Abstract
According to WHO, the number of people over 60 years of age is set to rise to 2 billion by 2050. Dysbiosis of microbial composition and impaired immune function have been observed in elderly persons compared to younger adults. As a result, the aging population has a higher disease risk than other age groups. In addition, high fat intakes have been observed to exert negative effects on microbial composition and immune function in murine studies. Elderly people have higher fat intakes than recommended levels, and this may make them more vulnerable to disease risk. Therefore, the impact of high fat consumption on elderly populations may be of relevance. Prebiotics and probiotics have been shown to have positive effects on microbiota composition and immune function in the elderly. This review describes aged-related changes in gut microbiome of elderly persons. It will also summarise studies concerning the impact of prebiotics, probiotics and high fat diets on microbiota composition and immune function.
General background on gut microbiology
Microbiota of the gastrointestinal tract
Over 1000 bacterial species exist within the human gut [1] with more than 50 bacterial genera being described [2]. The large intestine harbours the highestnumbers of bacteria in the gastrointestinal tract, at around 1011 to 1012 cells per gram. Decreased transit time, readily available nutrients and a favourable pH provide a suitable environment for microbial growth in the large intestine [3].
Substrate and products of microbial fermentation
There are two main fermentation substrates from the diet: non-digestible carbohydrates and undigested proteins from the upper gastrointestinal tract [4].Carbohydrates that escape hydrolysis and absorption in the upper colon are principal substrates for bacterial growth. Saccharolytic fermentation is mostly from species belong to the genera Bacteroides, Ruminococcus, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus, Eubacterium, and Clostridium [5]. The end-products of carbohydrate fermentation include short chain fatty acids (SCFAs), mainly, acetate, propionate and butyrate [6–8], lactate and other metabolites such as CO2, H2, CH4 and ethanol [9]. Amino acids, peptides and proteins, are also important substrates for bacterial growth.Proteolytic fermentation is mostly from species belonging to the genera Bacteroides and Clostridium [10]. The end-products of protein fermentation in-clude branched chain fatty acids such as iso-butyrate, nitrogenous and sulphur-containing compounds. Some are toxic to host health, such as ammonia and amines [10]. Increased concentrations of ammonia have been suggested to be responsible for hepatic coma syndrome, a loss of consciousness, which may stem from impaired liver function [11]. High levels of amines are also related to increased risk of bowel diseases, such as colorectal cancer [12]. In addition, high fat diets have also been seen to have an impact on the microbiota [13–15]. Although most dietary fat is digested in the small intestine, there are still small amounts entering the large intestine [16–18].
Definition and history of probiotics and prebiotics
As the gut microbiota can be influenced by diet, consumers may positively modulate their microbiome through consumption of specific functional foods, namely probiotics and prebiotics. The first scientific introduction of the probiotic concept was by Metchnikoff at the beginning of the 1900 s. In his thesis called the ‘Prolongation of Life’, he hypothesised that longevity in Bulgarian peasants was associated with their large intakes of fermented milk containing health-promoting microorganisms (now known as probiotics) [19]. In 2001 and 2002, the concept of probiotics was proposed by a WHO/FAO working party as ‘live microorganisms that, when administered in adequate amounts, confer a health benefit on the host [20, 21]’.
The concept of prebiotics was introduced when Gibson and Roberfroid [22] observed that certain non-digestible oligosaccharides were selectively fermented by bifidobacteria. A prebiotic is ‘a non-digestible food ingredient that beneficially affects the host by selectively stimulating the growth and/or activity of one or a limited number of bacteria in the colon that can improve host health [22]’. Subsequently, due to improved knowledge of the gut microbiota composition, a dietary prebiotic has been defined as ‘a selectively fermented ingredient that results in specific changes, in the composition and/or activity of the gastrointestinal microbiota, thus conferring benefit(s) upon host health [23]’.
What happens as we get older?
