The Healthy China strategy is an important development objective of the 14th Five-Year Plan and Vision 2035 in China, while health service use in rural China has been a weak link in this strategy.
OBJECTIVE:
Nowadays, people’s health service use will be influenced by digital technology due to the arrival of the Digital Age, and that is the reason why our interest is to discuss the effect of digital life on health service use among rural residents.
METHODS:
We use the data from the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS) 2020 to examine the effect of digital life on health service use among rural residents, and we use Instrumental Variables method to control the endogenous problem and use KHB model to discuss the mechanism of this effect.
RESULTS:
It was found that digital life has increased the health service use among rural residents significantly, and this result has been verified by robust test and Instrumental Variables method. Besides, digital life can increase health service use through the information channel effect and the health literacy effect indirectly. Moreover, digital life has a more significant impact on the residents with low social capital, low physical capital and low social trust, which represents the inclusivity of digital life.
CONCLUSION:
The results of our paper will be helpful to examine the effect of the digital policy on promoting the health service use in rural China, and our findings will provide evidence of how to use digital life to enhance health service use among rural residents. Based on this, the government should take measures to eliminate the digital divide between urban and rural areas by promoting the level of digital life among rural residents, paying more attention to the digital literacy development among them, and forging ahead toward the great goal of the Healthy China under the Digital Age.
ZhangXWanGZhangJ, et al. Digital economy, financial inclusion and inclusive growth. China Economist.2020; 15(3): 92-105. doi: 10.19602/j.chinaeconomist.2020.05.07.
2.
SuLKongR. Does internet use improve rural households’ entrepreneurial performance? An empirical analysis based on endogenous switching regression model. Chinese Rural Economy (in Chinese).2020; (02): 62-80.
3.
WanJNieCZhangF. Does broadband infrastructure really affect consumption of rural households? – A Quasi-Natural Experiment Evidence from China. China Agricultural Economic Review.2021; 13(4): 832-850. doi: 10.1108/caer-12-2020-0303.
4.
ZhongJWuWZhaoF. The Impact of Internet Use on the Subjective Well-Being of Chinese Residents: From a multi-dimensional perspective. Front Psychol.2022; 13: 950287. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.950287.
5.
IsleyCLowS. Broadband adoption and availability: Impacts on rural employment during COVID-19. Telecomm Policy.2022; 46(7): 102310. doi: 10.1016/j.telpol.2022.102310.
6.
HeWShenS. Does the integration of urban and rural medical insurance policy alleviate health inequality? Evidence from a Quasi-natural Experiment in Prefecture-level Cities of China. China Rural Survey (in Chinese).2021; (03): 67-85.
7.
GrossmanM. On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy.1972; 80(2): 223-255. doi: 10.2307/1830580.
8.
AndersenR. Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: Does it matter. Journal of Health and Social Behavior.1995; 36(1): 1-10. doi: 10.2307/2137284.
9.
ZhangFShiXZhouY. The Impact of Health Insurance on Healthcare Utilization by Migrant Workers in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2020; 17(6): 1852. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17061852.
10.
ChenHChenJMaC. For a Healthy China: Has Targeted Poverty Alleviation Improved the Utilization of Medical Services? The Journal of World Economy (in Chinese).2020; 43(12): 76-101. doi: 10.19985/j.cnki.cassjwe.2020.12.005.
11.
MaCLiZSunZ, et al. The effect of new rural pension scheme on alleviating the health care spending burden – why subsidize income is better than subsidize health insurance. China Industrial Economics (in Chinese).2021; (04): 43-61. doi: 10.19581/j.cnki.ciejournal.2021.04.009.
12.
ZhengLHuRDongZ, et al. Comparing the needs and utilization of health services between urban residents and rural-to-urban migrants in China from 2012 to 2016. BMC Health Services Research.2018 Sep 17; 18(1): 717-725. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3522-y.
13.
LiaoXLuoJLuoY. The effect of intergenerational support on medical service utilization among rural elderly – an empirical from Hunan. Population and Development (in Chinese).2017; (06): 87-95.
14.
PanDLiuX. Effect of the Children Care on Grandparent’s Health Care Utilization in Rural China. Population and Development (in Chinese).2021; (02): 39-51.
15.
XiaXChenZZhangH, et al. Agricultural high-quality development: Digital empowerment and implementation path. Chinese Rural Economy (in Chinese).2019; (12): 2-15.
16.
MeiBKhanAKhanS, et al. Complementarity or substitution: A study of the impacts of internet finance and rural financial development on agricultural economic growth. Agriculture.2022; 12(11): 1786-1805. doi: 10.3390/agriculture12111786.
17.
WuZLiangZLiB. Realizing a rural sustainable development through a digital village construction: Experiences from China. Sustainability.2022; 14(21): 1-26. doi: 10.3390/su142114199.
18.
LiuZRenYMeiY. How does internet use promote farmer entrepreneurship: Evidence from Rural China. Sustainability.2022; 14(24): 16915. doi: 10.3390/su142416915.
19.
ZhouXCuiYZhangS. Internet use and rural residents’ income growth. China Agricultural Economic Review.2020; 12(2): 315-327. doi: 10.1108/caer-06-2019-0094.
20.
