This paper deals with the investigation of external joint movement with respect to leg kinematics. The overall leg kinematics were investigated by means of a rigid, three-segment, 3D leg model. A 3D kinematics and ground reaction forces was being restructured. The images were then authenticated with the help of a cadaveric investigation and analysis. This was eventually used for prediction of the overall leg kinematics. Thereafter FEM based simulations were undertaken, and muscle forces were investigated based on the data available. With the help of FEM predictions it was found and understood that the overall leg kinematics were having higher loading factor with respect to the lateral.
ChristopherJN. Lessons from dynamic cadaver and invasive bone pin studies: do we know how the foot really moves during gait? Journal of Foot and Ankle Research 2:1. Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009, 2009.
2.
International Organization for Standardization. Prosthet-ics and orthotics - vocabulary - Part 1: General terms for external limb prostheses and external orthoses. ISO 8549-1, 1989.
3.
AbdallahAA, RadwanAY. Biomechanical changes accompanying unilateral and bilateral use of laterally wedged insoles with medial arch supports in patients with medial knee osteoarthritis. Clinical Biomechanics, 2011; 26: 783-789.
4.
KakihanaW, AkaiM, NakazawaK, TakashimaT, NaitoK, ToriiS. Effects of laterally wedged insoles on knee and subtalar joint moments. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2005; 86: 1465-1471.
5.
KerriganDC, LelasJL, GogginsJ, MerrimanGJ, KaplanRJ, FelsonDT. Effectiveness of a lateral-wedge insole on knee varus torque in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2002; 83: 889-893.
6.
LouS-Z, SuF-C, ChenY-C. Effects of arch support insoles on gait patterns of patients with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Medical and Biological Engineering, 2015; 35: 202-208.
7.
ArokoskiJP, JurvelinJS, VäätäinenU, HelminenHJ. Normal and pathological adaptations of articular cartilage to joint loading. Scandinavian Journal of Medical Science in Sports, 2000; 10: 186-198.
8.
KaramanidisK, ArampatzisA. Evidence of mechanical load redistribution at the knee joint in the elderly when ascending stairs and ramps. Annals of Biomedical Engi-neering, 2009; 37: 467-476.
9.
SimicM, HinmanRS, WrigleyTV, BennellKL, HuntMA. Gait modification strategies for altering medial knee joint load: A systematic review. Arthritis Care & Research, 2011; 63: 405-426.
10.
van den NoortJC, van der EschM, SteultjensMP, DekkerJ, SchepersHM, VeltinkPH, HarlaarJ. The knee adduction moment measured with an instrumented force shoe in patients with knee osteoarthritis. Journal of Biomechanics, 2012; 45: 281-288.
11.
KinneyAL, BesierTF, SilderA, DelpSL, D'LimaDD, FreglyBJ. Changes in in vivo knee contact forces through gait modification. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2013; 31: 434-440.
12.
MeyerAJ, D'LimaDD, BesierTF, LloydDG, ColwellCW, Jr, FreglyBJ. Are external knee load and EMG measures accurate indicators of internal knee contact forces during gait. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2012; 31: 921-929.
13.
ShelburneKB, TorryMR, SteadmanJR, PandyMG. Effects of foot orthoses and valgus bracing on the knee adduction moment and medial joint load during gait. Clinical Biomechanics, 2008; 23: 814-821.
14.
AdouniM, Shirazi-AdlA, ShiraziR. Computational biodynamics of human knee joint in gait: From muscle forces to cartilage stresses. Journal of Biomechanics, 2012; 45: 2149-2156.
15.
ShimadaS, KobayashiS, WadaM, UchidaK, SasakiS, KawaharaH, et al. Effects of disease severity on response to lateral wedged shoe insole for medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2006; 87: 1436-1441.
16.
