Abstract
As state institutions are implementing increasingly sophisticated computerized systems, tremendous amounts of data are being constantly generated. This has opened up a wide range of possibilities for the production of statistics that are relevant to virtually all sectors of society. However, despite a large consensus regarding the importance of such statistics, little research examining the specific quality issues associated to administrative data is available. Here, we report the results of two studies conducted by the Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention evaluating the quality of the raw data used for the official crime statistics in Sweden. Our analyses revealed that the Police assigned in average 12 percent of the crime codes incorrectly, with severe consequences for the final statistics. Furthermore, different interpretations and over-usage of a particular code have rendered national statistics on police decisions nearly unusable. Based on our observations regarding the causes of these errors, we propose recommendations likely to be applicable to both users and producers of statistics based on administrative sources. With official statistics being at the backbone of evaluations and strategic decisions, we strongly believe that investigating and continuously improving the quality of the raw data is a must for all the national statistical agencies.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.