The ability of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobacteria (PGPR) to produce ammonia (NH3) is one of the key mechanisms for the growth and development of plants. Ammonia spectrophotometric quantification assay using Nessler’s reagent remains laborious and seems to be not suitable for large-scale PGP screening assay. Here, we performed a new accurate, easy, and cost-effective micro-plate protocol for large-scale ammonia quantification in bacterial supernatants as an alternative to the spectrophotometric method. In order to validate the accuracy of our innovative microplate assay, 9 bacterial strains were explored for their ability to produce ammonia using both the conventionally described assay and the newly performed micro-plate one. The ammonia 96-well microplate assay was successfully performed by scaling down the spectrophotometric methods to reduce the volume of bacterial supernatant as well as Nessler’s reagent. The reduction was estimated to 90%of the total used volume in comparison to the conventional test. The micro-test is 10-fold cheaper and 26 times faster than the conventional method. All bacterial isolates were positive for ammonia production. Bacillus inaquorsum and Bacillus mojavensis produced the highest ammonia concentration of about 371 and 370μM respectively. Furthermore, the application of the ammonia micro-plate assay reduces drastically the reagent waste and toxicity hazard of K2HgI4 (Nessler’s reagent) in the environment, thus, we can classify it as eco-friendly respecting the Green Chemistry concept according to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The statistical data obtained from both assays are significantly correlated (r = 0.985, R squared = 0.9329, and p < 0.001) proving the accuracy of the micro-plate assay. The proposed NH3 micro-assay is a reliable, rapid, eco-friendly, and cost-effective method to screen plant growth-promoting potential of more than 25 bacterial strains in one micro-plate. It could be an alternative for the conventional NH3 assay as a routine research tool.
AhemadM. and KibretM., Mechanisms and applications of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria: Current perspective. Vol. 26, Journal of King Saud University - Science. Elsevier; 2014. pp. 1–20.
3.
TangD., LiuM.Y., ZhangQ., MaL., ShiY. and RuanJ., Preferential assimilation of NH4+over NO3–in tea plant associated with genes involved in nitrogen transportation, utilization and catechins biosynthesis, Plant Sci291 (2020), 110369.
4.
Van Den BergE.M., Van DongenU., AbbasB. and Van Loosdrecht, M.C.M., Enrichment of DNRA bacteria in a continuous culture, ISME J [Internet]. 2015 Oct 23 [cited 2021 Jun 25]; 9(10), 2153–61. Available from: http://technelysium.com.au
5.
RadkovA.D., McNeillK., UdaK. and MoeL.A., D-amino acid catabolism is common among soil-dwelling bacteria, Microbes Environ [Internet]. 2016 Jun 25 [cited 2020 Aug 24]; 31(2) (2016), 165–168. Available from: http://pmc/articles/PMC4912152/?report=abstrac
6.
HodgesS.C., Soil fertility basics: NC certified crop advisor training. In: Raleigh, NC: Soil Science Extension.: North Carolina State University; 2010.
7.
WeiseT., KaiM. and PiechullaB., Bacterial Ammonia Causes Significant Plant Growth Inhibition. Börnke F, editor, PLoS One [Internet]. 2013 May 15 [cited 2020 Jul 25]; 8(5) (2013), e63538. Available from: https://dx.plos.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0063538
8.
DilfuzaE. In: Soil Nutrients role of microorganisms in nitrogen cycling in soils. 2011. pp. 159–176.
9.
PajaresS. and BohannanB.J.M., Ecology of nitrogen fixing, nitrifying, and denitrifying microorganisms in tropical forest soils [Internet]. Vol. 7, Frontiers in Microbiology. Frontiers Media S.A.; 2016 [cited 2020 Jul 30]. pp. 1045. Available from: http://www.frontiersin.org
10.
AbbasT., ZhouH., ZhangQ., LiY., LiangY., DiH., et al, Anammox co-fungi accompanying denitrifying bacteria are the thieves of the nitrogen cycle in paddy-wheat crop rotated soils, Environ Int130 (2019), 104913.