Currently, there is an increase in life expectancy leading to an expanding aged population. According to WHO, since 1980, the worldwide population of adults aged over 60 has doubled and this number will increase to 2 billion by 2050 [24]. Aging is defined as ‘the regression of physiological function accompanied by advancement of age [25]’. The aging process leads to changes in the functional ability of many organs and tissues, such as within the gastrointestinal tract and immune system [26, 27]. Dietary components, which are fermentation substrates for intestinal microbiota, are able to inevitably affect the diversity, numbers and activities of colonic bacteria. Their metabolites may subsequently influence the immune system [28]. Age-related changes can be associated with increased disease risk.
Changes in gastrointestinal tract in elderly population
Understanding changes within the gastrointestinal tract of the elderly is important as manipulation of this system may aid in maintenance of host heath. Older people have an increased threshold for taste and smell than younger adults [29]; consequently they often find foods bland and tasteless [30]. Furthermore, loss of teeth can lead to difficulties in masticating [31] and swallowing [32]. Therefore, there are problems associated with the diet of older people [33]. In addition, intestinal motility is reduced, possibly leading to faecal impaction and constipation [34–36]. Decreased faecal weight is indicative of physiological gastrointestinal tract changes, associated with reduced transit times and bacterial metabolites in older persons [37–40]. A reduced transit time can also lead to increases in detrimental proteolytic bacteria metabolites, such as ammonia and amines, which can be toxic to host gut health [9, 33].
Changes in immune function in elderly populations
A compromised immune function, loosely defined as immunosenescence has been observed in elderly populations, where the aging process adversely influences immune functionality [41]. Immunosenescence is characterised by a decreased immune response to exogenous infectious agents and increased response to endogenous signals. Additionally, increased levels of proinflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), decreased phagocytosis and natural killer (NK) cell activity have been observed in elderly populations [42, 43].
During aging, clearance of apoptotic cells is impaired and not complete, resulting in an accumulation of necrotic cells, with the production of autoantigens such as nucleic acids [44]. Autoimmune and abnormal immune responses to the host are observed during immunosenescence. In addition, naive B cells, generated in the bone marrow, decrease with increasing age [45], resulting in a reduced ability to protect the host against infectious agents. Furthermore, elderly populations have been observed to have intrinsic B cell dysfunction or declined CD4-T cell helper function [46]. The T cell compartment has been observed to be reduced due to a lowering in size and cellularity of the thymus. Such alterations may result in persistent viral infections and chronic disease by making cells more exposed to antigens [47].
Intestinal microbiota changes in an aging population
Microbiota equilibrium is important in maintaining host health and providing a natural defence against invading pathogens. However, because of age-related changes in the diet, immune function and physiology of the gastrointestinal tract microbiota, dysbiosis has been observed in the elderly [28]. For example, culture based studies have shown decreased Bacteroides in elderly compared to younger adults [39, 48]. Also, by using fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) Mueller et al. [49] found this trend in Italian elderly. Furthermore, increased Bacteroides have been reported in Austrian elderly patients [50] and Finnish elderly subjects [51] by using molecular methods.
Bifidobacterium is an important genus thought to be involved in health promotion [28]. A reduction of bifidobacteria in terms of number and diversity is one of the most notable changes in elderly populations and has been reported in studies using traditional culture and modern molecular methods [39, 52–55]. These changes may result from declined adhesion to the intestinal mucosa, although it is not sure whether this is due to changes in bifidobacteria or in the chemical component and structure of intestinal mucosa [56, 57]. Overall, this may lead to a reduction in gut function and immune response, and potentially increased susceptibility to disease [33].
Clostridium cluster XIVa (Clostridium coccoides group) and cluster IV (Clostridium leptum group) are important bacterial groups within the gut microbiota. A large proportion of bacteria producing butyrate, a SCFA beneficial to gut health, belong to these two clusters [58, 59]. A decrease of Clostridium cluster XIVa in elderly persons was reported by Biagi et al. [38]. Mueller et al. [49] and Makivuokko et al. [51] found that such a change was dependent on the nationality of the volunteer.
