Smart glass technology offers remote interaction between health professionals for telehealth, alleviating healthcare disparities in isolated areas.
OBJECTIVE:
To evaluate the professionals’ perceptions of smart glass technology as a tool for telehealth and distance learning.
METHOD:
This mixed-method study on health professionals in 10 different island areas in Korea involved participants experiencing a smart glass-based telehealth system using the scenario of clinical consultation with remote specialists. A group pre- and post-test design was used to examine the change in attitude and perceived importance among health professionals about using smart glasses in telehealth.
RESULTS:
Forty-seven participants completed both pre-and post-evaluation of smart glasses. A positive, statistically significant change in participants’ perceptions of smart glasses regarding their implications for telehealth and distance learning ( 0.05) was found. Fifty-one health workers provided feedback on smart glasses, and a majority expressed their expectations of quality care with telehealth using advanced technology. The main concerns were patients’ privacy issues and inadequate technology for seamless application.
CONCLUSION:
The incorporation of smart glass technology offers great potential to enrich telehealth as well as distance learning for unskilled health professionals in isolated areas. Future studies are needed to increase efforts to secure a high level of acceptance for clinical consultation with remote specialists on this newly developed device.
Korea Research Institute for Local Administration. A study on the island’s population changes analysis and development plan (Policy Research No. 2016–12). 2020. Available at (https://library.khu.ac.kr/seoul/referencingNcitation/vancouver).
2.
SeoJHLeeSJHaJH, et al. The experience and competence of physicians who provide emergency health care at public health sub-centers on remote islands in Korea. J Agric Med Community Health.2011; 35(1): 36-46.
3.
KimSKChoiJMoonJHChoiSELeeY. Trends of extended reality-based telemedicine technology for emergency patients in medically vulnerable areas. Commun Korean Inst Inf Sci Eng.2020; 38(5): 27-35.
4.
KimDLeeJ. Implication for gap of avoidable mortality rate by area deprivation. Health and Social Welfare Review (Pogon Sahoe Yangu).2017; 340: 1-8.
5.
Ministry of Health and Welfare [Internet]. Telemedicine for emergency patients, great help in rapid treatment; [updated 2014 Jan 27; cited 2021 Dec 14]. Available from: http://www.mohw.go.kr/react/al/sal0301vw.jsp?PAR_MENU_ID=04&MENU_ID=0403&CONT_SEQ=296455&page=1. Korean.
6.
LeeWSPyunL. Study on Emergency medical care teleconsultation network in vulnerable areas. The Korean Journal of Health Economics and Policy.2019; 25(2): 49-71.
7.
GuptaRTanwarSTyagiSKumarN. Tactile-internet-based telesurgery system for healthcare 4.0: An architecture, research challenges, and future directions. IEEE Netw.2019; 33(6): 22-29.
8.
KimJH. Medically underserved area, one alternative: Teleconsultation. Proceedings of the 2016 Korea Emergency Medicine Conference, April 2016. pp. 270-275. Daegu, Korea.
9.
KumarNMSinghNKPeddinyVK. Wearable smart glass: Features, applications, current progress and challenges. In 2018 Second International Conference on Green Computing and Internet of Things (ICGCIoT), August 2018. pp. 577-582. Bangalore, India.
10.
SatoTSandarsJBrownJRogersSN. Usefulness of smart glasses and point of view for suturing skills training in medical students: Pilot study. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn.2021; 7(3). doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2020-000669.
11.
KlinkerKObermaierJWiescheM. Conceptualizing passive trust: the case of smart glasses in healthcare. In Proceedings of the 27th European Conference on Information Systems (ECIS), June 2019, Stockholm & Uppsala, Sweden. https://aiselaisnet.org/ecis2019_rip/60/ (accessed December 14, 2021).
12.
WeiNJDoughertyBMyersABadawySM. Using Google Glass in surgical settings: Systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth.2018; 6(3): e9409. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9409.
13.
DoughertyBBadawySM. Using Google Glass in nonsurgical medical settings: Systematic review. JMIR MHealth UHealth.2017; 5(10): e159. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.8671.
14.
RahmanRWoodMEQianLPriceCLJohnsonAAOsgoodGM. Head-mounted display use in surgery: A systematic review. Surg Innov.2020; 27(1): 88-100.
15.
RahimiBNadriHAfsharHLTimpkaT. A systematic review of the technology acceptance model in health informatics. Appl Clin Inform.2018; 9(03): 604-634.
16.
LemayDJMorinMMBazelaisPDoleckT. Modeling students’ perceptions of simulation-based learning using the technology acceptance model. Clin Simul Nurs.2018; 20: 28-37.
17.
FrederickJVan GelderenS. Revolutionizing simulation education with smart glass technology. Clin Simul Nurs.2021; 52: 43-49.
18.
MunusamyTKaruppiahRBahuriNFASockalingamSChamCYWaranV. Telemedicine via smart glasses in critical care of the neurosurgical patient – COVID-19 pandemic preparedness and response in neurosurgery. World Neurosurg.2021; 45: e53-e60. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.09.076.
19.
MillTParikhSAllenA, et al. Live streaming ward rounds using wearable technology to teach medical students: A pilot study. BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn.2021; 7: 494-500. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2021-000864.
20.
RyuCHSeokJChoiYLKimSKJungYSRyuJ. Wireless parathyroid detection device using autofluorescence and smart glasses: A preliminary study. Technol Health Care.2021; 29(5): 979-987. doi: 10.3233/THC-202699.
21.
TangXLiFSeetharamTGVigneshCC. Internet of things-assisted intelligent monitoring model to analyze the physical health condition. Technol Health Care.2021; 29(6): 1355-1369. doi: 10.3233/THC-213011.
22.
FollmannARuhlAGöschMFelzenMRossaintRCzaplikM. Augmented reality for guideline presentation in medicine: Randomized crossover simulation trial for technically assisted decision-making. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth.2021; 9(10): e17472. doi: 10.2196/17472.
23.
LeeYKimSKYoonHChoiJKimHGoY. Integration of extended reality and a high-fidelity simulator in team-based simulations for emergency scenarios. Electronics.2021; 10(17): 2170. doi: 10.3390/electronics10172170.
24.
BasogluNOkAEDaimTU. What will it take to adopt smart glasses: A consumer choicebased review? Technol Soc.2017; 50: 50-56.
25.
ChoiJKimSKLeeYYoonHGoYByunKS. Perceived usefulness and attitude toward smart-glass for first-aid remote support among coast guards in Korea. Journal of the Korea Industrial Information Systems Research.2021; 26(4): 1-9.
26.
Scott KruseCKaremPShifflettKVegiLRaviKBrooksM. Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: A systematic review. J Telemed Telecare. 2018; 24: 4-12.
27.
PatersonCBaconRDwyerR, et al. The role of telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic across the interdisciplinary cancer team: Implications for practice. Semin Oncol Nurs.2020; 36(6): 151090. doi: 10.1016/j.soncn.2020.151090.
28.
TsaiHHTsaiYF. Attitudes toward and predictors of videoconferencing use among frequent family visitors to nursing home residents in Taiwan. Telemed e-Health.2015; 21(10): 838-844.
29.
DelgadoRM. Without IPv6, there is no digital transformation for healthcare. Technol Health Care.2022; 30(2): 505-508. doi: 10.3233/THC-213571.
30.
MonagheshEHajizadehA. The role of telehealth during COVID-19 outbreak: A systematic review based on current evidence. BMC Public Health.2020; 20: 1193. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09301-4.
31.
SteindalSANesAAGGodskesenTE, et al. Patients’ experiences of telehealth in palliative home care: Scoping review. J Med Internet Res. 2020; 22: e16218. doi: 10.2196/16218.
