Robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) was initially developed based on the passive controlled (PC) mode, where the target or ideal locomotor kinematic trajectory is predefined and a patient basically ‘rides’ the robot instead of actively participating in the actual locomotor relearning process. A new insightful contemporary neuroscience and mechatronic evidence suggest that robotic-based locomotor relearning can be best achieved through active interactive (AI) mode rather than PC mode.
OBJECTIVE:
The purpose of this study was to compare the pattern of gait-related cortical activity, specifically gait event-related spectral perturbations (ERSPs), and muscle activity from the tibialis anterior (TA) and clinical functional tests in subacute and chronic stroke patients during robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) in passive controlled (PC) and active interactive (AI) modes.
METHODS:
The present study involves a two-group pretest-posttest design in which two groups (i.e., PC-RAGT group and AI-RAGT group) of 14 stroke subjects were measured to assess changes in ERSPs, the muscle activation of TA, and the clinical functional tests, following 15– 18 sessions of intervention according to the protocol of each group.
RESULTS:
Our preliminary results demonstrated that the power in the μ band (8– 12 Hz) was increased in the leg area of sensorimotor cortex (SMC) and supplementary motor area (SMA) at post-intervention as compared to pre-intervention in both groups. Such cortical neuroplasticity change was associated with TA muscle activity during gait and functional independence in functional ambulation category (FAC) and motor coordination in Fugl– Meyer Assessment for lower extremity (FMA-LE) test as well as spasticity in the modified Ashworth scale (MAS) measures.
CONCLUSIONS:
We have first developed a novel neuroimaging experimental paradigm which distinguished gait event related cortical involvement between pre- and post-intervention with PC-RAGT and AI-RAGT in individuals with subacute and chronic hemiparetic stroke.
Brown,C. E., Aminoltejari,K., Erb,H., Winship,I. R., & Murphy,T. H. (2009) In vivo voltage-sensitive dye imaging in adult mice reveals that somatosensory maps lost to stroke are replaced over weeks by new structural and functional circuits with prolonged modes of activation within both the peri-infarct zone and distant sites, Journal of Neuroscience29(6), 1719–1734.
2.
Bulea,T. C., Kim,J., Damiano,D. L., Stanley,C. J., & Park,H.-S. (2015) Prefrontal, posterior parietal and sensorimotor network activity underlying speed control during walking, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience9, 247.
3.
Cao,J., Xie,S. Q., Das,R., & Zhu,G. L. (2014) Control strategies for effective robot assisted gait rehabilitation: the state of art and future prospects, Med Eng Phys36(12), 1555–1566. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2014.08.005
4.
Criswell,E. (2010) Cram’s introduction to surface electromyography. Jones & Bartlett Publishers.
5.
Delorme,A., & Makeig,S. (2004) EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis, Journal of Neuroscience Methods134(1), 9–21.
6.
Dohring,M. E., & Daly,J. J. (2008) Automatic synchronization of functional electrical stimulation and robotic assisted treadmill training, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering16(3), 310–313.
7.
Duschau-Wicke,A., Caprez,A., & Riener,R. (2010) Patient-cooperative control increases active participation of individuals with SCI during robot-aided gait training, Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation7(1), 1–13.
8.
Fleerkotte,B. M., Koopman,B., Buurke,J. H., van Asseldonk,E. H., van der Kooij,H., & Rietman,J. S. (2014) The effect of impedance-controlled robotic gait training on walking ability and quality in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: an explorative study, Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation11, 26. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-11-26
9.
Gerloff,C., Bushara,K., Sailer,A., Wassermann,E. M., Chen,R., Matsuoka,T., Waldvogel,D., Wittenberg,G. F., Ishii,K., & Cohen,L. G. (2006) Multimodal imaging of brain reorganization in motor areas of the contralesional hemisphere of well recovered patients after capsular stroke, Brain129(3), 791–808.
10.
Gwin,J. T., Gramann,K., Makeig,S., & Ferris,D. P. (2011) Electrocortical activity is coupled to gait cycle phase during treadmill walking, Neuroimage54(2), 1289–1296.
11.
Hermens,H. J., Freriks,B., Merletti,R., Stegeman,D., Blok,J., Rau,G., Disselhorst-Klug,C., & Hägg,G. (1999) European recommendations for surface electromyography, Roessingh Research and Development8(2), 13–54.
12.
Hidler,J. M., & Wall,A. E. (2005) Alterations in muscle activation patterns during robotic-assisted walking, Clinical Biomechanics20(2), 184–193.
13.