An increase in facultative anaerobes, such as streptococci, enterococci and enterobacteria is a well confirmed age-related occurrence [39, 60, 61]. The enterobacteria group are considered to be potentially detrimental; as such these are implicated in pathogenesis when the host immune response alters during the aging process.
Age-related changes and disease
As mentioned above, aging leads to gastrointestinal tract changes in terms of the gut microbiota and immune function. Immunosenescence is observed in elderly persons with dysregulated immune response [42, 43]. Elderly populations also have declined colonic mucin production and elevated inflammatory status, increasing the potential for bacteria to adhere to gut epithelial cells [62]. Changes in the gut microbiota may increase susceptibility to pathogenic infections [62], which may lead to immune dysregulation. The triadic relationship between an impaired gastrointestinal tract, imbalanced gut microbiota and chronic inflammation is significantly associated with increased disease risk in elderly persons, such as infections, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colorectal cancer (CRC) [62] (Fig. 1). IBD is a chronic disorder characterised by inflammation and ulceration of the gastrointestinal tract. Age-related changes in microbiota, such as reduced gut microbiota diversity has been observed in IBD patients [62–64]. In addition, decreased levels of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii has been seen in Crohn's disease patients [65, 66]. An imbalance between proinflammatory and immunoregulatory cytokines found in the elderly also may contribute towards IBD [67]. Elderly people have an increased risk of CRC; one reason for this could be gut microbiota dysbiosis and immune dysfunction. Decreased levels of short chain fatty acids, especially butyrate, are found in western elderly populations and are considered relevant to CRC risk. Butyrate shows anticarcinogenic capacity by stimulating cell differentiation and apoptosis as well as preventing cell proliferation [4]. A decrease in butyrate levels is associated with declined numbers of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Clostridium cluster XIVa, a group containing many known butyrate producers[68]. Chronic inflammation related to immune dysfunction in the elderly may also contribute to CRC risk [62].

Relationship between the impaired gastrointestinal tract, imbalanced gut microbiota, and chronic inflammation is significantly associated with increased disease risk in elderly populations, such as infections, inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and colorectal cancer (CRC).
Effects on microbiota composition
Prebiotics and probiotics can modulate colonic microbiota composition in elderly people by increasing bifidobacteria and may decrease other bacteria, findings from such studies have been summarised in Table 1. Well-tested prebiotics include short-chain fructooligosaccharides (scFOS), inulin and galactooligosaccharides (GOS). One tested dose was 2.64 g B-GOS which acted as prebiotic, this was taken for 10 weeks by healthy elderly [28]. Studies of other prebiotics (scFOS and inulin) are often used at higher doses than that of B-GOS [34, 69–71]. To study specific bacterial number changes, enumeration techniques, traditional culture methods, fluorescent in situ hybridisation (FISH), real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) may be applied. To study stability and diversity of microbiota changes, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) can be used. For example, to investigate the impact of GOS on the faecal microbiota, real-time PCR was used by Walton et al. [71] and DGGE by Maukonen et al. [72]. According to their results, GOS exerted positive effects on microbiota composition and host health in the elderly by increasing numbers of bifidobacteria. However, diversity was not assessed. Compared to other prebiotics, B-GOS may be more selective in stimulating the growth of bifidobacteria, as the prebiotic is produced by enzymes (three β and one α galactosidase enzyme) from a probiotic strain Bifidobacterium bifidum NCIMB 41171 using lactose as a substrate [73]. Similarly, composition of the microbiota in elderly persons has been modulated through administration of selected probiotics (e.g. Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus spp.) (Table 1). Daily administration of L. casei has been observed to reduce numbers of Enterobacteriaceae, some of which are pathogenic [74]. Different L. casei strains have varying functions and health benefits. Even within the same species, strains may promote activities of different bacteria [75–78] and lead to a range of health promoting properties [79]. Synbiotics, a mixture of prebiotics and probiotics, also have shown modulatory effects on colonic bacterial composition in the elderly (Table 1). By using synbiotics, survival of probiotics in the colon can be reinforced and modulatory effects fortified [80, 81]. Synbiotic, Bifidobacterium bifidum BB-02, Bifidobacterium lactis BL-01 and inulin not only stimulated specific probiotic numbers, but also total bifidobacteria and lactobacilli [80]. This also occurred with Lactobacillus acidophilus and lactitol [81].
