Agnosia for objects is often overlooked in neuropsychology, especially with respect to rehabilitation. Prosopagnosia has been studied more extensively, yet there have been few attempts at training it. The lack of training protocols may partially be accounted for by their relatively low incidence and specificity to sensory modality. However, finding effective rehabilitations for such deficits may help to reduce their impact on the social and psychological functioning of individuals.
Objective:
Our aim in this study was to provide clinicians and researchers with useful information with which to conduct new studies on the rehabilitation of object agnosia and prosopagnosia. To accomplish this, we performed a systematic and comprehensive review of the effect of neuropsychological rehabilitation on visual object and prosopagnosia.
Methods:
The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were followed. In addition, the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) and the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) scales were used to assess the quality of reporting.
Results:
Seven articles regarding object agnosia, eight articles describing treatments for prosopagnosia, and two articles describing treatments for both deficits were included.
Conclusions:
In the light of the studies reviewed, treatments based on analysis of parts seem effective for object agnosia, while prosopagnosia appears to benefit most from treatments relying on holistic/configural processing. However, more attempts at rehabilitation of face and object agnosia are needed to clarify the mechanisms of these processes and possible rehabilitations. Moreover, a publication bias could mask a broader attempt to find effective treatments for visual agnosia and leaving out studies that are potentially more informative.
Ahissar,M., Hochstein,S. (2004). The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences8(10), 457–464.
2.
Anderson,S.W., Rizzo,M. (1995). Recovery and rehabilitation of visual cortical dysfunction. NeuroRehabilitation5(2), 129–140.
3.
Barton,J.J., Corrow,S.L. (2016). The problem of being bad at faces. Neuropsychologia89, 119–124.
4.
Barton,J.J., Albonico,A., Susilo,T., Duchaine,B., Corrow,S.L. (2019). Object recognition in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology36(1-2), 54–84.
5.
Bate,S., Bennetts,R.J. (2014). The rehabilitation of face recognition impairments: A critical review and future directions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8, 491.
6.
Bauer,R.M. (2006). The Agnosias.
7.
Behrmann,M., Marotta,J., Gauthier,I., Tarr,M.J., McKeeff,T.J. (2005). Behavioral change and its neural correlates in visual agnosia after expertise training. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience17(4), 554–568.
8.
Behrmann,M., Avidan,G. (2005). Congenital prosopagnosia: Face-blind from birth. Trends in Cognitive Sciences9(4), 180–187.
9.
Behrmann,M., Peterson,M.A., Moscovitch,M., Suzuki,S. (2006). Independent representation of parts and the relations between them: Evidence from integrative agnosia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance32(5), 1169.
10.
Behrmann,M., Williams,P. (2007). Impairments in part-whole representations of objects in two cases of integrative visual agnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology24(7), 701–730.
11.
Geskin,J., Behrmann,M. (2018). Congenital prosopagnosia without object agnosia? A literature review. Cognitive Neuropsychology35(1-2), 4–54.
12.
Bentin,S., Allison,T., Puce,A., Perez,E., McCarthy,G. (1996). Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience8(6), 551–565.
13.
Bentin,S., DeGutis,J.M., D’Esposito,M., Robertson,L.C. (2007). Too many trees to see the forest: Performance, event-related potential, and functional magnetic resonance imaging manifestations of integrative congenital prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience19(1), 132–146.
14.
Benton,A.L., Van AllenM.W. (1968). Impairment in facial recognition in patients with cerebral disease. Transactions of the American Neurological Association93, 38–42.
15.
Bowles,D.C., McKone,E., Dawel,A., Duchaine,B., Palermo,R., Schmalzl,L., YovelG. (2009). Diagnosing prosopagnosia: Effects of ageing, sex, and participant–stimulus ethnic match on the Cambridge Face Memory Test and Cambridge Face Perception Test. Cognitive Neuropsychology26(5), 423–455.
16.
Bruce,V., Young,A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology77(3), 305–327.
17.
