Effects of robot-assisted gait training combined with virtual reality on motor and cognitive functions in patients with multiple sclerosis: A pilot,single-blind,randomized controlled trial
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May 19, 2020
Effects of robot-assisted gait training combined with virtual reality on motor and cognitive functions in patients with multiple sclerosis: A pilot,single-blind,randomized controlled trial
Studies on robot-assisted gait training rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis have reported positive effects on mobility and quality of life. However, their effects on cognitive functions are difficult to determine because not all trials have included cognition assessments. Virtual reality-based training provides enhanced opportunity for stimulating cognitive abilities by repetitive practice, feedback information, and motivation for endurance practice.
Objective:
To compare the effects of innovative robot-assisted gait training combined with virtual reality versus standard robot-assisted gait training on information processing speed, sustained attention, working memory, and walking endurance in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Methods:
Seventeen outpatients were randomly assigned to receive robot-assisted gait training either with or without virtual reality. The robot assisted gait training + virtual reality group underwent end-effector system training engendered by virtual reality. The standard training group underwent end-effector system training. A blinded rater evaluated patients before and after treatment and at one month follow-up. The outcome measures were the Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test, Phonemic Fluency Test, Novel Task, Digit Symbol, Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54, 2-Minutes Walk Test, 10-Meter Walking Test, Berg Balance Scale, gait analysis, and stabilometric assessment.
Results:
Between-group comparisons showed a significant change on the 2-Minutes Walk Test (p = 0.023) after treatment in the robot-assisted gait training + virtual reality group. Significant improvement were obtained also in executive functions (p = 0.012). Both gains were maintained at the 1-month follow-up evaluation (p = 0.012, p = 0.012) in the robot-assisted gait training + virtual reality group. Both group improved quality of life after treatment (Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life-54: Mental Health p = 0.018, Physical Health p = 0.017).
Conclusions:
Both training lead to positive influenced on executive functions. However larger positive effects on gait ability were noted after robot-assisted gait training engendered by virtual reality with multiple sclerosis. Robot-assisted gait training provides a therapeutic alternative and motivational of traditional motor rehabilitation.
Baram,Y., & Miller,A. (2010). Glide-symmetric locomotion reinforcement in patients with multiple sclerosis by visual feedback. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 5(5), 323–326.
2.
Benedict,R.H.B., & Zivadinov,R. (2011). Risk factors for and management of cognitive dysfunction in multiple sclerosis. Nature Reviews Neurology, 7(6), 332–342.
3.
Bisht,B., Darling,W.G., White,E.C., White,K.A., Shivapour,E.T., Zimmerman,M.B., & Wahls,T.L. (2017). Effects of a multimodal intervention on gait and balance of subjects with progressive multiple sclerosis: a prospective longitudinal pilot study. Degenerative Neurological and Neuromuscular Disease, 7, 79–93.
4.
Brütsch,K., Koenig,A., Zimmerli,L., Mérillat-Koeneke,S., Riener,R., Jäncke,L., van Hedel,H.J., & Meyer-Heim,A. (2011). Virtual reality for enhancement of robot-assisted gait training in children with central gait disorders. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43(6), 493–499.
Calabrò,R.S., Russo,M., Naro,A., De Luca,R., Leo,A., Tomasello,P., Molonia,F., Dattola,V., Bramanti,A., & Bramanti,P. (2017). Robotic gait training in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: can virtual reality make the difference? Findings from a randomized controlled trial. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 377, 25–30.
7.
Cameron,M.H., Fitzpatrick,M., Overs,S., Murchison,C., Manning,J., & Whitham,R. (2014). Dalfampridine improves walking speed, walking endurance, and community participation in veterans with multiple sclerosis: a longitudinal cohort study. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 20(6), 733–738.
8.
Cameron,M., Mazumder,R., Murchison,C., & King,L. (2014). Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test in people with multiple sclerosis: reflects imbalance but may not predict falls. Gait & Posture, 39(1), 669.
9.