Example of studies designed to determine effects of prebiotics and probiotics on microbiota modulation in elderly people
Example of studies designed to determine effects of prebiotics and probiotics on microbiota modulation in elderly people
B-GOS, trans-galactooligosaccharide mixture; FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridisation; scFOS, short-chain fructooligosaccharides; GOS, galactooligosaccharide; PCR, polymerase chain reaction; DGGE, denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis.
Prebiotics and probiotics may additionally help regulate immune function of elderly persons, this has been observed through altered immune markers such as NK cell and phagocytic activities, such studies have been summarised in Table 2. Prebiotics, including B-GOS and scFOS, may regulate immune responses in the elderly by down-regulating proinflammatory cytokines, hence leading to positive effects on the immune system. For example, studies indicate that test prebiotics could reduce production of proinflammatory cytokines IL-6 and TNF-α in elderly people [28, 82]. However, in one study, oligofructose/inulin supplemented with vitamins and protein did not show immuno-regulatory effects in elderly persons [83]. Probiotics may also modulate the immune system of elderly people e.g., L. rhamnosus HN001 [84–87] and B. lactis HN019 [86, 88–90] are well studied strains. The targeted immune markers of probiotics are similar to those of prebiotics, indicating that both may share some general mechanisms. A synbiotic containing lactitol and L. acidophilus led to a significant increase in prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) levels which are declined in the elderly and essential in normal physiological gut function including cytoprotection [81].
Example of studies designed to determine effects of prebiotics and probiotics on immune markers in elderly people
Example of studies designed to determine effects of prebiotics and probiotics on immune markers in elderly people
B-GOS, trans-galactooligosaccharide mixture; NK, natural killer; TNF-α, tumour necrosis factor-α; scFOS, short-chain fructooligosaccharides; FOS, fructooligosaccharides, LFM, low-fat milk.
Prebiotics and probiotics exert direct or indirect effects on modulation of gut microbiota and immune function. In terms of probiotics, depending on products, a dosage range of 108 to 1012 CFU/day live microorganisms is often consumed [91]. Prebiotics (typical dose 4–8 g/d for FOS or GOS) stimulate the growth and/or activity of endogenous microbiota or probiotics when consumed. Gut microbiota can be modulated by prebiotics and probiotics through the latter's ability to compete with pathogens for nutrients and colonisation sites. For example, strains of lactobacilli have been shown to compete for colonisation sites with pathogens [92, 93]. In addition, via saccharolytic fermentation, SCFAs can be produced, mainly acetate, butyrate and propionate [6, 7]. Prebiotic and probiotic treatment can increase saccharolytic fermentation and SCFA production, hence the colonic pH becomes lowered. Reduced gut pH encourages the survival and growth of commensal bacteria preferring an acidic environment, thus may reduce the activities of pathogens [91, 94]. The production of butyrate is important as it serves as a colonocyte energy source and regulates the growth and differentiation of cells [7]. Butyrate can also stimulate the production of mucins [95], which are required for mucous layer maintenance and epithelial protection [96], hence enhancing gut barrier function.
