Most discussions on data quality overlook the legal framework within which data are collected. This paper examines India’s Census Act, 1948 that provides the legal framework for conducting population censuses. The Act stipulates punishment for interfering with the process of enumeration but the punitive provisions have not been invoked to deal with cases of widespread manipulation of census. Major instances of manipulation were reported in 1951 and 2001 after the government introduced additional punitive measures in 1948 and 1994, respectively. The paper identifies the structural flaws of the Census Act, 1948 vis-à-vis manipulation. It compares the Act with other Indian laws on the collection of statistics and census laws of other common law countries. It shows that fines are very small compared to per capita income in most countries and yet violators are rarely fined. The paper uses simple games to explain why the punitive provisions might be redundant and suggests that the problem of interference with government statistics can possibly be addressed without recourse to law. The insights drawn from the games are examined in light of the experience of Nagaland and other states of India where census statistics were affected by widespread manipulation in the recent decades.
AbramsonD. Identity counts: the Soviet legacy and the census in Uzbekistan. In KertzerD.I. and ArelD. (Eds.), Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 176-201.
2.
AdepojuA. Military Rule and Population Issues in Nigeria. African Affairs.1981; 80(318): 29-47.
3.
AgrawalAKumarV. An Investigation into Changes in Nagaland’s Population between 1971 and 2011. IEG Working Paper No. 316. Delhi: Institute of Economic Growth. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from http//iegindia.org/upload/pdf/wp316.pdf, 2012.
4.
AgrawalAKumarV. Nagaland’s Demographic Somersault. Economic and Political Weekly.2013; 48(39): 69-74.
5.
AgrawalAKumarV. Infirmities in NSSO Data for Nagaland. Economic and Political Weekly.2014; 49(12): 20-22.
6.
AgrawalAKumarV. NSSO Surveys along India’s Periphery: Data Quality and Its Implications, Working Paper No. 9, Azim Premji University Working Paper Series. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from https//azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/SitePages/pdf/APU-173194-Working-Paper-Series-9-15.11.2017.pdf, 2017.
7.
AgrawalAKumarV. Community, Numbers, and Politics in Nagaland, In WoutersJ.J.P. and TunyiZ. (Eds.), Democracy in Nagaland: Tribes, Traditions, and Tensions. Kohima: Highlander Books, 2018, pp. 57-84.
8.
AgrawalAKumarV. Numbers in India’s Periphery: The Political Economy of Government Statistics. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press, 2020.
9.
AgrawalAKumarV. Anomalies in Manipur’s Census, 1991–2011. Azim Premji University Working Paper Series No 16. Bengaluru: Azim Premji University. Retrieved 20 June 2020 from https//azimpremjiuniversity.edu.in/SitePages/pdf/APU_201165_Working_Paper_Series_16.pdf, 2020.
10.
AhmedI. The 1947 Partition of Punjab: Arguments Put Forth before the Punjab Boundary Commission by the Parties Involved. In TalbotI. and SinghG. (Eds.), Region and Partition: Bengal, Punjab and the Partition of the Subcontinent. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 1999, pp. 116-167.
11.
AhonsiBA. Deliberate Falsification and Census Data in Nigeria. African Affairs.1988; 87(349): 553-562.
12.
AlukoSA. How Many Nigerians? An Analysis of Nigeria’s Census Problems, 1901–63. Journal of Modern African Studies. 1965; 3(3): 371-392.
13.
Assam Tribune. PC keeps mum on population growth. 2 April. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from http//www.assamtribune.com/scripts/mdetails.asp?id=apr0211/at09, 2011.
14.
AungSY. Still No Date for Release of Census Findings on Ethnic Populations. The Irrawaddy, 21 February. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from https//www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/still-no-date-release-census-findings-ethnic-populations.html, 2018.
15.
BasuK. The Republic of Beliefs: A New Approach to ‘Law and Economics’. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 7259. Retrieved 21 June 2019 from http//www.mospi.gov.in/report-dr-rangarajan-commission, 2015.
16.
BhagatRB. Role of Census in Racial and Ethnic Construction: US, British and Indian Censuses. Economic and Political Weekly.2003; 38(8): 686-691.
17.
BookmanMZ. The demographic struggle for power: the political economy of demographic engineering in the modem world. Oxon: Routledge, 2013.
18.
BradshawST. Death, Taxes, and Census Litigation: Do the Equal Protection and Apportionment Clauses Guarantee a Constitutional Right to Census Accuracy? George Washington Law Review.1996; 64(2): 379-413.
19.
BrassPR. Language, Religion and Politics in North India. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1974.
20.
DurrJ-M. The balance between governance support needed and influence avoided: The case of population censuses. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2020; 36(1): 211-215.
21.
