National recommendations in Sweden recommend a safety distance of 3 meter (m) between mobile phones and medical-electrical (ME) equipment in hospitals. A questionnaire was used to investigate how often mobile phones were reported to interfere with ME products in clinical practice across Sweden.
The results confirmed that ME equipment can be affected by mobile phone use but, the risk of the patient’s outcome being affected were minimal; no cases were identified which led to injury or death.
In conclusion, the results support recommendations for a general safety distance of 0.5 m between mobile phones and ME equipment in care environments.
HaroonMYasinFEckelRWalkerF. Perceptions and attitudes of hospital staff toward paging system and the use of mobile phones. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2010; 26(4): 377-381.
2.
SotoRGChuLFGoldmanJMRampilIJRuskinKJ. Communication in critical care environments: Mobile telephones improve patient care. Anesth Analg. 2006; 102(2): 535-541.
3.
Internetstiftelsen i Sverige (IIS)(2016)Svenskarna och internet 2015, Available from: http://www.soi2015.se/
4.
Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare (Socialstyrelsen). Mobiltelefoni och annan radiokommunikation på sjukhus [Use of mobile phones and other radio-communication in hospitals. Swedish.] SoS; 2003. Available from: http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/publikationer2003/2003-126-17.
5.
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) 60601-1-2 C 1. Medical electrical equipment – Part 1-2: General requirements for basic safety and essential performance – Collateral standard: Electromagnetic compatibility – Requirements and tests. IEC; 2007. Available from: http://www.sis.se/h%C3%A4lso-och-sjukv%C3%A5rd/medicinsk-utrustning/allm%C3%A4nt/iec-60601-1-22014.
6.
European Commission. MEDDEV 2.12-1 rev 8. Guidelines on a medical devices vigilance system. Guidance MEDDEV; 2013. Available from: http://www.eisnersafety.com/meddev-2-12-1-guidelines-on-medical-devices-vigilance-system-updated-to-rev-8/.
7.
CalcagniniGCensiFTriventiMMatteiEBartoliniP. Electromagnetic immunity of infusion pumps to GSM mobile phones: A systematic review. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2007; 43(3): 225-228.
8.
Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Wireless device use and patient monitoring equipment in any healthcare delivery setting: A review of safety and guidelines. CADTH Rapid Response Reports; 2014. 1. Available from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0064463/pdf/PubMedHealth_PMH0064463.pdf.
9.
CarranzaNFeblesVHernándezJABardasanoJLMonteagudoJLFernández de AldecoaJCRamosV. Patient safety and electromagnetic protection: A review. Health Phys. 2011; 100(5): 530-541.
10.
EtteltSNolteEMcKeeMHaugenOAKarlbergIKlazingaN, et al. Evidence-based policy? The use of mobile phones in hospital. J Public Health. 2006; 28(4): 299-303.
11.
HietanenMSibakovV. Electromagnetic interference from GSM and TETRA phones with life-support medical devices. Ann Ist Super Sanita. 2007; 43(3): 204-207.
12.
IshiharaSHigashiyamaJOnishiTTarusawaY. Electromagnetic interference with medical devices from third generation mobile phone including LTE. Electromagnetic Compatibility, Tokyo, 2014 International Symposium on. EMC’14/Tokyo; 2014. pp 217-217.
LawrentschukNBoltonDM. Mobile phone interference with medical equipment and its clinical relevance: A systematic review. Med J Aust. 2004; 181(3): 145-149.
15.
PashazadehAMAghajaniMNabipourIAssadiM. An update on mobile phones interference with medical devices. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2013; 156(4): 401-406.
16.
AnellAGlenngårdAHMerkurS. Sweden health system review. Health Syst Transit. 2012; 14(5): 1-159.
17.
FexAFlensnerGEkACSöderhamnO. Health-illness transition among persons using advanced medical technology at home. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011; 25(2): 253-261.
18.
PommergaardHCBurcharthJRosenbergJ. Use of mobile phones in hospitals do not jeopardise the safety of the patients. Article in Danish. Ugeskr Laeger. 2013; 175(13): 876-880.
