The Visual Vertigo Analogue Scale (VVAS) assesses visual vertigo. Instead of the original scoring methods (positive VVAS > 1), we propose categorizing patients as having No (0), Mild (0.1–40), Moderate (40.01–70), or Severe (70.01–100) symptoms.
OBJECTIVE:
Our primary aim was to validate an alternative interpretation of the VVAS by exploring the relationship between categories of visual vertigo symptoms and measures of activity and participation, dizziness handicap, anxiety, and depression. We aimed to describe the severity of visual vertigo reported by patients in different vestibular diagnostic categories.
METHODS:
Participants with vestibular disorders (n = 250) completed the VVAS, Vestibular Activities and Participation (VAP) Measure, Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
RESULTS:
Patients with central disorders were more symptomatic than those with peripheral vestibular disorders. As evaluated by one-way ANOVA, the scores on the VAP, HADS, and DHI significantly differed among mild, moderate, severe, and no visual vertigo categories (p < 0.001). As VVAS severity increased, activity and participation decreased (r = 0.582, p < 0.001); dizziness handicap increased (r = 0.597, p < 0.001, n = 199); anxiety increased (r = 0.405, p < 0.001); and depression increased (r = 0.521, p < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS:
The findings of this study support the use of an alternative VVAS interpretation method of categorizing symptoms as none, mild, moderate, and severe visual vertigo.
AlghwiriA.A., WhitneyS.L., BakerC.E., SpartoP.J., MarchettiG.F., RogersJ.C. and FurmanJ.M., The development and validation of the vestibular activities and participation measure, Arch Phys Med Rehabil93 (2012),, 1822–1831.
2.
BednarczukN.F., BonsuA., OrtegaM.C., FluriA.-S., ChanJ., RustH., de MeloF., SharifM., SeemungalB.M., GoldingJ.F., KaskiD., BronsteinA.M. and ArshadQ., , Abnormal visuo-vestibular interactions in vestibular migraine: a cross sectional study, Brain142 (2019), 606–616.
3.
BehS.C., MasrourS., SmithS.V. and FriedmanD.I., The spectrum of vestibular migraine: Clinical features, triggers, and examination findings, Headache59 (2019), 727–740.
4.
BestC., TschanR., Eckhardt-HennA. and DieterichM., Who is at risk for ongoing dizziness and psychological strain after a vestibular disorder?Neuroscience164 (2009), 1579–1587.
5.
BjellandI., DahlA.A., HaugT.T. and NeckelmannD., The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review, J Psychosom Res52 (2002), 69–77.
6.
DannenbaumE., ChilingarianG. and FungJ., Validity and responsiveness of the Visual Vertigo Analogue Scale, J Neurol Phys Ther43 (2019), 117–121.
7.
DannenbaumE., ChilingaryanG. and FungJ., Visual vertigo analogue scale: an assessment questionnaire for visual vertigo, J Vestib Res21 (2011), 153–159.
8.
DunlapP.M., HolmbergJ.M. and WhitneyS.L., Vestibular rehabilitation: advances in peripheral and central vestibular disorders, Curr Opin Neurol32 (2019), 137–144.
9.
DunlapP.M., MarchettiG.F., SpartoP.J., StaabJ.P., FurmanJ.M., DelittoA. and WhitneyS.L., Exploratory factor analysis of the Vestibular Activities Avoidance Instrument, JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg147 (2021), 144–150.
10.
Eckhardt-HennA., BestC., BenseS., BreuerP., DienerG., TschanR. and DieterichM., Psychiatric comorbidity in different organic vertigo syndromes, J Neurol255 (2008), 420–428.
11.
GrahamM.K., StaabJ.P., LohseC.M. and McCaslinD.L., A comparison of Dizziness Handicap Inventory scores by categories of vestibular diagnoses, Otol Neurotol42 (2021), 129–136.
12.
GrunfeldE.A., GrestyM.A., BronsteinA.M. and JahanshahiM., Screening for depression among neuro-otology patients with and without identifiable vestibular lesions: Identificación de la depresión en pacientes neuro-otológicos con y sin lesiones vestibulares identificables, Int J Audiol42 (2003), 161–165.
