It is estimated that a significant number of spinal surgeries are performed, but many patients do not often benefit.
OBJECTIVE:
Our aim was to determine how effective minimally invasive pain procedures (MIP) are in chronic low back pain (CLBP) patients with proven degenerative causes (specific low back pain).
METHODS:
386 eligible patients with CLBP/sciatica resistant to conservative therapy and scheduled for open surgery were screened, and 167 could be enrolled in this study. Indications for MIP in the remaining 150 individuals were made by one experienced spinal surgeon. Before and 6 months after the intervention, the numeric rating scale (NRS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were recorded. MIP was performed, such as radiofrequency of the facet and SI-joint, intradiscal electrothermal therapy in case of discogenic pain, as well as epidural neuroplasty in patients with disc herniation/epidural fibrosis.
RESULTS:
There was a statistically significant decrease in NRS ( 0.05), as well as a significant increase in ODI ( 0.001) 6 months after the procedures. This was also true for the results of all different pain generators and subsequent performed procedures alone.
CONCLUSIONS:
The indication of MIP should be routinely reviewed in patients with CLBP to avoid potentially open surgery and a burden on healthcare costs.
PetzoldTTeschFAdlerJBGünsterCNiethardFUSchmittJ. 10-year development of spine surgery in Germany – An analysis of health insurance funds data from 2005 to 2014. Z Orthop Unfall.2018; 156: 298.
North American Spine Society. Evidence-Based Clinical Guidelines for Multidisciplinary Spine Care: Diagnosis & Treatment of Low Back Pain NASS, 2020.
4.
BirkenmaierCVeihelmannATrouillierHHausdorfJDevensCWegenerB et al. Percutaneous cryodenervation of lumbar facet joints: a prospective clinical trial. Int Orthop.2007; 31: 525.
5.
HurleyRWAdamsMCBBaradMBhaskarABhatiaAChadwickA et al. Consensus practice guidelines on interventions for cervical spine (facet) joint pain from a multispecialty international working group. Reg Anesth Pain Med.2022; 47: 3.
6.
van KleefMBarendseGAKesselsAVoetsHMWeberWEde LangeS. Randomized trial of radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976).1999; 24: 1937.
7.
McCormickZLHurleyR. The Evolution of Radiofrequency Denervation for Pain Indications. Pain Med.2021 Jul 25; 22: 1465.
8.
EstefanMEstefanV. Intradiscal Electrothermal Therapy. 2023 Jun 26. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2023 Jan.
9.
HeavnerJERaczGBRajP. Percutaneous epidural neuroplasty: prospective evaluation of 0.9% NaCl versus 10% NaCl with or without hyaluronidase. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 1999; 24: 202.
10.
ManchikantiLKnezevicEKnezevicNNSanapatiMRKayeADThotaS et al. The role of percutaneous neurolysis in lumbar disc herniation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Korean J Pain.2021; 34: 346.
11.
VeihelmannADevensCTrouillierHHHausdorfJDevens,CWegenerB et al. Epidural neuroplasty versus physiotherapy to releive pain in patients with sciatica: a prospective randomized blinded clinical trial. J Orthop Sci2006; 11: 365.
12.
FalowskiSSayedDPopeJPattersonDFishmanMGuptaM. et al. A Review and Algorithm in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Sacroiliac Joint Pain. J Pain Res.2020 Dec 8; 13: 3337.
13.
HoKYHadiMAPasutharnchatKTanKH. Cooled radiofrequency denervation for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain: two-year results from 20 cases. J Pain Res.2013; 6: 505.
14.
BirkenmaierCVeihelmannATrouillierHHHausdorfJvon Schulze PellengahrC. Medial branch blocks versus pericapsular blocks in selecting patients for percutaneous cryodenervation of lumbar facet joints. Reg Anesth Pain Med.2007; 32: 27.
15.
ManchikantiLBakhitC. Percutaneous lysis of epidural adhesions. Pain Physician.2000; 3(1): 46-64.
16.
TaluGErdineS. Complications of Epidural Neuroplasty: A Retrospective Evaluation. Neuromodulation.2003; 6(4): 237-247.
17.
RaczGDayMHeavnerJSmithJScottJNoeC et al. Epidural Lysis of Adhesions and Percutaneous Neuroplasty. In Tech 2012 Pain Management – Current Issues and Opinions, 337-370.
18.
TompkinsMPanuncialmanILucasPPalumboM. Spinal Epidural abscess. J. Emergency Medicine.2010; 39(3): 384-390.
19.
