In December 2019 the Basel Committee has launched the consolidated Basel framework. The framework inherits the Basel II internal ratings-based (IRB) approach for the credit risk with mostly no changes. The absence of the material methodological changes is unexpected given the fact that the key shortcomings of the IRB approach stay unresolved. The paper objective is therefore to list its earlier discussed shortcomings and to address the new ones. Latter include the unbalanced treatment of PD and LGD parameters, as well as methodological inconsistency in expected and unexpected loss treatment.
AltmanE. (2011). Default Recovery Rates and LGD in Credit Risk Modelling and Practice. In: LiptonA. & RennieA., eds. The Oxford Handbook of Credit Derivatives. s.l.:s.n.
2.
AltmanE. (2018). A fifty-year retrospective on credit risk models, the Altman Z-score family of models and their applications to financial markets and managerial strategies. The Journal of Credit Risk, Volume IRMC 10th Anniversary Special Issue, pp. 1-34.
3.
BCBS, (1988). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards (updated to april 1998). [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsc111.pdf [Accessed 25 December 2019].
4.
BCBS, (1999). A new capital adequacy framework. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs50.htm [Accessed 27 September 2019].
5.
BCBS, (2000). Range of Practive in Banks’ Internal Rating Systems. [Online] Available at: http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs66.htm [Accessed 9 October 2019].
6.
BCBS, (2001a). Basel II: The New Basel Capital Accord. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbscp02.htm [Accessed 27 September 2019].
7.
BCBS, (2001b). The Internal Ratings-Based Approach. Supporting Document to the New Basel Capital Accord. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbsca05.pdf [Accessed 09 January 2020].
8.
BCBS, (2003). Basel II: The New Basel Capital Accord. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/bcbscp3.htm [Accessed 27 September 2019].
9.
BCBS, (2004). Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: a Revised Framework. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs107.htm [Accessed 27 September 2019].
10.
BCBS, (2005a). An Explanatory Note on the Basel II IRB Risk Weight Functions, Basel: BIS.
11.
BCBS, (2005b). Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs118.htm [Accessed 27 September 2019].
12.
BCBS, (2005c). Studies on the Validation on Internal Rating Systems. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs_wp14.htm [Accessed 25 December 2019].
13.
BCBS, (2006). Basel II: International Convergence of Capital Measurement and Capital Standards: A Revised Framework – Comprehensive Version. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs128.htm [Accessed 27 September 2019].
14.
BCBS, (2009). Strengthening the resilience of the banking sector. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs164.htm [Accessed 21 December 2019].
15.
BCBS, (2013). Fundamental review of the trading book. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs265.pdf [Accessed 09 January 2020].
16.
BCBS, (2016a). TLAC holdings standard. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d387.htm [Accessed 09 January 2020].
17.
BCBS, (2016b). Reducing variation in credit risk-weighted assets – constraints on the use of internal model approaches. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d362.pdf [Accessed 09 January 2020].
18.
BCBS, (2017a). Basel III: Finalising post-crisis reforms. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d424.htm [Accessed 12 November 2018].
19.
BCBS, (2017b). Range of practices in implementing the countercyclical capital buffer policy. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d407.htm [Accessed 07 January 2020].
20.
BCBS, (2019a). Consolidated Basel Framework. Consultative Document. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d462.pdf [Accessed 25 December 2019].
21.
BCBS, (2019b). Guiding principles for the operationalisation of a sectoral countercyclical capital buffer. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/publ/d487.htm [Accessed 07 January 2020].
22.
CaruanaJ. (2010). Strengthened capital framework: from Basel II to Basel III. [Online] Available at: http://www.bis.org/speeches/sp100921a.pdf [Accessed 13 January 2020].
23.
ChiuM.JacksonK., & KreininA. (2017). Correlated multivariate Poisson processes and extreme measures. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 12, pp. 369-385.
24.
ErmolovaM. D., & PenikasH. I. (2019). The Impact of PD-LGD Correlation on Bank Capital Adequacy in Nongranular Loan Portfolio. Model Assisted Statistics and Applications, 14(1), pp. 103-120.
25.
FoulcherS.GouriérouxC. & TiomoA. (2005). Latent Variable Approach to Modelling Dependence of Credit Risks: Application to French Firms and Implications for Regulatory Capital, Paris: CREF 05-01.
26.
