Speaker Identification denotes the speech samples of known speaker and it identifies the best matches of the input model. The SGMFC method is the combination of Sub Gaussian Mixture Model (SGMM) with the Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients (MFCC) for feature extraction. The SGMFC method minimizes the error rate, memory footprint and also computational throughput measure needs of a medium-vocabulary speaker identification system, supposed for preparation on a transportable or otherwise. Fuzzy -means and -means clustering are used in the SGMM method to attain the improved efficiency and their outcomes with parameters such as precision, sensitivity and specificity are compared.
ReynoldsD. and RoseR., Robust text-independent speaker identification using Gaussian mixture speaker models, IEEE Trans Speech Audio Process3(1) (1995), 72–83.
2.
MakhoulJ., Linear prediction: A tutorial review, Proc IEEE63(4) (1975), 561–580.
3.
ReynoldsD., Large population speaker identification using clean and telephone speech, IEEE Signal Process Lett2(3) (1995), 46–48.
4.
ReynoldsD., Speaker identification and verification using Gaussian mixture speaker models, Speech Commun17(1–2) (1995), 91–108.
5.
PellomB. and HansenJ., An efficient scoring algorithm for gaussian mixture model based speaker identification, IEEE Signal Process Lett5(11) (1998), 281–284.
6.
BaraldiA. and BlondaP., A survey of fuzzy clustering algorithms for pattern identification, IEEE Trans Syst, Man, Cybern, B: Cybern29(6) (1999), 778–785.
7.
ReynoldsD.QuatieriT. and DunnR., Speaker verification using adapted Gaussian mixture models, Digital Signal Process10(1–3) (2000), 19–41.
8.
WangC., Prosodic modeling for improved speech identification and understanding, Ph.D. dissertation, Mass Inst of Technol, Cambridge, MA, 2001.
9.
EzzaidiH.RouatJ. and O’ShaughnessyD., Towards combining pitch and mfcc for speaker identification systems, in: Proc 7th Eur Conf Speech Commun Technol, 2001.
10.
ChaudhariU.NavrratilJ.RamaswamyG. and MaesS., Very large population text-independent speaker identification using transformation enhanced multi-grained models, in: Proc IEEE Int Conf Acoust, Speech, Signal Process (ICASSP’01)1 (2001), 461–464.
11.
De CheveignéA. and KawaharaH., Yin, a fundamental frequency estimator for speech and music, J Acoust Soc Amer111 (2002), 1917.
12.
HosseinzadehD. and KrishnanS., Combining vocal source and MFCC features for enhanced speaker identification performance using GMMS, in: IEEE 9th Workshop Multimedia Signal Process MMSP’07, 2007, pp. 365–368.
13.
GrimaldiM. and CumminsF., Speaker identification using instantaneous frequencies, IEEE Trans Audio, Speech, Lang Process16(6) (2008), 1097–1111.
14.
ApsingekarV. and De LeonP., Speaker model clustering for efficient speaker identification in large population applications, IEEE Trans Audio, Speech, Language Process17(4) (2009), 848–853.
15.
SarkarA.RathS. and UmeshS., Fast approach to speaker identification for large population using mllr and sufficient statistics, in: Proc National Conf Commun (NCC), 2010, pp. 1–5.
16.
TogneriR. and PullellaD., An overview of speaker identification: Accuracy and robustness issues, IEEE Circuits Syst Mag11(2) (2011), 23–61.
17.
DehakN.KennyP.DehakR.DumouchelP. and OuelletP., Front-end factor analysis for speaker verification, IEEE Trans Audio, Speech, Lang Process19(4) (2011), 788–798.
18.
HuY.WuD. and NucciA., Pitch-based gender identification with two-stage classification, Security Commun Netw (2011).
19.
WangN.ChingP.ZhengN. and LeeT., Robust speaker identification using denoised vocal source and vocal tract features, IEEE Trans Audio, Speech, Lang Process19(1) (2011), 196–205.
20.
DiezM.PenagarikanoM.VaronaA.Rodriguez-FuentesL. and BordelG., On the use of dot scoring for speaker diarization, Pattern Recogn and Image Anal (2011), 612–619.
21.
NakagawaS.WangL. and OhtsukaS., Speaker characterization and identification-speaker identification and verification by combining mfcc and phase information, IEEE Trans Audio, Speech, Lang Process20(4) (2012), 1085.
22.
HuY.WuD. and NucciA., Fuzzy-clustering-based decision tree approach for large population speaker identification, IEEE Transactions On Audio, Speech, and Language Processing21(4) (2013).
23.
ChandraE.ManikandanK. and SivasankarM., A proportional study on feature extraction method in automatic speech identification system, Ijireeice2(1) (2014).
MadikeriS.MotlicekP. and BourandH., Combining SGMM speaker vectors and KL-HMM approach for Speaker Diarization, ICASSP, IEEE, (2015).
26.
LeonV.R.A., Speaker model clustering for efficient speaker identification in large population applications, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing17(4) (2009), 848–853.
27.
PoveyD. and BurgetL., The subspace gaussian mixturemodel – a structured model for speech recognition, ComputerSpeech and Language25(2) (2011), 404–439.
28.
VermaV.K. and KhannaN., Indian language identification using k-means clustering and support vector machine (SVM), Engineering and Systems (SCES), IEEE, (2013).
29.
GhoshS. and Kumar DuberyS., Comparative analysis of k-means and fuzzy C-means algorithm, IJACSA4(4) (2013).
30.
SahuS. and DharmaleN., Controlling the application via speech processing through mel frequency cepstral coefficients and back propagation neural method3(2) (2016).
31.
BaidU. and TalbarS., Comparative mixture, fuzzy C-means algorithms for brain tumor segmentation, ICCASP137 (2016), 592–597.
