Paper packaging is favored by manufacturers in various industries due to its advantages such as economy and environmental friendliness, and the application of paper packaging in various types of products is also becoming increasingly popular. However, with the growth of the national economy and the increasing purchasing power of the people, consumers not only have higher requirements for the functionality of products, but also have higher requirements for the visual effect of product packaging. Based on the potential consumption trend of “looking for things”, enterprises need to further strengthen the artistic design effect when using paper packaging, promoting the unity of practicality and aesthetics of paper packaging. Pattern design art, as a component of graphic design art, is mainly based on pattern modeling to convey artistic concepts and aesthetic temperament. Integrating pattern design art into the process of paper packaging design can effectively enhance the artistic value of paper packaging, thereby adding color to products. The pattern design quality evaluation is a classical multi-attribute decision making (MADM). In this paper, the MADM methodology is investigated based on cross-entropy (CE) method under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IVIFSs) for pattern design quality evaluation. First of all, this paper extends the CE method under the IVIFSs to propose the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy number cross-entropy (IVIFN-CE) method, it enlarges the application range of the CE method. Secondly, a new MADM model for pattern design quality evaluation based on IVIFN-CE algorithm is proposed. In this algorithm, attribute weight is calculated by CRITIC method which is a well-known objective method. At the end of this study, we noticed to a comparison between the proposed IVIFN-CE approach with other existing methods to verify the effectiveness of the algorithm.
TahvildariLKontogiannisK, editors. On the role of design patterns in quality-driven re-engineering. 6th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR 2002); 2002 Mar 11–13; Budapest, Hungary. LOS ALAMITOS: Ieee Computer Soc; 2002.
2.
LiBShiuBWLauKJ. Weld pattern design for sheet metal laser welding considering fixturing quality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.2002; 19(6): 418-25.
3.
EdenAH. Giving “the quality” a name – Precise specification of design patterns – A second look at the manuscripts. J Object-Oriented Program.1998; 11(3): 5-+.
4.
NationBDPetersALawsonRALudovicePJHendersonCL, editors. Effect of chemoepitaxial guiding underlayer design on the pattern quality and shape of aligned lamellae for fabrication of line-space patterns. Conference on Alternative Lithographic Technologies VII; 2015 Feb 23–26; San Jose, CA. BELLINGHAM: Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering; 2015.
5.
TonBTVeldhuisRNJ, editors. A High Quality Finger Vascular Pattern Dataset Collected Using a Custom Designed Capturing Device. 6th IAPR International Conference on Biometrics (ICB); 2013 Jun 04–07; Univ Autonoma Madrid, Madrid, SPAIN. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2013.
6.
YangSZManzerATzerposV, editors. Measuring the Quality of Design Pattern Detection Results. 22nd IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution, and Reengineering (SANER); 2015 Mar 02–06; Montreal, CANADA. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2015.
7.
PradhanPDwivediAKRathSK, Ieee, editors. Impact of Design Patterns on Quantitative Assessment of Quality Parameters. 2nd IEEE International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communication Engineering (ICACCE); 2015 May 01–02; Tulas Inst, Dehradun, INDIA. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2015.
8.
WojszczykRWojcikR, editors. The Model of Quality Assessment of Implementation of Design Patterns. 13th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI); 2016 Jun 01–03; Sevilla, SPAIN. CHAM: Springer Int Publishing Ag; 2016.
9.
WaheedAUbaidSRasoolGGhaffarF, Ieee, editors. Discovery of Design Patterns Variants for Quality Software Development. International Conference on Intelligent Systems Engineering (ICISE); 2016 Jan 15–17; Faisal Masjid Campus, E7 Islamabad, Islamabad, PAKISTAN. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2016.
10.
de AragaoJJGYamashitaYOrricoRD. BRT in Brazil: Designing services in function of given infrastructure projects or designing infrastructure in function of established service quality patterns? Res Transp Econ.2016; 59: 304-12.
11.
