In order to plan a trip, tourists with disabilities need to gather and analyse a broad range of information concerning the features of the places and services with which they are going to interact. For these people, guidebooks may represent an important source of information for gaining prior knowledge about the various critical situations they may experience as tourists. Generally, disabled people find tourist information on dedicated communication tools; guidebooks for the disabled often provide information for wheelchair users only.
OBJECTIVE:
The aim of the research project was to develop a mainstream guidebook with supplementary tourist information both for people with impaired vision and for people with reduced mobility.
METHODS:
The communication project behind “The Florence Experience” guidebook is inspired by both the Universal Design approach and the Performance Design approach. This article describes a case study and provides suggestions for planning in similar situations. It is also part of a broader research project relating to the communication about urban spaces accessibility.
RESULTS:
The main outcome of the research project is a multimedia and multisensory bilingual guidebook (in Italian and English) that provides information in four separate coordinated forms: a paper-based guidebook, web pages, MP3 audio files, and portable tactile maps.
CONCLUSIONS:
Creating a guidebook for all is a tough challenge that requires a highly articulated vision and the cooperation of different fields of knowledge and skills. Despite the limits described in the paper, “The Florence Experience” guidebook is, in our opinion, a considerable step forward with respect to the majority of available guidebooks both because it is a unique information tool for disabled and non-disabled people and because, unlike the majority of the guidebooks for disabled people, it does not only consider the needs of wheelchair users.
ArditiA. Making Text Legible: Designing for People with Partial Sight. Lighthouse International, 2000. Available from: http://www.lighthouse.org/print_leg.htm.
3.
ArditiA, ChoJ. Letter case and text legibility in normal and low vision. Vision Research2007;47(19):2499–2505.
4.
BaraccoL, editor. Questioni di leggibilitá, Se non riesco a leggere non è solo colpa dei miei occhi. Venezia:
Comune di Venezia; 2005.
5.
Bentzen BL. Orientation aids. In WelshR.L. & BlaschB.B., editors. Foundation of Orientation and Mobility, New York:
AFB; 1980.
6.
BuhalisD, MichopoulouE, EichhornV, MillerG. Accessibility market and stakeholder analysis –One-Stop-Shop for Accessible Tourism in Europe (OSSATE). Surrey, United Kingdom:
University of Surrey; 2005.
7.
BuhalisD, AmbroseI, DarcyS, editors. Accessible Tourism Issues: Inclusion, Disability, Ageing Population And Tourism, Bristol:
Channel View Publications; 2011.
8.
BurnettJJ. What services marketers need to know about the mobility-disabled consumer. The Journal of Services Marketing1996;10(3):3–20.
9.
BurnettJ, Bender BakerH. Assessing the travel-related behaviors of the mobility-disabled consumer. Journal of Travel Research2001;40(1):4–11.
10.
CameronB, DarcyS, FogginE. Barrier free Tourism for People with Disabilities in the Asian and Pacific Region. New York: United Nations; 2003.
11.
C.A.R.E. Analysis of the demand for leisure services in a hospitable city for all, INTERREG IIIB AREA CADSES, 2004-2006; 2006.
12.
CarvalhoAC, Filgueiras PaschoalinR, CastañonJA. Mobility and accessibility in historic cities. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation2012;41:5874–5876.
13.
CavinatoJ, CuckovichM. Transportation and tourism for the disabled: An assessment. Transportation Journal1992;31(3):46–53.
14.
ChurchR, MarstonJ. Measuring accessibility for people with a disability. Geographical Analysis2003;35(1):83–96.
15.
CNR ITC Coordinator Building Accessible Services. Evaluating accessibility & highlighting good practice, A showcase of Building and Urban Space Accessibility in the EU, Project supported by the EU –DG Employment and Social Affairs 2004–2006; 2006.
16.
CooperRA, WolfE, FitzgeraldSG, DobsonA, AmmerW. Interaction of Wheelchairs and Pavement Surfaces. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Concrete Block Paving, Concrete Manufacturers Association of South Africa; 2003.
17.
CooperRA, CooperRM, BoningerML. Wheelchair design and seating technology. In SelzerM., ClarkeS., CohenL., DuncanP. & GageF., editorsTextbook of Neural Repair and RehabilitationCambridge (MA):
Cambridge University Pres; 2006, pp. 147–164.
18.
DanielsMJ, Drogin RodgersEB, WigginsBP. “Travel Tales”: An interpretive analysis of constraints and negotiations to pleasure travel as experienced by persons with physical disabilities. Tourism Management2005;26(6):919–930.
19.
DarcyS. Anxiety to Access: Tourism Patterns and Experiences of New South Wales People With a Physical Disability. Sydney:
Tourism New South Wales; 1998.
20.
DarcyS, DaruwallaP. The trouble with travel: People with disabilities and travel. Social Alternatives1999;18(1):41–46.
21.
DarcyS, DicksonT. A whole-of-life approach to tourism: The case for accessible tourism experiences. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management2009;16(1):32–44.
22.
DiGiovineC. Analysis ofwhole-body vibration duringmanual wheelchair propulsion using ISO standard 2631. Proceedings of the Annual RESNA Conference; Long Beach CA, Washington DC: RESNA Press; 1999.
23.