ZhouHZhangXGeC, et al. Does internet use boost the sustainable subjective well-being of rural residents? Evidence from Rural China. Sustainability.2023; 15(2): 1-16. doi: 10.3390/su15021652.
21.
NedungadiPJayakumarARamanR. Personalized health monitoring system for managing well-being in rural areas. Journal of Medical Systems.2018; 42(1): 1-11. doi: 10.1007/s10916-017-0854-9.
22.
BalikuddembeJReinhardtJ. Can digitization of health care help low-resourced countries provide better community-based rehabilitation services? Physical Therapy.2020; 100(2): 217-224. doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzz162.
23.
DelgadoR. Without IPv6, there is no digital transformation for healthcare. Technology Health Care.2022; 30(2): 505-508. doi: 10.3233/THC-213571.
24.
YuJMengS. Impacts of the internet on health inequality and healthcare access: A cross-country study. Front Public Health.2022; 10: 935608. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.935608.
25.
LeTGalperinHTraubeD. The impact of digital competence on telehealth utilization. Health Policy and Technology.2023; 12(1): 100724. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2023.100724.
26.
AghaZSchapiraRMakerAH. Cost effectiveness of telemedicine for the delivery of outpatient pulmonary care to a rural population. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health.2002; 8(3): 281-291. doi: 10.1089/15305620260353171.
27.
SanchezDLefebvreCAbeytaK. Teledentistry in the United States: A new horizon of dental care. International Journal of Dental Hygiene.2004; 2(4): 161-164. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-5037.2004.00093.x.
28.
BangalVSomasundaramKThitameS. Influence of Mobile Communication on Utilization and Outcome of Maternal Health Services in Rural Area. Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development.2018; 9(5): 504-508. doi: 10.5958/0976-5506.2018.00497.7.
29.
KitsiouSVataniHParéG, et al. Effectiveness of mobile health technology interventions for patients with heart failure: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of Cardiology.2021; 37(8): 1248-1259. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2021.02.015.
30.
MaSHuZ. Does Digital Finance Affects Labor Mobility? – Based on the Micro Perspective of China’s Floating Population. China Economic Quarterly (in Chinese).2022; 22(01): 303-322. doi: 10.13821/j.cnki.ceq.2022.01.15.
31.
van DeursenAvan DijkJ. The first-level digital divide shifts from inequalities in physical access to inequalities in material access. New Media & Society.2019; 21(2): 354-375. doi: 10.1177/1461444818797082.
32.
ScheerderADeursenADijkJ. Determinants of internet skills, uses and outcomes. A systematic review of the second- and third-level digital divide. Telematics and Informatics.2017; 34(8): 1607-1624. doi: 10.1016/j.tele.2017.07.007.
33.
LythreatisSSinghSEl-KassarA. The digital digital divide: A review and future research agenda. Technological Forecasting and Social Change.2022; 175(6): 121359. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2021.121359.
34.
SuLPengY. Digital education, digital literacy and farmers’participation in digital life. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Science Edition) (in Chinese).2021; 20(03): 27-40.
35.
QiYChuX. The employment effect of digital life: The internal mechanism and micro evidence. Finance & Trade Economics (in Chinese).2021; 42(04): 98-114. doi: 10.19795/j.cnki.cn11-1166/f.20210406.002.
36.
TofflerA. The Third Wave. New York: William Morrowand Company, 1980.
37.
WangSWangXZhouY, et al. Utilization of, satisfaction toward, and challenges for Internet-based healthcare services provided by primary health institutions: Evidence from China. Front Public Health.2023; 10: 1100634. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1100634.
38.
LeeHJinSHenning-SmithC, et al. Role of health literacy in health-related information-seeking behavior online: Cross-sectional study. Journal of Medical Internet Research.2021; 23(1): e14088. doi: 10.2196/14088.
39.
NegroponteN. Being Digital. New York: Vintage Book, 1996.
40.
GaoM. New rural cooperative medical care and health service use of rural residents. The Journal of World Economy (in Chinese).2010; 33(10): 79-97.
41.
MengYHanJ. The impact of medical insurance on the health service utilization of the floating population: Empirical Analysis Based on the 2017 China Migrants Dynamic Survey. Chinese Journal of Population Science (in Chinese).2019; (05): 110-120+128.
42.
BaronRKennyD. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology.1986; 51(6): 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.
43.
KarlsonKHolmABreenR. Comparing regression coefficients between models using logit and probit: A new method. Sociological Methodology.2012; 42(1): 286-313. doi: 10.1177/0081175012444861.
44.
LiTZhouJJinX, et al. Determinants of social capital: The subjective economic status perspective. Economic Research Journal (in Chinese).2021; 56(01): 191-205.
45.
GanLHanCLiuP. Does Internet Use Affect Medical Decisions among Older Adults in China? Evidence from CHARLS. Healthcare.2021; 10(1): 60-75. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10010060.
46.
LiXJingKZhenY, et al. Qiong Meng, HeLiping. Health Equity of Rural Residents in Southwest China. Front Public Health.2021; 9: 611583. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.611583.
47.
Bujnowska-FedakMWaligóraJMastalerz-MigasA. The internet as a source of health information and services. Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology.2019; 1211: 1-16. doi: 10.1007/5584_2019_396.