11.
KumarV. and GeraR., Isolation of a multi-trait plant growth promoting Brevundimonas sp. and its effect on the growth of Bt-cotton, 3 Biotech [Internet]. 2014 Feb 13 [cited 2020 Aug 3]; 4(1) (2014), 97–101. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
12.
TsegayeZ., GizawB., TeferaG., FelekeA., ChaniyalewS., AlemuT., et al, Isolation and biochemical characterization of Plant Growth Promoting (PGP) bacteria colonizing the rhizosphere of Tef crop during the seedling stage, Plant Sci Phytopathol [Internet]. 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 25]; 3 (2019), 013–27. Available from: https://doi.org/10.29328/journal.jpsp.1001027
13.
JainD., SanadhyaS., SaheewalaH., MaheshwariD., ShukwalA., SinghP.B., et al, Molecular Diversity Analysis of Plant Growth Promoting Rhizobium Isolated from Groundnut and Evaluation of Their Field Efficacy, Curr Microbiol [Internet]. 2020 Aug 4 [cited 2020 Jul 25]; 77(8) (2020), 1550–1557. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00284-020-01963-y
14.
FranchiE., RolliE., MarascoR., AgazziG., BorinS., CosminaP., et al, Phytoremediation of a multi contaminated soil: mercury and arsenic phytoextraction assisted by mobilizing agent and plant growth promoting bacteria, J Soils Sediments [Internet]. 2017 May 1 [cited 2020 Aug 6]; 17(5) (2017), 1224–1236. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi.
15.
MoustaineM., ElkahkahiR., BenbouazzaA., BenkiraneR. and AchbaniE.H., Effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacterial (PGPR) inoculation on growth in tomato (Solanum Lycopersicum L.) and characterization for direct PGP abilities in Morocco, Int J Environ Agric Biotechnol2(2) (2017), 238708.
16.
MukherjeeP., RoychowdhuryR. and RoyM., Phytoremediation potential of rhizobacterial isolates from Kans grass (Saccharum spontaneum) of fly ash ponds, Clean Technol Environ Policy [Internet]. 2017 Jul 1 [cited 2020 Aug 4]; 19(5) (2017), 1373–1385. Available from: http://www.ncbi.n1m.nih.gov/blast/Blast.cgi.
17.
SasongkoA., NugrohoR.W. and MulyaniD., Ammonia determination in bottled water using spectrophotometer: comparison between nessler and berthelot methods, JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknol [Internet]. 2018 Jul 2 [cited 2020 Aug 22]; 7(1) (2018), 126–134. Available from: https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JST/article/view/13009
18.
ZhaoY., ShiR., BianX., ZhouC., ZhaoY., ZhangS., et al, Essay Ammonia Detection Methods in Photocatalytic and Electrocatalytic Experiments: How to Improve the Reliability of NH 3 Production Rates? 2019 [cited 2020 Jul 24]; Available from: http://www.advancedscience.com
19.
ZhuY., ChenJ., YuanD., YangZ., ShiX., LiH., et al, Development of analytical methods for ammonium determination in seawater over the last two decades. 2019 [cited 2021 Aug 31]; Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trac.2019.115627
20.
CappucinoJ.C. and ShermanN., “Microbiology A Laboratory Manual,”. In: Benjamin/Cumming, editor. 3rd Editio. New York; 1992.
21.
RoychowdhuryR., QaiserT.F., MukherjeeP. and RoyM., Isolation and Characterization of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa Strain PGP for Plant Growth Promotion, Proc Natl Acad Sci India Sect B Biol Sci [Internet]. 2019 Mar 16 [cited 2020 Aug 7]; 89(1) (2019), 353–360. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s40011-017-0946-9
KremerR.J., Determination of soil phosphatase activity using a microplate method1, Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal25(3–4) (1994), 319–325.
24.
SarwarM. and KremerR.J., Determination of bacterially derived auxins using a microplate method,pp. 282-285. Lett Appl Microbiol, Letters in Applied Microbiology20(2ml) (1995), 282–285.
