This work introduces a novel approach to display and arbitration of machine to machine abstract argumentation for Internet of Things devices, which does not require human intervention. The proposed model is a hybrid between weighted Dung style argumentation frameworks and competitive facility placement Voronoi games. It can accommodate weights of arguments and attack relations to depict weighted argumentation frameworks, as well as a set of premises for dynamic argumentation frameworks. Included is a visualization tool for the strength of attacks and strength of arguments and a discussion on computational challenges of the paradigm.
AhmedS.I., HasanM. and SopanA., Vindictive Voronoi Games and Stabbing Delaunay Circles, Voronoi Diagrams in Science and Engineering (ISVD), 2010 International Symposium on, Quebec, QC, Canada, (28-30 June 2010), 124-131.
2.
AhnH.K., ChengS.W., CheongO., GolinM. and van OstrumR., Competitive facility location: The Voronoi game, Theoretical Computer Science310(1-3) (2004), 457-467.
3.
AhnH.K., ChengS.W., CheongO., GolinM. and van OstrumR., Competitive facility location along a highway, in: Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Conference on Computing and Combinatorics, (COCOON '01), Guilin, China, WangJ., ed., Springer-Verlag, London, UK, (20-23 August 2001), 237-246.
4.
AmgoudL. and Ben-NaimJ., Argumentation-based ranking logics, in: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, (AAMAS '15), Istanbul, Turkey, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, (4-8 May 2015), 1511-1519.
5.
AmgoudL. and Ben-NaimJ., Ranking-based semantics for argumentation frameworks, in: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Scalable Uncertainty Management, (SUM'13), Washington, DC, USA, (16-18 September 2013), 134-147.
6.
AmgoudL., ParsonsS. and MaudetN., Arguments, dialogue and negotiation, in: Proceedings of the 14th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (ECAI'00), Berlin Germany, (20-25 August 2000), 338-342.
7.
Bench-CaponT.J.M. and DunneP.E., Argumentation in artificial intelligence, Artificial Intelligence171(10-15) (2007), 619-641.
8.
BirnbaumL., Argument molecules: A functional representation of argument structure, in: Proceedings of the Second National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (AAAI-82), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, AAAI Press, (18-20 August 1982), 63-65.
9.
CheongO., Har-PeledS., LinialN. and MatoušekJ., The one-round Voronoi game, in: Proceedings of the 18th Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, (SCG '02), Barcelona, Spain, ACM, New York, NY, USA, (5-7 June 2002), 97-101.
10.
CohonJ.L. and MarksD.H., A review and evaluation of multiobjective programing techniques, Water Resources Research11(2) (1975), 208-220.
11.
Coste-MarquisS., KoniecznyS., MarquisP. and OualiM.A., Weighted attacks in argumentation frameworks, in: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Principles in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, (KR'12), Rome, Italy, (10-14 June 2012), 593-597.
12.
DimopoulosY., KakasA.C. and MoraitisP., Argumentation based modeling of embedded agent dialogues, in: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems, (ArgMAS'05), Utrecht, The Netherlands, ParsonsS., MaudetN., MoraitisP. and RahwanI., eds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 25-26 July 2005, pp. 169-181.
13.
DirichletL., Über die reduction der positiven quadratischen Formen mit drei unbestimmten ganzen zahlen, J Reine U Angew Math40 (1850), 209-227.
14.
DunneP.E., Prevarication in dispute protocols, in: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on AI and Law, (ICAIL 03), Edinburgh, Scotland, UK, New York, NY, USA, SartorG., ed., ACM Press, 24-28 June 2003, pp. 12-21.
15.
DunneP.E., HunterA., McBurneyP., ParsonsS. and WooldridgeM., Weighted argument systems: Basic definitions, algorithms, and complexity results, Artificial Intelligence175(2) (2011), 457-486.
16.
DungP.M., On the acceptability of arguments and its fundamental role in nonmonotonic reasoning, logic programming and n-person games, Artificial Intelligence77(2) (1995), 321-357.
17.
FatimaS., WooldridgeM.J. and JenningsN.R., An agenda based framework for multi-issues negotiation, Artificial Intelligence Journal152(1) (2004), 1-45.
18.
FeketeS.P. and MeijerH., The one-round voronoi game replayed, Computational Geometry30(2) (2005), 81-94.
19.
FortuneS., A sweepline algorithm for Voronoi diagrams, in: Proceedings of the 2nd Annual Symposium on Computational Geometry, (SCG '86), Yorktown Heights, NY, USA, ACM, New York, NY, USA, (2-4 June 1986), 313-322.
20.
KakasA. and MoraitisP., Adaptive agent negotiation via argumentation, in: Proceedings of the 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, (AAMAS '06), Hakodate, Japan, ACM, New York, NY, USA, (8-12 May 2006), 384-391.
21.
LippiM., and TorroniP., Argumentation Mining: a machine learning perspective, in: Theory and Applications of Formal Argumentation: Third International Workshop, (TAFA 2015), Buenos Aires, Argentina, (25-26 July 2015), 163-176.
22.
MattP. and ToniF., A game-theoretic measure of argument strength for abstract argumentation, in: Proceedings of 11th European Conference on Logics in Artificial Intelligence, (JELIA'08), Dresden, Germany, HölldoblerS., LutzC. and WansingH., eds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 28 Sep-1 Oct 2008, pp. 285-297.
23.
MatternF. and FloerkemeierC., From the internet of computers to the internet of things, in: From Active Data Management to Event-based Systems and More, SachsK., PetrovI., and GuerreroP., eds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2010, pp. 242-259.
24.
MožinaM., abkarJ. and BratkoI., Argument based machine learning, Artificial Intelligence171(10) (2007), 922-937.
25.
PenningtonD.C., The social psychology of behavior in small groups, Hove, England, Psychology Press, 2002.
26.
PollockJ., Defeasible Reasoning and Degrees of Justification, in: Argument & Computation1(1) (2010), 7-22.
RahwanI. and SimariG.R., Argumentation in Artificial Intelligence, Springer, eds, 2009.
29.
RasheedM.M., HasanM. and RahmanM.S., Maximum neighbour voronoi games, in: Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Algorithms and Computation, (WALCOM'09), Kolkata, India, DasS. and UeharaR., eds, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 18-20 February 2009, pp. 93-104.
30.
RotsteinN., MoguillanskyM., GarcíaA., and SimariG., A Dynamic Argumentation Framework, in: Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2010), Desenzano del Garda, Italy, BaroniP., CeruttiF., GiacominM. and SimariG.R., eds, IOS Press, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, The Netherlands, 8-10 Sep 2010, pp. 427-438.
31.
SandholmT., Distributed rational decision making, in: Multiagent Systems, WeissG., ed., MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA, 1999, pp. 201-258.
32.
SeveriS., SottileF., AbreuG., PastroneC., SpiritoM. and BerensF., M2M technologies: Enablers for a pervasive Internet of Things, Networks and Communications (EuCNC) 2014 European Conference on, Bologna, Italy, (23-26 June 2014), 1-5.
33.
SycaraK., Argumentation: Planning other agents' plans, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, (IJCAI 89), Detroit, MI, (20-26 August 1989), 517-523.
34.
ToulminS., Uses of Arguments, Cambridge University Press, 1958.
35.
VoronoiG., Nouvelles applications des parametres continus a la theorie des formes quadratiques., J Reine Angew, Math134 (1908), 198-287.