Tight junction protein expression and localisation can also be improved following administration of prebiotics and probiotics [91, 98], therefore improving barrier function and preventing translocation of pathogens. Antimicrobial substances, such as bacteriocins, can be produced following prebiotic and probiotic intake. These can inhibit the growth of pathogenic bacteria in vitro and may result in reduced infections [91]. Modulation of gut microbiota through prebiotics and probiotics may alter bacterial immune-interactive profiles. These interactions may lead to cytokine production with improved immune status [101, 102]. Fermentation products such as SCFAs can modify the activity of immune cells and enterocytes. SCFAs influence chemokine expression in intestinal epithelial cells [103, 104]. SCFAs can modulate inflammation with pro-inflammatory IL-12, IFN-γ and TNF-α being inhibited by butyrate [105–107] and immunoregulatory IL-10 being increased by acetate, butyrate and propionate [107, 108].
Age-related changes in microbiota composition and immune function in the elderly are considered to be detrimental to health. Additionally, a high fat diet has been shown to have an impact on the microbiota composition and immune function in animal models [13–15, 109]. Elderly people have higher fat intakes than recommended levels [110]. Therefore, it is worth considering the impact of fat on elderly microbiota and immune function.
Fat intake in elderly persons
According to Bates et al. [110], a typical elderly person's daily intake of total fat is 36.1% food energy and daily intake of saturated fatty acids is 14.2% food energy. The elderly daily intakes of total fat and saturated fatty acid are higher than the UK Dietary Reference Value (DRV), which are 35% and 11% food energy respectively. According to several studies, fat can contribute and improve tenderness and different flavours in food. This is relevant as the elderly often have difficulties with their teeth, and their threshold of taste and smell may become higher, thus rendering food tasteless and bland [111]. Thus, high fat foods become a feasible option for the elderly [110]. High fat intake can have an impact on the gut microbiota composition and immune function in animal models. Elevated fat intake by elderly populations may make this group more vulnerable to disease risk.
Effects of high fat diet on gut microbiota
Most dietary fat is digested by pancreatic lipases in the small intestine; the products of this digestion are absorbed into mucosal cells and mostly re-esterified into triacylglycerol. However, there are still small amounts of fat entering the large intestine as has been shown by ileostomy studies [16–18]. In addition, the fatty acid composition of ileostomy effluent resembles that of the diet [18]. A high fat diet can alter the composition of colonic microbiota. Importantly, the most consistently observed impact of a high fat diets are decreased numbers of the Bacteriodetes phylum but increased Firmicutes (Table 3). This result, as observed in murine studies, is relatively reproducible and reliable.
Example of studies designed to determine effects of the high fat diet on microbiota composition
Example of studies designed to determine effects of the high fat diet on microbiota composition
C, standard chow diet; LF, a low fat diet; HF, a high fat diet; GT, green tea powder; Lp, Lactobacillus plantarum DSM 15313; GOS, α1-2-GlucoOligoSaccharide; ITF, inulin-type fructans; AX, arabinoxylans.
The ultimate way to model the impact of a high-fat diet on humans would be in a human population; however, due to ethical considerations this is not always possible. The use of animal models offers a tempting alternative and enables tighter dietary controls to be operated. Differences in the microbiota between humans and animals can be reduced by the use of gnotobiotic animals, whereby animals are inoculated with a human microbiota. Gnotobiotic animals have not always been used in such studies, however, in the study of Respondek et al. [113], (Table 3) gnotobiotic germ-free mice were inoculated with fresh faecal samples from human, and results showed that high fat diets significantly reduced numbers of Lactobacillus-Enteroccocus compared to control diet. This does also match with the results of some non-gnotobiotic studies [118, 119]. However, caution must be taken when comparing and interpreting this data from such models as differences in anatomy and physiologies to test species, (e.g. mouse) are apparent. In the following section murine high fat studies have often given rise to similar results in older humans, showing, although varied the data is useful.
As summarised from studies shown in Table 3, within the Bacteriodetes phylum, the genus, Bacteroides has been shown to decrease in most murine studies following a high fat diet [114–118]. However, within the phylum Firmicutes, specific bacterial changes are more varied. For example, Eubacterium rectale–Clostridium coccoides, Roseburia spp. [117, 119] and Lactobacillus spp. [118, 119] decreased following high fat diets. Similarly, the phylum Proteobacteria decreased following a high fat diet [15], however, within this phylum, Enterobacteriales increases were observed [120]. These animal study findings have similarly been observed in humans with decreases in Bacteroides [39, 48], Clostridium coccoides [38] and increases in Enterobacteriales [39, 61] in elderly populations.
