Scaling effects on the creep crack growth behaviour are investigated by analyzing the results of compact tension (CT) tests on different-sized notched steel specimens appearing in the literature. Creep crack growth rate data are correlated to the elastic stress-intensity factor in terms of a Paris-type law, da∕dt = C0Kq, where C0 turns out to be a crack-size dependent coefficient of proportionality. Considering specimens with the same loading configuration (CT) and the same thickness, the observed crack-size effect on the creep crack growth rate is discussed on the basis of self-similarity considerations, and geometrically interpreted in terms of fractal tortuosity of the crack profile. A size-independent formulation of the creep crack growth law correlating renormalized quantities is finally deduced and confirmed by the experimental results.
BarenblattG.I., Scaling, Self-similarity and Intermediate Asymptotics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1996.
2.
BarenblattG.I., Scaling phenomena in fatigue and fracture, International Journal of Fracture138 (2006), 19–35.
3.
BarenblattG.I. and BotvinaL.R., Incomplete self-similarity of fatigue in the linear range of fatigue crack growth, Fatigue and Fracture of Engineering Materials and Structures3 (1980), 193–202.
4.
BettinsonA.D.O’DowdN.P. and NikbinK., Two parameter characterization of crack tip fields under creep conditions, in: Proceedings of the IUTAM Symposium, 3–7 April 2000, Nagoya, Japan2001, pp. 95–104.
5.
BuckinghamE., Model experiments and the forms of empirical equations, ASME Transactions37 (1915), 263–296.
6.
BuddenP. and AinsworthR., The effect of constraint on creep fracture assessment, International Journal of Fracture97(1–4) (1999), 237–247.
7.
CarpinteriA., Fractal nature of material microstructure and size effects on apparent mechanical properties, Mechanics of Materials18 (1994), 89–101, Internal Report, Laboratory of Fracture Mechanics, Politecnico di Torino, N. 1/92, 1992.
8.
CarpinteriA., Scaling laws and renormalization groups for strength and toughness of disordered materials, International Journal of Solids and Structures31 (1994), 291–302.
9.
CarpinteriA. and MontagnoliF., Scaling and fractality in fatigue crack growth: Implications to Paris’ law and Wöhler’s curve, Procedia Structural Integrity14 (2019), 957–963.
10.
CarpinteriA. and MontagnoliF., Scaling and fractality in sub-critical fatigue crack growth: Crack-size effects on Paris’ law and fatigue threshold, Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures43 (2020), 788–801.
11.
CarpinteriA. and PaggiM., A unified fractal approach for the interpretation of the anomalous scaling laws in fatigue and comparison with existing models, International Journal of Fracture161 (2010), 41–52.
12.
CarpinteriA. and SpagnoliA., A fractal analysis of size effect on fatigue crack growth, International Journal of Fatigue26 (2004), 125–133.
13.
CherepanovG.P., The propagation of cracks in a continuous medium, Journal of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics31(3) (1967), 503–512.
14.
FernándezR.BrunoG. and González-DoncelG., Fractal nature of aluminum alloys substructures under creep and its implications, Journal of Applied Physics123 (2018), 145108-1–145108-8.
15.
GarofaloF., Fundamentals of Creep and Creep-Rupture in Metals1965.
16.
GroverP.S. and SaxenaA., Creep crack growth in power plant materials, Sadhana20(1) (1995), 53–85.
17.
HarperM.P. and EllisonE.G., The use of C* parameter in predicting creep crack propagation rates, Journal of Strain Analysis12(3) (1977), 167–179.
18.
HarrisonC.B. and SandorG.N., High-Temperature crack growth in low-cycle fatigue, Engineering Fracture Mechanics3 (1971), 403–420.
19.
HutchinsonJ.W., Singular behaviour at the end of a tensile crack in a hardening material, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids16(1) (1968), 13–31.
20.
LandesJ.D. and BegleyJ.A., A fracture mechanics approach to creep crack growth, vol. 590, ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1976, pp. 128–148.
