The present study investigates the bio-activity and bio-adsorption properties of graphene family materials (GFMs) in comparison to nano-Al2O3 (12 nm, gamma phase). This is the first study that determines the type of solid adsorbent (GFMs or nano-Al2O3) preferred by living bacteria cells. The investigated GFMs were: graphene, graphene oxide (GO) and reduced graphene oxide (RGO). The SEM images indicated that bacterial preferences depended on the particular strain, the type of GFM and the composition of the suspension. Generally, bacteria preferred to colonize the GFMs surfaces in the presence of nano-Al2O3 which resulted in no changes of zeta potential (ζ) measured for bacteria cells due to the fact that carbon is known as a good nourishment for microorganisms. There were however few exceptions from that rule i.e. the Sarcina bacteria preferred to adsorb on the surface of nano-Al2O3 when suspended with RGO flakes, and the E. coli preferred to colonize the surface of nano-Al2O3 when suspended with graphene sheets. For this suspension, ζ of bacteria cells decreased suggesting their starving state on the surface of nano-Al2O3. We also found disruptions in morphology of almost all E. coli cells, when attached to all investigated adsorbents.
NovoselovK.S., GeimA.K., MorozovS.V., JiangD., ZhangY., DubonosS.V., GrigorievaI.V. and FirsovA.A., Electric field effect in atomically thin carbon films, Sci306 (2004), 666–669.
2.
SanchezV.C., JachakA., HurtR.H. and KaneA.B., Biological Interactions of Graphene-Family Nanomaterials: An interdisciplinary Review, Chem Res Toxicol25(1) (2011), 15–34.
3.
NetoA.C., GuineaF., PeresN.M.R., NovoselovK.S. and GeimA.K., The electronic properties of graphene, Rev Modern Phys81 (2009), 109–162.
4.
JastrzębskaA.M., KurtyczP. and OlszynaA.R., Recent advances in Graphene Family Materials toxicity investigations, J Nanoparticle Res14 (2012), 1–21.
5.
JastrzębskaA.M. and
OlszynaA.R., The ecotoxicity of Graphene Family Materials: Current status, knowledge gaps and future needs, J Nanoparticle Res17 (2015), 1–21.
AkhavanO. and GhaderiE., Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria, ACS Nano10 (2010), 5731–5736.
8.
LiuS., ZengT.H., HofmannM., BurcombeE., WeiJ., JiangR., KongJ. and ChenY., Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: Membrane and oxidative stress, ACS Nano5 (2011), 6971–6980.
9.
ZhangY., MoG., LiX., ZhangW., ZhangJ., YeJ., HuangX. and YuC., A graphene modified anode to improve the performance of microbial fuel cells, J Power Sources196 (2011), 5402–5407.
10.
WangG., QianF., SaltikovC.W., JiaoY. and LiY., Microbial reduction of graphene oxide by Shewanella, Nano Res6 (2011), 563–570.
11.
AkhavanO. and GhaderiE., Toxicity of graphene and graphene oxide nanowalls against bacteria, ACS Nano10 (2010), 5731–5736.
12.
JastrzębskaA., KarwowskaE. and OlszynaA., Chapter XI - Bio-Assessment and Toxicology: Influence of the Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteria Cells on the Zeta Potential of Graphene Oxide Modified with Alumina Nanoparticles in Electrolyte and Drinking Water Environment, Springer Proceedings in Energy, 2nd International Congress on Energy Efficiency and Energy Related Materials (ENEFM 2014), Proceedings, Oludeniz, Fethiye/Mugla, Turkey, October 16-19, Springer, 2014, pp. 245–250, ISBN 978-3-319-16901-9.
13.
BhatnagarA. and MinochaA.K., Conventional and non-conventional adsorbents for removal of pollutants from water – A review, Indian J Chem Technol13 (2006), 2013–217.
14.
JastrzębskaA.M., KunickiA.R.,
OlszynaA.R. and KarwowskaE., Al2O3-Ag nanopowders - new method of synthesis, characterization and biocidal activity, Adv Appl Ceram110 (2011), 108–113.
15.