25.
ZhangS., ReddyM.S. and KloepperJ.W., Development of Assays for Assessing Induced Systemic Resistance by Plant Growth-Promoting Rhizobacteria against Blue Mold of Tobacco, Biol Control23(1) (2002), 79–86.
26.
LiZ., ChangS., LinL., LiY. and AnQ., A colorimetric assay of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) based on ninhydrin reaction for rapid screening of bacteria containing ACC deaminase, Lett Appl Microbiol [Internet]. 2011 Aug 1 [cited 2021 Aug 27]; 53(2) (2011), 178–185. Available from: https://sfamjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/j.1472765X.2011.03088.x
27.
AroraN.K. and VermaM., Modified microplate method for rapid and efficient estimation of siderophore produced by bacteria, 3 Biotech 2017 76 [Internet]. 2017 Oct 26 [cited 2021 Aug 28]; 7(6) (2017), 1–9. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s13205-017-1008-y
28.
JhaC.K., PatelB. and SarafM., Stimulation of the growth of Jatropha curcas by the plant growth promoting bacterium Enterobacter cancerogenus MSA2, World J Microbiol Biotechnol [Internet]. 2012 Mar 23 [cited 2021 May 23]; 28(3) (2012), 891–899. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11274-011-0886-0
29.
SahooB. and ChaudhuriS., Screening of lindane degrading bacteria isolated from soil for their plant growth promoting attributes, Environ Sustain [Internet]. 2019 Jun 23 [cited 2021 Jun 25]; 2(2) (2019), 97–106. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42398-019-00054-4
30.
GoswamiD., PithwaS., DhandhukiaP. and ThakkerJ.N., Delineating Kocuria turfanensis 2M4 as 381 a credible PGPR: A novel IAA-producing bacteria isolated from saline desert, J Plant Interact [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2021 May 23]; 9(1) (2014), 566–576. Available from: https://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=tjpi20
31.
GuptaR.S., PatelS., SainiN. and ChenS., Robust demarcation of 17 distinct bacillus species clades, proposed as novel bacillaceae genera, by phylogenomics and comparative genomic analyses: Description of robertmurraya kyonggiensis sp. nov. and proposal for an emended genus bacillus limiting it only to the members of the subtilis and cereus clades of species, Int J Syst Evol Microbiol [Internet]. 2020 Oct 28 [cited 2021 Jun 26]; 70(11) (2020), 5753–5798. Available from: https://www.microbiologyresearch.org/content/journal/ijsem/10.1099/ijsem.0.004475
32.
KashyapB.K.,
SolankiM.K.,
PandeyA.K.,
PrabhaS.,
KumarP. and
KumariB., Bacillus as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): a promising green agriculture technology. In:
AnsariR,
MahmoodI, editors. Plant Health Under Biotic Stress. 1. Singapore: Springer; (2019). pp. 219236. Available from: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-13-6040-4_11
33.
NawazS. and BanoA., Effects of PGPR (Pseudomonas sp.) and Ag-nanoparticles on Enzymatic Activity and Physiology of Cucumber, Recent Pat Food Nutr Agric11(2) (2019), 124–136.
34.
Cuaxinque-FloresG., Aguirre-NoyolaJ.L., Hernández-FloresG., Martínez-RomeroE., Romero-RamírezY. and Talavera-MendozaO., Bioimmobilization of toxic metals by precipitation of carbonates using Sporosarcina luteola: An in vitro study and application to sulfide-bearing tailings, Sci Total Environ724 (2020), 138124.
35.
de FreitasM.M., SouzaP.M., CruvinelK., BarrosT., SantosS.N., LongP.F., et al, Interferences that impact measuring optimal l-asparaginase activity and consequent errors interpreting these data [Internet]. Vol. 103, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. Springer Verlag; 2019 [cited 2021 May 25]. pp. 5161–5166. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-019-09890-0
36.