Alterations observed in bifidobacterial numbers following a high fat diet vary (Table 3). In a few murine studies, numbers of bifidobacteria in caecal samples have been seen to decrease following a high fat diet [114, 119]. In contrast, other studies showed different results in terms of bifidobacteria. For example, in the human study of Fava et al. [112] and murine study of Respondek et al. [113], high fat diets had no significant effect on bifidobacterial numbers in faecal samples. In the murine studies of Patrone et al. [118] and Neyrinck et al. [117], bifidobacteria in caecal samples were shown to be significantly higher following a high fat diet compared to a control group. As the bifidobacterial change following a high fat diet is inconclusive in murine studies, it may not be observed in elderly persons. The impact needs to be further investigated in human trials. Although a high fat diet may change specific bacterial numbers, total bacteria are not generally affected (Table 3). A high fat diet may result in an increased ratio of Firmicutes: Bacteriodetes, but could also impact on bacteria such as Clostridium spp., Lactobacillus spp. and Bifidobacterium spp. Such differences may be due to: 1, subject group/animal; 2, age groups; 3, type and content of fat; 4, treatment protocol (duration and sample size); 5, techniques used to enumerate bacteria. Most studies have used mice as the experimental model, because they are inexpensive and easily operated, furthermore they can receive much higher fat content diets compared to humans. Also in human studies, the overall diet is more difficult to control.
Many human studies have focused on comparisons in faecal microbiota between obese and normal-weight subjects. Most showed differences at the phylum level, and some studies at the genus and species level. Lower proportions of the Bacteriodetes phylum and higher Firmicutes in obese subjects compared to normal-weight subjects were first reported in the study of Ley et al. [121]. A decrease in Bacteroidetes and increase in Lactobacillus spp. within the Firmicutes phylum was also confirmed later [122]. An increased ratio of Firmicutes: Bacteriodetes in obese subjects was also confirmed by Verdam et al. [123]. Turnbaugh et al. [124] and Furet et al. [125] however found no change in Firmicutes with a decrease in Bacteroidetes (Bacteroides/Prevotella) in obese subjects. Whereas, Collado et al. [126] found increases in species level within both Firmicutes phylum (Staphylococcus aureus) and Bacteroidetes phylum (Bacteroides/ Prevotella) in obese women. Some other studies also reported no changes in Bacteriodetes and Firmicutes between obese and normal-weight subjects [127–129]. Changes in these two phyla in obese subjects were not as consistent as those seen in high-fat-diet treated animal models. In addition, some studies also reported decreases, increases or no changes in Actinobacteria (the class in which Bifidobacterium spp. belongs) in obese subjects compared to healthy body mass index (BMI) subjects [124, 129–132]. These human studies indeed show that a high fat diet may impact on the microbiota composition and there are differences, although not well characterised, between obese and normal-weight subjects. In the future, studies of larger sample sizes should be conducted by applying standardised techniques and taking account different factors, design of studies such as age, sex, type and amounts of fat, and applied method used for DNA extraction and microbial quantification.
A high fat diet can induce both intestinal and systemic inflammation in experimental animal models, as evidenced by the monitoring of inflammatory cytokines and mRNA expression, studies on this are summarised in Table 4.
Example of studies designed to determine effects of the high fat diet on immune markers
Example of studies designed to determine effects of the high fat diet on immune markers
C, standard chow diet; LF, a low fat diet; HF, a high fat diet; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor-α; GG, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG; PJS, Propionibacterium freudenreichii spp. shermanii JS; MCP-1, monocyte chemoattractant protein –1; AX, arabinoxylans; Bb, Bb12, Bifidobacterium lactis; sIgA, immunoglobulin A.
