In his memoir published in 2002, George Dantzig, who had invented the simplex algorithm to solve linear programming problems, praised Wassily Leontief as a great pioneer for proposing a large but simple matrix model that represents the interindustry input-output structure of an economy. Input-output tables, which depict the transactions of goods and services between industries, have been intensively used to prepare the U.S. economy for World War II, and to eventually liberate Europe. This paper not only revisits the early development of structural analysis but also applies it to the 1939, 1947 and 1958 U.S. input-output tables using triangulation and dispersion indices as fundamental tools. The degree of integrity represented in the Leontief inverse significantly increased as the division of work progressed in the time of war to achieve maximum productivity. The structural changes ensured a smooth transition of the American economy from peacetime to wartime, and later, the fast rebuilding of European economies that had been completely devastated during the war.
LeontiefWW. The structure of development. Scientific American. 1963; 209(3): 148-166.
2.
KirbyMW. Operations research in World War Two: Its role in RAF fighter command. Military Operations Research. 2008; 13(1): 65-72.
3.
AlbersDJReidC. An interview with George B. Dantzig: The father of linear programming. The College Mathematics Journal. 1986; 17(4): 293-314.
4.
KjeldsenTH. Operations research and mathematical programming: From war to academia - A joint venture. In: Lundsgaard HansenVGrayJ, editors, History of mathematics in Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems. Oxford, UK: Eolss Publishers; 2008. Chapter 8.
5.
DantzigGB. Linear programming. Operations Research. 2002; 50(1): 42-47.
6.
KoopmansTCReiterS. A model of transportation. In: KoopmansTC, editor, Activity analysis of production and allocation. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons; 1951. Chapter 14.
7.
BjerkholtO. Wassily Leontief and the discovery of the Input-Output approach. Memorandum, no. 18, Department of Economics, University of Oslo; 2016. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2884686
8.
TsujimuraKTsujimuraM. Roman law in the national accounting perspective: Usus, fructus and abusus. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2021; 37(2): 613-628.
9.
LeontiefWW. Die Bilanz der russischen Volkswirtschaft: Eine methodologische Untersuchung. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv. 1925; 22: 338-344.
10.
LeontiefWW. Essays in economics: Theories, facts and policies; Volume 2. White Plains, NY: M. E. Sharpe; 1977.
11.
LeontiefWW. Die Wirtschaft als Kreislauf. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik. 1928; 60: 577-623.
12.
LeontiefWW. The economy as a circular flow. Translated by Aylett R.Structural Change and Economic Dynamics. 1991; 2(1): 181-212.
13.
CarterAPPetriPA. Leontief’s contribution to economics. Journal of Policy Modeling. 1989; 11(1): 7-30.
14.
LeontiefWW. Quantitative input and output relations in the economic systems of the United States. Review of Economic Statistics. 1936; 18(3): 105-125.
15.
LeontiefWW. The structure of American economy 1919–1929. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1941.
16.
LeontiefWW. The structure of American economy 1919–1939. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1951.
17.
LeontiefWW. Interrelation of prices, output, savings, and investment. Review of Economic Statistics. 1937; 19(3): 109-132.
18.
WilsonMR. Destructive creation: American business and the winning of World War II. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press; 2016.
19.
ArnoldHH. Global mission. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers; 1949.
20.
VatterHG. The U.S. economy in World War II. New York, NY: Columbia University Press; 1985.
21.
MansfieldHC. A short history of OPA. Washington, DC: Office of Temporary Controls – Office of Price Management; 1947.
22.
Office of Price Administration. Rationing why and how. Washington DC: Office of Price Administration; 1942.
23.
GoldbergJRMoyeWT. The first hundred years of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 2235, September 1985. Available from: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/5181
24.
HansonACCornfieldJEpsteinLA. Income and spending and saving of city families in wartime. Monthly Labor Review. 1942; 55(3): 419-434.
25.
HansonACCornfieldJ. Spending and saving of the nation’s families in wartime. Monthly Labor Review. 1942; 55(4): 700-713.
26.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Family spending and saving in wartime, Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 822, 1945. Available from: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4295
27.
BradyDS. Expenditures and savings of city families in 1944. Monthly Labor Review. 1946; 62(1): 1-5.
28.
HendersonSW. Consumer spending in World War II: The forgotten consumer expenditure surveys. Monthly Labor Review. 2015; 15(8-6): 1-19.
29.