Casuso-Holgado,M.J., Martín-Valero,R., Carazo,A.F., Medrano-Sánchez,E.M., Cortés-Vega,M.D., & Montero-Bancalero,F.J. (2018). Effectiveness of virtual reality training for balance and gait rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clinical Rehabilitation, 32(9), 1220–1234.
10.
Cattaneo,D., Jonsdottir,J., Zocchi,M., & Regola,A. (2007). Effects of balance exercises on people with multiple sclerosis: a pilot study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 21(9), 771–781.
11.
Cattaneo,D., Regola,A., & Meotti,M. (2006). Validity of six balance disorders scales in persons with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28(12), 789–795.
12.
Ciaramelli,E., Serino,A., Benassi,M., & Bolzani,R. (2006). Standardizzazione di tre test di memoria di lavoro. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 33(3), 607–624.
13.
Wechsler,D. (1955). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. Oxford, England: Psychological Corp.
14.
De Keersmaecker,E., Lefeber,N., Geys,M., Jespers,E., Kerckhofs,E., & Swinnen,E. (2019). Virtual reality during gait training: does it improve gait function in persons with central nervous system movement disorders? A systematic review and meta-analysis. NeuroRehabilitation, 44(1), 43–66.
15.
Eldridge,S.M., Chan,C.L., Campbell,M.J., Bond,C.M., Hopewell,S., Thabane,L., Lancaster,G.A., PAFS consensus group. (2016). CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. British Medical Journal, 355, i5239.
16.
Fanciullacci,C., Straudi,S., BasagliaN., & Chisari,C. (2017). The role of psychological well-being in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 53(1), 105–113.
17.
Feinstein,A., Freeman,J., & Lo,A.C. (2015). Treatment of progressive multiple sclerosis: what works, what does not, and what is needed. Lancet Neurology, 14(2), 194–207.
18.
Folstein,M.F., Folstein,S.E., & McHugh,P.R. (1975). Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.
19.
Fonte,C., Smania,N., Pedrinolla,A., Munari,D., Gandolfi,M., Picelli,A., Varalta,V., Benetti,MV., Brugnera,A., Federico,A., Muti,E., Tamburin,S., Schena,F., & Venturelli,M. (2019). Comparison between physical and cognitive treatment in patients with MCI and Alzheimer’s disease. Aging, 11(10), 3138–3155.
20.
Fulk,G.D. (2005). Locomotor training and virtual reality-based balance training for an individual with multiple sclerosis: a case report. Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy, 29(1), 34–42.
21.
Gandolfi,M., Geroin,C., Picelli,A., Munari,D., Waldner,A., Tamburin,S., Marchioretto,F., & Smania,N. (2014). Robot-assisted vs. sensory integration training in treating gait and balance dysfunctions in patients with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 318.
22.
Gijbels,D., Eijnde,B., & Feys,P. (2011). Comparison of the 2- and 6-minute walk test in multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 17(10), 1269–1272.
23.
Givon,U., Zeilig,G., & Achiron,A. (2009). Gait analysis in multiple sclerosis: characterization of temporal- spatial parameters using GAITRite functional ambulation system. Gait & Posture, 29(1), 138–142.
24.
Goodman,A.D., Brown,T.R., Edwards,K.R., Krupp,L.B., Schapiro,R.T., Cohen,R., Marinucci,L.N., Blight,A.R., MSF204 Investigators. (2010). A phase 3 trial of extended release oral dalfampridine in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Neurology, 68(4), 494–502.
Gunn,H.J., Newell,P., Haas,B., Marsden,J.F., & Freeman,J.A. (2013). Identification of risk factors for falls in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Physical Therapy, 93(4), 504–513.
27.
Guyatt,G.H., Pugsley,S.O., Sullivan,M.J., Thompson,P.J., Berman,L., Jones,N.L., Fallen,E.L., & Taylor,D.W. (1984). Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax, 39(11), 818–822.
28.
Hesse,S., Schattat,N., Mehrholz,J., & Werner,C. (2013). Evidence of end-effector based gait machines in gait rehabilitation after CNS lesion. NeuroRehabilitation, 33(1), 77–84.
29.
