OBJECTIVE: To compare chest X-ray with echocardiogram (ECHO) in the localization of an umbilical venous catheter (UVC) tip in very low birth weight infants (VLBW). Secondary objectives determined the association between techniques for tip placement by the vertebral body level on X-ray, as well as the length of the thoracic inferior vena cava-right atrial (TIVC-RA) junction by ECHO.
STUDY DESIGN: Prospective, sequentially enrolled, masked, single regional perinatal center study. Shortly after birth, one or more anterior-posterior X-rays were ordered by the clinical team to verify that the UVC tip was fixed in the central right atrium (cRA) or at the TIVC-RA junction. An echocardiogram was performed as soon as possible after the last X-ray and UVC tip location was interpreted by a pediatric cardiologist. The pediatric radiologist and cardiologist were masked with regard to each other’s reading.
RESULTS: The newborns (n = 51) were 27 (±3) weeks by gestational age with birth weights of 1029 (±288) grams (mean±SD). The radiologist read 50 UVC tips (98%) in the cRA or TIVC-RA junction and 1 (2%) in the LA. The cardiologist read 22 (43%) in the cRA or TIVC-RA, 21 (41%) in the LA and 8 (16%) tips could not be located in the heart. When the UVC tip was interpreted by X-ray as located in the TIVC-RA junction 8/29 (28%) were in the LA by echocardiogram. There was no agreement between vertebral level and tip position in the TIVC-RA junction, RA or LA. The TIVC-RA junction measured 6±1 mm and correlated with birth weight r = 0.54 (p < 0.001).
CONCLUSION: In VLBW newborns, placement of the UVC tip into the cRA or TIVC-RA junction by X-ray does not avoid misplacement in the left atrium as demonstrated by echocardiography. For VLBW infants, it is suggested that echocardiography may be helpful in verifying that the original placement or migration of the UVC tip into the LA has not occurred.
DiamondLK, AllenFHJr, ThomasWOJr. Erythroblastosis fetalis – treatment with exchange transfusion. N Engl J Med1951;244(2):39–49.
2.
WeberAL, DeLucaS, ShannonDC. Normal and abnormal position of the umbilical artery and venous catheter on the roentgenogram and review of complications. Am J Roentgenol Radium Ther Nucl Med1974;120(2):361–7.
3.
GuptaAO, PeesayMR, RamasethuJ. Simple measurements to place umbilical catheters using surface anatomy. J Perinatol2015;35:476–80.
4.
ShuklaH, FerraraA. Rapid estimation of insertional length of umbilical catheters in newborns. AMA Am J Dis Child1986;140(8):786–8.
5.
VerheijGH, te PasAB, Smits-WintjensVE, SramekA, WaltherFJ, LoprioreE. Revised formula to determine the insertion length of umbilical vein catheters. Eur J Pediatr2013;172(8):1011–5.
6.
RavalNC, GonzalezE, BhatAM, PearlmanSA, StefanoJL. Umbilical venous catheters: Evaluation of radiographs to determine position and associated complications of malpositioned umbilical venous catheters. J Perinatol1995;12(3):201–4.
OestreichAE. Umbilical vein catheterization–appropriate and inappropriate placement. Pediatr Radiol2010;40(12):1941–9.
9.
SchlesingerAE, BravermanRM, DiPietroMA. Pictorial Essay. Neonates and umbilical venous catheters: Normal appearance, anomalous positions, complications, and potential aid to diagnosis. AJR AM J Roentgenol2003;180(4):1147–53.
10.
ButlerG, Al-AssafN, TarrantA, RyanS, El-KhuffashA. Using lateral radiographs to determine umbilical venous catheter tip position in neonates. Ir Med J2014;107(8):256–8.
11.
BrodskyD, MartinC. Neonatology Review. 2nd Ed. BrodskyD and MartinC, eds. 2010. p. 135.
12.
SalvadoriS, PivaD, FilipponeM. Umbilical venous line displacement as a consequence of abdominal girth variation. J Pediatr2002;141(5):737.
13.
LaiW.W., GevaT., ShiraliG.S., FrommeltP.C., HumesR.A., BrookM.M., et al. Guidelines and standards for performance of a pediatric echocardiogram: A report from the Task Force of the Pediatric Council of the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr2006;19:1413–30.
GreenC, YohannanMD. Umbilical arterial and venous catheters: Placement, use, and complications. Neonatal Netw1998;17(6):23–8.
16.
SaidM, Rais-BahramiK. Umbilical Vein Catheterization. In: MacDonaldMG RJ, editor. Atlas of Procedures in Neonatology. 5th ed. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA: 2013. pp. 173–81.
17.
HaraborA, SoraishamA. Rates of intracardiac umbilical venous catheter placement in neonates. J Ultrasound Med2014;33(9):1557–61.
18.
GreenbergM, MovahedH, PetersonB, BejarR. Placement of umbilical venous catheters with use of bedside real-time ultrasonography. J Pediatr1995;126(4):633–5.
19.
HoelleringAB, KoortsPJ, CartwrightDW, DaviesMW. Determination of umbilical venous catheter tip position with radiograph. Pediatr Crit Care Med2014;15(1):56–61.
20.
HuningBM, HorschS, RollC. Blood sampling via umbilical vein catheters decreases cerebral oxygenation and blood volume in preterm infants. Acta paediatr2007;96(11):1617–21.
21.
BrayM, StucchiI, FumagalliM, et al. Blood withdrawal and infusion via umbilical catheters: Effect on cerebral perfusion and influence of ibuprofen. Biol Neonate2003;84(3):187–93.
22.
FlemingSE, KimJH. Ultrasound-guided umbilical catheter insertion in neonates. J Perinatol2011;31(5):344–9.
23.
PulickalAS, CharlagorlaPK, TumeSC, ChhabraM, NarulaP, NadrooAM. Superiority of targeted neonatal echocardiography for umbilical venous catheter tip localization: Accuracy of a clinician performance model. J Perinatol2013;33(12):950–3.