13.
HabsM., StroblR., GrillE., DieterichM. and Becker-BenseS., Primary or secondary chronic functional dizziness: does it make a difference? A DizzyReg study in 356 patients, J Neurol267 (2020), 212–222.
14.
JacobsonG.P. and NewmanC.W., The development of the Dizziness Handicap Inventory, Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg116 (1990), 424–427.
15.
KirbyS.E. and YardleyL., Understanding psychological distress in Meniere’s disease: a systematic review, Psychol Health Med13 (2008), 257–273.
16.
LacourM. and Bernard-DemanzeL., Interaction between vestibular compensation mechanisms and vestibular rehabilitation therapy: 10 recommendations for optimal functional recovery, Front Neurol5 (2014), 285.
17.
LahmannC., HenningsenP., BrandtT., StruppM., JahnK., DieterichM., Eckhardt-HennA., FeuereckerR., DinkelA. and SchmidG., Psychiatric comorbidity and psychosocial impairment among patients with vertigo and dizziness, J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry86 (2015), 302–308.
18.
MerettaB.M., WhitneyS.L., MarchettiG.F., SpartoP.J. and MuirheadR.J., The five times sit to stand test: responsiveness to change and concurrent validity in adults undergoing vestibular rehabilitation, J Vestib Res16 (2006), 233–243.
19.
MichelL., LaurentT. and AlainT., Rehabilitation of dynamic visual acuity in patients with unilateral vestibular hypofunction: earlier is better, Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol277 (2020), 103–113.
20.
PavlouM., DaviesR.A. and BronsteinA.M., The assessment of increased sensitivity to visual stimuli in patients with chronic dizziness, J Vestib Res16 (2006), 223–231.
21.
PowellG., Derry-SumnerH., RajenderkumarD., RushtonS.K. and SumnerP., Persistent postural perceptual dizziness is on a spectrum in the general population, Neurology94 (1929), e1929–e1938.
22.
PowellG., Derry-SumnerH., SheltonK., RushtonS., HedgeC., RajenderkumarD. and SumnerP., Visually-induced dizziness is associated with sensitivity and avoidance across all senses, J Neurol267 (2020), 2260–2271.
23.
SerlinR.C., MendozaT.R., NakamuraY., EdwardsK.R. and CleelandC.S., When is cancer pain mild, moderate or severe? Grading pain severity by its interference with function, Pain61 (1995), 277–284.
24.
ShiQ., MendozaT.R. and CleelandC.S., Interpreting Patient-reported Outcome Scores for Clinical Research and Practice: Definition, Determination, and Application of Cutpoints,S8–S, Med Care57(Suppl 5, Suppl 1) (2019), 12.
25.
StaabJ.P., The influence of anxiety on ocular motor control and gaze, Curr Opin Neurol27 (2014), 118–124.
26.
StaabJ.P., Eckhardt-HennA., HoriiA., JacobR., StruppM., BrandtT. and BronsteinA., Diagnostic criteria for persistent postural-perceptual dizziness (PPPD): Consensus document of the committee for the Classification of Vestibular Disorders of the Bárány Society, J Vestib Res27 (2017), 191–208.
27.
StaabJ.P. and RuckensteinM.J., Which comes first? Psychogenic dizziness versus otogenic anxiety, Laryngoscope113 (2003), 1714–1718.
28.
WhitneyS.L. and RossiM.M., Efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation, Otolaryngol Clin North Am33 (2000), 659–672.
29.
WinklerP.A. and CiuffredaK.J., Ocular fixation, vestibular dysfunction, and visual motion hypersensitivity, Optometry80 (2009), 502–512.
30.
ZigmondA.S. and SnaithR.P., The hospital anxiety and depression scale, Acta Psychiatr Scand67 (1983), 361–370.
31.
ZurO., SchoenG., DicksteinR., FeldmanJ., BernerY., DannenbaumE. and FungJ., Anxiety among individuals with visual vertigo and vestibulopathy, Disabil Rehabil37 (2015), 2197–2202.
