We describe and analyze a method that blends records from both observed and synthetic microdata into public-use tabulations on establishment statistics. The resulting tables use synthetic data only in potentially sensitive cells. We describe different algorithms, and present preliminary results when applied to the Census Bureau's Business Dynamics Statistics and Synthetic Longitudinal Business Database, highlighting accuracy and protection afforded by the method when compared to existing public-use tabulations (with suppressions).
HaltiwangerJ., JarminR. and MirandaJ., Jobs Created from Business Startups in the United States [BDS Brief]; 2008. Available from: https://www.census.gov/ces/pdf/BDS_Stat Brief1_Jobs_Created.pdf.
2.
RubinD.B., Discussion of Statistical Disclosure Limitation, Journal of Official Statistics9(2) (1993), 461-468.
3.
LittleR.J.A., Statistical Analysis of Masked Data, Journal of Official Statistics9(2) (1993), 407-426.
4.
MachanavajjhalaA., KiferD., AbowdJ.M., GehrkeJ. and VilhuberL., Privacy: Theory meets practice on the map, International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), 2008.
5.
RodríguezR., Synthetic Data Disclosure Control for American Community Survey Group Quarters [presentation], 2007.
6.
HawalaS., Producing partially synthetic data to avoid disclosure, in: Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings. American Statistical Association, 2008. Available from: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/y2008/Files/301018.pdf.
7.
ZayatzL., LuceroJ., MassellP. and RamanayakeA., Disclosure Avoidance for Census 2010 and American Community Survey Five-year Tabular Data Products, in: Proceedings of the Joint Statistical Meetings. American Statistical Association; 2009. Available from: http://www.amstat.org/sections/srms/proceedings/y2010/Files/307156_57962.pdf.
8.
AbowdJ.M., GittingsK., McKinneyK.L., StephensB.E., VilhuberK. and WoodcockS., Dynamically consistent noise infusion and partially synthetic data as confidentiality protection measures for related time-series, Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology, 2012. Available from: http://www.fcsm.gov/events/papers2012.html.
9.
SakshaugJ.W. and RaghunathanT.E., Synthetic Data For Small Area Estimation In The American Community Survey, Center for Economic Studies, U.S. Census Bureau; 2013, 13-19. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/p/cen/wpaper/13-19.html.
10.
DrechslerJ., New data dissemination approaches in old Europe synthetic datasets for a German establishment survey, Journal of Applied Statistics39(2) (2012), 243-265. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02664763.2011.584523.
11.
KinneyS.K., ReiterJ.P., ReznekA.P., MirandaJ., JarminR.S. and AbowdJ.M., Towards Unrestricted Public Use Business Microdata: The Synthetic Longitudinal Business Database, International Statistical Review79(3) (2011) 362-384. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/a/bla/istatr/v79y2011i 3p362-384.html.
12.
AbowdJ.M., StinsonM. and BenedettoG., Final Report to the Social Security Administration on the SIPP/SSA/IRS Public Use File Project, U.S. Census Bureau; 2006. Available from: http://www2.vrdc.cornell.edu/news/?p=308.
13.
JarminR., LouisT.A. and MirandaJ., Expanding the Role of Synthetic Data at the U.S. Census Bureau. U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies; 2014, 14-10.
14.
HaltiwangerJ.C., JarminR.S. and MirandaJ., Who Creates Jobs? Small vs. Large vs. Young. National Bureau of Economic Research; 2010. 16300. Available from: http://www. nber.org/papers/w16300.
15.
HurstE. and PugsleyB.W., What do Small Businesses Do?Brookings Papers on Economic Activity43(2) (2011), 73-142. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/a/bin/bpeajo/v43y2011i2011-02p73-142.html.
16.
DeckerR., HaltiwangerJ., JarminR. and MirandaJ., The Role of Entrepreneurship in US Job Creation and Economic Dynamism, Journal of Economic Perspectives28(3) (2014), 3-24. Available from: http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi= 10.1257/jep.28.3.3.
17.
PugsleyB.W. and ŞahinA., Grown-up business cycles, FRB of New York; 2015. 707, revised Sept 2015.
18.
U S Census Bureau. Synthetic LBD Beta Version 2.0. Washington, DC and Ithaca, NY, USA: U.S. Census Bureau and Cornell University, Synthetic Data Server [distributor]; 2011. Available from: http://www2.vrdc.cornell.edu/news/data/lbd-synthetic-data/.
19.
GittingsR.K., Essays in labor economics and synthetic data methods [Ph.D.]. Cornell University, 2009.
20.
DrechslerJ. and ReiterJ.P., Sampling With Synthesis: A New Approach for Releasing Public Use Census Microdata, Journal of the American Statistical Association105(492) (2010), 1347-1357. Available from: http://ideas.repec.org/a/bes/jnlasa/v105i492y2010p1347-1357.html.
21.
MirandaJ. and VilhuberL., Using Partially Synthetic Data to Replace Suppression in the Business Dynamics Statistics: Early Results, in: Privacy in Statistical Databases, J. Domingo-Ferrer, ed., vol. 8744 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Springer International Publishing; 2014, pp. 232-242. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11257-2_18.
22.
U S Census Bureau. Business Dynamics Statistics 2012 release. Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau [distributor]; 2014. Available from: http://www.census.gov/ces/dataproduc ts/bds/data.html.
23.
KinneyS.K. and ReiterJ., SynLBD: providing firm characteristics on synthetic establishment data, World Statistics Conference; 2013.
24.
KinneyS.K., ReiterJ. and MirandaJ., Improving the Synthetic Longitudinal Business Database. U.S. Census Bureau, Center for Economic Studies; 2014, 14-12.
25.
EvansT., ZayatzL. and SlantaJ., Using Noise for Disclosure Limitation of Establishment Tabular Data, Journal of Official Statistics. 1998 December.
26.
AbowdJ.M., StephensB.E., VilhuberL., AnderssonF., McKinneyK.L., RoemerM. et al., The LEHD Infrastructure Files and the Creation of the Quarterly Workforce Indicators, in: Dunne T, Jensen JB, Roberts MJ, editors. Timothy Dunne, J. Bradford Jensen, and Mark J. Roberts. University of Chicago Press, 2009.
27.
AbowdJ.M. and VilhuberL., Synthetic Data Server; 2010. Available from: http://www.vrdc.cornell.edu/sds/.
28.
KarrA.F., KohnenC.N., OganianA., ReiterJ.P. and SanilA.P., A Framework for Evaluating the Utility of Data Altered to Protect Confidentiality, The American Statistician60(3) (2006), 1-9.
29.
HolanS.H., TothD., FerreiraM.A.R. and KarrA.F., Bayesian Multiscale Multiple Imputation With Implications for Data Confidentiality, Journal of the American Statistical Association105(490) (2010), 564-577. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1198/jasa.2009.ap08629.