EdmanP. Tactile Graphics. New York, NY:
American Foundation for the Blind; 1992.
24.
EmilianiADal museo al territorio 1967–1974. Alfa Ed.: Bologna; 1974.
25.
FelliP, LauríaA, BacchettiA. Comunicativitá ambientale e pavimentazioni La segnaletica sul piano di calpestio. Pisa:
ETS; 2004.
26.
FoodnessD, MurrayB. A model of tourist information search behavior. Journal of Travel Research1999;37(1):220–230.
27.
GouldPR. Spatial diffusion. Resource Paper No. 4., Washington, DC: Association of American Geographers;
1969.
28.
GrayDB, GouldM, BickenbachJE. Environmental barriers and disability. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research2003;20(1):29–37.
29.
LauríaA. La comunicativitá ambientale. Paesaggio Urbano2002;10(1):32–38.
30.
LauríaA, editor. Persone ‘reali’ e progettazione dell’ambiente costruito. L’accessibilitá come risorsa per la qualitá ambientaleRimini:
Maggioli; 2003.
31.
LauríaA, editor. I Piani per l’Accessibilitá. Una sfida per elevare l’autonomia degli abitanti e per valorizzare i luoghi dell’abitare. Roma:
Gangemi; 2012.
32.
LauríaA. Accessibility as a “Key Enabling Knowledge” to human development: The accessibility plan. Techne Journal of Technology for Architecture and Environment2014;7:125–131.
33.
LeonardJA, NewmanRC. Three types of ‘maps’ for Blind Travel. Ergonomics1970;13(2):165–179.
34.
LowenfeldB. Berthold Lowenfeld on Blindness and Blind People, Selected Papers, New York NY:
American Foundation for the Blind; 1981.
35.
PetrucciD. The blind child and its adjustment. New Outlook for the Blind1953;47(8):240–246.
36.
Matos de CarvalhoRJ. ERGOPOLIS: An ergonomics approach applied to a city. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation2012;41(Suppl 1):6071–6078.
37.
Nascimento dos SantosL, Matos de CarvalhoRJ. Ergonomics and accessibility for people with visual impairment in hotels. Work: A Journal of Prevention, Assessment and Rehabilitation2012;41(Suppl 1):1417–1424.
38.
NolanCY, MorrisJE. Improvement of tactual symbols for blind children: Final Report. Louisville (KY):
American Printing House for the Blind; 1971.
39.
RubinGS, FeelyM, PereraS, EkstromK, WilliamsonE. The effect of font and line width on reading speed. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics2006;26(6):545–554.
40.
Russell-MindaE, JutaiJW, Graham StrongJ, CampbellKA, GoldD, PrettyL, WilmotL. The legibility of typefaces for readers with low vision: A research review. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness2007;101(7):402–415.
41.
SakkasN, PérezJ. Elaborating metrics for the accessibility of buildings. In Computers, Environment and Urban Systems2006;30(5):661–685.
42.
ScottLM. Evaluating intra-metropolitan accessibility in the information age: Operational issues, objectives and the implementation. In JanelleD.G. & HodgeD.C., editors.Information, place, and cyberspace: Issues in accessibility. Berlin:
Springer; 2000, pp. 21–45.
43.
SettisS. Italia s.p.a. L’assalto al patrimonio culturale. Torino: Einaudi; 2002.
44.
SL&A. Accessibile è meglio. Primo libro bianco sul turismo per tutti in Italia 2013. Roma: Presidenza del Consiglio dei Ministri; 2013.
45.
SmithR. Leisure of disabled tourists: Barriers to participation. Annals of Tourism Research1987;14(3):376–389.
46.
SørmoenO, editor. Accessibility to Cultural Heritage Nordic Perspectives. Copenhagen:
Nordic Council of Ministers; 2009.
47.
StumboN, PeggS. Travellers and tourists with disabilities: A matter of priorities and loyalties. Tourism Review International2005;8(3):195–209.
48.
Touche Ross. Profiting from Opportunities –A new market for tourism. London:
Touche Ross & Co.; 1993.
49.
Van SickleD, CooperRA, BoningerML, DiGiovineCP. Analysis of vibrations induced during wheelchair propulsion. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development2001;38:409–421.
50.
von ProndzinskiS. Le persone non vedenti e l’autonomianegli spostamenti. In LauríaA, editor. Persone ‘reali’ eprogettazione dell’ambiente costruito. L’accessibilitá come risorsa per la qualitá ambientale. Rimini:
Maggioli; 2003;105–116
.
51.
WelshRL. In WelshR.L. & BlaschB.B., editors, Psychosocial Dimensions. Foundation of Orientation and Mobility, New York NY:
AFB; 1987.
52.
WithstockRH. Dog Guides. In WelshR.L. & BlaschB.B., editors, Foundation of Orientation and Mobility. New York NY:
AFB1987.
53.
W3C (2008),Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0. W3C Recommendation 11 December 2008. Available from: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG/.
WolfEJ, PearlmanJ, CooperRA. Vibration exposure of individuals using wheelchairs over sidewalk surfaces. Disability Rehabilitation2005;27(23):1443–1449.
56.
YauM, McKercherB, PackerT. Travelling with a disability –more than an access issue. Annals of Tourism Research2004;31(4):946–960.
