This article examines the indicators of perception and experience, frequently used in surveys to measure corruption, criminal violence, and discrimination. Focusing on Madagascar, we study the correlations between these two types of measurements, which are subject to some debates in the literature as they are not sufficiently understood. The results show that, apart from discrimination, there is little correlation between perceptions and experiences. In addition, we find that media exposure, education, trust, and contact with the administration are factors that significantly influence both experience and perception as measurements. These factors may exhibit a similar influence, showing convergence between the two measures, or opposite influences, dealing a difference between the measured phenomena. These results, mobilizing “Gouvernance, Paix et Sécurité” surveys (GPS-SHaSA), emphasize the relevance to always distinguish between perceptions and experiences when measuring, studying or treating with one of these concepts. For having identified variables that are captured (or not) by those two complementary indicators, this paper should be useful to both governments, practitioners, and researchers, if their aims are to address and better understand those governance phenomena.
Mo Ibrahim Foundation. African Governance Report. Agendas 2063 & 2030: Is Africa on track? Mo Ibrahim Foundation; 2019; 96.
2.
ClingJPRazafindrakotoMRoubaudF. L’ODD16 sur la gouvernance et sa mesure. L’Afrique en tête. Afrique Contemporaine. 2016; 258(2): 73–93.
3.
GutmannJPadovanoFVoigtS. Perception vs. experience: Explaining differences in corruption measures using microdata. European Journal of Political Economy. 2020 Dec 1; 65: 101925.
4.
KaufmannDKraayAMastruzziM. Measuring Governance Using Cross-Country Perceptions Data [Internet]. International Handbook on the Economics of Corruption. Edward Elgar Publishing; 2006 [cited 2023 Jan 15]. Available from: https://www.elgaronline.com/display/1845422422.00008.xml.
5.
AbramoCW. How Much Do Perceptions of Corruption Really Tell Us? [Internet]. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network; 2008 [cited 2020 Jun 9]. Report No.: ID 1726825. Available from: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1726825.
6.
AmbreyCLFlemingCMManningM. Perception or reality, what matters most when it comes to crime in your neighbourhood? Soc Indic Res. 2014 Nov 1; 119(2): 877–96.
7.
AgerbergM. Corrupted Estimates? Response Bias in Citizen Surveys on Corruption. Polit Behav [Internet]. 2020 Jul 6 [cited 2020 Aug 4]; Available from: doi: 10.1007/s11109-020-09630-5.
8.
UNSD, Praia Group. Handbook on Governance Statistics [Internet]. UNSD: New York; 2020. 272 p. Available from: https://www.ohchr.org/sites/default/files/Documents/Issues/HRIndicators/handbook_governance_statistics.pdf.
9.
RazafindrakotoMRoubaudFWachsbergerJM. Puzzle and Paradox: A Political Economy of Madagascar. Cambridge University Press; 2020. 303 p.
10.
INSTAT. Troisième recensement général de la population et de l’habitation-RGPH-3. [Internet]. Antananarivo, Madagascar: Institut National de la Statistique Madagascar (INSTAT); 2020; 192. Available from: https://www.instat.mg/p/resultats-definitifs-du-rgph-3-2018-troisieme-recensement-general-de-la-population-et-de-lhabitation.
11.
BertrandMMullainathanS. Do people mean what they say? Implications for Subjective Survey Data. 2001; 91(2): 6.
12.
JahediSMéndezF. On the advantages and disadvantages of subjective measures. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 2014 Feb 1; 98: 97–114.
13.
KahnemanD. Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY, US: Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2011. 499 p. (Thinking, fast and slow.).
14.
RazafindrakotoMRoubaudF. Are international databases on corruption reliable? A comparison of expert opinion surveys and household surveys in sub-saharan africa. World Development. 2010 Aug 1; 38(8): 1057–69.
15.