Hesse,S., Tomelleri,C., Bardeleben,A., Werner,C., & Waldner,A. (2012). Robot-assisted practice of gait and stair climbing in nonambulatory stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Research & Development, 49(4), 613–622.
30.
Higginson,C.I., Arnett,P.A., & Voss,W.D. (2000). The ecological validity of clinical tests of memory and attention in multiple sclerosis. Archives Clinical Neuropsychology, 15(3), 185–204.
31.
Jongen,P.J., Ter Horst,A.T., & Brands,A.M. (2012). Cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Minerva Medica, 103(2), 73–96.
32.
Khan,F., & Amatya,B. (2017). Rehabilitation in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 98(2), 353–367.
33.
Krause,I., Kern,S., Horntrich,A., & Ziemssen,T. (2013). Employment status in multiple sclerosis: impact of disease-specific and non-disease-specific factors. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 19(13), 1792–1799.
34.
Kurtzke,J.F. (1983). Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology, 33(11), 1444–1452.
35.
Larocca,N.G. (2011). Impact of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis: perspectives of patients and care partners. Patient, 4(3), 189–201.
36.
Laver,K.E., Lange,B., George,S., Deutsch,J.E., Saposnik,G., & Crotty,M. (2017). Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Database Of Systematic Reviews, 11, CD008349.
37.
Lehrer,N., Chen,Y., Duff,M., L Wolf,S., & Rikakis,T. (2011). Exploring the bases for a mixed reality stroke rehabilitation system, Part II: design of interactive feedback for upper limb rehabilitation. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 8, 54.
38.
Leocani,L., Comi,E., Annovazzi,P., RovarisM., RossiP., CursiM., ComolaM., MartinelliV., & Comi,G., (207). Impaired short-term motor learning in multiple sclerosis: evidence from virtual reality. Neurorehabilitation Neural Repair, 21(3), 273–278.
39.
Loitfelder,M., Fazekas,F., Koschutnig,K., Fuchs,S., Petrovic,K., Ropele,S., Pichler,A., Jehna,M., Langkammer,C., Schmidt,R., Neuper,C., & Enzinger,C. (2014). Brain activity changes in cognitive networks in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis - insights from a longitudinal FMRI study. PLoS One, 9(4), e93715.
40.
Maggio,M.G., Russo,M., Cuzzola,M.F., Destro,M., La Rosa,G., Molonia,F., Bramanti,P., Lombardo,G., De Luca,R., & Calabrò,R.S. (2019). Virtual reality in multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: A review on cognitive and motor outcomes. Journal of Clinical Neuroscience, 65, 106–111.
41.
Massetti,T., Trevizan,I.L., Arab,C., Favero,F.M., Ribeiro-Papa,D.C., & de Mello Monteiro,C.B. (2016). Virtual reality in multiple sclerosis –A systematic review. Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders, 8, 107–112.
42.
Menz,H.B., Latt,M.D., Tiedemann,A., Mun San Kwan,M., & Lord,S.R. (2004). Reliability of the GAITRite walkway system for the quantification of temporo-spatial parameters of gait in young and older people. Gait & Posture, 20(1), 20–25.
43.
MondiniS., MapelliD., Alec Vestri,A., Arcara,G., & Bisiacchi,P.S. (2011). Esame neuropsicologico breve 2. Una batteria di test per lo screening neuropsicologico. Milan, Italy: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
44.
Ortiz-Gutiérrez,R., Cano-de-la-Cuerda,R., Galán-del-Río,F., Alguacil-Diego,I.M., Palacios-Ceña,D., & Miangolarra-Page,J.C. (2013). A telerehabilitation program improves postural control in multiple sclerosis patients: a Spanish preliminary study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(11), 5697–5710.
45.
Paltamaa,J., West,H., Sarasoja,T., Wikström,J., & Mälkiä,E. (2005). Reliability of physical functioning measures in ambulatory subjects with MS. Physiotherapy Research International, 10(2), 93–109.
46.
