Performance evaluation and comparative analysis of CrowWhale-energy and trust aware multicast routing algorithm

Abstract

Multipath routing helps to establish various quality of service parameters, which is significant in helping multimedia broadcasting in the Internet of Things (IoT). Traditional multicast routing in IoT mainly concentrates on ad hoc sensor networking environments, which are not approachable and vigorous enough for assisting multimedia applications in an IoT environment. For resolving the challenging issues of multicast routing in IoT, CrowWhale-energy and trust-aware multicast routing (CrowWhale-ETR) have been devised. In this research, the routing performance of CrowWhale-ETR is analyzed by comparing it with optimization-based routing, routing protocols, and objective functions. Here, the optimization-based algorithm, namely the Spider Monkey Optimization algorithm (SMO), Whale Optimization Algorithm (WOA), Dolphin Echolocation Optimization (DEO) algorithm, Water Wave Optimization (WWO) algorithm, Crow Search Algorithm (CSA), and, routing protocols, like Ad hoc On-Demand Distance Vector (AODV), CTrust-RPL, Energy-Harvesting-Aware Routing Algorithm (EHARA), light-weight trust-based Quality of Service (QoS) routing, and Energy-awareness Load Balancing-Faster Local Repair (ELB-FLR) and the objective functions, such as energy, distance, delay, trust, link lifetime (LLT) and EDDTL (all objectives) are utilized for comparing the performance of CrowWhale-ETR. In addition, the performance of CrowWhale-ETR is analyzed in terms of delay, detection rate, energy, Packet Delivery Ratio (PDR), and throughput, and it achieved better values of 0.539 s, 0.628, 78.42%, 0.871, and 0.759 using EDDTL as fitness.

Keywords

Spider monkey optimization dolphin echolocation water wave optimization crow search algorithm whale optimization algorithm

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abbas,

Asim,

Tariq,

Baker and

Abbas, A mechanism for securing IoT-enabled applications at the fog layer, Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks 8(1) (2019), 16. doi:10.3390/jsan8010016.

Airehrour,

Gutierrez and

S.K.

Ray, Secure routing for Internet of things: A survey, Journal of Network and Computer Applications 66 (2016), 198–213. doi:10.1016/j.jnca.2016.03.006.

Almobaideen,

Krayshan,

Allan and

Saadeh, Internet of things: Geographical routing based on healthcare centers vicinity for mobile smart tourism destination, Technological Forecasting & Social Change 123 (2017), 342–350. doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2017.04.016.

Z.A.

Almusaylim,

Alhumam,

Mansoor,

Chatterjee and

N.Z.

Jhanjhi, Detection and mitigation of RPL rank and version number attacks in smart Internet of things, 2020.

Askarzadeh, A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: Crow search algorithm, Computers & Structures 169 (2016), 1–12. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2016.03.001.

M.F.

Aziz,

A.N.

Khan,

Shuja,

I.A.

Khan,

F.G.

Khan and

A.U.R.

Khan, A lightweight and compromise-resilient authentication scheme for IoTs, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies 33(3) (2022), e3813. doi:10.1002/ett.3813.

J.C.

Bansal,

Sharma,

S.S.

Jadon and

Clerc, Spider monkey optimization algorithm for numerical optimization, Memetic computing 6(1) (2014), 31–47. doi:10.1007/s12293-013-0128-0.

Beeby and

N.M.

White (eds), Energy Harvesting for Autonomous Systems, Artech House, 2010.

I.D.

Chakeres and

E.M.

Belding-Royer, AODV routing protocol implementation design, in: Proceedings 24th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops, 2004. Proceedings, 2004, pp. 698–703.

10.

H.-Y.

Chang, A connectivity-increasing mechanism of ZigBee-based IoT devices for wireless multimedia sensor networks, Multimedia Tools and Applications 78 (2019), 5137–5154. doi:10.1007/s11042-017-4584-2.

11.

Chaudhry,

Tapaswi and

Kumar, FZ enabled multi-objective PSO for multicasting in IoT based wireless sensor networks, Information Sciences 498 (2019), 1–20. doi:10.1016/j.ins.2019.05.002.

12.

Giordani,

Polese,

Mezzavilla,

Rangan and

Zorzi, Toward 6G networks: Use cases and technologies, IEEE Communications Magazine 58(3) (2020), 55–61. doi:10.1109/MCOM.001.1900411.

13.

Huang,

Duan,

Zhao,

Zheng and

Wang, Multicast routing for multimedia communications in the Internet of things, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 4(1) (2017), 215–224. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2016.2642643.

14.

Kaveh and

Farhoudi, A new optimization method: Dolphin echolocation, Advances in Engineering Software 59 (2013), 53–70. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2013.03.004.

15.

Q.V.

Khanh,

V.H.

Nam,

L.D.

Manh,

A.N.

Le and

Jeon, Wireless communication technologies for IoT in 5G: Vision, applications, and challenges, Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 1 (2022), 1–12.

16.

Kheirandishfard,

Zohrizadeh,

Adil and

Madani, Convexification of bilinear matrix inequalities via conic and parabolic relaxations, Generic Colorized Journal (2017), 1–14.

17.

Kothandaraman,

Naik Korra,

Balasundaram and

Magesh Kumar, Sequence number based secure routing algorithm for IoT networks, Materials Today: Proceedings (2021).

