Abstract
The effect of D.C. electrical fields on in vivo nerve regeneration following rat sciatic nerve transection was assessed by a toe-twitch tension method for motor recovery. Two groups for baseline comparisons received either a nerve transection and a neutral battery implant or a nerve crush and no implant. Two treatment groups each received a nerve transection and an implant delivering either cathodal (–10 μA) or anodal (+10 μA) current via electrodes positioned on either side of the transection site. The contralateral nerve was exposed but not given a lesion. The functional recovery was assessed at weekly intervals by comparing the amplitude and area of the twitch tension curves on both sides, expressed as a ratio (index of motor recovery = IMR). By 28–35 days postoperative (dpo) the crushed/untreated group had mean IMR values not significantly different than the preoperative values. The transected/neutral group appeared to have the worst recovery throughout the study. Compared to these two groups, both the cathodal and anodal treatment groups with a transected nerve showed intermediate IMR values, but by 63 dpo the group differences were less. These results indicate that following a nerve transection lesion steady D.C. electrical fields may temporarily enhance the early functional recovery of motor nerve regeneration compared to conventional nerve repair alone.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