FoleyDK. (1998) An interview with Wassily Leontief. Macroeconomic Dynamics. 1998; 2(1): 116-140.
30.
KohliMC. The Leontief-BLS partnership: A new framework for measurement. Monthly Labor Review. 2001; 124(6): 29-37.
31.
LeontiefWW. Wages, profit and prices. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1946; 61(1): 26-39.
32.
ShraderCR. History of operations research in the United States army; Volume I, 1942–1962. Washington, DC: United States Army; 2006.
33.
MillerJP. Military procurement policies: World War II and today. American Economic Review. 1952; 42(2): 453-475.
34.
FremdlingR. The German industrial census of 1936: Statistics as Preparation for the War. JournalJahrbuch für Wirtschaftsgeschichte. 2005; 46(2): 155-165.
35.
KatzBM. Foreign intelligence: Research and analysis in the Office of Strategic Services. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1989.
36.
FremdlingRStaeglinR. Output, national income, and expenditure: An input–output table of Germany in 1936. European Review of Economic History. 2014; 18(4): 371-397.
37.
RostowWW. The Enemy Objective Unit: Waging economic warfare from London. Studies in Intelligence. 1991; 37(4): 35-41.
38.
WoodMKDantzigGB. Programming of interdependent activities: I General discussion. Econometrica. 1949; 17 (3/4): 193-199.
39.
DantzigGB. Programming of interdependent activities: II Mathematical model. Econometrica. 1949; 17 (3/4): 200-211.
40.
CopelandBJ, editor. Colossus: The secrets of Bletchley Park’s codebreaking computers. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.
41.
BollardA. Economists at war. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press; 2020.
42.
WhitmarshA. D-Day in photographs. Cheltenham, UK: The History Press; 2009.
43.
KindlebergerCP. Essays in history: Financial, economic, personal. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press; 1999.
44.
Bureau of the Census. Historical statistics of the United States, Colonial times to 1957. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1960. Available from: https://www.census.gov/library/publications/1960/compendia/hist_stats_colonial-1957.html
45.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Handbook of Labor Statistics, 1950 ed., Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 1016, 1951.
46.
United Nations Statistical Division. Handbook of Input-Output table: Compilation and analysis. New York, NY: United Nations. 1999. Available from: https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/370160
47.
LeontiefWW. Computational problems arising in connection with economic analysis of interindustrial relationships. In: Harvard Computation Laboratory. Proceedings of a symposium on large-scale digital calculating machinery. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1948. p. 169-175.
48.
RasmussenPN. Studies in inter-sectoral relations. København, DK: Einar Harcks Forlag; 1956.
49.
HirschmanAO. The strategy of economic development. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1958.
50.
SonisMHewingsJDGuoJ. A new image of classical key sector analysis: Minimum information decomposition of the Leontief inverse. Economic Systems Research. 2000; 12(3): 401-423.
51.
CheneryHBWatanabeT. International comparison of the structure of production. Econometrica. 1958; 26(4): 487-521.
52.
BernsteinDS. Matrix mathematics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2005.
53.
LeontiefWW. Exports, imports, domestic output, and employment. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1946; 60(2): 171-193.
54.
LeontiefWWBrodyA. Money-flow computations. Economic Systems Research. 1993; 5(3): 225-233.
55.
MitchellWC. The flow of payments: A preliminary survey of concepts and data. A memorandum. New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1944.
56.
CopelandMA. Tracing money flows through the United States economy. American Economic Review. 1947; 37(2): 31-49.
57.
CopelandMA. Social accounting for moneyflows. Accounting Review. 1949; 24(3): 254-264.
58.
CopelandMA. A Study of moneyflow in the United States. New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1952.
59.
TsujimuraKTsujimuraM. (2019) Flow of funds analysis: A combination of Roman law, accounting and economics. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2019; 35(4): 691-702.
60.
LeontiefWW. Output, employment, consumption, and investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 1944; 58(2): 290-314.
61.
HornerP. Air force salutes project SCOOP. Operations Research and the Management Sciences Today. 2007; 34(6). doi: 10.1287/orms.2007.06.15
62.
KohliMC. Leontief and the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, 1941–1954: Developing a framework for measurement. History of Political Economy. 2001; 33(Annual Supplement): 190-212.
EvansWDHoffenbergM. The interindustry relations study for 1947. Review of Economics and Statistics. 1952; 34(2): 97-142.
65.