IslamMZKoliMNYEsselleKP, Ieee, editors. Design and Improvement of Pattern Quality in Circularly Polarised Slot Array Antenna for Direct Broadcast Satellite Applications. 2nd International Conference on Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ICEEE); 2017 Dec 27–29; Rajshahi, BANGLADESH. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2017.
12.
HussainSKeungJKhanAA, Ieee, editors. The Effect of Gang-of-Four Design Patterns Usage on Design Quality Attributes. IEEE International Conference on Software Quality, Reliability and Security (Companion Volume); 2017 Jul 25–29; Prague, CZECH REPUBLIC. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2017.
13.
GravinoCRisiM, editors. How the use of design patterns affects the quality of software systems: a preliminary investigation. 43rd Euromicro Conference on Software Engineering and Advanced Applications (SEAA); 2017 Aug 30–Sep 01; Vienna, AUSTRIA. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2017.
14.
PattiyanonCSenivongseT, editors. Quality Model for Assessing Object-Oriented Design Patterns Under Development. 18th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD); 2017 Jun 26–28; Kanazawa, JAPAN. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2017.
15.
NationBDPetersAJLawsonRALudovicePJHendersonCL. Effect of chemoepitaxial guiding underlayer design on the pattern quality and shape of aligned lamellae for fabrication of line-space patterns. J Micro-Nanolithogr MEMS MOEMS.2017; 16(4): 12.
16.
MoreiraRPaivaACNabucoMMemonA. Pattern-based GUI testing: Bridging the gap between design and quality assurance. Softw Test Verif Reliab.2017; 27(3): 29.
17.
SafaMSoltani-MohammadiSKurdiM. Optimal design of additional sampling pattern for drinking-water quality control. Environ Dev Sustain.2017; 19(4): 1265-78.
18.
RochimahSHantrionoAIAkbarRJBaskaraAR, editors. Application of Design Patterns and Quality Measurement on Academic Information Systems. 4th International Conference on Information Technology, Computer, and Electrical Engineering (ICITACEE); 2017 Oct 18–19; Semarang, INDONESIA. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2017.
19.
PriyalakshmiGNadarajanRWashizakiHSharmaS, editors. Quality Assessment of a Job Portal System Designed Using Bout Design Pattern. 1st International Conference on Advanced Informatics for Computing Research (ICAICR); 2017 Mar 17–18; Lyallpur Khalsa Coll Engn, Jalandhar, INDIA. BERLIN: Springer-Verlag Berlin; 2017.
20.
BiTTLiangPTangA, Ieee, editors. Architecture Patterns, Quality Attributes, and Design Contexts: How Developers Design with Them? 25th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference (APSEC); 2018 Dec 04–07; Nara, JAPAN. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2018.
21.
WojszczykR, editor. The Experiment with Quality Assessment Method Based on Strategy Design Pattern Example. 38th International Conference on Information Systems Architecture and Technology (ISAT); 2017 Sep 17–19; Szklarska Poreba, POLAND. CHAM: Springer International Publishing Ag; 2018.
22.
WojszczykR, editor. Quality Assessment of Implementation of Strategy Design Pattern. 14th International Symposium on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence (DCAI); 2017 Jun 21–23; Porto, PORTUGAL. CHAM: Springer International Publishing Ag; 2018.
23.
VendenhoutenRHermerschmidtAFiebelkornR, editors. Design and quality metrics of point patterns for coded structured light illumination with diffractive optical elements in optical 3D sensors. Conference on Digital Optical Technologies; 2017 Jun 26–28; Munich, GERMANY. BELLINGHAM: Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering; 2017.
24.
ZhuYWangNChuaGLChenBTSrinivasMSinghN, et al., editors. Quality Factor Improvement of a 24 GHz. AlN Checker Patterned Lamb Wave Resonator by Novel Distributed Anchor Design. IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium (IUS); 2018 Oct 22–25; Kobe, JAPAN. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2018.
25.
WojszczykRStolaP, editors. Method of Quality Assessment of the Implementation of Design Patterns Used in Production. 15th International Conference on Distributed Computing and Artificial Intelligence; 2018 Jun 20–22; Toledo, SPAIN. CHAM: Springer International Publishing Ag; 2019.