21.
MandelbrotB.B.PassojaD.E. and PaullayA.J., Fractal character of fracture surfaces of metals, Nature308 (1984), 721–722.
22.
NicholsonR.D. and FormbyC.L., The validity of various fracture mechanics methods at creep temperatures, International Journal of Fracture11(4) (1975), 595–604.
23.
NikbinK., Justification for meso-scale modelling in quantifying constraint during creep crack growth, Materials Science and Engineering: A365(1–2) (2004), 107–113.
24.
NikbinK.M.WebsterG.A. and TurnerC.E., Relevance of nonlinear fracture mechanics to creep cracking, vol. 601, ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1976, pp. 47–62.
25.
NikbinK.M.WebsterG.A. and TurnerC.E., A comparison of methods of correlating creep crack growth, in: Fracture, Vol. 2 of the Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Fracture (ICF4), 19–24 June 1977, Waterloo, Canada1977, pp. 627–634.
26.
O’DowdN.P. and ShihC.F., Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—I. Structure of fields, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids39(8) (1991), 989–1015.
27.
O’DowdN.P. and ShihC.F., Family of crack-tip fields characterized by a triaxiality parameter—II. Fracture applications, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids40(5) (1992), 939–963.
28.
PaggiM. and CarpinteriA., Fractal and multifractal approaches for the analysis of crack-size dependent scaling laws in fatigue, Chaos Solitons & Fractals40 (2009), 1136–1145.
29.
RiceJ.R., A path independent integral and the approximate analysis of strain concentration by notches and cracks, Journal of Applied Mechanics35 (1968), 379–386.
30.
RiceJ.R. and RosengrenG.F., Plane strain deformation near a crack tip in a power-law hardening material, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids16(1) (1968), 1–12.
31.
RiedelH. and RiceJ.R., Tensile cracks in creeping solids, vol. 700ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1980, pp. 112–130.
32.
RitchieR.O., Incomplete self-similarity and fatigue-crack growth, International Journal of Fracture132 (2005), 197–203.
33.
SaxenaA., Evaluation of C* for the characterization of creep crack growth behaviour in 304 SS, vol. 700, ASTM Special Technical Publication, 1980, pp. 131–151.
34.
SaxenaA., Analysis of cracks under creep conditions, in: Comprehensive Structural IntegrityMilneI.RitchieR.O. and KarihalooB. (eds), Vol. 5: Creep and High-Temperature Failure (Edited by A. Saxena), Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 2003, pp. 201–240.
35.
ShihC.O’DowdN. and KirkM., A framework for quantifying crack tip constraint, in: Constraint Effects in FractureHacklettE.ScwalbeK. and DoddsR. (eds), ASTM International, 1993, pp. 2–20.
36.
SivernsM.J. and PriceA.T., Crack growth under creep conditions, Nature228 (1970), 760–761.
37.
SivernsM.J. and PriceA.T., Crack propagation under creep conditions in a quenched 2.25 chromium 1 molybdenum steel, International Journal of Fracture9(2) (1973), 199–207.
38.
SmithD.J. and WebsterG.A., Characterizations of creep crack growth in 1 per cent Cr Mo V steel, Journal of Strain Analysis16(2) (1981), 137–143.
39.
SunP.J.WangG.Z.XuanF.Z.TuS.T. and WangZ.D., Quantitative characterization of creep constraint induced by crack depths in compact tension specimens, Engineering Fracture Mechanics78(4) (2011), 653–665.
40.
SunP.J.WangG.Z.XuanF.Z.TuS.T. and WangZ.D., Three-dimensional numerical analysis of out-of-plane creep crack-tip constraint in compact tension specimens, International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping96–97 (2012), 78–89.
41.
TabuchiM.KuboK. and YagiK., Effect of specimen size on creep crack growth rate using ultra-large CT specimens for 1 Cr–Mo–V steel, Engineering Fracture Mechanics40 (1991), 311–321.
42.
