Passenger seats need to be designed according to ergonomic guidelines for long hour sitting travel. In Bangladesh, passenger seats are designed and fabricated by the local manufacturers who have no knowledge about anthropometry. As a result, passenger has to face stress, fatigue, headache and other disorders.
Objective
To compare passengers’ anthropometric measurements and relevant existing seat dimensions for identifying possible discrepancy and recommending an optimum design.
Methods
In this study the passengers’ anthropometric measurements and relevant existing seat dimensions were compared to identify possible discrepancy.
Results
The result represented a considerable mismatch between body dimensions of passengers and the existing seat dimensions. The recommended new seat dimensions would enhance match percentage.
Conclusions
The design and allocation of passenger seats were given on the basis of passenger's anthropometry. The proposed seat dimensions would ensure a safe and comfortable journey for the passengers.
HendrickHW. The technology of ergonomics. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science2000; 1: 22–33.
2.
BuckleP.Ergonomics and musculoskeletal disorders: Overview. Occupational Medicine2005; 55: 164–167. doi:10.1093/occmed/kqi081.
3.
MattilaM.Computer-aided ergonomics and safety - A challenge for integrated ergonomics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics1996; 17: 309–314. doi:10.1016/0169-8141(95)00062-3.
4.
IsmailaSO, AkanbiOG, AdekunleNO, AdetunjiOR, KuyeSI. An ergonomics assessment of passenger seats in buses in South Western Nigeria. Sigurnost2010; 52: 329–334.
5.
Hiemstra-van MastrigtS, KampI, van VeenSAT, VinkP, BoschT.The influence of active seating on car passengers’ perceived comfort and activity levels. Applied Ergonomics2015; 47: 211–219. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.10.004.
6.
GhaderiE, MalekiA, DianatI.Design of combine harvester seat based on anthropometric data ofIranian operators. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics2014; 44: 810–816. doi:10.1016/j.ergon.2014.10.003.
7.
SabaB, YesusGGG, SinghAP, WoyessaGK, SeidS.Ergonomics assessment of passenger seats of minibuses in Ethiopia. Global Journal of Researches in Engineering Industrial Engineering2013; 13: 7.
8.
KampI.The influence of car-seat design on its character experience. Applied Ergonomics2012; 43: 329–335. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2011.06.008.
9.
TanCC-F, LiewK, RosleyM, KhalilS, TanB, LimT, et al. Conceptual design of an integrated bus passenger seat. World Applied Sciences Journal2013; 28: 722–725.
10.
MahamudT, NoorSA, HalderPK, BiswasSK. A mismatch between seat measurements and body dimensions of truck drivers in Bangladesh. In: International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Energy Engineering, Khulna, Bangladesh: KUET; 2014, p. 1–4.
11.
TanCF, LiewKF, RosleyMN, KhalilSN, TanBL, LimTL, et al. Conceptual design of an integrated bus passenger seat. World Applied Sciences Journal2013; 28: 722–725. doi:10.5829/idosi.wasj.2013.28.05.1169.
12.
MolenbroekJFM, Kroon-RamaekersYMT, SnijdersCJ. Revision of the design of a standard for the dimensions of school furniture. Ergonomics2003; 46: 681–694. doi:10.1080/0014013031000085635.
13.
GouvaliMK, BoudolosK.Match between school furniture dimensions and children's anthropometry. Applied Ergonomics2006; 37: 765–773. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.11.009.
14.
TanC, SinghRSS, AnasSA. Truck seating comfort: Objectify and subjectify measurement approach. International Journal of Soft Computing and Engineering2011; 1: 1–6.
15.
CorlettEN, ClarkTS. The ergonomics of workplaces and machines: A design manual. Taylor & Francis, London. 1984.
16.
ParcellsC, StommelM, HubbardRP. Mismatch of classroom furniture and student body dimensions: Empirical findings and health implications. The Journal of Adolescent Health: Official Publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine1999; 24: 265–273.
17.
TanCF, ChenW, DelbressineFLM, RauterbergGWM. Objectifying discomfort seat measurement for next generation truck driver's seat. FISITA World Automotive Congress, Munich, Germany. 2008.
18.
PoulakakisG, MarmarasN. A model for the ergonomic design of office. In: ScottPA, BridgerRS, CharterisJ, eds. Ergonomics Conference in Cape Town: Global Ergonomics, Elsevier Ltd; 1998, p. 500–504.
19.
SandersMS, McCormickEJ. Applied anthropometry, work-space design and seating. Human Factors in Engineering and Design, McGraw-Hill, Singapore. 1993.
20.
HelanderM. Anthropometry in workstation design. In: HelanderM, ed. A guide to the Ergonomics of Manufacturing, Taylor & Francis, London; 1997, 17–28.
21.
NazifNKA, HaniSE, LeeCK, RasdanIA. A study on the suitability of science laboratory furniture in Malaysian secondary school. Asia Pacific Symposium on Advancements in Ergonomics and Safety2011; 1–9.
22.
OborneDJ. Ergonomics at work: Human factors in design and development. Wiley. 1995.
23.
TanCF, ChenW, RauterbergM. Seat discomfort of Dutch druck driver deat: A survey study and analysis. 2010. doi:10.4271/2010-01-0774.
24.
SrivastavaN, AnandA, SrivastavaN, AnandA.A literature review on ergonomics of Indian small auto-vehicles seat design for passenger comfort and safety. International Journal of Technology Innovations and Research2015; 15: 1–8.
25.
BIFMA Ergonomics Guideline for VDT (Visual Display Terminal) Furniture Used in Office Workspace. 2002.
