BACKGROUND: Navigation skills are required for performance of functional complex tasks and may decline due to aging. Investigation of navigation skills should include measurement of cognitive-executive and motor aspects, which are part of complex tasks.
OBJECTIVE: to compare young and older healthy adults in navigation within a simulated environment with and without a functional-cognitive task.
METHODS: Ten young adults (25.6±4.3 years) and seven community dwelling older men (69.9±3.8 years) were tested during a single session. After training on a self-paced treadmill to navigate in a non-functional simulation, they performed the Virtual Multiple Errands Test (VMET) in a mall simulation. Outcome measures included cognitive-executive aspects of performance and gait parameters.
RESULTS: Younger adults’ performance of the VMET was more efficient (1.8±1.0) than older adults (5.3±2.7; p < 0.05) and faster (younger 478.1±141.5 s, older 867.6±393.5 s; p < 0.05). There were no differences between groups in gait parameters. Both groups walked slower in the mall simulation.
CONCLUSIONS: The shopping simulation provided a paradigm to assess the interplay between motor and cognitive aspects involved in the efficient performance of a complex task. The study emphasized the role of the cognitive-executive aspect of task performance in healthy older adults.
AlahmariK.A., SpartoP.J., MarchettiG.F., RedfernM.S., FurmanJ.M. and WhitneyS.L., Comparison of virtual reality based therapy with customized vestibular physical therapy for the treatment of vestibular disorders, IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng22 (2014), 389–399.
2.
AlbinetC.T., BoucardG., BouquetC.A. and AudiffrenM., Processing speed and executive functions in cognitive aging: How to disentangle their mutual relationship?Brain and Cognition79 (2012), 1–11.
3.
AldermanN., BurgessP.W., KnightC. and HenmanC., Ecological validity of a simplified version of the multiple errands shopping test, J Int Neuropsychol Soc9 (2003), 31–44.
4.
AngelakiD.E. and YakushevaT.A., How vestibular neurons solve the tilt/translation ambiguity. Comparison of brainstem, cerebellum, and thalamus, Ann N Y Acad Sci1164 (2009), 19–28.
5.
BigelowR.T. and AgrawalY., Vestibular involvement in cognition: Visuospatial ability, attention, executive function, and memory, J Vestib Res25 (2015), 73–89.
6.
BohannonR.W., Comfortable and maximum walking speed of adults aged 20-79 years: Reference values and determinants, Age Ageing26 (1997), 15–19.
7.
BorelL. and Alescio-LautierB., Posture and cognition in the elderly: Interaction and contribution to the rehabilitation strategies, Neurophysiol Clin44 (2014), 95–107.
8.
BoydT.M. and SautterS.W., Route-finding: A measure of everyday executive functioning in the head-injured adult, Applied Cognitive Psychology7 (1993), 171–181.
9.
DeppC.A. and JesteD.V., Definitions and predictors of successful aging: A comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies, Am J Geriatr Psychiatry14 (2006), 6–20.
10.
FrickeJ. and UnsworthC.A., Time use and importance of instrumental activities of daily living, Australian Occupational Therapy Journal48 (2001), 118–131.
11.
FungJ., RichardsC.L., MalouinF., McFadyenB.J. and LamontagneA., A treadmill and motion coupled virtual reality system for gait training post-stroke, Cyberpsychol Behav9 (2006), 157–162.
12.
HausdorffJ.M., SchweigerA., HermanT., Yogev-SeligmannG. and GiladiN., Dual-task decrements in gait: Contributing factors among healthy older adults, Journals of Gerontology Series a-Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences63 (2008), 1335–1343.
13.
JetzschkeS., ErnstM.O., MoscatelliA. and BoeddekerN., Going round the bend: Persistent personal biases in walked angles, Neurosci Lett617 (2016), 72–75.
14.
JosmanN., KizonyR., HofE., GoldenbergK., WeissP.L. and KlingerE., Using the virtual action planning-supermarket for evaluating executive functions in people with stroke, Journal of Stroke & Cerebrovascular Diseases23 (2014), 879–887.
15.
KeshnerE.A., StreepeyJ., DhaherY. and HainT., Pairing virtual reality with dynamic posturography serves to differentiate between patients experiencing visual vertigo, J Neuroeng Rehabil4 (2007), 24.
16.
