Visuospatial neglect (VSN) may be caused by an inter-hemispheric imbalance of neural activity after brain injury. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) allows rebalancing restoration to a certain degree, relieving neglect symptoms.
OBJECTIVE:
This study investigates the therapeutic effect of 1 Hz rTMS applied over the left angular gyrus combined with visual scanning training in patients with left VSN in the subacute stroke phase.
METHODS:
Twenty-eight patients with VSN were randomly assigned to either experimental (fifteen sessions of rTMS consisted of 1800 magnetic pulses delivered to the left angular gyrus with a neuronavigation control), or control group (fifteen sessions of sham stimulation), followed by visual scanning training. VSN severity was assessed both before and after treatment with a 3-month follow up employing the Behavioural Inattention Test and functional measures.
RESULTS:
No statistically significant differences were detected in outcome measures between the rTMS and sham groups after completion of 3-week therapy and at 3-month follow up. The magnitude of stimulation effects was not associated either with lesion volume, its location, or baseline motor threshold.
CONCLUSIONS:
Our study did not confirm efficacy of 1 Hz rTMS over the angular gyrus as an adjuvant method to visual scanning training in patients with VSN in the subacute stroke.
Bernhardt,J., Hayward,K. S., Kwakkel,G., Ward,N. S., Wolf,S. L., Borschmann,K., et al. (2017). Agreed definitions and a shared vision for new standards in stroke recovery research: the stroke recovery and rehabilitation roundtable taskforce. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 31, 793–799.
2.
Borckardt,J. J., Nahas,Z., Koola,J., & George,M. S. (2006). Estimating resting motor thresholds in Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation research and practice. The Journal of ECT, 22, 169–175.
3.
Brighina,F., Bisiach,E., Oliveri,M., Piazza,A., LaBua, V., Daniele,O., et al. (2003). 1Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans. Neuroscience Letters, 336, 131–133.
4.
Cao,L., Fu,W., Zhang,Y., Huo,S., Du,J., Zhu,L., et al. (2016). Intermittent θ burst stimulation modulates resting-state functional connectivity in the attention network and promotes behavioral recovery in patients with visual spatial neglect. Neuroreport, 27, 1261–1265.
5.
Cattaneo,Z., Silvanto,J., Pascual-Leone,A., & Battelli,L. (2009). The role of the angular gyrus in the modulation of visuospatial attention by the mental number line. Neuroimage, 44, 563–568.
6.
Cazzoli,D., Müri,R. M., Schumacher,R., vonArx, S., Chaves,S., Gutbrot,K., et al. (2012). Theta burst stimulation reduces disability during the activities of daily living in spatial neglect. Brain, 135, 3426–3439.
7.
Cha,H. G., & Kim,M. K. (2015). The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on unilateral neglect of acute stroke patients: a randomised controlled trial. Hong Kong Physiotherapy Journal, 33, 53–58.
8.
Cha,H. G., & Kim,M. K. (2016). Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on arm function and decreasing unilateral spatial neglect in subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 30, 649–656.
9.
Chechlacz,M., Humphreys,G. W., Sotiropoulos,S. N., Kennard,C., & Cazzoli,D. (2015). Structural organization of the corpus callosum predicts attentional shifts after continuous Theta Burst Stimulation. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35, 15353–15368.
10.
Chen,P., Pitteri,M., Gillen,G., & Ayyala,H. (2017). Ask the experts how to treat individuals with spatial neglect: A survey study. Disability and Rehabilitation, 0, 1–15.
11.
Cicerone,K. D.,
Goldin,Y.,
Ganci,K.,
Rosenbaum,A.,
Wethe,J. V.,
Langenbahn,D. M., et al. (2019). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Systematic review of the literature from 2009 through 2014. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 100, 1515–1533.
12.
Corbetta,M., Kincade,M. J., Lewis,C., Snyder,A. Z., & Sapir,A. (2005). Neural basis and recovery of spatial attention deficits in spatial neglect. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1603–1610.
13.
