,
DelisleA.
Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors
associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Ind
Ergonom2012;42(5):478–488.
doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2012.07.003.
43.
DeepakS, AjeeshPS.
Correlation of ergonomic risk factors with RULA in IT professionals from
India. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and
Rehabilitation2012;41:512–515. doi:
10.3233/WOR-2012-0205-512.
44.
McAtamneyL, Nigel
CorlettE. RULA: A
survey method for the investigation of work-related upper limb
disorders. Applied Ergonomics1993;24(2):91–99.
doi: 10.1016/0003-6870(93)90080-s.
45.
SalaE, TorriD,
TomasiC, ApostoliP.
Risk assessment for upper extremity work related musculoskeletal
disorders in different manufactures by applying six methods of ergonomic
analysis. Giornale Italiano Di Medicina Del Lavoro Dd
Ergonomia2010;32(2):162–173.
46.
JonesT, KumarS.
Comparison of ergonomic risk assessment output in a repetitive sawmill
occupation: Trim-saw operator. Work: A Journal of Prevention,
Assessment and Rehabilitation2008;31(4):367–376.
47.
JonesT, KumarS.
Comparison of Ergonomic Risk Assessment Output in Four Sawmill
Jobs. Int J Occup Safety Ergonomics2010;16(1):105–111.
48.
ÖztürkN, EsinMN.
Investigation of musculoskeletal symptoms and ergonomic risk factors
among female sewing machine operators in Turkey. Int J Ind
Ergonom2011;41(6):585–591.
doi: 10.1016/j.ergon.2011.07.001.
49.
ChiuYC, ChenS,
WuGJ, LinYH.
Three-dimensional computer-aided human factors engineering analysis of a
grafting robot. J Agric Saf Health2012;18(3):181–194.
50.
GarcíaAB, PadillaM.
Estudio de la prevención de riesgos laborales en invernadero. Colegio
Oficial de Ingenieros Técnicos Agrícolas de Almería:
Spain: 2005.