Economic Times. Consumer spend survey won’t be released: Ministry. November 16 Retrieved 29 June 2020 from https//economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/economy/indicators/consumer-expenditure-survey-not-to-be-released-due-to-data-quality-issues-government/articleshow/72074837.cms, 2019.
22.
Economist. ‘What’s in a Number: Why Ethiopia Has Postponed Its Census’. 29 March 2019.
23.
EllicksonRC. Of Coase and Cattle: Dispute Resolution Among Neighbors in Shasta County. Stanford Law Review.1986; 38(3): 623-687.
24.
GillMS. Politics of Population Census Data in India. Economic and Political Weekly.2007; 42(3): 241-249.
25.
GlaisterD. 120 people convicted for not filling in census form. Guardian, 27 January. Retrieved 22 August 2017 from https//www.theguardian.com/uk/2012/jan/27/120-convicted-census-forms-2011, 2012.
26.
GöderleW. Administration, Science, and the State: The 1869 Population Census in Austria-Hungary. Austrian History Yearbook.2016; 47: 61-88.
27.
GoldinDB. Number Wars: A Decade of Census Litigation. University of Toledo Law Review.2000; 32(1): 1-17.
28.
GoI/Government of India. nd1. Report of the National Statistical Commission. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from http//www.mospi.gov.in/report-dr-rangarajan-commission.
29.
GoI/Government of India. nd2. ‘Census of India 2011: Instruction Manual for Updating of Abridged Houselist and Filling up of the Household Schedule’. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from http//censusindia.gov.in/2011-Documents/Updating%20of%20Abridged%20Houselist-English.pdf, 2011.
30.
GoI/Government of India. nd3. “Census of India 1981 Series-13, Part 1A, Manipur Administration Report – Enumeration”. Imphal: Director of Census Operations, Manipur, 1981.
31.
GoI/Government of India. nd4. “Census of India 1971. Series 8-Jammu; & Kashmir Administration Report on Enumeration, Jammu & Kashmir.” Srinagar: Director of Census Operations, Jammu & Kashmir, 1971.
32.
GoI/Government of India. “Census of India 1951, Volume I India, Part IA - Report”, New Delhi: Registrar General of India, 1953.
33.
GoI/Government of India. Census of India, Paper No. 6, Estimation of Birth and Death Rates in India during 1941–50–1951 Census. New Delhi: Census Commissioner, 1954.
34.
GoI/Government of India. Census of India 1961, Volume VI – Part VIII – A, Jammu and Kashmir, Administrative Report (Enumeration). Srinagar: Superintendent of Census Operations, Jammu & Kashmir, 1963.
35.
GoI/Government of India. “Census of India. 1961, Nagaland, Part II-A, General Population Tables.” Kohima: Superintendent of Census Operations, Nagaland, 1966.
36.
GoI/Government of India. “Census of India, 1981 Series-8 Jammu & Kashmir Part I-A Administration Report-Enumeration”. Srinagar: Director of Census Operations, Jammu & Kashmir, 1985.
37.
GoI/Government of India. ‘Census of India 2001, The First Report on Religion Data’. New Delhi: Registrar General and Census Commissioner of India, 2004.
38.
GoI/Government of India. Manual on Vital Statistics. New Delhi: Central Statistical Organisation, 2009.
39.
GoI/Government of India. Census of India, 2011. Provisional Population Totals, Paper 1 of 2011, Series 1 India. Office of the Registrar General & Census Commissioner, India, Ministry of Home Affairs, New Delhi, 2011.
40.
GoI/Government of India. Report of the Committee on Legislative Measures in Statistical Matters as Adopted by the National Statistical Commission. New Delhi: National Statistical Commission Secretariat. Retrieved 20; June 2019 from http//www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/committee_reports/legislative_measure_stat_matter_18jan12.pdf, 2011.
41.
GoI/Government of India. Census of India 2011, Provisional Population Totals, Paper 1 of 2011, Series 14 Nagaland. Kohima: Directorate of Census Operations Nagaland, 2011.
42.
GoN/Government of Nagaland. Evaluation Report on Registration of Births and Deaths in Nagaland. Publication No. 50. Kohima: Directorate of Evaluation. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from http//14.139.60.153/bitstream/123456789/9522/1/Pub50.pdf, 2003.
43.
GoN/Government of Nagaland. Resolutions adopted in the Consultative Meeting on Census–2011 held at the Zonal Council Hall, Kohima, on 30th September, 2009. (Copy obtained from the Director of Census Operations, Nagaland), 2009.
44.
GuhaS. The Politics of Identity and Enumeration in India c. 1600–1990. Comparative Studies in Society and History. 2003; 45(1): 148-167.
45.
GuilmotoCZRajanSI. Fertility at the District Level in India: Lessons from the 2011 Census. Economic and Political Weekly.2013; 48(23): 59-70.