26.
KhomhFGueheneucYG, editors. Design Patterns Impact on Software Quality: Where Are the Theories? 25th IEEE International Conference on Software Analysis, Evolution and Reengineering (SANER); 2018 Mar 20–23; Campobasso, ITALY. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2018.
27.
WedyanFAbufakherS. Impact of design patterns on software quality: A systematic literature review. IET Softw.2020; 14(1): 1-17.
28.
NikolaevaDBozhikovaV, Ieee, editors. One Approach to Improve the Software Quality by Applying Software Design Patterns. 16th Conference on Electrical Machines, Drives and Power Systems (ELMA); 2019 Jun 06–08; Varna, BULGARIA. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2019.
29.
AladibLLeeSP. Pattern detection and design rationale traceability: An integrated approach to software design quality. IET Softw.2019; 13(4): 249-59.
30.
HuangQGLinHWangBLinSSWangPFSuiP, et al. Patterned glass ceramic design for high-brightness high-color-quality laser-driven lightings. J Adv Ceram.2022; 11(6): 862-73.
31.
AsokanA, Ieee, editors. A Signal-Integrity Aware ATPG Flow to Generate High-Quality Patterns for Testing System-on-Chip Designs. 30th IFIP/IEEE International Conference on Very Large Scale Integration (VLSI-SoC); 2022 Oct 03–05; Univ Patras, Patras, GREECE. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2022.
32.
SuXPZhouYLiQ. Designing Ecological Security Patterns Based on the Framework of Ecological Quality and Ecological Sensitivity: A Case Study of Jianghan Plain, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health.2021; 18(16): 30.
33.
HummellCLCollinsNMDaltonGMWheelingRAYangJThompsonKR, et al., editors. Design and fabrication of multi-metal patterned target anodes for improved quality of hyperspectral X-ray radiography and computed tomography imaging systems. Conference on Advances in X-Ray/EUV Optics and Components XVII; 2022 Aug 22–23; San Diego, CA. BELLINGHAM: Spie-Int Soc Optical Engineering; 2022.
34.
HuangQGSuiPHuangFLinHWangBLinSS, et al. Toward high-quality laser-driven lightings: Chromaticity-tunable phosphor-in-glass film with “phosphor pattern” design. Laser Photon Rev.2022; 16(7): 10.
35.
ValeGCorreiaFFGuerraEMRosaTDFritzschJBognerJ, et al., editors. Summary of the artifact accompanying the article “Designing Microservice Systems Using Patterns: An Empirical Study on Quality Trade-Offs”. 19th IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA); 2022 Mar 12–15; Electr Network. LOS ALAMITOS: Ieee Computer Soc; 2022.
36.
ValeGCorreiaFFGuerraEMRosaTDFritzschJBognerJ, et al., editors. Designing Microservice Systems Using Patterns: An Empirical Study on Quality Trade-Offs. 19th IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture (ICSA); 2022 Mar 12–15; Electr Network. LOS ALAMITOS: Ieee Computer Soc; 2022.
37.
TahvildariLKontogiannisK. Improving design quality using meta-pattern transformations: a metric-based approach (vol 16, pg 331, 2004). J Softw-Evol Proc. 2023; 1.
38.
YangL. Online simulation quality assessment of illustration patterns based on digital art design in neural network perspective. Mob Inf Syst.2022; 2022: 9.
39.
KizielewiczBWatrobskiJSalabunW. Identification of relevant criteria set in the MCDA process-wind farm location case study. Energies.2020; 13(24): 40.
40.
SalabunWWatrobskiJShekhovtsovA. Are MCDA methods benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods. Symmetry-Basel.2020; 12(9): 56.
41.
WieckowskiJKizielewiczBShekhovtsovASalabunW. RANCOM: A novel approach to identifying criteria relevance based on inaccuracy expert judgments. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence.2023; 122: 21.
42.