Dionísio,A., Duarte,I. C., Patrício,M., & Castelo-Branco,M. (2018). The use of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for stroke rehabilitation: A systematic review. Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases, 8(27), 1–31.
14.
Farnè,A., Buxbaum,L. J., Ferraro,M., Frassinetti,F., Whyte,J., Veramonti,T., et al. (2004). Patterns of spontaneous recovery of neglect and associated disorders in acute right brain-damaged patients. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 75, 1401–1410.
15.
Fregni,F., & Pascual-Leone,A. (2007). Technology insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology-perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nature Clinical Practice. Neurology, 3, 383–393.
16.
Fu,W., Song,W., Zhang,Y., Yang,Y., Huo,S., Zhang,R., et al. (2015). Long-term effects of continuous theta-burst stimulation in visuospatial neglect. The Journal of International Medical Research, 43, 196–203.
17.
Groppa,S., Oliviero,A., Eisen,A., Quartarone,A., Cohen,L. G., Mall,V., et al. (2012). A practical guide to diagnostic transcranial magnetic stimulation: Report of an IFCN committee. Clinical Neurophysiology, 123, 858–882.
18.
Hall,K. M., Hamilton,B. B., Gordon,W. A., & Zasler,N. D. (1993). Characteristics and comparisons of functional assessment indices. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 83, 60–74.
19.
Hallett,M. (2007). Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation: A primer. Neuron, 55, 187–199.
20.
He,B. J., Snyder,A. Z., Vincent,J. L., Epstein,A., Shulman,G. L., & Corbetta,M. (2007). Breakdown of functional connectivity in frontoparietal networks underlies behavioral deficits in spatial neglect. Neuron, 53, 905–918.
21.
Heilman,K. M., Valenstein,E., & Watson,R. T. (2000). Neglect and related disorders. Seminars in Neurology, 20, 463–470.
22.
Hillis,A. E., Newhart,M., Heidler,J., Barker,P. B., Herskovits,E. H., & Degaonkar,M. (2005). Anatomy of Spatial Attention: Insights from Perfusion Imaging and Hemispatial Neglect in Acute Stroke. The Journal of Neuroscience, 25, 3161–3167.
23.
Hummel,F. C., & Cohen,L. G. (2006). Non-invasive brain stimulation: A new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke? The Lancet. Neurology, 5, 708–712.
24.
Kerkhoff,G., & Schenk,T. (2012). Rehabilitation of neglect: An update. Neuropsychologia, 50, 1072–1079.
25.
Kim,B. R., Chun,M. H., Kim,D. Y., & Lee,S. J. (2013). Effect of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visuospatial neglect in patients with acute stroke: A double-blind, sham-controlled trial. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabiitation, 94, 803–807.
26.
Kim,J. S., Kim,J. C., Shin,S. H., & Kim,Y. K. (2010). Comparison of effects of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation with high- or low-frequency on visuospatial neglect in stroke patients. Journal of the Korean Academy of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, 397–402.
27.
Kim,K-U., Kim,S-H., & An,T-G. (2017). The effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on depression, visual perception, and activities of daily living in stroke patients. Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 29, 1036–1039.
28.
Kim,Y. K., Jung,J. H., & Shin,S. H. (2015). A comparison of the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) by number of stimulation sessions on hemispatial neglect in chronic stroke patients. Experimantal Brain Ressearch, 233, 283–289.
29.
Kim,W. J., Min,Y. S., Yang,E. J., & Paik,N. J. (2014). Neuronavigated vs. conventional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation method for virtual lesioning on the Broca’s area. Neuromodulation, 17, 16–21.
30.
Kinsbourne,M. (1987). Mechanisms of unilateral neglect. In M. Jeannerod (Ed.), |it Neurophysiological and Neuropsychological Aspects of Spatial Neglect (pp. 69-86). North Holland: Elsevier Science.
31.
Koch,G., Bonnì,S., Giacobbe,V., Bucchi,G., Basile,B., Lupo,F., et al. (2012). ensuremath theta -burst stimulation of the left hemisphere accelerates recovery of hemispatial neglect. Neurology, 78, 24–30.