According to Table 4, a high fat diet may lead to inflammation status and dysregulated immune response in the host by upregulating proinflammatory cytokines. Higher levels of TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 and their mRNA expression levels in plasma and tissues following a high fat diet have been observed in animal models [15, 134]. Similar changes in these proinflammatory cytokines have been observed in elderly populations, indicating that a high fat intake may be one factor driving such effects. Other immune system components are also affected by a high fat diet, leading to intestinal and systemic inflammation. For example, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1, F4/80, proinflammatory cytokines MCP-1, and their mRNA levels have been reported to be higher following a high fat diet [114, 133].
Most studies shown in Table 4 have focused on the impact of mixtures of fat and fatty acids, the specific types of fat may be relevant, as different types may have varying impacts on immune status. For example, unsalted butter rich in saturated fatty acids may upregulate inflammatory status by influencing proinflammatory cytokines [135]. However, a maternal high fat diet rich in omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids can down-regulate inflammation status and modulate immune function in mice offspring, by modulating the balance of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory cytokines [136].
Although excessive maternal n-3 fatty acid intake has been shown to down-regulate inflammationstatus in mice offspring [136], most studies applying saturated and unsaturated fatty acid mixtures, have suggested that high fat feeding may contribute to gut and systemic inflammation, similarly immune function changes are also observed in elderly persons. The impact of a high fat diet on some immune markers in animal models are similar to those driven by the aging process in elderly. Therefore, there may be an association between high fat intake and immune function changes in elderly groups. In addition, these studies were conducted in experimental animal models rather than human beings, therefore, the effects of the high fat diet on immune function and the mechanisms still need to be confirmed further in human subjects.
The mechanism of how a high fat diet affects microbiota composition is not well known. When studying the effects of a high fat diet it is also important to control other factors, for example to make sure diets contain the same energy. Normally, a high fat diet is low in carbohydrate, while standard chow diet or a low fat diet is significantly higher in carbohydrate and fibre - thelatter will also serve as substrate for microbiotagrowth. Therefore, results may be influenced by increased fat or decreased carbohydrate content [137]. It has been suggested that the effect of dietary fat on microbiota composition may be indirectly related to bile acids. To help fat digestion, bile salts emulsify lipids. With increasing fat intake, hepatic production and release of bile acids from the gallbladder to the small intestine is increased. Some gut microbiota components can convert 7 α-dehydroxylate primary bile acids into secondary bile acids, which are potentially carcinogenic and related to colon cancer and gastrointestinal diseases [138, 139]. These bacteria normally represent a small proportion in the gut and consist of species belonging to the genus Clostridium.
A high fat diet could lead to inflammation and chronic disease via a few different pathways (Fig. 2). It has been suggested that alterations in the microbiota could lead to increased gut permeability following a high fat diet by decreasing mRNA expression of tight junction proteins including zona occludens-1 [13, 109]. Alternations in microbiota composition could lead to elevated endotoxin production. With impaired gut barrier function, this would lead to increased lipopolysaccharide (LPS) translocation to plasma, which in turn triggers inflammation and may indicate metabolic disorder [14, 114]. LPS, a component of Gram-negative bacterial cell walls, may bind to the CD14 toll-like receptor-4 (TLR-4) complex at the surface of innate immune cells to trigger an inflammatory process [141]. LPS absorption can be increased following a high fat diet. Dietary fat is transported from the gut as triglycerides into chylomicrons after incorporation. Chylomicrons have a high affinity with LPS; and therefore can carry and move LPS from the gut lumen into the circulatory system [142]. LPS can also be degraded by alkaline phosphatase. Intestinal alkaline phosphatase (IAP), is an intestinal brush border enzyme, mainly expressed on the surface of enterocyte microvillus membranes in the proximal small intestine [143]. The IAP is directly secreted into the intestinal lumen and bloodstream, with activity throughout the colon and within faeces [144]. Dietary fat content and fatty acids can affect this in different ways [14, 146]. A decrease in IAP activity may decrease LPS degradation and increase circulating LPS levels [147].