Hoyer,E. H., & Celnik,P. A. (2011) Understanding and enhancing motor recovery after stroke using transcranial magnetic stimulation, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience29(6), 395–409.
14.
Hussain,S., Jamwal,P. K., Ghayesh,M. H., & Xie,S. Q. (2016) Assist-as-needed control of an intrinsically compliant robotic gait training orthosis, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics64(2), 1675–1685.
15.
Hussain,S., Xie,S. Q., & Liu,G. (2011) Robot assisted treadmill training: mechanisms and training strategies, Medical Engineering and Physics33(5), 527–533.
16.
Jacquelin Perry,M. (2010) Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. New Jersey: SLACK.
17.
Jang,S. H., Cho,S.-H., Kim,Y.-H., You,S. H., Kim,S. H., Kim,O., & Yang,D. S. (2005) Motor recovery mechanism of diffuse axonal injury: a combined study of transcranial magnetic stimulation and functional MRI, Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience23(1), 51–56.
18.
Johnson,A. N., & Shinohara,M. (2012) Corticomuscular coherence with and without additional task in the elderly, Journal of Applied Physiology112(6), 70–981.
19.
Jones,T. A., Kleim,J. A., & Greenough,W. T. (1996) Synaptogenesis and dendritic growth in the cortex opposite unilateral sensorimotor cortex damage in adult rats: a quantitative electron microscopic examination, Brain Research733(1), 142–148.
20.
Kilner,J., Baker,S., Salenius,S., Jousmäki,V., Hari,R., & Lemon,R. (1999) Task-dependent modulation of 15-30 Hz coherence between rectified EMGs from human hand and forearm muscles, The Journal of Physiology516(2), 559–570.
21.
Kim,H. Y., Yang,S. P., Park,G. L., Kim,E. J., & You,J. S. H. (2016) Best facilitated cortical activation during different stepping, treadmill, and robot-assisted walking training paradigms and speeds: a functional near-infrared spectroscopy neuroimaging study, NeuroRehabilitation38(2), 171–178.
22.
Klem,G. H., Lüders,H. O., Jasper,H. H., & Elger,C. (1999) The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology Supplement52, 3–6.
23.
Knaepen,K., Mierau,A., Swinnen,E., Fernandez Tellez,H., Michielsen,M., Kerckhofs,E., Lefeber,D., & Meeusen,R. (2015) Human-robot interaction: does robotic guidance force affect gait-related brain dynamics during robot-assisted treadmill walking?PloS One10(10), e0140626.
24.
Luft,A. R., Macko,R. F., Forrester,L. W., Villagra,F., Ivey,F., Sorkin,J. D., Whitall,J., McCombe-Waller,S., Katzel,L., & Goldberg,A. P. (2008) Treadmill exercise activates subcortical neural networks and improves walking after stroke: a randomized controlled trial, Stroke39(12), 3341–3350.
25.
Luu,T. P., Brantley,J. A., Zhu,F., & Contreras-Vidal,J. L. (2017) Electrocortical amplitudemodulations of human level-ground, slope, and stair walking. 2017 39th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC),
26.
Macko,R. F., Ivey,F. M., Forrester,L. W., Hanley,D., Sorkin,J. D., Katzel,L. I., Silver,K. H., & Goldberg,A. P. (2005) Treadmill exercise rehabilitation improves ambulatory function and cardiovascular fitness in patients with chronic stroke: a randomized, controlled trial, Stroke36(10), 2206–2211.
27.
Makeig,S. (1993) Auditory event-related dynamics of the EEG spectrum and effects of exposure to tones, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology86(4), 283–293.
28.
Marchal-Crespo,L., & Reinkensmeyer,D. J. (2009) Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury, Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation6(1), 20. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-6-20
29.
Marshall,R. S., Perera,G. M., Lazar,R. M., Krakauer,J. W., Constantine,R. C., & DeLaPaz,R. L. (2000) Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction, Stroke31(3), 656–661.
30.
Miyai,I., Tanabe,H. C., Sase,I., Eda,H., Oda,I., Konishi,I., Tsunazawa,Y., Suzuki,T., Yanagida,T., & Kubota,K. (2001) Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study, Neuroimage14(5), 1186–1192.
31.
Moreno,J. C., Barroso,F., Farina,D., Gizzi,L., Santos,C., Molinari,M., & Pons,J. L. (2013) Effects of robotic guidance on the coordination of locomotion, Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation10(1), 1–15.
32.
Mummolo,C., Mangialardi,L., & Kim,J. H. (2013) Quantifying dynamic characteristics of human walking for comprehensive gait cycle, Journal of Biomechanical Engineering135(9).