46.
HamsherD. Counted out Twice – Power, Representation & (and) the Usual Residence Rule in the Enumeration of Prisoners: A State-Based Approach to Correcting Flawed Census Data. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology.2005; 96(1): 299-328.
47.
HeineKErichO. Towards a political economy of statistics. Statistical Journal of the IAOS.2016; 32: 201-209.
48.
HorowitzDL. Ethnic Groups in Conflict. Second edition. Berkeley: University of California Press, 2000.
49.
JanusT. The Political Economy of Fertility. Public Choice.2013; 155(3-4): 493-505.
50.
JervenM. Poor Numbers: How We Are Misled by African Development Statistics and What to Do about It. Ithaca NY: Cornell University Press, 2013.
51.
KarmakarR. Census weapon for battle in NE. Hindustan Times, 22 April 2010.
52.
KertzerDIArelD. Censuses, Identity Formation, and the Struggle for Political Power. In KertzerD.I. and ArelD. (Eds.), Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002, pp. 1-42.
53.
KulkarniS. Distortion of Census Data on Scheduled Tribes. Economic and Political Weekly.1991; 26(5): 205-208.
54.
KumarV. Use of statistics in politics not new in India. Deccan Herald, 5 March 2015, p. 11.
55.
KumarVAgrawalA. “Winning Censuses”. Annual Meeting of the European Public Choice Society (C4 Empirics: Elections), University of Freiburg, Germany, 30 March–2 April 2016.
56.
LaithangbamI. Naga tribal council plans blockade. The Hindu: 13 November. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from https//www.thehindu.com/2004/11/13/stories/2004111301591300.htm, 2004.
57.
MaheshwariSR. The Census Administration under the Raj and After. New Delhi: Concept Publishing Company, 1996.
58.
NatarajanD. Census of India 1971, Intercensal Growth of Population: Analysis of Extracts from All India Census Reports, Census Centenary Monograph No. 3. New Delhi: Office of the Registrar General, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of India, 1972.
59.
NENA/North East News Agency. Political parties for maintenance of assembly status quo. 9 August. Retrieved 28 January 2019 from https//www.oneindia.com/2007/08/09/political-parties-for-maintenance-of-assembly-status-quo-1186648886.html, 2007.
60.
OkoloA. ‘The Nigerian Census: Problems and Prospects’. The American Statistician.1999; 53(4): 321-5.
61.
Koch-WeserIN. The Reliability of China’s Economic Data: An Analysis of National Output. U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Staff Research Project, 2013.
62.
PrewittK. Politics and Science in Census Taking. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; Washington, D.C.: Population Reference Bureau, 2003.
63.
PrewittK. The US Decennial Census: Politics and Political Science. Annual Review of Political Science. 2010; 13: 237-254.
64.
PurtillJ. What fine? No-one yet prosecuted over 2016 Census ‘boycott’. Australian Broadcasting Corporation, 02 March. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from https//www.abc.net.au/triplej/programs/hack/no-one-yet-prosecuted-over-2016-census-boycott/8315898, 2017.
65.
ReamerA. “Census: Planning Ahead for 2020, Testimony of Andrew Reamer, Research Professor George Washington Institute of Public Policy, George Washington University, Subcommittee on Federal Financial Management, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs, US. Senate.” Washington, D.C. 18 July. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from https//www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/CHRG-112shrg76063/pdf/CHRG-112shrg76063.pdf, 2012.
66.
RioN. Speeches of Neiphiu Rio, Chief Minister, Nagaland, 2010. Kohima: Directorate of Information and Public Relations, Government of Nagaland, 2011.
67.
RutsaX. Nagaland census 2011 begins. Eastern Panorama, 5 July. Retrieved 20 June 2019 from http//www.easternpanorama.in/index.php/component/content/article/59-2010/july/1065-nagaland-census-2011-begins, 2010.
SaxenaNC. Socio Economic Caste Census Has It Ignored Too Many Poor Households? Economic and Political Weekly.2015; 50(30): 14-17.
70.
SwamiP. “The Game of Numbers’. Frontline 17(21). Accessed on 30 June 2019. Retrieved 29 June 2020 from https//frontline.thehindu.com/other/article30255135.ece, 2000.
71.
VermaAK. Tribal ‘Annihilation’ and ‘Upsurge’ in Uttar Pradesh. Economic and Political Weekly.2013; 48(51): 52-59.
72.
WeissAM. ‘Much Ado about Counting: The Conflict over Holding a Census in Pakistan’. Asian Survey.1999; 39(4): 679-93.
73.
WoutersJJP. In the Shadows of Naga Insurgency: Tribes, State, and Violence in Northeast India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press, 2018.
