The conception and rehabilitation of apartments for people with disabilities, using computer simulation methods, are relatively recent. This paper aims to present a new method of assessing a wheelchair user's capacity to have access to swinging doors, as an example. The accessibility assessment is achieved by determining the adequate maneuvering clearances at doorways for a wheelchair user to open, cross and close, easily, a swinging door. The user's upper body deficiencies are taken into consideration in several wheelchair designs. The results obtained revealed that our method may help designing and rehabilitating apartments for this category of people, while increasing their autonomy and decreasing the risks they may be exposed to.
Legislation.gov.uk [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2015 Jun 12]. Available from: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga.
2.
LOI n° 2005-102 du 11 février 2005 pour l'égalité droits et des chances, la participation et la citoyenneté des personnes handicapées (Law n° 2005-102 February 11th 2005 for equal rights and equal opportunities, inclusion and citizenship of persons with disabilities). 2005-102 February, 2005.
3.
Americans with disabilities act accessibility guide. [Internet]. Washington, DC: Access Board, US Architectual ans TransporationBarriers Compliance Board; 1997. Available from: http://www.ada.gov/2010ADAstandards_index.htm.
4.
ArnaudJ. Automatic generation of plans and virtual tour of habitats suitable for the disabled deficit [PhD thesis]. 2007.
5.
LeloupJ. Le projet HM2PH, habitat modulaire et mobile pour personnes handicapées: spécification d'un espace de vie adapté pour personne en déficit d'autonomie (PROJET HM2PH, modular and mobile house for persons with disabilities: specification of a life space adapted to persons with autonomy deficit) [Internet]. Tours; 2004 [cited 2015 Dec 2]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/2004TOUR4055.
6.
GoncalvesF. Conception d'un environnement virtuel avec adaptation de l'immersion pour la simulation de conduite en fauteuil roulant (virtual environment design with immersion adaptation for wheelchair driving simulation) [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 Dec 2]. Available from: http://www.theses.fr/ s77298.
7.
TaychouriF, MonacelliE, HamamY. Analyse d'accessibilité avec prise en compte de la qualité de conduite d'un fauteuil (accessibility analysis considering driving wheelchair quality). Sci Technol Pour Handicap. 2007; 1(2): 173-92.
8.
HanCS, LawKH, LatombeJ-C, KunzJC. A performance-based approach to wheelchair accessible route analysis. Adv Eng Inform. Jan 2002; 16(1): 53-71.
9.
OtmaniR, MoussaouiA, PruskiA. A new approach to indoor accessibility. Int J Smart Home. 3 Oct 2009.
10.
PruskiA. A unified approach to accessibility for a person in a wheelchair. Robot Auton Syst. 30 Nov 2010; 58(11): 1177-84.
11.
YangJ (James), Abdel-MalekK. Human reach envelope and zone differentiation for ergonomic design. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind. 1 Jan 2009; 19(1): 15-34.
12.
VilarE, RebeloF, NoriegaP. Indoor human wayfinding performance using vertical and horizontal signage in virtual reality. Hum Factors Ergon Manuf Serv Ind. 1 Nov 2014; 24(6): 601-15.
13.
Center for Expertise and Education on the Risks, the Environment, Mobility and Development. 2015 [cited 2015 Jun 12]. Available from: http://www.territoires-ville.cerema.fr/.
14.
AlexanderRM. A minimum energy cost hypothesis for human arm trajectories. Biol Cybern. Feb 1997; 76(2): 97-105.
15.
AndersonFC, PandyMG. Static and dynamic optimization solutions for gait are practically equivalent. J Biomech. Feb 2001; 34(2): 153-61.
16.
GallagherS, MarrasWS, DavisKG, KovacsK. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task. Ergonomics. 15 Apr 2002; 45(5): 380-98.
17.
KimJH, YangJ, Abdel-MalekK. A novel formulation for determining joint constraint loads during optimal dynamic motion of redundant manipulators in DH representation. Multibody Syst Dyn. 10 Jan 2008; 19(4): 427-51.
18.
YangJ, PitarchEP. Digital human modeling and virtual reality for FCS. The University of Iowa, Contract/PR NO. DAAE07-03-D-L003/0001; 2004. Report No.: VSR-04.02.
19.
DenavitJ, HartenbergRS. A kinematic notation for lower pair mechanisms based on matrices. Journal of Applied Mechanics. 1955; 77: 215-21.
20.
LatombeJ-C. Robot Motion Planning [Internet]. Vol. 124. Boston, MA: Springer US; 1991 [cited 2015 Dec 7]. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-1-4615-4022-9.
21.
MoussaouiA, OtmaniR, PruskiA. A comparative study of incremental algorithms for computing the inverse kinematics of redundant articulated. J Autom Mob Robot Intell Syst. 2010; 4(3): 3-9.
22.
LaumondJ. Feasible trajectories for mobile robots with kinematic and environment constraints. in Intelligent Autonomous Systems, HertzbergerLO, GroenFCA, eds, New York: North_Holland. 1987; 346-54.