Bukach,C.M., Gauthier,I., Tarr,M.J. (2006). Beyond faces and modularity: The power of an expertise framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences10(4), 159–166.
18.
Bukach,C.M., Gauthier,I., Tarr,M.J., Kadlec,H., Barth,S., Ryan,E., BubD.N. (2012). Does acquisition of Greeble expertise in prosopagnosia rule out a domain-general deficit?Neuropsychologia50(2), 289–304.
19.
Burns,M.S. (2004). Clinical management of agnosia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation11(1), 1–9.
20.
Burns,E.J., Arnold,T., Bukach,C.M. (2019). P-curving the fusiform face area: Meta-analyses support the expertise hypothesis. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews104, 209–221.
21.
Caldara,R., Schyns,P., Mayer,E., Smith,M. L., Gosselin,F., Rossion,B. (2005). Does prosopagnosia take the eyes out of face representations? Evidence for a defect in representing diagnostic facial information following brain damage. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience17(10), 1652–1666.
22.
Carbon,C.C., Grüter,T., Weber,J.E., Lueschow,A. (2007). Faces as objects of non-expertise: Processing of thatcherised faces in congenital prosopagnosia. Perception36(11), 1635–1645.
23.
Carmel,D., Bentin,S. (2002). Domain specificity versus expertise: Factors influencing distinct processing of faces. Cognition83(1), 1–29.
24.
Cattaneo,Z., Daini,R., Malaspina,M., Manai,F., Lillo,M., Fermi,V., CominciniS. (2016). Congenital prosopagnosia is associated with a genetic variation in the oxytocin receptor (OXTR) gene: An exploratory study. Neuroscience339, 162–173.
25.
Clarke,S., Bindschaedler,C. (2005). Rehabilitation of visual disorders after stroke. Recovery After Stroke, 456.
26.
Coltheart,M., Brunsdon,R., Nickels,L. (2005). Cognitive rehabilitation and its relationship to cognitive-neuropsychological rehabilitation. Effectiveness of Rehabilitation for Cognitive Deficits, 11–2.
27.
Corrow,S.L., Dalrymple,K.A., Barton,J.J. (2016). Prosopagnosia: Current perspectives. Eye and Brain8, 165.
28.
Corrow,S.L., Davies-Thompson,J., Fletcher,K., Hills,C., Corrow,J.C., Barton,J.J. (2019). Training face perception in developmental prosopagnosia through perceptual learning. Neuropsychologia134, 107196.
Dalrymple,K.A., Fletcher,K., Corrow,S., das NairR., Barton,J.J., Yonas,A., Duchaine,B. (2014). A room full of strangers every day”: The psychosocial impact of developmental prosopagnosia on children and their families. Journal of Psychosomatic Research77(2), 144–150.
31.
Dalrymple,K.A., Palermo,R. (2016). Guidelines for studying developmental prosopagnosia in adults andchildren. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science7(1), 73–87.
32.
Davies-Thompson,J., Pancaroglu,R., Barton,J. (2014). Acquired prosopagnosia: Structural basis and processing impairments. Front Biosci (Elite Ed)6, 159–174.
33.
Davies-Thompson,J., Fletcher,K., Hills,C., Pancaroglu,R., Corrow,S.L., Barton,J.J. (2017). Perceptual learning of faces: A rehabilitative study of acquired prosopagnosia. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience29(3), 573–591.
34.
DeGutis,J.M., Bentin,S., Robertson,L.C., D’Esposito,M. (2007). Functional plasticity in ventral temporal cortex following cognitive rehabilitation of a congenital prosopagnosic. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience19(11), 1790–1802.
35.
DeGutis,J., Cohan,S., Mercado,R.J., Wilmer,J., Nakayama,K. (2012). Holistic processing of the mouth but not the eyes in developmental prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology29(5-6), 419–446.
36.
DeGutis,J.M., Chiu,C., Grosso,M.E., Cohan,S. (2014). Face processing improvements in prosopagnosia: Successes and failures over the last 50 years. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8, 561.