YangNH, CanavanPK, Nayeb-HashemiH, NajafiB, VaziriA. Protocol for constructing subject-specific biomechanical models of knee joint. Computer Methods in Biomechanics and Biomedical Engineering, 2010; 13: 589-603.
17.
ShelburneKB, TorryMR, PandyMG. Muscle, ligament, and joint-contact forces at the knee during walking. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2005; 37: 1948-1956.
18.
SchippleinOD, AndriacchiTP. Interaction between active and passive knee stabilizers during level walking. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 1991; 9: 113-119.
19.
ReinschmidtC, van Den BogertA, MurphyN, LundbergA, NiggB. Tibiocalcaneal motion during running, measured with external and bone markers. Clinical Biomechanics, 1997; 12: 8-16.
20.
DelpSL, AndersonFC, ArnoldAS, LoanP, HabibA, JohnCT, et al. OpenSim: Open-source software to create and analyze dynamic simulations of movement. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2007; 54: 1940-1950.
21.
PerryJ. Gait analysis: Normal and pathological func-tion. New Jersy: Slack, 1992.
22.
DulJ. Development of a minimum-fatigue optimization technique for predicting individual muscle forces during human posture and movement with application to the ankle musculature during standing and walking. Ph.D. thesis, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, 1983.
23.
KimKJ, KitaokaHB, LuoZP, OzekiS, BerglundLJ, KaufmanKR, AnKN. In vitro simulation of the stance phase in human gait. Journal of Musculoskeletal Research, 2001; 5: 113-121.
24.
AhmedAM, BurkeDL. In-vitro measurement of static pressure distribution in synovial joints - Part I: Tibial surface of the knee. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 1983; 105: 216-225.
25.
YangNH, Nayeb-HashemiH, CanavanPK, VaziriA. Effect of frontal plane tibiofemoral angle on the stress and strain at the knee cartilage during the stance phase of gait. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 2010; 28: 1539-1547.
26.
WintersJM, StarkL. Estimated mechanical prop-erties of synergistic muscles involved in movements of a variety of human joints. Journal of Biomechanics, 1988; 21: 1027-1041.
27.
MündermannA, WakelingJM, NiggBM, HumbleRN, StefanyshynDJ. Foot orthoses affect frequency components of muscle activity in the lower extremity. Gait Posture, 2006; 23: 295-302.
28.
LewekMD, RudolphKS, Snyder-Mackler,L. Control of frontal plane knee laxity during gait in patients with medial compartment knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage, 2004; 12: 745-751.
29.
ReillyDT, BursteinAH. The elastic and ultimate properties of compact bone tissue. Journal of Biomechanics, 1975; 8: 393-405.
30.
MogloKE, Shirazi-AdlA. On the coupling between anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments, and knee joint response under anterior femoral drawer in flexion: A finite element study. Clinical Biomechanics, 2003; 18: 751-759.
31.
LeRouxMA, SettonLA. Experimental and biphasic FEM determinations of the material properties and hydraulic permeability of the meniscus in tension. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 2002; 124: 315-321.
32.
SahaA, AnupamD, AbhirupC. An experimental analysis of the strength of the taper joint. Technology and Health Care, 2016; 24(2): 241-249.
33.
NakamuraS, CrowninshieldRD, CooperRR. An analysis of soft tissue loading in the foot - a preliminary report. Bulletin of Prosthetics Research, 1981; 18: 27-34.
34.
DasA, ArinditaS. An ontological framework for tele-monitoring in e-healthcare. International Journal of Telemedicine and Clinical Practices, 2016; 1(4): 293-305.
35.
SahaS, et al. An investigation on biofeedback analysis and psychosomatic applications. Recent Developments in Control, Automation and Power Engineering (RDCAPE), 2015 International Conference on. IEEE, 2015.
36.
DasA, et al. A metallic strain gauge-based experimental study of an analytic method for detection of urinary bladder dysfunction. International Journal of Biomedical Engineering and Technology, 2015; 17(1): 83-98.
