Students studying in the higher education system face multiple challenges, such as meeting the minimum requirements for enrolling in a programme, securing tuition fees and adapting to new teaching and learning styles, whilst also coping with minimal support. The challenges are more profound for students with disabilities (SWDs) who must progress and emerge triumphantly as graduates, despite their unique and special needs.
OBJECTIVE:
By relating the personal experiences of SWDs, this article examines the different types of support they need as they commence their studies in higher education institutions, as well as throughout their journeys.
METHODS:
The study adopted a qualitative multiple case study research design in which the approaches of public and private high schools in handling SWDs were compared with the experiences of SWDs at a higher education open distance e-learning institution.
RESULTS:
The findings revealed that the use and availability of assistive technology devices were more pronounced at the school level than at the ODeL institution. The SWDs expressed their frustrations and reported more struggles with their studies at the ODeL institution than they had experienced at school level.
CONCLUSION:
The SWDs in the study provided some potential improvements that could be implemented by ODeL institutions in addressing their needs and in providing support, whilst also emulating the best practices implemented at high school level.
LumadiRI. Enhancing student development through support services in an Open Distance Learning institution: A case study in South Africa. SAJHE.2021; 35(1): 113-126.
2.
ArintoP. Issues and challenges in open and distance elearning: Perspectives from the Philippines. IRRODL.2016; 17(2): 162-180.
3.
NdlovuS. Provision of assistive technology for students with disabilities in South African higher education. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health.2021; 18: 3892. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18083892.
4.
MutangaO. Experiences of disabled students at two South African universities: A capabilities approach (Doctoral dissertation, University of the Free State). 2015.
5.
Van Der MerweM. Students with disabilities disadvantaged at higher educational level. Daily Maverick, [15 August. 2017. cited 2021 August 23]. Available from: https://www.dailymaverick.co.za.
6.
RousseauNDumontMBeaudoinC. The use of assistive technologies in writing situations with dyslexic and dysorthographic students. Intech Open. 2021.
7.
RichardsonJ. Academic attainment of students with disabilities in distance education. JPED.2014; 27(3): 291-305.
8.
RichardsonV. From behavioursim to constructivism in teacher education. Teach Educ Spec Educ.1996; 19(3): 1-16.
9.
TerblanchéEJ. It’s about ability: Becoming aware of the needs of students with optical disabilities. Int. J. Learn.2012; 18(3).
10.
United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities and optional protocol. New York: UN. 2006.
11.
Foundation of Tertiary Institutions of the Northern Metropolis (FOTIM). Disability in higher education: Project report. 2011. [cited May 2017 3]. Available from: https://www.uct.ac.za/usr/disability/reports/annual_report_10_11.pdf.
12.
BiggeriMDi MasiDBellaciccoR. Disability and higher education: assessing students’ capabilities in two Italian universities using structured focus group discussions. Stud High Educ.2020; 45(4): 909-24.
13.
Foundation of Tertiary Institutions of the Northern Metropolis (FOTIM). 2011. Disability in Higher Education: Project Report. Johannesburg/Cape Town.
14.
ColemanMBergeZL. A review of accessibility in online higher education. 2018. [cited May 2022 6]. Available from: https://www.westga.edu./∼distance/ojdla/spring211/coleman_berge211.html.
15.
ShacharMNeumannY. Differences between traditional and distance education academic performances: A meta-analytic approach. IRRODL.2003; 4(2): 1-20.
16.
RowlandCBurgsthalerSSmithJCoombsN. Issues in accessing distance education technologies for individuals with disabilities. 2002. [cited April 2020 4]. Available from: http://ncdae.org/resources/articles/technology.php#_end10.
17.
Cain,HMerrill,Z. Distance education for master’s students with visual impairments: Technology and support. JSET.2001; 18(4): 45-52.
18.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Health and Human Development. What are some types of assistive devices and how are they used? 2018. [cited May 2022 6] Available from: https://www.nichd.nih.gov/health/topics/rehabtech/conditioninfo/device.
19.
AdomDHusseinEKAgyemJA. Theoretical and conceptual framework: Mandatory ingredients of a quality research. Int J Sci Res.2018; 7(1): 438-41.
20.
BellF. Connectivism: A network theory for teaching and learning in a connected world. Educational developments. The Magazine of the Staff and Educational Development Association.2009; 10(3).
