BACKGROUND: Organizational resilience refers to the ability to respond productively to significant disruptive change and transform challenges into opportunities. There is a gap in the literature about resilient nonprofit organizations and its application for identifying organizational conditions for successful adaption to external variables that threaten their existence.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify organizational characteristics that point to the resilience of nonprofit behavioral healthcare organizations as they successfully adapt to funding changes.
METHODS: A multiple case study of two behavioral health nonprofit organizations was conducted. Data was collected through interviews and focus groups, and analyzed through a qualitative content analysis.
RESULTS: Using the framework of resilience, six themes that equipped these organizations to successfully adapt to funding changes were identified. They included: commitment to the mission, improvisation, community reciprocity, servant and transformational leadership, hope and optimism, and fiscal transparency.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that incorporating these qualities into an organizational system equips it to systematically adapt to funding changes and other disruptive challenges. Using resilience as a process and not simply an outcome after recovery, nonprofit organizations can have the capacity to continuously respond to challenges and provide uninterrupted and valuable services to society.
DuchekS
. Growth in the face of crisis: The role of organizational resilience capabilities. Acad Manage Proc2014;861–6.
2.
ZolliA, HealyAM
. Resilience: Why things bounce backNew York, NY: Simon and Schuster; 2013.
3.
KimberlinS, SchwartzSL, AustinMJ
. Growth and resilience of pioneering nonprofit human service organizations: A cross-case analysis of organizational histories. Journal of Evidence Based Social Work2011;8(1-2):4–28.
4.
HamelG, ValikangasL
. The quest for resilience. Harvard Business Review2003;8(9):52–64.
5.
WeickK, SutcliffeK
. Managing the unexpected: Resilient performance in an age of uncertainty. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass; 2007.
6.
FolkeC
. Resilience: The emergence of a perspective for social– ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change2006;16(3):253–67.
7.
WestleyF
. Social innovation and resilience: How one enhances the other. Stanford Social Innovation Review2013;11(3):28–39.
8.
MendelP, ScottWR. Institutional change and the organization of health care. In: BirdCE, ConradP, FremontAM, TimmermansF, editors. Handbook of Medical Sociology. 6th ed. Nashville TN: Vanderbilt University Press; 2010.
9.
FurrowBR, GreaneyTL, JohnsonSH, JostTS, SchwartzRL. Health law cases, materials and problems
. 4th ed. St. Paul, MN: West Group; 2001.
10.
GalvinTL
. Examining institutional change: Evidence from the founding dynamics of U.S. health care interest associations. Academy of Management Journal2002;45(4):673–96.
11.
ZimmermanB, DooleyK
. Mergers versus emergers: Structural change in healthcare systems. Emergence2001;3(4):65–82.
MastenAS
. Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development. American Psychologist2001;56(3):227.
14.
HollingCS
. Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems2001;4(5):390–405.
15.
WalkerB, HollingCS, CarpenterSR, KinzigA
. Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society2004;9(2):5–.
16.
LevinSA, BarrettS, AniyarS, BaumolW, BlissC, BolinB, SheshinskiE
. Resilience in natural and socioeconomic systems. Environment and Development Economics1998;3(2):221–62.
17.
BertalanffyL
. General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. Revised ed. New York: George Braziller, Inc; 1969.
18.
LissackMR, LeticheH
. Complexity, emergence, resilience, and coherence: Gaining perspective on organizations and their study. Emergence, a Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management2002;4(3):72–94.
19.
DervitsiotisKN
. The pursuit of sustainable business excellence: Guiding transformation for effective organizational change. Total Quality Management2003;14(3):251–67.
20.
CoutuDL
. How resilience works. Harvard Business Review2002;80(5):46–55.
21.
MallakL
. Putting organizational resilience to work. Industrial Management1998;40(6):8–13.
22.
SiebertA
. The resiliency advantage: Master change, thrive under pressure, and bounce back from setbacks. New York: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc; 2005.
23.
BabbiE. The practice of social research. 9th ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth/Thompson Learning; 2001.
24.
YinRK. Case study research: Design and methods. 5th ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage; 2014.
25.
WeickKE
. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly1993;38(4):628–52.
26.
CreswellJW
. Qualitative inquiry and research designing: Choosing among five traditions. 1998.
27.
StraussA, CorbinJ. Basics of qualitative research tecniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 1998.
28.
KaplanRS
. Strategic performance measurement and management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit Management and Leadership2001;11(3):353–70.
29.
GreenleafRK
. Servant leadership. New York: Paulist Press; 1977.
30.
MullerJ, MacleanR, BiggsHC
. The impact of a supportive leadership program in a policing organisation from the participants’ perspective. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation2009;32(1):69–79.
31.
SchmidtB, LoerbroksA, HerrR, LitakerD, WilsonM, KastnerM, FischerJ
. Psychosocial resources and the relationship between transformational leadership and employees’ psychological strain. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment & Rehabilitation2014;49(2):315–24.
32.
SommerSA, HowellJM, HadleyCN
. Keeping positive and building Strength the role of affect and team leadership in developing resilience during an organizational crisis. Group & Organization Management2015;1–31. DOI: 10.1177/1059601115578027
.
33.
ScheinEH. Defining organizational culture. In:
OttJS, editor. Classics of organization Theory. 4th ed. New York: Harcourt Brace College; 1985.
34.
MallakLA. Toward a theory of organizational resilience. In Management of Engineering and Technology. Technology and Innovation Mangement. PICMET’99. Portland International Conference1999;1:223.
35.
MallakL. Measuring resilience in health care provider organizations. Health Manpower Management1998;24(4):148–52.
36.
StephensonA, VargoJ, SevilleE
. Measuring and comparing organisational resilience in Auckland. Australian Journal of Emergency Management2010;25(2):27–32.
37.
SalamonLM
. The state of nonprofit America. 2nd edWashington, DC:
Brookings Institution Press; 2012.
38.
HasenfeldY
. Human services as complex organizations.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2010.