SoltasE. Original Input-Output table from 1947 interindustry relations study. Harvard Dataverse. 2019. doi: 10.7910/DVN/MMHRU7.
66.
HorowitzKJPlantingMA. Concepts and methods of the U.S. Input-Output Accounts. Washington, DC: Bureau of Economic Analysis; 2006.
67.
National Accounts Review Committee. The national economic accounts of the United States: Review, appraisal, and recommendations. New York, NY: National Bureau of Economic Research; 1958.
68.
Office of Business Economics. The transactions table of the 1958 Input-Output study and revised direct and total requirements data. Survey of Current Business. 1965; 45(9): 33-49. Available from: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/46/item/9721/toc/321275?start_page=35
69.
Office of Business Economics. The Input-Output structure of the United States economy: 1947. Washington, DC: Department of Commerce; 1970.
70.
HalberstamD. The fifties. New York, NY: Villard Books; 1993.
71.
MarlingKA. As seen on TV: The visual culture of everyday life in the 1950s. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1994.
72.
KaszynskiW. The American highway. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company; 2012.
73.
WolmarC. The great railroad revolution. New York, NY: Public Affairs; 2012.
74.
DanielsR. Trains across the continent, Bloomington. IN: Indiana University Press; 2000.
75.
SakumaITsujimuraMTsujimuraK. The value added and operating surplus deflators for industries: The right price indicators that should be used to calculate the real interest rates. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2018; 34(2): 235-253.
76.
DrammJR. History of forest products utilization and marketing assistance. Washington, DC: Department of Agriculture; 2006.
77.
Bureau of Labor Statistics. Construction in the war years 1942–1945. Bulletin of the United States Bureau of Labor Statistics, No. 915, 1948. Available from: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/4358
78.
O’CallaghanTJ. Ford in the service of America: Mass production for the military during the world wars. Jefferson, NC: McFarland & Company; 2009.
79.
Subcommittee on Study of Monopoly Power. The iron and steel industry: Report of the subcommittee on study of monopoly power of the committee on the judiciary house of representatives, eighty-first congress, second edition, Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office; 1950.
80.
HurtD. American agriculture: A brief history. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press; 2002.
81.
YoungWHYoungNK. The 1950s. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 2004.
82.
HendricksN. Daily life in 1950s America. Santa Barbara, CA: Greenwood Press; 2019.
83.
KnightK. Rationing in the Second World War. Brimscombe Port, UK: The History Press; 2007.
84.
SickelsR. The 1940s. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 2004.
85.
OxobyM. The 1990s. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press; 2003.
86.
HeinrichT. Warship builders: An industrial history of U.S. Naval shipbuilding 1922–1945. Annapolis, MD: Naval Institute Press; 2020.
87.
KlingamanWK. The darkest year: The American homefront 1941–1942. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press; 2019.
88.
FunderburgAC. Sundae best: A history of soda fountains. Bowling Green, OH: Bowling Green State University Popular Press; 2001.
89.
HelmstädterE. The hierarchical structure of interindustrial transactions. In: United Nations Industrial Development Organization, editor. International comparisons of interindustry data. New York, NY: United Nations; 1969. p. 231-43
90.
TwedeDSelkeSEMKamdemDPShiresD. Cartons, crates and corrugated board: Handbook of paper and packaging technology. Lancaster, PA: DEStech Publications; 2015.
91.
SnowR. Disney’s Land: Walt Disney and the invention of the amusement park that changed the world. New York, NY: Scribner; 2019.
92.
SmothersMC. Walt’s Disneyland. Los Angeles, CA: Disney Editions; 2021.
93.
HermanA. Freedom’s forge. New York, NY: Random House; 2012.
94.
WasserSFDolfmanML. BLS and the Marshall plan: The forgotten story. Monthly Labor Review. 2005; 128(6): 44-52.
95.
WickensAJ. In memoriam: Isador Lubin 1896-1978. American Statistician. 1979; 33(4): 207.
96.
LeontiefWW. What hope for the economy? New York Times. 1982; August 12 issue. Available from: https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1982/08/12/what-hope-for-the-economy/
97.
HolmM. The Marshall Plan: A New Deal for Europe. New York, NY: Routledge; 2017.
98.
PriceHB. Marshall Plan and its meaning. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1955.
99.
TarnoffC. The Marshall Plan: Design, accomplishments, and significance. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service; 2018. Available from: https://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc1156806/