21.
MattarJ. Constructivism and connectivism in education technology: Active, situated, authentic, experiential, and anchored learning. RIED.2018; 21(2): 201-217.
22.
KopRHillA. Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning.2008; 9(3): 1-3.
23.
KerrB. A challenge to connectivism. Transcription of keynote speech, online connectivism conference. University of Manitoba. 2007. [cited 2022 May 5]. Available from: http://itc.umanitoba.ca/wiki/index.php?title=kerr.
24.
NobleHSmithJ. Issues of validity and reliability in qualitative research. Evidence-Based Nursing.2015; 18: 34-35.
25.
McMillanJHSchumacherS. Research in education: Evidence-based inquiry, MyEducationLab Series. Pearson; 2010.
26.
CohenLManionLMorrisonK. Methodology of educational research. Athens: Metaichmio. [In Greek]; 2008.
27.
CreswellJ. Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among the five approaches. 3 ed. SAGE; 2013.
28.
YinRK. Qualitative research from start to finish. Guilford Publications; 2015.
29.
GillPStewartKTreasureEChadwickB. Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews and focus groups. Br Dent J.2008; 204(6): 291-5.
30.
BowenGA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J.2009; 9(2): 27-40.
31.
SmulowitzS. Document analysis. The international encyclopedia of communication research methods.2017; 24: 1-8.
32.
Plymouth. Policies and procedures. 2020. [cited 11 April 2020]. Available from https://schools.graniteschools.org/plymouth/policies-procedure/.
33.
DoddDJHebert-BoydM. Capacity building: Linking community Experience to public policy. 2000. [Cited 9 February 2022]. Available from: https://carleton.ca/cure/wp-content/uploads/capacity_2000_e.pdf.
34.
BraunVClarkeV. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology.2006; 3(2): 77-101.
35.
NowellLSNorrisJMWhiteDEMoulesNJ. Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. IJQM.2017; 16: 1-13.
36.
KorstjensIMoserA. Series: Practical guidance to qualitative research. Part 4: Trustworthiness and publishing. EJGP. 2018; 24(1): 120-124.
37.
ShentonAK. Strategies for ensuring trustworthiness in qualitative research projects. Education for Information, 2004; 63-75.
38.
TobinGABegleyCM. Methodological rigour within a qualitative framework. J Adv Nurs.2004; 48: 388-396. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2004.03207.x.
39.
YoungGMacCormackJ. Assistive technology for students with learning disabilities. 2014. [cited March 2014 2]. Available from: https://www.idatschool.ca/assistivetechnology/.
40.
StanberryKRaskindMH. Assistive technology for kids with learning disabilities: An overview. 2019. [cited July 2019 17]. Available from https://www.readingrockets.org/article/assisitve-technology-kids-learning-disabilities-overview.
41.
CiobanuA. The role of student services in the improving of student experience in higher education. Procedia Soc.2013; 92: 169-73.
Arko-AchemfuorA. Accessing learner support services in a distance education context at UNISA Adult Basic Education Department (Doctoral dissertation, University of Fort Hare). 2013.
44.
MuleyaG. Managing and leading through Ubuntu. In Education in a competitive and globalising world: Open distance learning (ODL) through the philosophy of ubuntu. New York: Nova Science Publishers; 2016.
45.
KumtepeEGToprakEOzturkABuyukkoseGTKilincHMenderisİA. Support services in open and distance education: An integrated model of open universities. Conference paper; May 2018.
46.
HatzipanagosSGregsonJ. The role of open access and open educational resources: A distance learning perspective. In ICEL-2014. Santa Maria Technical University Valparaiso Chile. 2014, p. 265.
47.
Department of Higher Education and Training (DHET). Statistics on post-school education and training in South Africa: 2016. Pretoria: DHET. 2018.
48.
AndersonT. The theory and practice of online learning. 2 ed. Athabasca: AU Press; 2008.
49.
WallaceS. Dictionary of Education. 2 ed. Oxford, Oxford University Press; 2015.
50.
Guri-RosenblitS. Challenges facing distance education in the 21st century: Policy and research implications. In Bernath U, Szucs A, Tait A, Vidal M (ed.) Online distance education. 2013. doi: 10.1002/9781118557686.ch1.