37.
DeGutis,J., Cohan,S., Nakayama,K. (2014). Holistic face training enhances face processing in developmental prosopagnosia. Brain137(6), 1781–1798.
38.
De RenziE., Perani,D., Carlesimo,G.A., Silveri,M.C., Fazio,F. (1994). Prosopagnosia can be associatedwith damage confined to the right hemisphere: An MRI and PET study and a review of the literature. Neuropsychologia32(8), 893–902.
39.
De HaanE.H., Young,A.W., Newcombe,F. (1991). Covert and overt recognition in prosopagnosia. Brain114(6), 2575–2591.
40.
Diamond,R., Carey,S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: An effect of expertise. Journal of experimental psychology: General. 115(2)
107.
41.
Duchaine,B.C., Dingle,K., Butterworth,E., Nakayama,K. (2004). Normal greeble learning in a severe case of developmental prosopagnosia. Neuron43(4), 469–473.
42.
Farah,M.J. (2004). Visual agnosia, MIT Press.
43.
Francis,R., Riddoch,M.J., Humphreys,G.W. (2002). Who’s that girl?’ Prosopagnosia, person-based semantic disorder, and the reacquisition of face identification ability. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation12(1), 1–26.
44.
Gauthier,I., Curran,T., Curby,K.M., Collins,D. (2003). Perceptual interference supports a non-modular account of face processing. Nature Neuroscience6(4), 428–432.
45.
Gauthier,I., Skudlarski,P., Gore,J.C., Anderson,A.W. (2000). Expertise for cars and birds recruits brain areas involved in face recognition. Nature Neuroscience3(2), 191–197.
46.
Gauthier,I., Tarr,M.J., Anderson,A.W., Skudlarski,P., Gore,J.C. (1999). Activation of the middle fusiform’face area’increases with expertise in recognizing novel objects. Nature Neuroscience2(6), 568–573.
47.
Gauthier,I., Williams,P., Tarr,M.J., Tanaka,J. (1998). Training ‘greeble’experts: A framework for studying expert object recognition processes. Vision Research38(15-16), 2401–2428.
48.
Germine,L., Cashdollar,N., Düzel,E., Duchaine,B. (2011). A new selective developmental deficit: Impaired object recognition with normal face recognition. Cortex47(5), 598–607.
49.
Geskin,J., Behrmann,M. (2018). Congenital prosopagnosia without object agnosia? A literature review. Cognitive Neuropsychology35(1-2), 4–54.
50.
Hasson,U., Avidan,G., Deouell,L.Y., Bentin,S., Malach,R. (2003). Face-selective activation in a congenital prosopagnosic subject. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience15(3), 419–431.
51.
Haxby,J.V., Hoffman,E.A., Gobbini,M.I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences4(6), 223–233.
52.
Heutink,J., Indorf,D.L., Cordes,C. (2019). The neuropsychological rehabilitation of visual agnosia and Balint’s syndrome. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation29(10), 1489–1508.
Humphreys,G.W., Riddoch,M.J. (1994). Visual object processing in normality and pathology: Implications for rehabilitation. In M.J. Riddoch & G.W. Humphreys (Eds.), Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation BT - Cognitive neuropsychology and cognitive rehabilitation (pp. 39–76, Chapter xx, 606 Pages). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Hillsdale, NJ.
55.
Kanwisher,N. (2000). Domain specificity in face perception. Nature Neuroscience3(8), 759–763.
56.
Kanwisher,N., McDermott,J., Chun,M.M. (1997). The fusiform face area: A module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception. Journal of Neuroscience17(11), 4302–4311.
57.
Kanwisher,N., Tong,F.Nakayama,K., (1998). The effect of face inversion on the human fusiform face area. Cognition68, B1–11.
58.
Kaplan,E.F., Goodglass,H., Weintraub,S. (1983). The Boston Naming Test (2nd ed.), Philadelphia.
59.