Z.G.R. Kizony,
WeissP.L.,
Baum-CohenI.,
BahatY.,
KodeshE.,
BondiM.,
MintzI. and KafriM., Development of a real world simulation to study cognitive, locomotor and metabolic processes in older adults, Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Assoc. Technologies (2014), 1–8.
17.
KizonyR., LevinM.F., HugheyL., PerezC. and FungJ., Cognitive load and dual-task performance during locomotion poststroke: A feasibility study using a functional virtual environment, Phys Ther90 (2010), 252–260.
18.
KrasovskyT., BaninaM.C., HacmonR., FeldmanA.G., LamontagneA. and LevinM.F., Stability of gait and interlimb coordination in older adults, J Neurophysiol107 (2012), 2560–2569.
19.
MirelmanA., RochesterL., ReelickM., NieuwhofF., PelosinE., AbbruzzeseG., DockxK., NieuwboerA. and HausdorffJ.M., V-TIME: A treadmill training program augmented by virtual reality to decrease fall risk in older adults: Study design of a randomized controlled trial, Bmc Neurology13 (2013).
20.
MoffatS.D., Aging and spatial navigation: What do we know and where do we go?Neuropsychol Rev19 (2009), 478–489.
21.
PodsiadloD. and RichardsonS., The timed “Up & Go”: A test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons, J Am Geriatr Soc39 (1991), 142–148.
22.
RandD., RukanS.B.A., WeissP.L. and KatzN., Validation of the Virtual MET as an assessment tool for executive functions, Neuropsychological Rehabilitation19 (2009), 583–602.
23.
RandD., WeissP.L. and KatzN., Training multitasking in a virtual supermarket: A novel intervention after stroke, Am J Occup Ther63 (2009), 535–542.
24.
RizzoA. and KimG.J., A SWOT analysis of the field of virtual reality rehabilitation and therapy, Presence-Teleoperators and Virtual Environments14 (2005), 119–146.
25.
SandersC. and Schmitter-EdgecombeM., Identifying the nature of impairment in planning ability with normal aging, J Clin Exp Neuropsychol34 (2012), 724–737.
26.
SheridanT.B., Musings on telepresence and virtual presence, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments1 (1992), 120–126.
27.
SlabodaJ.C. and KeshnerE.A., Reorientation to vertical modulated by combined support surface tilt and virtual visual flow in healthy elders and adults with stroke, J Neurol259 (2012), 2664–2672.
28.
SouchayC. and IsingriniM., Age related differences in metacognitive control: Role of executive functioning, Brain Cogn56 (2004), 89–99.
29.
SpiersH.J., Keeping the goal in mind: Prefrontal contributions to spatial navigation, Neuropsychologia46 (2008), 2106–2108.
30.
TailladeM., N’KaouaB. and SauzeonH., Age-related differences and cognitive correlates of self-reported and direct navigation performance: The effect of real and virtual test conditions manipulation, Front Psychol6 (2015), 2034.
31.
ThompsonJ.L., BentleyG., DavisM., CoulsonJ., StathiA. and FoxK.R., Food shopping habits, physical activity and health-related indicators among adults aged >/=70 years, Public Health Nutr14 (2011), 1640–1649.
32.
TombaughT.N., Trail Making Test A and B: Normative data stratified by age and education, Arch Clin Neuropsychol19 (2004), 203–214.
33.
van der HamI.J.M., FaberA.M.E.,
VenselaarM.,
van KreveldM.J. and LöfflerM., Ecological validity of virtual environments to assess human navigation ability, Frontiers in Psychology6 (2015), 637.
34.
WebberL.S. and CharltonJ.L., Wayfinding in older adults, Clinical Geronlologist23 (2001), 168–172.
35.
WeissP.L. and JesselA.S., Virtual reality applications to work, Work11 (1998), 277–293.
36.
WhiteP.J., ByagowiA. and MoussaviZ., Effect of viewing mode on pathfinding in immersive Virtual Reality, Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2015 (2015), 4619–4622.
37.
WhitneyS.L., MarchettiG.F., PritcherM. and FurmanJ.M., Gaze stabilization and gait performance in vestibular dysfunction, Gait Posture29 (2009), 194–198.
38.
WolbersT. and HegartyM., What determines our navigational abilities?Trends Cogn Sci14 (2010), 138–146.
