The Sars-Cov-2 coronavirus outbreak significantly impacted Ghana’s educational system, driving schools to close campuses and swiftly deploy online instruction. This study evaluated e-teaching in higher education amidst the Sars-Cov-2 coronavirus by using the University of Ghana as a case study. Specifically, the study investigated university instructors’ preferences for online instructional strategies to enable higher educational institutions to transit smoothly into online teaching and learning. With the help of a face-to-face questionnaire administration, this cross-sectional study used a discrete choice experiment design to capture the responses of 230-course instructors. The analysis of the survey data obtained was possible using the multinomial logit model. Our results revealed that a recorded lecture video had the highest preference among the course instructors, breakdown of teaching content for approximately 30 to 45 minutes, providing online tutorials, and online support/video tutoring from teaching assistants were the important instructional attributes to help higher educational institutions transition into online teaching and learning.
AbidovaM., & GuzachevaN. (2020). Features of Medical Terminology Teaching in English Lessons.Bulletin of Science and Practice, 6, 434-437.
2.
AdamowiczW. L. (1998). Introduction to Attribute-Based Stated Choice Methods.Washinton, U.S.A: Resource Valuation Branch Damage Assessment Center, NOAA, U.S Department.
3.
AnkersonK. S., & PableJ. (2008). Interior design: Practical strategies for teaching and learning. New York, NY: Fairchild Books Inc.
4.
AstriL. Y. (2017). Barrier factors that influence the satisfaction of e-learning: a literature study.Advanced Science Letters, 23, 3767-3771.
5.
BaoW. (2020). COVID-19 and online teaching in higher education: A case study of Peking University.Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2, 113-115.
BingimlasK. A. (2009). Barriers to the successful integration of ICT in teaching and learning environments: A review of the literature. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 5, 235-245.
8.
Chang,C. L., & Fang,M. (2020). E-Learning and online instructions for higher education during the 2019 novel coronavirus diseases (COVID-19) epidemic. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1574, 012166.
9.
ElzainyA.El SadikA., & Al AbdulmonemW. (2020). Experience of e-learning and online assessment during the COVID-19 pandemic at the College of Medicine, Qassim University.Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 15, 456-462.
10.
HauberA. B.GonzalezJ. M.Groothuis-OudshoornC. G.PriorT.MarshallD. A.CunninghamC, et al. (2016). Statistical Methods for the Analysis of Discrete Choice Experiments: A Report of the ISPOR Conjoint Analysis Good Research Practices Task Force.Value Health, 19, 300-315.
11.
HarapanH.ItohN.YufikaA.WinardiW.KeamS.TeH., & MudatsirM. (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): A literature review.Journal of infection and public health, 13, 667-673.
12.
HensherD. A.RoseJ. M., & GreeneW. H. (2005). Applied Choice Analysis, A Primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13.
KohnT.MaierR., & ThalmannS. (2010). Knowledge Transfer with E-Learning Resources to Developing Countries: Barriers and Adaptive Solutions, in BreitnerM.H.LehnerF.StaffJ. & WinandU. (Eds.), E-Learning Springer.
14.
LancsarE., & LouviereJ. (2008). Conducting discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making: a user’s guide.Pharmacoeconomics, 26, 661-677.
15.
LapitanL. D., JrTiangcoC. E.SumalinogD. A. G.SabarilloN. S., & DiazJ. M. (2021). An effective blended online teaching and learning strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic.Education for Chemical Engineers, 35, 116-131.
16.
MailizarA.AbdulsalamM., & SuciB. (2020). Secondary schoolmathematics teachers’ views on e-learning implementation barriers during theCOVID-19 pandemic: The case of Indonesia.Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 16, 1-9.
17.
ManghamL. J.HansonK., & McPakeB. (2009). How to do (or not to do). Designing a discrete choice experiment for application in a low-income country.Health policy and planning, 24, 151-158.
McFaddenD. (1978). Modeling the choice of residential location. In: KarlquistA.LundquistL. SnickarsF, & WeibullJ. W., eds. Spatial interaction theory and planning models. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
20.
NaveenkumarV.NagB. S.VijayaraghavanR., & PorteenK. (2020). The Possible Risk of Reverse Zoonosis in COVID-19: An Epidemiological Driving Approach for the One Health Future Challenges: A Review.Asian Journal of Dairy and Food Research, 39, 173-179.
21.
NewtonG.TuckerT.DawsonJ., & CurrieE. (2014). Use of lecture capture in higher education-lessons from the trenches.TechTrends, 58, 32-45.
22.
NerantziC. (2020). The use of peer instruction and flipped learning to support flexible blended learning during and after the COVID-19 Pandemic.International Journal of Management and Applied Research, 7, 184-195.
23.
RajasulochanaS.NyarkoE.DashU., & MuraleedharanV. R. (2016). Expectant Mother’s preferences for Services in Public Hospitals of Tamil Nadu, India.Journal of Health Management, 18, 305-317.
24.
SchneiderS. (2021). Are there never too many choice options? The effect of increasing the number of choice options on learning with digital media.Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 3, 759-775.
25.
SchleicherA. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on education: Insights from education at a glance. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/education/education-at-a-glance/.
26.
SmithD. K. (2014). iTube, YouTube, WeTube: Social media videos in chemistry education and outreach.Journal of Chemical Education, 91, 1594-1599.
27.
StorkC.CalandroE., & GamageR. (2014). The future of broadband in Africa.Info, 16, 76-93.
28.
SundarasenS.ChinnaK.KamaludinK.NurunnabiM.BalochG. M.KhoshaimH. B., & SukaytA. (2020). Psychological impact of COVID-19 and lockdown among university students in Malaysia: implications and policy recommendations.International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17, 6206-6206.
29.
TrainK. E. (2009). Discrete choice methods with simulation. New York: Cambridge university press.
30.
WangB.ChenG.RatcliffeJ.AfzaliH. H. A.GilesL., & MarshallH. (2017). Adolescent values for immunization programs in Australia: A discrete choice experiment.PLoS ONE, 12, e0181073.
31.
ZaharahZ.KirilovaG. I., & WindartiA. (2020). Impact of corona virus outbreak towards teaching and learning activities in Indonesia.SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syari, 7, 269-282.
32.
ZhelezniakovaE. A., & LaptevaM. L. (2021). Distance Learning Technologies in Teaching Russian as a Non-Native Language in Primary School.Russian Language Studies, 19, 21-33.
33.
ZhuH.WeiL., & NiuP. (2020). The novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. sGlobal health research and policy, 5, 1-3.
