Analysis of pathogen distribution and sTREM-1 and miR-126 levels in patients with pulmonary infection after craniocerebral injury

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

sTREM-1H and miR-126 play crucial roles in inflammation and immune responses, yet their involvement in patients with pulmonary infection following cranial injury remains understudied.

OBJECTIVE:

The distribution of pathogens causing infection in patients with pulmonary infection after craniocerebral injury was explored, and the changes in the levels of soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cells-1 (sTREM-1) and miR-126 in peripheral blood were analyzed.

METHODS:

In this study, 60 patients (study group) with postoperative lung infection in craniocerebral injury treated from January 2019 to December 2, 2021, and 60 patients without lung infection were selected as the control group. The study group received anti-infection treatment. The infection pathogen of the study group was tested, and the changes of sTREM-1 and miR-126 levels in the peripheral blood of the study and control groups were recorded to explore the diagnosis and predictive Value of prognostic death.

RESULTS:

66 pathogens were detected, including 18 gram-positive bacteria, 42 gram-negative bacteria, and 6 fungi. The sTREM-1 level was higher than the control group, and the miR-126 level was lower than the control group. By ROC curve analysis, the diagnostic AUC values of both patients were 0.907 and 0.848, respectively ( $P<$ 0.05). Compared to those in the study group, patients had decreased sTREM-1 levels and increased miR-126 levels after treatment ( $P<$ 0.05). Compared with the survival group, patients in the death group had increased sTREM-1 levels and decreased miR-126 levels, and ROC curve analysis, the predicted AUC death values were 0.854 and 0.862, respectively.

CONCLUSION:

Gram-negative bacteria, with increased peripheral sTREM-1 levels and decreased miR-126 levels. The levels of sTREM-1 and miR-126 have specific diagnostic and prognostic Values for pulmonary infection after craniocerebral injury. However, the study’s conclusions are drawn from a limited sample and short-term data, which might limit their broader applicability. Future studies with larger populations and longitudinal designs are required to confirm these findings and determine these biomarkers’ robustness across different settings. Further research should also explore how these biomarkers influence patient outcomes in craniocerebral injuries.