Upper limb dysfunction is a frequent complication after stroke impairing outcome. Inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) applied over the contralesional hemisphere is supposed to enhance the positive effects of conventional rehabilitative treatment.
OBJECTIVE:
This double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial investigated whether inhibitory rTMS as add-on to standard therapy improves upper limb spasticity.
METHODS:
Twenty-eight patients (aged 44 to 80 years) with unilateral stroke in the middle cerebral artery territory were analyzed. Participants were randomly assigned to inhibitory, low-frequency (LF-) rTMS (n = 14) or sham-rTMS (n = 14). The primary outcome measure was the spasticity grade, which was assessed with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). In addition, the Fugl-Meyer-Assessment (FMA) for the upper extremity (UE) and a resting-state fMRI were performed to measure motor functions and the sensorimotor network, respectively.
RESULTS:
The MAS score was reduced in the LF-rTMS group only, whereas the FMA score improved in both groups over time. Regarding the fMRI data, both groups activated typical regions of the sensorimotor network. In the LF-rTMS group, however, connectivity to the left angular gyrus increased after treatment.
CONCLUSION:
Changes in functional connectivity in patients receiving inhibitory rTMS over the contralesional motor cortex suggest that processes of neuronal plasticity are stimulated.
Alia,C., Spalletti,C., Lai,S., Panarese,A., Lamola,G., Bertolucci,F.,. . . Caleo,M. (2017). Neuroplastic changes following brain ischemia and their contribution to stroke recovery: Novel approaches in neurorehabilitation. Frontiers in Cellular Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 11, 76. https://doi.org/10.3389/fncel.2017.00076.
2.
Aşkin,A., Tosun,A., & Demirdal,Ü. S. (2017). Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery and functional outcomes in chronic stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Somatosensory & Motor Research, Somatosensory & Motor Research, 34(2), 102–107. https://doi. org/10.1080/08990220.2017.1316254.
3.
Behzadi,Y., Restom,K., Liau,J., & Liu,T. T. (2007). A component based noise correction method (CompCor) for BOLD and perfusion based fMRI. NeuroImage, 37(1), 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.04.042.
4.
Boddington,L. J, & Reynolds,J. N. J. (2017). Targeting interhemispheric inhibition with neuromodulation to enhance stroke rehabilitation. Brain Stimulation, 10(2), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2017.01.006.
5.
Bohannon,R. W., & Smith,M. B. (1987). Interrater reliability of a modified Ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Physical Therapy, 67(2). https://doi.org/10.1093/ptj/67.2.206
6.
Bolognini,N., Russo,C., Souza Carneiro,M. I., Nicotra,A., Olgiati,E., Spandri,V.,. . . Vallar,G. (2020). Bi-hemispheric transcranial direct current stimulation for upper-limb hemiparesis in acute stroke: A randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled trial. European Journal of Neurology, 27(12), 2473–2482. https://doi.org/10.1111/ene.14451.
7.
Dobkin,B. H. (2005). Rehabilitation after stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 352(16), 1677–1684. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMcp043511.
8.
Du,J., Yang,F., Hu,J., Hu,J., Xu,Q., Cong,N.,. . . Liu,X. (2019). Effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor recovery in early stroke patients: Evidence from a randomized controlled trial with clinical, neurophysiological and functional imaging assessments. NeuroImage: Clinical, 21, 101620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nicl.2018.101620.
9.
Fisicaro,F., Lanza,G., Grasso,A. A., Pennisi,G., Bella,R., Paulus,W., & Pennisi,M. (2019). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke rehabilitation: Review of the current evidence and pitfalls. Therapeutic Advances in Neurological Disorders, 12, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1756286419878317.
10.
Fugl-Meyer,A. R., Jääskö,L., Leyman,I., Olsson,S., & Steglind,S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient.. A method for evaluation of physical performance, Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7(1), 13–31.
11.
Harris,J. E., & Eng,J. J. (2006). Individuals with the dominant hand affected following stroke demonstrate less impairment than those with the nondominant hand affected. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 20(3), 380–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968305284528.
12.
Harvey,R. L., Edwards,D., Dunning,K., Fregni,F., Stein,J., Laine,J.,. . . Pratt,W. (2018). Randomized sham-controlled trial of navigated repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for motor recovery in stroke. Stroke, 49(9), 2138–2146. https://doi.org/10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020607.
13.
Hoonhorst,M. H., Nijland,R. H., van den Berg,J. S., Emmelot,C. H., Kollen,B. J., & Kwakkel,G. (2015). How do Fugl Meyer arm motor scores relate to dexterity according to the Action Research Arm Test at 6 months poststroke?Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 96(10), 1845–1849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2015.06.009.
14.
Hussain,N., Alt Murphy,M., & Sunnerhagen,K. S. (2018). Upper limb kinematics in stroke and healthy controls using target-to-target task in virtual reality. Frontiers in Neurology, 9, 300. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2018.00300.
15.
Johnson,C. O., Nguyen,M., Roth,G. A., Nichols,E., Alam,T., Abate,D.,. . . Murray,C. J. L. (2019). Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990–2016: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. The Lancet Neurology, 18(5), 439–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(19)30034-1.
16.
Kakuda,W., Abo,M., Sasanuma,J., Shimizu,M., Okamoto,T., Kimura,C.,. . . Hara,H. (2016). Combination protocol of lowfrequency rTMS and intensive occupational therapy for post stroke upper limb hemiparesis: a 6-year experience of more than 1700 japanese patients. Translational Stroke Research, 7(3), 172–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12975-016-0456-8.
17.
Kakuda,W., Abo,M., Shimizu,M., Sasanuma,J., Okamoto,T., Yokoi,A.,. . . Investigators (2012). A multi-center study on low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis in post-stroke patients. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-4.
18.
Kwakkel,G., & Kollen,B. J. (2013). Predicting activities after stroke: What is clinically relevant?International Journal of Stroke, 8(1), 25–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00967.x.
19.
Lowe,M. J., Mock,B. J., & Sorenson,J. A. (1998). Functional connectivity in single and multislice echoplanar imaging using resting-state fluctuations. Neuro Image, 7(2), 119–132. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.1997.0315.
20.
Sankarasubramanian,V., Machado,A. G., Conforto,A. B., Potter-Baker,K. A., Cunningham,D. A., Varnerin,N. M.,. . . Plow,E. B. (2017). Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 128(6), 892–902. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinph.2017.03.030.
21.
Seghier,M. L. (2013). The angular gyrus: Multiple functions and multiple subdivisions. The Neuroscientist, 19(1), 43–61. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073858412440596.
22.
Whitfield-Gabrieli,S., & Nieto-Castanon,A. (2012). Conn: A functional connectivity toolbox for correlated and anticorrelated brain networks. Brain Connectivity, 2(3), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1089/brain.2012.0073.
23.
Yan,C.-G., Wang,X.-D., Zuo,X.-N., & Zang,Y.-F. (2016). DPABI: Data processing & analysis for (resting state) brain imaging. Neuroinformatics, 14(3), 339–351. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12021-016-9299-4.
24.
Yin,D., Song,F., Xu,D., Peterson,B. S., Sun,L., Men,W.,. . . Fan,M. (2012). Patterns in cortical connectivity for determining outcomes in hand function after subcortical stroke. PLoS ONE, 7(12), e52727. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052727.