XiongW., GuoZ., ZhaoS., WangQ., XuQ. and WangX., Facile, Cost-Effective Plasma Synthesis of Self-Supportive FeSx on Fe Foam for Efficient Electrochemical Reduction of N2 under Ambient Conditions, The Royal Society of Chemistry. Electronic Supplementary Material (ESI); 2019. pp. 1–25.
37.
Kumar ChowdhuryS., MajumdarS. and Mandal, V., Biocontrol Potential and Growth Promotion Capability of Bacillus sp. LBF-1 for Management of Wilt Disease of Solanum lycopersicum Caused by Fusarium sp, Russ Agric Sci46(2) (2020), 139–147.
38.
PrajaktaB.M., SuvarnaP.P., RaghvendraS.P. and AlokR.R., Potential biocontrol and superlative plant growth promoting activity of indigenous Bacillus mojavensis PB-35(R11) of soybean (Glycine max) rhizosphere, SN Appl Sci [Internet]. 2019 Oct 1 [cited 2021 Jun 6]; 1(10) (2019), 1–11. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42452-019-1149-1
39.
MapelliF., MarascoR., RolliE., BarbatoM., CherifH., GuesmiA., et al, Potential for Plant Growth Promotion of Rhizobacteria Associated with Salicornia Growing in Tunisian Hypersaline Soils. Biomed Res Int [Internet]. 2013;2013. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/248078.
40.
DoddsW.K. and WhilesM.R.Nitrogen, Sulfur, Phosphorus, and Other Nutrients. In: Freshwater Ecology. Elsevier; 2020. pp. 395–424.
41.
ZhengH., WangZ., DengX., HerbertS. and XingB., Impacts of adding biochar on nitrogen retention and bioavailability in agricultural soil, Geoderma [Internet]. 2013 Sep [cited 2020 Aug 24]; 206 (2013), 32–39. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0016706113001365
42.
PearsonJ. and StewartG.R., The deposition of atmospheric ammonia and its effects on plants, New Phytol [Internet]. 1993 Oct [cited 2020 Aug 23]; 125(2) (1993), 283–305. Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1469-8137.1993.tb03882.x
43.
LiuY., GaoJ., BaiZ., WuS., LiX., WangN., et al, Unraveling mechanisms and impact of microbial recruitment on oilseed rape (Brassica napus l.) and the rhizosphere mediated by plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria, Microorganisms [Internet]. 2021 Jan 1 [cited 2021 Jun 7]; 9(1) (2021), 1–21. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9010161
44.
KeT., GuoG., LiuJ., ZhangC., TaoY., WangP., et al, Improvement of the Cu and Cd phytostabilization efficiency of perennial ryegrass through the inoculation of three metal-resistant PGPR strains, Environ Pollut271 (2021), 116314.
45.
Environmental Protection Agency EPA. US. “Environmental management guide for small laboratories.” Washington, D.C.; 2000.
RammJ.G., DorscheidG.L., PassosC.G. and SirtoriC., Development of a Waste Management Program in Technical Chemistry Teaching, J Chem Educ [Internet]. 2018 Apr 10 [cited 2021 May 26]; 95(4) (2018), 570–576. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jchemed.7b00590
48.
NascimentoE.D.S. and FilhoA.T., Chemical waste risk reduction and environmental impact generated by laboratory activities in research and teaching institutions [Internet]. Vol. 46, Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences. Faculdade de Ciências Farmacêuticas da Universidade de São Paulo; 2010 [cited 2020 Aug 21]. pp. 187–97. Available from: http://www.iso.org
49.
ShettyD.N. and NarayanaB., Simple Methods for the Spectrophotometric Determination of Carvedilol, Int Sch Res Netw ISRN Spectrosc (2012), 2012.
50.
JoshiD., SinghB., RautelaA., SemwalN. and Pharmaceu SciG.J., Analytical Method Development and Validation of UV-Visible Spectrophotometric Method for the Estimation of Saxagliptin in Gastric Medium, India Glob J Pharmaceu Sci8(2), 2021.