Relationship between a high fat diet, microbiota composition and metabolic endotoxaemia. LPS, lipopolysaccharide.
In summary, due to changes in colonic microbiota, gut integrity, immune markers and their interactions following a high fat diet, disease risk may increase leading to a detrimental impact on host health.
As previously mentioned, changes in gut microbiota composition and immune markers driven by high fat diets in animal models are similar to those driven by the aging process in elderly populations. Prebiotics and probiotics have been shown to modulate the microbiota composition and improve immune function in elderly populations. This presents the possibility that such interventions may counteract effects induced by a high fat diet in the elderly. Therefore, investigation is warranted to determine whether they could improve changes caused by a high fat diet in elderly populations.
Modulation of microbiota composition
As shown in Table 3, although the impact of a high fat diet on bifidobacteria is controversial, prebiotic supplementation can have positive effects. Prebiotics, including FOS, inulin-type fructans, and GOS were observed to increase bifidobacteria in several studies [113, 119]. Other carbohydrates, with prebiotic properties, such as arabinoxylans can also have this potential [117, 119]. Changes in other bacteria induced by a high fat diet were also modulated and normalised by prebiotic supplementation [117, 148]. In addition, prebiotics could regulate the balance of dominating bacteria, hence modulating microbiota equilibrium. In one study, the ratio of Firmicutes: Bacteriodetes was significantly lower following supplementation of GOS compared to that of a high-fat-diet treated group [148]. However, there was no low fat group in this study, which was a limitation of this experiment design.
Modulation in immune function
Prebiotics may modulate changes in immune function induced by a high fat diet through regulating immune markers including pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines (Table 4). In murine studies, oligofructose, inulin and arabinoxylans have shown this potential [115, 149]. This provides the possibility of using prebiotics to modulate immune function in elderly people taking high fat diets.
Intestinal and systemic inflammation induced by high fat diets could also be down-regulated by different probiotic strains (Table 4). The impact of different probiotics has been tested and confirmed by a few murine studies. Well-studied probiotics include L.curvatus HY7601 and L. plantarum KY1032 [133], B. longum [134], L. rhamnosus GG and Propionibacte-rium freudenreichii spp. shermanii JS [150] (Table 4). These probiotics can downregulate both intestinal and systemic pro-inflammatory changes induced by a high-fat diet by reducing levels of some proinflammatory cytokines (TNF- α, IL6, IL-1β). Under high fat conditions, probiotics act to modulate immune markers in animal models, indicating the possibility to impact on immune function in elderly people consuming high fat diets. Synbiotics also have this potential. In the study of Roller et al. [149], a synbiotic combination of probiotics (Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG and Bifidobacterium lactis Bb12) and prebiotics (inulin enriched with oligofructose) could reduce systemic inflammation.
In summary, a high fat diet has an impact on the microbiota composition and immune function in animal models (Tables 3 and 4). Some changes are similar to those induced by the aging process in elderly populations. Prebiotics, probiotics and synbiotics may modulate changes in the microbiota composition and immune function induced by a high fat diet (Tables 3 and 4). Therefore, it is possible that they could improve those changes induced by a high fat diet in elderly persons. A few possible mechanisms have been suggested, however they still need to be confirmed.
Conclusion
With an increasing aged population, more attention to elderly health status should be made. The aging process could lead to alterations in gut microbiota and dysregulation of immune function. These changes are similar to those induced by high fat intakes in animal models. Furthermore, elderly people have higher fat intakes than recommended levels, thus there may be an association between a high fat intake and dysfunctional aging processes. High fat diets may exasperate dysbiosis of gut microbiota and lead to impaired immune function. Hence, the elderly may be more vulnerable to disease risk, making the impact of fat on the gut microbiota important. Prebiotics and probiotics have been shown to have positive effects on microbiota composition, immune function and repress metabolic disorder in elderly, but mainly in animal models.