32.
Koch,G., Oliveri,M., Cheeran,B., Ruge,D., LoGerfo, E., Salerno,S., et al. (2008). Hyperexcitability of parietal-motor functional connections in the intact left-hemisphere of patients with neglect. Brain, 131, 3147–3155.
33.
Lefaucheur,J-P., André-Obadia,N., Antal,A., Ayache,S. S., Baeken,C., Benninger,B. H., et al. (2014). Evidence-based guidelines on the therapeutic use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS). Clinical Neurophysiology, 125, 2150–2206.
34.
Lim,J. Y., Kang,E. K., & Paik,N. J. (2010). Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for hemispatial neglect in patients after stroke: An open-label pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 42, 447–452.
35.
Mort,D. J., Malhotra,P., Mannan,S. K., Rorden,C., Pambakian,A., Kennard,C., et al. (2003). The anatomy of visual neglect. Brain, 126, 1986–1997.
36.
Müri,R. M., Cazzoli,D., Nef,T., Mosimann,U. P., Hopfner,S., & Nyffeler,T. (2013). Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation in neglect rehabilitation: An update. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 1–10.
37.
Nyffeler,T., Cazzoli,D., Hess,C. W., & Müri,R. M. (2009). One session of repeated parietal theta burst stimulation trains induces long-lasting improvement of visual neglect. Stroke, 40, 2791–2796.
38.
Rossetti,Y., & Rode,G. (2002). Reducing spatial neglect by visual and other sensory manipulations: Noncognitive (physiological) routes to the rehabilitation of a cognitive disorder. In H. Karnath, A. D. Milner, & G. Vallar (Eds.), The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect (pp. 375-396).Oxford:Oxford University Press.
39.
Rossi,S., Hallett,M., Rossini,P. M., & Pascual-Leone,A. (2009). Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology, 120, 2008–2039.
40.
Salazar,A. P. S., Vaz,P. G., Marchese,R. R., Stein,C., Pinto,C., & Pagnussat,A. S. (2018). Noninvasive Brain Stimulation improves hemispatial neglect after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 99, 355–366.
41.
Saur,D., Lange,R., Baumgaertner,A., Schraknepper,V., Willmes,K., Rijntjes,M., et al. (2006). Dynamics of language reorganization after stroke. Brain, 129, 1371–1384.
42.
Saur,D., Ronneberger,O., Kümmerer,D., Mader,I., Weiller,C., & Klöppel,S. (2010). Early functional magnetic resonance imaging activations predict language outcome after stroke. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 133, 1252–1264.
43.
Shindo,K., Sugiyama,K., Huabao,L., Nishijima,K., Kondo,T., & Izumi,S-I. (2006). Long-term effect of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation over the unaffected posterior parietal cortex in patients with unilateral spatial neglect. *Presented part by the 42nd Annual Congress of the Japanese Association of Rehabilitation. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38, 65–67.
44.
Song,W., Du,B., Xu,Q., Hu,J., Wang,M., & Luo,Y. (2009). Low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation for visual spatial neglect: A pilot study. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41, 162–165.
45.
Vallar,G. (2001). Extrapersonal visual unilateral spatial neglect and its neuroanatomy. S. Neuroimage, 14, 52–8.
46.
Wilson,B. A., Cockburn,J., & Halligan,P. (1987). Development of a behavioral test of visuospatal neglect. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 98–102.
47.
Yang,N. Y. H., Fong,K. N. K., Li-Tsang,C. W. P., & Zhou.D. (2017). Effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation combined with sensory cueing on unilateral neglect in subacute patients with right hemispheric stroke: A randomized controlled study. Clinical Rehabilitation, 31, 1154–1163.
48.
Yang,W., Liu,T. T., Song,X. B., Zhang,Y., Li,Z. H., & Cui,Z. H.et al. (2015). Comparison of different stimulation parameters of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for unilateral spatial neglect in stroke patients. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 359, 219–225.