Kennerknecht,I., Grueter,T., Welling,B., Wentzek,S., Horst,J., Edwards,S., Grueter,M. (2006). Firstreport of prevalence of non-syndromic hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA. American Journal of Medical GeneticsPart A140(15), 1617–1622.
60.
Kennerknecht,I., Ho,N.Y., Wong,V.C. (2008). Prevalence of hereditary prosopagnosia (HPA) in Hong Kong Chinese population. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A146(22), 2863–2870.
61.
Lev,M., Gilaie-Dotan,S., Gotthilf-Nezri,D., Yehezkel,O., Brooks,J.L., Perry,A., Bentin,S., Bonneh,Y., Polat,U. (2015). Training-induced recovery of low-level vision followed by mid-level perceptual improvements in developmental object and face agnosia. Developmental Science18(1), 50–64.
62.
Ma,L.L., Wang,Y.Y., Yang,Z.H., Huang,D., Weng,H., Zeng,X.T. (2020). Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: What are they and which is better?Military Medical Research7(1), 1–11.
63.
Marr,D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information.
64.
McKone,E., Kanwisher,N., Duchaine,B. C. (2007). Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?Trends in Cognitive Sciences11(1), 8–15.
65.
Moher,D., Liberati,A., Tetzlaff,J., Altman,D.G., PrismaGrou. (2009). Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PLoS Med6(7), e1000097.
66.
Moscovitch,M., Winocur,G., Behrmann,M. (1997). What is special about face recognition? Nineteen experiments on a person with visual object agnosia and dyslexia but normal face recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience9(5), 555–604.
67.
Page,M.J., McKenzie,J.E., Bossuyt,P.M., Boutron,I., Hoffmann,T.C., Mulrow,C.D., MoherD. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. International Journal ofSurgery88, 105906.
68.
Palermo,R., Willis,M.L., Rivolta,D., McKone,E., Wilson,C. E., Calder,A.J. (2011). Impaired holistic coding of facial expression and facial identity in congenital prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia49(5), 1226–1235.
69.
Polster,M.R., Rapcsak,S.Z. (1996). Representations in learning new faces: Evidence from prosopagnosia. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society2(3), 240–248.
70.
Powell,J., Letson,S., Davidoff,J., Valentine,T., Greenwood,R. (2008). Enhancement of face recognition learning in patients with brain injury using three cognitive training procedures. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation18(2), 182–203.
71.
Raskin,S.A., Sohlberg,M.M. (2009). Prospective memory intervention: A review and evaluation of a pilot restorative intervention. Brain Impairment10(1), 76–86.
72.
Raymond,M.J., Bennett,T.L., Malia,K.B., Bewick,K.C. (1996). Rehabilitation of visual processing deficits following brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation6(3), 229–239.
73.
Rezlescu,C., Chapman,A., Susilo,T., Caramazza,A. (2016). Large inversion effects are not specific to faces and do not vary with object expertise.
74.
Rezlescu,C., Barton,J.J., Pitcher,D., Duchaine,B. (2014). Normal acquisition of expertise with greebles in two cases of acquired prosopagnosia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(14), 5123–5128.
75.
Riddoch,M.J., Humphreys,G.W. (1987). A case of integrative visual agnosia. Brain110(6), 1431–1462.
76.
Riddoch,M.J., Humphreys,G.W. (1993). Birmingham object recognition battery. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
77.
Riddoch,M.J., Johnston,R.A., Bracewell,R.M., Boutsen,L., Humphreys,G.W. (2008). Are faces special? A caseof pure prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology25(1), 3–26.
78.
Robbins,R., McKone,E. (2007). No face-like processing for objects-of-expertise in three behavioural tasks. Cognition103(1), 34–79.
79.
Rosenthal,O., Behrmann,M. (2006). Acquiring long-term representations of visual classes following extensive extrastriate damage. Neuropsychologia44(5), 799–815.
80.
Rosselli,M., Ardila,A., Beltran,C. (2001). Rehabilitation of Balint’s syndrome: A single case report. Applied Neuropsychology8(4), 242–247.