Peruzzi,A., Zarbo,I.R., Cereatti,A., Della Croce,U., & Mirelman,A. (2017). An innovative training program based on virtual reality and treadmill: effects on gait of persons with multiple sclerosis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 39(15), 1557–1563.
47.
Postigo-Alonso,B., Galvao-Carmona,A., Benítez,I., Conde-Gavilán,C., Jover,A., Molina,S., Peña-Toledo,M.A., & Agüera,E. (2018). Cognitive-motor interference during gait in patients with Multiple Sclerosis: a mixed methods Systematic Review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 94, 126–148.
48.
Russo,M., Dattola,V., De Cola,M.C., Logiudice,A.L., Porcari,B., Cannavò,A., Sciarrone,F., De Luca,R., Molonia,F., Sessa,E., Bramanti,P., & Calabrò,R.S. (2018). The role of robotic gait training coupled with virtual reality in boosting the rehabilitative outcomes in patients with multiple sclerosis. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 41(2), 166–172.
49.
Schwartz,I., Sajin,A., Moreh,E., Fisher,I., Neeb,M., Forest,A., Vaknin-Dembinsky,A., Karusis,D., & Meiner,Z., Robot-assisted gait training in multiple sclerosis patients: a randomized trial. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 18(6), 881–890.
50.
Sepulcre,J., Vanotti,S., Hernández,R., Sandoval,G., Cáceres,F., Garcea,O., & Villoslada,P. (2006). Cognitive impairment in patients with multiple sclerosis using the Brief Repeatable Battery-Neuropsychology test. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 12(2), 187–195.
51.
Shah,P. (2015). Symptomatic management in multiple sclerosis. Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology, 18(1), S35–S42.
52.
Solari,A., Filippini,G., Mendozzi,L., Ghezzi,A., Cifani,S., Barbieri,E., Baldini,S., Salmaggi,A., Mantia,L.L., Farinotti,M., Caputo,D., & Mosconi,P. (1999). Validation of Italian multiple sclerosis quality of life 54 questionnaire. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 67(2), 158–162.
53.
Sosnoff,J.J., Sandroff,B.M., & Motl,R.W. (2012). Quantifying gait abnormalities in persons with multiple sclerosis with minimal disability. Gait & Posture, 36(1), 154–156.
54.
Straudi,S., Benedetti,M.G., Venturini,E., Manca,M., Foti,C., & Basaglia,N. (2013). Does robot-assisted gait training ameliorate gait abnormalities in multiple sclerosis? A pilot randomized-control trial. NeuroRehabilitation, 33(4), 555–563.
55.
Straudi,S., Fanciullacci,C., Martinuzzi,C., Pavarelli,C., Rossi,B., Chisari,C., & BasagliaN. (2016). The effects of robot-assisted gait training in progressive multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled trial. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 22(3), 373–384.
56.
Sumowski,J.F., Chiaravalloti,N., Wylie,G., & Deluca,J. (2009). Cognitive reserve moderates the negative effect of brain atrophy on cognitive efficiency in multiple sclerosis. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15(4), 606–612.
57.
Taylor,M., & Griffin,M. (2015). The use of gaming technology for rehabilitation in people with multiple sclerosis. Multiple Sclerosis Journal, 21, 355–371.
58.
Varalta,V., Fonte,C., & Munari,D. (2018). The influence of cognitive factors on balance and gait. In G. Sandrini, V. Homberg, L. Saltuari, N. Smania & A. Pedrocchi (Eds), Advanced technologies for the rehabilitation of gait and balance disorders (pp. 121-134). Switzerland AG: Springer Nature.
59.
Yogev-Seligmann,G., Hausdorff,J.M., & Giladi,N. (2008). The role of executive function and attention in gait. Movement Disorders, 23(3), 329–342.
60.
You,S.H., Jang,S.H., Kim,Y.H., Hallett,M., Ahn,S.H., Kwon,Y.H., Kim,J.H., & Lee,MY. (2005). Virtual reality-induced cortical reorganization and associated locomotor recovery in chronic stroke: an experimenter-blind randomized study. Stroke, 36(6), 1166–1171.