WieckowskiJWatrobskiJ, editors. How to determine complex MCDM model in the COMET method? Automotive sport measurement case study. 25th KES International Conference on Knowledge-Based and Intelligent Information & Engineering Systems (KES); 2021 Sep 08–10; Szczecin, POLAND. AMSTERDAM: Elsevier Science Bv; 2021.
43.
KizielewiczBParadowskiBWieckowskiJSalabunW, editors. Towards the identification of MARCOS models based on intuitionistic fuzzy score functions. 17th Conference on Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (FedCSIS); 2022 Sep 04–07; Sofia, BULGARIA. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2022.
44.
ShekhovtsovAParadowskiBWieckowskiJKizielewiczBSalabunW, Ieee, editors. Extension of the SPOTIS method for the rank reversal free decision-making under fuzzy environment. IEEE 61st Conference on Decision and Control (CDC); 2022 Dec 06–09; Cancun, MEXICO. NEW YORK: Ieee; 2022.
45.
MunierN. A new approach to the rank reversal phenomenon in MCDM with the SIMUS method. Multiple Criteria Decision Making.2016; (11): 137-52.
46.
ZadehLA. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control.1965; 8(3): 338-53.
47.
ZadehLA. Probability measures of fuzzy events. Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications.1968; 23(2): 421-7.
48.
ShannonCE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal.1948; 27(4): 379-423.
49.
KullbackSLeiblerRA. On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics.1951; 22(1): 79-86.
50.
ZadehLA. Fuzzy Sets. Information and Control. 1965; 338-56.
51.
AtanassovKT. Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems.1986; 20(1): 87-96.
DiakoulakiDMavrotasGPapayannakisL. Determining objective weight in multple criteria problems: The CRITIC method. Computers & Operations Research.1995; 22(7): 763-70.
54.
AtanassovKT. Operators over interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems.1994; 64(2): 159-74.
55.
XuZSYagerRR. Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst.2006; 35(4): 417-33.
56.
LiuHWWangGJ. Multi-criteria decision-making methods based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. European Journal of Operational Research.2007; 179(1): 220-33.
57.
BhandariDPalNR. Some new information measures for fuzzy sets. Information Sciences.1993; 67(3): 209-28.
58.
LinJ. Divergence measures based on the Shannon entropy. IEEE Transactions on Information theory.1991; 37(1): 145-51.
59.
DiakoulakiDMavrotasGPapayannakisL. Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems the critic method. Elsevier Scienc.1995; 22: 767-70.
60.
MukhametzyanovI. Specific character of objective methods for determining weights of criteria in MCDM problems: Entropy, CRITIC and SD. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.2021; 4(2): 76-105.
61.
ŽižovićMMiljkovićBMarinkovićD. Objective methods for determining criteria weight coefficients: A modification of the CRITIC method. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering.2020; 3(2): 149-61.
62.
MuZMZengSZLiuQB. Some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy zhenyuan aggregation operators and their application to multi-attribute decision making. International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems.2018; 26(4): 633-53.
63.
ZhangSFLiuSY. A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for personnel selection. Expert Systems with Applications.2011; 38(9): 11401-5.
64.
XiaoLWeiGGuoYChenX. Taxonomy method for multiple attribute group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy with entropy. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems.2021; 41(6): 7031-45.
65.
YeniFBOzcelikG. Interval-valued atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy CODAS method for multi criteria group decision making problems. Group Decision and Negotiation.2019; 28(2): 433-52.
66.
SalabunWUrbaniakK, editors. A New Coefficient of Rankings Similarity in Decision-Making Problems. 20th Annual International Conference on Computational Science (ICCS); 2020 Jun 03–05; Amsterdam, NETHERLANDS. CHAM: Springer International Publishing Ag; 2020.
67.
SałabunWWa̧tróbskiJShekhovtsovA. Are MCDA Methods Benchmarkable? A Comparative Study of TOPSIS, VIKOR, COPRAS, and PROMETHEE II Methods. Symmetry.2020; 12(9): 1549.