JastrzębskaA.,
RadziunE.,
RosłonM.,
KunickiA.,
OlszynaA.,
Dudkiewicz-WilczyńskaJ., AnuszewskaE. and KarwowskaE., In vitro assessment of antibacterial properties and cytotoxicity of Al2O3-Ag nanopowders, Adv Appl Ceram110 (2011), 353–359.
16.
JastrzębskaA.,
KarwowskaE.,
TabernackaA.,
MosdorfP.,
PolisP.,
KurtyczP.,
OlszynaA. and KunickiA.R., New non phyto- and eco-toxic alumina-stabilized silver and praseodymium nanoparticles, Int J Appl Ceram Technol10 (2013), 908–916.
17.
JastrzębskaA.M.,
KarwowskaE.,
KurtyczP.,
OlszynaA.R. and KunickiA., Influence of bacteria adsorption on zeta potential of Al2O3 and Al2O3/Ag nanoparticles in electrolyte and drinking water environment studied by means of zeta potential, Surf Coat Technol271 (2015), 225–233.
18.
KosteckiM. and JezierskaE., Influence of milling media on mechanically exfoliated MoS2, Nanomat Nanotechnol (2014), 4.
19.
KosteckiM., OlszynaA.R. and SokołowskaA., Liquid exfoliation – new low-temperature method of nanotechnology, Mat Sci Poland2 (2013), 165–172.
20.
YangD., VelamakanniA., BozokluG., ParkS., StollerM., PinerR.D., StankovichS., JungI., FieldD.A., VentriceC.A.Jr and RuoffR.S., Chemical analysis of graphene oxide films after heat and chemical treatments by X-ray photoelectron and Micro-Raman spectroscopy, Carbon47 (2009), 145–152.
21.
EricksonK., ErniR., LeeZ., AlemN., GannettW. and ZettlA., Determination of the local chemical structure of graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide, Adv Mat22 (2010), 4467–4472.
22.
MavarroC.G., MeyerJ.C., SundaramR.S., ChuvilinA., KuraschS. and BurghardM., Atomic structure of reduced graphene oxide, Nano Lett10 (2010), 1144–1148.
23.
MatteviC., EdaG., AgnoliS., MillerS., MkhoyanK.A. and CelikO., Evolution of electrical, chemical and structural properties of transparent and conducting chemically derived graphene thin films, Adv Funct Mat19 (2009), 2577–2583.
24.
JastrzębskaA.M.,
KarczJ.,
LetmanowskiR.,
ZabostD.,
CiecierskaE.,
ZdunekJ.,
KarwowskaE.,
SiekierskiM., OlszynaA. and KunickiA., Synthesis of the RGO/Al2O3 core-shell nanocomposite flakes and characterization of their unique electrostatic properties using zeta potential measurements, Appl Surf Sci362 (2016), 577–594.
25.
JastrzębskaA.M.,
KarczJ.,
KarwowskaE.,
FiedorczukA. and OlszynaA., Synthesis and bioactivity of reduced graphene oxide/alumina-noble metal nanocomposite flakes, International Journal of Applied Ceramic Technology1-15 (2016). doi: 10.1111/ijac.12555
26.
JastrzębskaA.M.,
KarczJ.,
LetmanowskiR.,
ZabostD.,
CiecierskaE.,
KarwowskaE.,
SiekierskiM. and OlszynaA., Synthesis of RGO/TiO2 nanocomposite flakes and characterization of their unique electrostatic properties using zeta potential measurements, J Alloys Compd679 (2016), 470–484.
27.
LiuP.Y., ChinL.K., SerW., AyiT.C., YapP.H., BourouinaT. and Leprince-WangY., Real-time measurement of single bacterium’s refractive index using optofluidic immersion refractometry, Procedia Eng87 (2014), 356–359.
28.
LiD., MullerM.B., GiljeS., KanerR.B. and WallaceG.C., Processable aqueous dispersions of graphene nanosheets, Nat Nanotechnol3 (2008), 101–105.
29.
StankovichS., DikinD.A., PinerR.D., KohlhaasK.A., KleinhammesA. and JiaY., Synthesis of graphene-based nanosheets via chemical reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide, Carbon45 (2007), 1558–1565.
30.
StankovichS., PinerR.D., ChenX.Q., WuN.Q., NguyenS.T. and RuoffR.S., Stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets via the reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide on the presence of poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate), J Mat Chem16 (2006), 155–158.