FlynnDJNyhanBReiflerJ. The nature and origins of misperceptions: Understanding false and unsupported beliefs about politics. Political Psychology. 2017; 38(S1): 127–50.
OlkenBA. Corruption perceptions vs. corruption reality. Journal of Public Economics. 2009 Aug 1; 93(7): 950–64.
18.
RoseRMishlerW. Experience versus perception of corruption: Russia as a test case. Global Crime. 2010 Apr 28; 11(2): 145–63.
19.
DonchevDUjhelyiG. What do corruption indices measure? Economics & Politics. 2014 Jul 1; 26(2): 309–31.
20.
PerdomoV, J C. Determinant Factors in the Perception of Crime-Related Insecurity in Mexico [Internet]. Inter-American Development Bank; 2013 Mar [cited 2020 Jun 9]. (IDB Publications (Working Papers)). Report No.: 4237. Available from: https://ideas.repec.org/p/idb/brikps/4237.html.
21.
DoranBJBurgessMB. Putting Fear of Crime on the Map: Investigating Perceptions of Crime Using Geographic Information Systems [Internet]. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2012 [cited 2020 Jun 9]. (Springer Series on Evidence-Based Crime Policy). Available from: https://www.springer.com/gp/book/9781441956460.
22.
BartonMSWeilFJacksonMHickeyDA. An investigation of the influence of the spatial distribution of neighborhood violent crime on fear of crime. Crime & Delinquency. 2017 Dec 1; 63(13): 1757–76.
23.
DuncanAMavisakalyanATarverdiY. Self-assessed vs. statistical evidence of racial discrimination: The case of indigenous Australians. Applied Economics. 2019 Mar 9; 51(12): 1232–47.
24.
AuerDRuedinD. Who Feels Disadvantaged? Reporting Discrimination in Surveys. In: SteinerIWannerP, editors. Migrants and Expats: The Swiss Migration and Mobility Nexus [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019 [cited 2020 May 22]. pp. 221–42. (IMISCOE Research Series). Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-05671-1_9.
25.
BrinbaumYSafiMSimonP. Discrimination in France: Between Perception and Experience. In: BeaucheminCHamelCSimonP, editors. Trajectories and Origins: Survey on the Diversity of the French Population [Internet]. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 10]. pp. 195–222. (INED Population Studies). Available from: doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-76638-6_8.
26.
KrausMWOnyeadorINDaumeyerNMRuckerJMRichesonJA. The misperception of racial economic inequality. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2019 Nov 1; 14(6): 899–921.
27.
GründlerKKöllnerS. Determinants of governmental redistribution: Income distribution, development levels, and the role of perceptions. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2017 Dec 1; 45(4): 930–62.
28.
QuGSlagterBSylwesterKDoironK. Explaining the standard errors of corruption perception indices. Journal of Comparative Economics. 2019 Dec 1; 47(4): 907–20.
29.
RazafindrakotoMRoubaudF. Responding to the SDG16 measurement challenge: The governance, peace and security survey modules in africa. Global Policy. 2018; 9(3): 336–51.
30.
CalvoTRazafindrakotoMRoubaudF. Fear of the state in governance surveys? Empirical evidence from African countries. World Development. 2019 Nov 1; 123: 104609.
31.
TreismanD. What have we learned about the causes of corruption from ten years of cross-national empirical research? Annual Review of Political Science. 2007; 10(1): 211–44.
32.
LavalléeERazafindrakotoMRoubaudF. Corruption and trust in political institutions in sub-Saharan Africa. In 2008 [cited 2023 Jan 15]. p. 21. Available from: https://hal.science/hal-01765960.
33.
MorrisSDKlesnerJL. Corruption and Trust: Theoretical Considerations and Evidence From Mexico: Comparative Political Studies [Internet]. 2010 Apr 27 [cited 2020 Jun 8]; Available from: https://journals-sagepub-com-s.proxy.bu.dauphine.fr/doi/abs/10.1177/0010414010369072.
