RadermacherWJ. Governing-by-the-numbers – reflections on the future of official statistics in a digital and globalised society. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2019; 35: 519-37.
2.
MeyerRMadrigalAC. Why the Pandemic Experts Failed – We’re still thinking about pandemic data in the wrong ways. The Atlantic. 2021 March 15, 2021; Sect. Science.
3.
RadermacherWJ. Medium [Internet]. Policy D, ed: Medium. 2021. [cited 2021]. Available from: https://medium.com/data-policy/official-statistics-language-for-public-discourse-part-1-294d31e56b6e.
4.
RadermacherWJ. Medium [Internet]. Policy D, ed: Medium. 2021. [cited 2021]. Available from: https://medium.com/data-policy/official-statistics-language-for-public-discourse-part-2-b9e912621523.
5.
Rancourt E. The scientific approach as a transparency enabler throughout the data lifecycle. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2019; 35(4): 549-58.
6.
Alleva GBaldacci EFalorsi PD. Methodological, technological and design challenges in the new multisource statistics ecosystem. Statistical Journal of the IAOS. 2021; 37: 245-54.
7.
CookL. Evidence, accountability and legitimacy: the oversight of child welfare services. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36(2): 365-73.
8.
LehtonenM. The multiple faces of trust in statistics and indicators: a case for healthy mistrust and distrust. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2019; 35(4): 539-48.
9.
RadermacherWJ. Guidelines on indicator methodology: a mission impossible? Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2021; 37: 205-17.
10.
KenettRSMagginoF. Techniques for analyzing and presenting official statistics indicators. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2021; 36(2).
11.
UmbachG. Of numbers, narratives and challenges: data as evidence in 21st century policy-making. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36: 1043-55.
12.
BartlWPapilloudC. Measuring “equivalent living conditions”? The use of indicators in german federal spatial planning. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36(2): 375-99.
13.
PrutschMJ. Science, numbers and politics in a “post-truth” world. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36: 1035-41.
14.
Diaz-BoneRHorvathK. Official statistics, big data and civil society. Introducing the approach of “economics of convention” for understanding the rise of new data worlds and their implications. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2021; 37: 219-28.
15.
KönigAPickarKStankiewiczJHondrilaK. Can citizen science complement official data sources that serve as evidence-base for policies and practice to improve water quality? Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2021; 37: 189-204.
16.
Carranza-TorresJA. How can traditional statistical relationships be redefined through citizen to government partnerships? Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2021; 37: 229-43.
17.
PullingerJ. Trust in official statistics and why it matters’. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36(2): 343-6.
18.
HabermannHLouisT. Can the fundamental principles of official statistics and the political process co-exist? Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36(2): 347-53.
19.
PrévostJ-G. Past, present and future of canadian statistics. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36(2): 355-63.
20.
BodinJ-L. A view on 50 years of life of the ISI: with a focus on ISI relations with official statistics. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36(2): 303-8.
21.
RadermacherWJ. Governing by the numbers – editorial. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36(2): 341-2.
22.
RadermacherWJ. Governing by the numbers – editorial. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36(4): 1033-4.
23.
RadermacherWJ. Governing by the numbers. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2021; 37: 185-7.
24.
Ammicht QuinnR. Artificial intelligence and the role of ethics. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2021; 37: 75-7.
25.
Open Data PolicyLab.,The Third Wave of Open Data Toolkit, New York: TheGovLab – NYU Tandon School of Engineering; 2021.
26.
The World Bank. World Development Report 2021 – Data for Better Lives. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group; 2021.
27.
DaviesW. How statistics lost their power – and why we should fear what comes next. The Guardian. 2017.
28.
DangH-AHPullingerJSerajuddinUStacyB. Statistical Performance Indicators and Index – A New Tool to Measure Country Statistical Capacity. Washington D.C.: World Bank Group; 2021.
29.
HeXLinX. Challenges and Opportunities in Statistics and Data Science: Ten Research Areas. Harvard Data Science Review [Internet] [Internet]. 2020 2021 Apr 08. Available from: https://hdsr.mitpress.mit.edu/pub/da99kl2q.
30.
MacDonaldAL. Of science and statistics: the scientific basis of the census. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36: 17-34.
31.
PorterTM. Trust in numbers: the pursuit of objectivity in science and public life. Princeton, N.J.; Chichester: Princeton University Press; 1995.
32.
GrohmannH. Vom theoretischen Konstrukt zum statistischen Begriff – Das Adäquationsproblem. Allgemeines Statistisches Archiv. 1985; Allg. Statist. Archiv 69: 1-15.
33.
DesrosièresA. The Politics of Large Numbers – A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press; 1998.
34.
Diaz-BoneR. Convention theory, classification and quantification. Historical Social Research.2016; 41(2): 48-71.
35.
BoxGEP. Science and Statistics. Journal of the American Statistical Association.1976; 71(356 (Dec., 1976)): 791-9.
36.
RadermacherWJ. Official Statistics 4.0 – Verified Facts for People in the 21st Century. Heidelberg: Springer Nature Switzerland AG; imprint Springer; 2020.
37.
von der LippeP, ed. The political role of official statistics in the former German Democratic Republic. ISI World Statistics Congress 2003; 2003; Berlin.
38.
SeltzerW. Politics and Statistics: Independence, Dependence, or Interaction? In: Analysis UDoEaSIaP, editor. New York: UN; 1994.
39.
PullingerJ. Misuse of statistics: time to speak out. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2021; 37: 79-84.
40.
GeorgiouAV. The manipulation of official statistics as corruption and ways of understanding it. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2021; 37: 85-105.
41.
O’ConnorMFaucheuxSGans CombeCPetousiV. Responsibility within without: the challenges of misconduct and quality assurance in scientific research. 2018.
42.
PemsteinDMarquardtKLTzelgovEWangY-tMedzihorskyJKrusellJ, et al. Variable Analysis for Cross-National and Cross-Temporal Expert-Coded Data. V-Dem Institute DoPS, University of Gothenburg, editor. Gothenburg: University of Gothenburg; 2019. 34 p.
43.
SchüllerK. Future Skills: a Framework for Data Literacy. Working Paper No. 53. Berlin: Hochschulforum Digitalisierung; 2020 July 2020.