FarrarJTYoungJPLaMoreauxLWerthJLPooleMR et al. Clinical importance of changes in chronic pain intensity measured on an 11-point numerical pain rating scale. Pain.2001; 94: 149.
20.
CohenSPWilliamsKAKuriharaCNguyenCShieldsCKimP et al. Multicenter, randomized, comparative cost-effectiveness study comparing 0, 1, and 2 diagnostic medial branch (facet joint nerve) block treatment paradigms before lumbar facet radiofrequency denervation. Anesthesiology.2010; 113: 395.
21.
van KleefMBarendseGAKesselsAVoetsHMWeberWEde LangeS.Randomized trial of radiofrequency lumbar facet denervation for chronic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999; 24: 1937.
22.
LeeCHChungCKKimCH. The efficacy of conventional radiofrequency denervation in patients with chronic low back pain originating from the facet joints: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Spine J.2017; 17: 1770.
23.
CohenSPStrasselsSAKuriharaCCrooksMTErdekMAForsytheA et al. Outcome predictors for sacroiliac joint (lateral branch) radiofrequency denervation. Reg Anesth Pain Med.2009; 34: 206.
24.
ChengJPopeJEDaltonJEChengOBensitelA. et al. Comparative outcomes of cooled versus traditional radiofrequency ablation of the lateral branches for sacroiliac joint pain. Clin J Pain.2013; 29: 132.
25.
BayerlSHFingerTHeidenPEsfahani-BayerlNToparCPrinzV et al. Radiofrequency denervation for treatment of sacroiliac joint pain-comparison of two different ablation techniques. Neurosurg Rev.2020 Feb; 43: 101.
26.
Mohd IsaILTeohSLMohd NorNHMokhtarSA. Discogenic Low Back Pain: Anatomy, Pathophysiology and Treatments of Intervertebral Disc Degeneration. Int J Mol Sci.2022; 24: 208.
27.
CuellarJMStauffMPHerzogRJCarrinoJABakerGACarrageeEJ et al. Does provocative discography cause clinically important injury to the lumbar intervertebral disc? A 10-year matched cohort study. Spine J. 2016; 16: 273.
28.
Helm IiSDeerTRManchikantiLDattaSChopraPSinghV et al. Effectiveness of thermal annular procedures in treating discogenic low back pain. Pain Physician.2012; 15: E279.
29.
PauzaKJHowellSDreyfussPPelozaJHDawsonKBogdukN. A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of intradiscal electrothermal therapy for the treatment of discogenic low back pain. Spine J.2004; 4: 27.
30.
FreemanBJFraserRDCainCMHallDJChappleDC. et al. A randomized, double-blind, controlled trial: intradiscal electrothermal therapy versus placebo for the treatment of chronic discogenic low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005; 30: 2369.
31.
WeinsteinJNLurieJDTostesonTDTostesonANHanscomBSkinnerJS et al. Surgical vs Nonoperative Treatment for Lumbar Disk Herniation. JAMA.2006; 296: 2451.
32.
BabarSSaifuddinA. MRI of the post-discectomy lumbar spine. Clin Radiol.2002; 57: 969.
33.
BirkenmaierCBaumertSSchroederCJanssonVWegenerB. A biomechanical evaluation of the epidural neurolysis procedure. Pain Physician.2012; 15: E89.
34.
RaczGHolubecJ. Lysis of adhesions in the epidural space. In: PajP. editor. Techniques of Neurolysis Boston: Kluwer;1989; S. 57.
35.
ManchikantiL.RiveraJJPampatiVDamronKSMcManusCDBrandonDE et al., One day lumbar epidural adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis in treatment of chronic low back pain: a randomized, double blind trial. Pain Physician.2004; 7: 177.
36.
GerdesmeyerLNoeCPrehn-KristensenAHarrasserNMuderisMAWeusterM et al. Long-term Efficacy of Percutaneous Epidural Neurolysis of Adhesions in Chronic Lumbar Radicular Pain: 10 Year Follow-up of a Randomized Controlled Trial. Pain Physician.2021; 24: 359.
37.
OsterBAKikanlooSRLevineNLLianJChoW, Systematic Review of Outcomes Following 10-Year Mark of Spine Patient Outcomes Research Trial (SPORT) for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis.Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2020; 45: 820.
38.
AcaroğluENordinMRandhawaKChouRCôtéPMmopelwaT et al. The Global Spine Care Initiative: a summary of guidelines on invasive interventions for the management of persistent and disabling spinal pain in low- and middle-income communities. Eur Spine J.2018; 27: 870.