TanJ.P.TuS.T.WangG.Z. and XuanF.Z., Effect and mechanism of out-of-plane constraint on creep crack growth behavior of a Cr–Mo–V steel, Engineering Fracture Mechanics99 (2013), 324–334.
43.
Van LeeuwenH.P., The application of fracture mechanics to creep crack growth, Engineering Fracture Mechanics9 (1977), 951–974.
44.
WangG.Z.LiB.K.XuanF.Z. and TuS.T., Numerical investigation on the creep crack-tip constraint induced by loading configuration of specimens, Engineering Fracture Mechanics79 (2012), 353–362.
45.
WangG.Z.LiuX.L.XuanF.Z. and TuS.T., Effect of constraint induced by crack depth on creep crack-tip stress field in CT specimens, International Journal of Solids and Structures47(1) (2010), 51–57.
46.
WebsterG.A., Creep crack growth, in: Comprehensive Structural IntegrityMilneI.RitchieR.O. and KarihalooB. (eds), Vol. 5: Creep and High-Temperature Failure (Edited by A. Saxena), Elsevier Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom, 2003, pp. 241–271.
47.
WebsterG.A. and AinsworthR.A., High Temperature Components Life Assessment, Chapman and Hall, London, 1994.
48.
ZaiserM.BayK. and HähnerP., Fractal analysis of deformation-induced dislocation patterns, Acta Mater.47 (1999), 2463–2476.
49.
ZhangJ.W.WangG.Z.XuanF.Z. and TuS.T., Prediction of creep crack growth behavior in Cr-Mo-V steel specimens with different constraints for a wide range of C*, Engineering Fracture Mechanics132 (2014), 70–84.
50.
ZhaoL.JingH.XiuJ.HanY. and XuL., Experimental investigation of specimen size effect on creep crack growth behavior in P92 steel welded joint, Materials and Design57 (2014), 736–743.
51.
ZhaoL.JingH.XuL.HanY. and XiuJ., Evaluation of constraint effects on creep crack growth by experimental investigation and numerical simulation, Engineering Fracture Mechanics96 (2012), 251–266.
52.
ZhaoL.XuL.HanY. and JingH., Quantifying the constraint effect induced by specimen geometry on creep crack growth behavior in P92 steel, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences94–95 (2015), 63–74.
53.
ZhaoL.XuL.HanY. and JingH., Two-parameter characterization of constraint effect induced by specimen size on creep crack growth, Engineering Fracture Mechanics143 (2015), 121–137.
54.
YokoboriT. and SakataH., Studies on crack growth rate under high temperature creep, fatigue, and creep-fatigue interaction—I: On the experimental studies on crack growth rate as affected by 𝛼𝜎g, 𝜎g and temperature, Engineering Fracture Mechanics13(3) (1980), 509–522.
55.
YokoboriA.T.SugiuraR.OhmiT. and AinsworthR.A., A review of a time-dependent fracture life law (or model) based on a proposed multi-scale analysis, Strength Fracture & Complexity8(4) (2014), 205–218.
56.
YokoboriA.T. and YokoboriT., New concept to crack growth at high temperature creep and creep-fatigue, in: Advances in Fracture Research, Vol. 2 of the Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Fracture (ICF7), 20–24 March 1989, Houston, Texas1989, pp. 1723–1735.
57.
YokoboriA.T. and YokoboriT., Comparative study on characterization parameters for high temperature creep crack growth with special emphasis on dual value behaviour of crack growth rate, Engineering Fracture Mechanics55 (1996), 493–503.
58.
YokoboriA.T.YokoboriT.KuriyamaT.KakoT. and KajiY., Characterization of high temperature creep crack growth rate in terms of independent parameters, in: Proceedings of the International Conference on Creep, 14–18 April 1986, Tokyo, Japan1986, pp. 135–140.
59.
YokoboriA.T.YokoboriT.NishihataT. and YamaokaT., An alternative correlating parameter for creep crack growth rate and its application: Derivation of the parameter Q*, Materials at High Temperatures10 (1992), 108–118.