18.

P.L.

Lahari,

Bharathi,

Jyothi and

Shirur, A review on distributed arithmetic and offset binary coding, i-manager’s Journal on Digital Signal Processing 7(3) (2019), 27–33. doi:10.26634/jdp.7.3.17035.

19.

Le,

Ngo-Quynh and

Magedanz, RPL-based Multipath Routing Protocols for Internet of Things on Wireless Sensor Networks, in: International Conference on Advanced Technologies for Communications (ATC), Hanoi, Vietnam, 2014.

20.

Mayzaud, Monitoring and security for the RPL-based Internet of things, Doctoral dissertation, Université de Lorraine, 2016.

21.

Mirjalili and

Lewis, The whale optimization algorithm, Advances in engineering software 95 (2016), 51–67. doi:10.1016/j.advengsoft.2016.01.008.

22.

T.D.

Nguyen,

J.Y.

Khan and

D.T.

Ngo, An effective energy-harvesting-aware routing algorithm for WSN-based IoT applications, in: Proceedings 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), 2017, pp. 1–6.

23.

M.-S.

Pan and

S.-W.

Yang, A lightweight and distributed geographic multicast routing protocol for IoT applications, Computer Networks 112 (2017), 95–107. doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2016.11.006.

24.

Parekh and

Saleena, Designing a cloud based framework for healthcare system and applying clustering techniques for region wise diagnosis, Procedia Computer Science 50 (2015), 537–542. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2015.04.029.

25.

Prakash,

Jayashri and

Prabaharan, Hybrid evolutionary algorithm (NNACOR) for energy minimization in a wireless mesh topology towards green computing, Soft Computing 24(14) (2020), 10893–10902. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04592-1.

26.

S.C.

Prasad, Route maintenance and multi-hop routing in IoT using optimization algorithm, Journal of Networking and Communication Systems 4(3) (2021), 34–42.

27.

Praveen Kumar Reddy and

Rajasekhara Babu, Cluster head selection in IoT using enhanced self adaptive bat algorithm, Journal of Networking and Communication Systems 2(4) (2019), 23–32.

28.

Rani and

S.H.

Ahmed, Multi-Hop Routing in Wireless Sensor Networks: An Overview, Taxonomy, and Research Challenges, 2015.

29.

Seyfollahi,

Moodi and

Ghaffari, MFO-RPL: A secure RPL-based routing protocol utilizing moth-flame optimizer for the IoT applications, Computer Standards & Interfaces 82 (2022).

30.

Sha,

Gunatilaka,

Wu and

Lu, Empirical study and enhancements of industrial wireless sensor-actuator network protocols, IEEE Internet of Things Journal 4(3) (2017), 696–704. doi:10.1109/JIOT.2017.2653362.

31.

D.K.

Shende and

S.S.

Sonavane, CrowWhale-ETR: CrowWhale optimization algorithm for energy and trust aware multicast routing in WSN for IoT applications, Wireless Networks 26(6) (2020), 4011–4029. doi:10.1007/s11276-020-02299-y.

32.

Subbulakshmi and

Vimal, Secure data packet transmission in manet using enhanced identity-based cryptography (EIBC), International Journal of New Technologies in Science and Engineering 3(12) (2016), 35–42.

33.

Suchanek, Sustainable transport development, innovation and technology, in: The Proceeding of TranSopot Conference, 2016.

34.

Tariq,

Asim,

Maamar,

M.Z.

Farooqi,

Faci and

Baker, A mobile code-driven trust mechanism for detecting internal attacks in sensor node-powered IoT, Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 134 (2019), 198–206. doi:10.1016/j.jpdc.2019.08.013.

35.

ul Hassan,

Asim,

Baker,

Hassan and

Tariq, CTrust-RPL: A control layer-based trust mechanism for supporting secure routing in routing protocol for low power and lossy networks-based Internet of things applications, Transactions on Emerging Telecommunications Technologies 32(3) (2021), e4224. doi:10.1002/ett.4224.

36.

Vivekanand and

V.T.

Thushara, Ultra resource constrained adaptive multipath routing for meteorological sensor networks, in: Advanced Networks and Telecommunications Systems (ANTS), Bangalore, India, 2016.

37.

Wang,

Chen and

Chang, A light-weight trust-based QoS routing algorithm for ad hoc networks, Pervasive and Mobile Computing 13 (2014), 164–180. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.06.004.

38.

Wang,

Chen and

Chang, A light-weight trust-based QoS routing algorithm for ad hoc networks, Pervasive and Mobile Computing 13 (2014), 164–180. doi:10.1016/j.pmcj.2013.06.004.

39.

Wang,

Zhu,

Zhang,

Yu and

Zhou, Security and privacy in 6G networks: New areas and new challenges, Digital Communications and Networks 6(3) (2020), 281–291. doi:10.1016/j.dcan.2020.07.003.

40.

Yan,

Zhou and

Ding, Recent advances in energy-efficient routing protocols for wireless sensor networks: A review, IEEE Access 4 (2016), 5673–5686. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2598719.

41.

Y.J.

Zheng, Water wave optimization: A new nature-inspired metaheuristic, Computers & Operations Research 55 (2015), 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.cor.2014.10.008.