81.
Rossion,B., Gauthier,I., Goffaux,V., Tarr,M.J., Crommelinck,M. (2002). Expertise training with novel objects leads to left-lateralized facelike electrophysiological responses. Psychological Science13(3), 250–257.
82.
Rossion,B., Gauthier,I., Tarr,M.J., Despland,P., Bruyer,R., Linotte,S., Crommelinck,M. (2000). The N170 occipito-temporal component is delayed and enhanced to inverted faces but not to inverted objects: An electrophysiological account of face-specific processes in the human brain. Neuroreport11(1), 69–72.
83.
Seniow,J., Polanowska,K., Mandat,T., Laudanski,K. (2003). The cognitive impairments due to the occipito-parietal brain injury after gunshot. A successful neurorehabilitation case study. Brain Injury17(8), 701–713.
84.
Susilo,T., Duchaine,B. (2013). Advances in developmental prosopagnosia research. Current Opinion in Neurobiology23(3), 423–429.
85.
Sand,K., Robotham,R.J., Martelli,M., Starrfelt,R. (2018). Visual crowding in pure alexia and acquired prosopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology35(7), 361–370.
86.
Strappini,F., Pelli,D.G., Di PaceE., Martelli,M. (2017). Agnosic vision is like peripheral vision, which is limited by crowding. Cortex89, 135–155.
87.
Tanaka,J.W., Farah,M.J. (1993). Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology46(2), 225–245.
88.
Tanemura,R. (1999). Awareness in apraxia and agnosia. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation6(1), 33–42.
89.
Tardif,J., Morin DuchesneX., Cohan,S., Royer,J., Blais,C., Fiset,D., GosselinF. (2019). Use of face information varies systematically from developmental prosopagnosics to super-recognizers. Psychological Science30(2), 300–308.
90.
TateLR., McDonald,S., Perdices,M., Togher,L., Schultz,R., Savage,S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation18(4), 385–401.
91.
Tarr,M.J., Gauthier,I. (2000). FFA: A flexible fusiform area for subordinate-level visual processing automatized by expertise. Nature Neuroscience3(8), 764–769.
Valentine,T., Powell,J., Davidoff,J., Letson,S., Greenwood,R. (2006). Prevalence and correlates of face recognition impairments after acquired brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation16(3), 272–297.
94.
Vancleef,K., Acke,E., Torfs,K., Demeyere,N., Lafosse,C., Humphreys,G., de-Wit,L. (2015). Reliability and validity of the L euven Perceptual Organization Screening Test (L-POST. Journal of Neuropsychology9(2), 271–298.
95.
Warrington,E.K., Taylor,A.M. (1973). The contribution of the right parietal lobe to object recognition. Cortex9(2), 152–164.
96.
Warrington,E.K., Taylor,A.M. (1978). Two categorical stages of object recognition. Perception7(6), 695–705.
97.
Warrington,E.K., James,M. (1991). The Visual Object and Space Perception Battery. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company.
98.
Whiting,P., Savović,J., Higgins,J.P., Caldwell,D.M., Reeves,B.C., Shea,B., ChurchillR. (2016). ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Journal of ClinicalEpidemiology69, 225–234.
Wilson,B.A. (1999). Case studies in neuropsychological rehabilitation. on demand, Oxford University press.
101.
Yin,R.K. (1969). Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology81(1), 141.
102.
Young,A.W., Burton,A.M. (2018). Are we face experts?{Trends in Cognitive Sciences22(2), 100–110.
103.
Young,A.W., Hellawell,D., Hay,D.C. (2013). Configurational information in face perception. Perception. 42(11)
1166–1178.
104.
Zihl,J., Kennard,C. (2003). Disorders of higher visual function. In T. Brandt (Ed.), Neurological disorders: Course and treatment. Amsterdam: Academic Press, pp. 255–261.
105.
Zihl,J. (2011). Rehabilitation of Visual Disorders after Brain Injury, East Sussex.