33.
Park,C., Oh-Park,M., Bialek,A., Friel,K., Edwards,D., & You,J. S. H. (2021) Abnormal synergistic gait mitigation in acute stroke using an innovative ankle– knee– hip interlimb humanoid robot: A preliminary randomized controlled trial, Scientific Reports11(1), 1–13.
34.
Park,C., Oh-Park,M., Dohle,C., Bialek,A., Friel,K., Edwards,D., Krebs,H. I., & You,J. S. H. (2020) Effects of innovative hip-knee-ankle interlimb coordinated robot training on ambulation, cardiopulmonary function, depression, and fall confidence in acute hemiplegia, NeuroRehabilitation46(4), 577–587.
35.
Park,J.H., Shin,Y.I., You,J. S. H., & Park,M. S. (2018) Comparative effects of robotic-assisted gait training combined with conventional physical therapy on paretic hip joint stiffness and kinematics between subacute and chronic hemiparetic stroke, NeuroRehabilitation42(2), 181–190.
36.
Pekna,M., Pekny,M., & Nilsson,M. (2012) Modulation of neural plasticity as a basis for stroke rehabilitation, Stroke43(10), 2819–2828.
37.
Petersen,T. H., Willerslev-Olsen,M., Conway,B. A., & Nielsen,J. B. (2012) The motor cortex drives the muscles during walking in human subjects, The Journal of Physiology590(10), 2443–2452.
38.
Pfurtscheller,G., & Da Silva,F. L. (1999) Event-related EEG/MEG synchronization and desynchronization: basic principles, Clinical Neurophysiology110(11), 1842–1857.
39.
Presacco,A., Goodman,R., Forrester,L., & Contreras-Vidal,J. L. (2011) Neural decoding of treadmill walking from noninvasive electroencephalographic signals, Journal of Neurophysiology106(4), 1875–1887.
40.
Rehme,A. K., Eickhoff,S. B., Wang,L. E., Fink,G. R., & Grefkes,C. (2011) Dynamic causal modeling of cortical activity from the acute to the chronic stage after stroke, Neuroimage55(3), 1147–1158.
41.
Seeber,M., Scherer,R., Wagner,J., Solis-Escalante,T., & Müller-Putz,G. R. (2014) EEG beta suppression and low gamma modulation are different elements of human upright walking, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience8, 485.
42.
Severens,M., Nienhuis,B., Desain,P., & Duysens,J. (2012) Feasibility of measuring event related desynchronization with electroencephalography during walking. 2012 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society,
43.
Sun,L., Yin,D., Zhu,Y., Fan,M., Zang,L., Wu,Y., Jia,J., Bai,Y., Zhu,B., & Hu,Y. (2013) Cortical reorganization after motor imagery training in chronic stroke patients with severe motor impairment: a longitudinal fMRI study, Neuroradiology55(7), 913–925.
44.
van Kammen,K., Boonstra,A. M., van der Woude,L. H., Reinders-Messelink,H. A., & den Otter,R. (2016) The combined effects of guidance force, bodyweight support and gait speed on muscle activity during able-bodied walking in the Lokomat, Clinical Biomechanics36, 65–73.
45.
Van Tran,Q., Kim,S., Lee,K., Kang,S., & Ryu,J. (2015) Force/torque sensorless impedance control for indirect driven robot-aided gait rehabilitation system. 2015 IEEEInternational Conference on Advanced Intelligent Mechatronics (AIM),
46.
Veneman,J. F., Kruidhof,R., Hekman,E. E., Ekkelenkamp,R., Van Asseldonk,E. H., & Van Der Kooij,H. (2007) Design and evaluation of the LOPES exoskeleton robot for interactive gait rehabilitation, IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering15(3), 379–386.
47.
Wagner,J., Solis-Escalante,T., Grieshofer,P., Neuper,C., Müller-Putz,G., & Scherer,R. (2012) Level of participation in robotic-assisted treadmill walking modulates midline sensorimotor EEG rhythms in able-bodied subjects, Neuroimage63(3), 1203–1211.
48.
Wieser,M., Haefeli,J., Bütler,L., Jäncke,L., Riener,R., & Koeneke,S. (2010) Temporal and spatial patterns of cortical activation during assisted lower limb movement, Experimental Brain Research203(1), 181–191.
49.
Wolbrecht,E. T., Chan,V., Le,V., Cramer,S. C., Reinkensmeyer,D. J., & Bobrow,J. E. (2007) Real-time computer modeling of weakness following stroke optimizes robotic assistance for movement therapy. 2007 3rd International IEEE/EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering
