BACKGROUND:
It is difficult to distinguish solitary of fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (SFT/HPC) from atypical meningioma (AM) by conventional imaging.As far as we know,diffusion weighting imaging may identify them effectively.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to determine the role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values to distinguish and predict prognosis of solitary of fibrous tumor/hemangiopericytoma (SFT/HPC) (WHOII) and atypical meningioma (AM).
METHODS:
Preoperative diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) of 30 cases with histopathologic and immunhistochemical testified SFT/HPC WHOII (
11) and AM (
19) were performed retrospectively. The ADC values of lesion, peritumoral edema, normal white matter and lesion NADC ratio (lesion ADC values/ADC values of normal white matter (NWN ADC)) were compared. The immunhistochemical markers (Ki-67, CD34, Vim, EMA, GFAP, S-100, PR, CD56) were compared. The correlation between the ADC values and Ki-67 index was evaluated.
RESULTS:
The mean lesion ADC values of SFT/HPC (1.15
0.04
10
mm
/s) was significantly higher than that of AM (0.80
0.04
10
mm
/s) (
23.824,
0.05). The mean NADC ratio was lower for AM (1.03
0.06) compared with SFT/HPC (1.51
0.05) (
23.105,
0.05). The mean edema ADC for SFT/HPC (1.47
0.06
10
mm
/s) was lower compared with AM (1.68
0.05
10
mm
/s) (
9.926,
0.05 ). There was no statistical difference between the two groups of NWM ADC (
1.475,
0.05) . The mean Ki-67 of SFT/HPC (7.18
2.60%) was lower than the mean Ki-67 of AM (13.58
4.50%) (
4.934,
0.05). The CD34 showed statistically differences between two groups (
13.659,
0.05). The EMA also showed statistically differences between two groups (
4.474,
0.05). Vim,GFAP, S-100, PR, CD56 showed no statistical difference in the two group (
0.05). The pearson analysis indicated that there was a negative correlation between lesion ADC and Ki-67 in SFT/HPC group (
0.770,
0.05) and AM group (
0.727,
0.05). There was also a negative correlation between lesion NADC ratio and Ki-67 in SFT/HPC group (
0.673,
0.05) and AM group (
0.707,
0.05). There was a positive correlation between edema ADC and Ki-67 in SFT/HPC group (
0.819,
0.05) and AM group (
0.942,
0.05). Furthermore,there was no correlation between NWM A DC and Ki-67 in SFT/HPC group (
0.403,
0.05) and AM group (
0.202,
0.05).
CONCLUSIONS:
The lesion ADC, lesion NADC ratio and edema ADC can distinguish the SFT/HPC WHO II from AM and be helpful to predict prognosis of the two tumors before operation. Further more, histopathologic and immunhistochemical can make a definite diagnosis of the two tumors.