Response Surface Methodology is a popular set of statistical techniques used to improve a system process. Peterson (2004) proposed a Bayesian multivariate response optimization method that considers the dependence structure among the responses when locating the optimal region as defined by some loss or desirability function. The main contribution of this paper lies in addressing the Bayesian reliability optimization for multivariate binary responses where the logistic models with traditional Bayesian reliability approach suffers from computational complexities. This work is focused on reducing the computational complexities by introducing latent variables in the response structure.
Chen,Y., & Ye,K. (2011). A Bayesian hierarchical approach to dual response surface modelling. Journal of Applied Statistics, 38, 1963-1975.
2.
Chib,S., & Albert,J. H. (1993). Bayesian analysis of binary and polychotomous response data. J. Am. Statist. Assoc, 88, 669-679.
3.
Del Castillo,E.Montgomery,D., & McCarville,D. R. (1996). Modified desirability functions for multiple response optimization. Journal of quality technology, 28, 337-345.
4.
Derringer,G. (1980). Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. Journal of quality technology, 12, 214-219.
5.
Eberhardt,K. R.Levenson,M. S., & Gann,R. G. (1997). Fabrics for testing the ignition propensity of cigarettes. Fire and Materials,21, 259-264.
6.
Jeong,I. J.Kim,K. J., & Lin,D. K. (2010). Bayesian analysis for weighted mean-squared error in dual response surface optimization. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 26, 417-430.
7.
Johnson,R. T., & Montgomery,D. C. (2009). Choice of second-order response surface designs for logistic and Poisson regression models. International Journal of Experimental Design and Process Optimisation, 1, 2-23.
Khuri,A. I., & Cornell,J. A. (1996). Response surfaces: designs and analyses. CRC press, 152.
10.
Ko,Y. H.Kim,K. J., & Jun.C. H. (2009). A new loss function-based method for multiresponse optimization. Journal of Quality Technology, 37, 50-59.
11.
Miro-Quesada,G.Del Castillo,E., & Peterson,J. J. (2004). A Bayesian approach for multiple response surface optimization in the presence of noise variables. Journal of Applied Statistics, 31, 251-270.
12.
Myers,R. H., & Carter,W. H. (1973). Response surface techniques for dual response systems. Technometrics, 15, 301-317.
13.
O’brien,S. M., & Dunson,D. B. (2004). Bayesian multivariate logistic regression. Biometrics, 60, 739-746.
14.
Peterson,J. J. (2008).A Bayesian approach to the ICH Q8 definition of design space.Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics, 18, 959-975.
15.
Peterson,J. J. (2004). A posterior predictive approach to multiple response surface optimization. Journal of Quality Technology36, 139.
16.
Peterson,J. J.Miro-Quesada,G., & del Castillo,E. (2009). A Bayesian reliability approach to multiple response optimization with seemingly unrelated regression models. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 6, 353-369.
17.
Pignatiello,J. J., Jr. (1993). Strategies for robust multiresponse quality engineering. IIE transactions, 25, 5-15.
18.
Roy,V., & Hobert,J. P. (2010). On Monte Carlo methods for Bayesian multivariate regression models with heavy-tailed errors. Journal of Multivariate Analysis, 101, 1190-1202.
19.
Sadilingam,G. K. (2011). Adaptive response surface method for efficient Bayesian reliability based design optimization. Proceedings of the 7th Annual GRASP Symposium, Wichita State University, 2011.
20.
Smith,W. (1932). The titration of antipneumococcus serum. Journal of Pathology, 35, 509-526.
21.
Stockdale,G. W., & Cheng,A. (2009). Finding design space and a reliable operating region using a multivariate Bayesian approach with experimental design. Quality Technology & Quantitative Management, 6, 391-408.
22.
Vining,G., & Myers,R. (1990). Combining Taguchi and response surface philosophies- A dual response approach. Journal of quality technology, 22, 38-45.
23.
Wang,J.Ma,Y.Ouyang,L., & Tu,Y. (2016). A new Bayesian approach to multi-response surface optimization integrating loss function with posterior probability. European Journal of Operational Research, 249, 231-237.