31.
WuZ-S., RenW., GaoL., LiuB., JiangC. and ChengH-M., Synthesis of high-quality graphene with a pre-determined number of layers, Carbon47 (2009), 493–499.
32.
LiuS., HofmannM., BurcombeE., WeiJ., JiangR., KongJ. and ChenY., Antibacterial activity of graphite, graphite oxide, graphene oxide, and reduced graphene oxide: Membrane and oxidative stress, ACS Nano5(9) (2011), 6971–6980.
33.
PoortingaA.T., BosR., NordeW. and BusscherH.J., Electric double layer interactions in bacterial adhesion to surfaces, Surf Sci Rep47 (2002), 1–32.
34.
van der WalA.,
NordeW.,
ZehnderA.J.B. and LyklemaJ., Determination of the total charge in the cell walls of Gram-positive bacteria, Colloids Surf B9(1-2) (1997), 81–100.
35.
TsunedaS., AikawaH., HayashiH. and HirataA., Significance of cell electrokinetic properties determined by soft-particle analysis in bacterial adhesion onto a solid surface, J Colloid Interf Sci279 (2004), 410–417.
36.
SchollM.A., MillsA.L., HermanJ.S. and HornbergerG.M., The influence of mineralogy and solution chemistry on the attachment of bacteria to representative aquifer materials, J Contamin Hydrol6 (1990), 321–336.
37.
KrekelerC., ZiehrH. and KleinJ., Influence of physicochemical bacterial surface properties on adsorption to inorganic porous supports, Appl Microbiol Biotechnol35 (1991), 484–490.
38.
MarshallK.C., StoutR. and MitchellR., Mechanisms of the initial events in the sorption of marine bacteria to surfaces, J General Microbiol68 (1971), 337–348.
39.
MozesN., MarchaF., HermesseM.P., Van HaechtJ.L.,
ReuliauxL.,
LeanonardA.J. and RouxhetP.G., Immobilization of microorganisms by adhesion: Interplay of electrostatic and non-electrostatic interactions, Biotechnol Bioengineer30 (1987), 439–450.
40.
MarshallK.C., Biofilm: An overview of bacterial adhesion, activity and control at surfaces, ASM News58 (1992), 202–207.
41.
HuysmanF., Verstraete, Effect of cell surface characteristic on the adhesion of bacteria of to soil particles, Biol Fertil Soil16 (1993), 21–26.
42.
FletcherM. and LoebG.I., Influence of substratum characteristics on the attachment of a marine pseudomonas to soil surfaces, Appl Environ Microbiol37 (1979), 67–72.
43.
HuysmanF. and VerstraeteW., Water-facilitated transport of bacteria in unsaturated soil columns: Influence of cell surface hydrophobicity and soil properties, Soil Biol Biochem25 (1993), 83–90.
44.
KurtyczP., JastrzębskaA.M.,
KarwowskaE.,
OlszynaA., Comparative assessment of the Graphene oxide and reduced Graphene oxide influence on the zeta potential of selected bacteria in drinking water environment, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Composite Science and Technology (ICCST) – 2020 – Scientific and Industrial Challenges, Location:Naples, Italy, Date: APR 24-26, 2013, pp. 383–393, Published by: DEStech Publication, Inc., USA, 2013.
45.
LiuP.Y., ChinL.K., SerW., AyiT.C., YapP.H., BourouinaT. and Leprince-WangY., Real-time measurement of single bacterium’s refractive index using optofluidic immersion refractometry, Procedia Eng87 (2014), 356–359.
46.
SoniK.A., BalasubramanianA.K., BeskokA. and PillaiS.D., Zeta potential of selected bacteria in drinking water when dead, starved, or exposed to minimal and rich culture media, Current Microbiol56 (2008), 93–97.
47.
BruinsmaG.M., Rustema-AbbingM., van der MeiH.C. and
BusscherH.J., Effects of cell surface damage on surface properties and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, J Microbiol Methods45 (2001), 95–101.
48.
FonteE.S., AmadoA.M., Meirelles-PereiraF., EstevesF.A., RosadoA.S. and FarjallaV.F., The combination of different carbon sources enhances bacterial growth efficiency in aquatic ecosystems, Microb Ecol66(4) (2013), 871–878.