GardesF.GaubertP., & LangloisS. (1999). Pauvrete et Convergence Des Consommations Au Canada. The Canadian Review of Sociology and Anthropology, 36(3), pp. 1-27.
27.
GoodhartC. (2011). The Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. A History of the Early Years 1974–1997. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
28.
GordyM. (2000). A comparative anatomy of credit risk models. Journal of Banking and Finance, 24, pp. 119-149.
29.
GordyM.HeitfieldE., & WuJ. (2014). Risk-Based Regulatory Capital and the Basel Accords. The Oxford Handbook of Banking, 2nd ed. Edited by Allen N. Berger, Philip Molyneux, John Wilson.
30.
GordyM. B., & HowellsB. (2004). Procyclicality in Basel II: Can We Treat the Disease Without Killing the Patient? [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/events/rtf04gordy_howells.pdf [Accessed 09 October 2019].
31.
GordyM., & LütkebohmertE. (2013). Granularity adjustment for regulatory capital assessment. International Journal of Central Banking, 3, pp. 33-70.
32.
IllingM., & PaulinG. (2005). Basel II and the Cyclicality of Bank Capital. Canadian Public Policy, 31(2), pp. 161-180.
33.
KruppaJ.LepeniesB., & JungK. (2018). A genetic algorithm for simulating correlated binary data from biomedical research. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 92, pp. 1-8.
34.
KupiecP. H. (2006). Capital Allocation for Portfolio Credit Risk. [Online] Available at: https://www.fdic.gov/bank/analytical/cfr/2006/wp2006/2006-08.pdf [Accessed 09 January 2020].
35.
LiD. (2000). On Default Correlation: A Copula Function Approach. Journal of Fixed Income, 9(4), pp. 43-54.
36.
LopezJ. A. (2002). The Empirical Relationship between Average Asset Correlation, Firm Probability of Default and Asset Size. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/bcbs/events/b2ealop.pdf [Accessed 09 January 2020].
37.
MengQ. et al., (2010). Implications of PD-LGD Correlation in a Portfolio Setting. Moody’s Analytics. [Online] Available at: https://www.moodysanalytics.com/-/media/whitepaper/before-2011/10-05-02-implications-of-pd-lgd-correlation-in-a-portfolio-setting.pdf [Accessed 09 December 2019].
38.
MertonR. (1974). On the pricing of corporate debt: The risk structure of interest. Journal of Finance, 29, pp. 449-470.
OzdemirB., & MiuP. (2009). Basel II Implementation. A Guide to Developing and Validating a Compliant Internal Risk Rating System. New York: McGrawHill.
41.
PenikasH. (2015). History of banking regulation as developed by the Basel Committee on banking supervision in 1974–2014 (brief overview). Financial Stability Journal, 28(5), pp. 9-47.
42.
PreisserJ. S., & QaqishB. F. (2014). A comparison of methods for simulating correlated binary variables with specified marginal means and correlations. Journal of Statistical Computation and Simulation, 84(11), pp. 2441-2452.
43.
PykhtinM. (2004). Portfolio credit risk Multi-factor adjustment. Risk, pp. 85-90.
44.
RepulloR. (2013). Banking Theory and Regulation. Madrid, CEMFI.
45.
SalmonF. (2009). Recipe for Disaster. The Formula That Killed Wall-Street.. [Online] Available at: https://www.wired.com/2009/02/wp-quant/ [Accessed 09 January 2020].
46.
TarashevN. A. (2005). An empirical evaluation of structural credit risk models. [Online] Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/work179.htm [Accessed 09 January 2020].
47.
The US Federal Reserve, 2006. Risk-Based Capital Standards: Advanced Capital Adequacy Framework, s.l.: s.n.
48.
VasicekO. (1987). Probability of Loss on Loan Portfolio. [Online] Available at: https://mx.nthu.edu.tw/∼jtyang/Teaching/Risk_management/Papers/Models/Probability%20of%20Loss%20on%20Loan%20Portfolio.pdf [Accessed 13 January 2020].
49.
WittG. (2014). A simple distribution for the sum of correlated, exchangeable binary data. Communications in Statistics – Theory and Methods, 43, pp. 4265-4280.
50.
WitzanyJ. (2013). A Note on the Vasicek’s Model with the Logistic Distribution. Ekonomický časopis, 10, pp. 1053-1066.
51.
Zimper, (2014). The Minimal Confidence Levels of Basel Capital Regulation. Journal of Banking Regulation, 15(2), pp. 129-43.
