In this paper, we expand the Muirhead mean (MM) operator and dual Muirhead mean (DMM) operator with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers (IVIFNs) to propose the interval -valued intuitionistic fuzzy Muirhead mean (IVIFMM) operator, interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted Muirhead mean (IVIFWMM) operator, interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy dual Muirhead mean (IVIFDMM) operator and interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy weighted dual Muirhead mean (IVIFWDMM) operator. Then the MADM methods are proposed with these operators. In the end, we utilize an applicable example for green supplier selection in green supply chain management to prove the proposed methods.
AtanassovK., Intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems20 (1986), 87–96.
2.
AtanassovK., More on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems33 (1989), 37–46.
3.
AtanassovK. and GargovG., Interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Fuzzy Sets and Systems31 (1989), 343–349.
4.
XuZ.S., Methods for aggregating interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information and their application to decision making, Control and decision22(2) (2007), 215–219.
5.
XuZ.S. and ChenJ., An approach to group decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic judgment matrices, System Engineer-Theory & Practice27(4) (2007), 126–133.
6.
XuZ.S., Models for multiple attribute decision-making with intuitionistic fuzzy information, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems15(3) (2007), 285–297.
7.
LiD.-F., Linear programming method for MADM with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Expert Syst Appl37(8) (2010), 5939–5945.
8.
LiD.-F., TOPSIS-based nonlinear-programming methodology for multiattribute decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems18(2) (2010), 299–311.
9.
YeJ., Fuzzy cross entropy of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its optimal decision-making method based on the weights of alternatives, Expert Syst Appl38(5) (2011), 6179–6183.
10.
BeliakovG.SolaH.B.JamesS.CalvoT. and FernndezJ., Aggregation for atanassov’s intuitionistic and interval valued fuzzy sets: The median operator, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems20(3) (2012), 487–498.
11.
ChenS.-M.YangM.-W.YangS.-W.SheuT.-W. and LiauC.-J., Multicriteria fuzzy decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Expert Syst Appl39(15) (2012), 12085–12091.
12.
ChenT.-Y., Data construction process and QUALIFLEX-based method for multiple-criteria group decision making with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of Information Technology and Decision Making12(3) (2013), 425–468.
13.
SinghP., A new similarity measure between interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27(1) (2014), 555–566.
14.
ZhangQ.XingH.LiuF.YeJ. and TangP., Some new entropy measures for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on distances and their relationships with similarity and inclusion measures, Inf Sci283 (2014), 55–69.
15.
ChenT.-Y., Multiple criteria decision analysis using a likelihood-based outranking method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Inf Sci286 (2014), 188–208.
16.
ChenS.-M. and ChiouC.-H., Multiattribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, PSO techniques, and evidential reasoning methodology, IEEE Trans Fuzzy Systems23(6) (2015), 1905–1916.
17.
RenP.XuZ. and LeiQ., Simplified interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets with intuitionistic fuzzy numbers, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems30(5) (2016), 2871–2882.
18.
GargH., A new generalized improved score function of interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and applications in expert systems, Appl Soft Comput38 (2016), 988–999.
19.
WangC.-Y. and ChenS.-M., Multiple attribute decision making based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, linear programming methodology, and the extended TOPSIS method, Inf Sci397 (2017), 155–167.
20.
Lakshmana Gomathi NayagamV.JeevarajS. and DhanasekaranP., An intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making method based on non-hesitance score for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Soft Comput21(23) (2017), 7077–7082.
21.
ChengS.-H., Autocratic multiattribute group decision making for hotel location selection based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Inf Sci427 (2018), 77–87.
XuZ.S. and YagerR.R., Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, International Journal of General Systems35 (2006), 417–433.
24.
XuZ.S., Choquet integrals of weighted intuitionistic fuzzy information, Information Sciences180 (2010), 726–736.
25.
WangJ.GaoH. and WeiG.W., The generalized Dice similarity measures for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems34(6) (2019), 1158–1183.
26.
WangJ.WeiG. and GaoH., Approaches to multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued 2-tuple linguistic pythagorean fuzzy information, Mathematics6(10) (2018), 201.
27.
ZhangX. and XuZ., Soft computing based on maximizing consensus and fuzzy TOPSIS approach to interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy group decision making, Appl Soft Comput26 (2015), 42–56.
28.
WuL.P.WangJ. and GaoH., Models for competiveness evaluation of tourist destination with some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy Hamy mean operators, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems36(6) (2019), 5693–5709.
29.
WangJ.WeiG. and LuM., An extended VIKOR method for multiple criteria group decision making with triangular fuzzy neutrosophic numbers, Symmetry10(10) (2018), 497.
30.
MengF. and ChenX., Entropy and similarity measure for Atannasov’s interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their application, FO & DM15(1) (2016), 75–101.
31.
LiuP.D., Some hamacher aggregation operators based on the interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making, IEEE Transations on Fuzzy Systems22(1) (2014), 83–97.
32.
WangJ.WeiG. and LuM., TODIM method for multiple attribute group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic environment, Symmetry10(10) (2018), 486.
33.
OtayI. and KahramanC., Multicriteria bottle design in the beverage industry using interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Multiple-Valued Logic and Soft Computing27(5-6) (2016), 457–474.
34.
LiD.-F. and RenH.-P., Multi-attribute decision making method considering the amount and reliability of intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems28(4) (2015), 1877–1883.
35.
WuL.P.GaoH. and WeiC., VIKOR method for financing risk assessment of rural tourism projects under interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy environment, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(2) (2019), 2001–2008.
36.
AbdullahL. and NajibL., A new preference scale mcdm method based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the analytic hierarchy process, Soft Comput20(2) (2016), 511–523.
37.
LuJ.P. and WeiC., TODIM method for performance appraisal on social-integration-based rural reconstruction with interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(2) (2019), 1731–1740.
38.
LiZ.WeiG. and LuM., Pythagorean fuzzy hamy mean operators in multiple attribute group decision making and their application to supplier selection, Symmetry10(10) (2018), 505.
39.
LiZ.GaoH. and WeiG., Methods for multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy dombi hamy mean operators, Symmetry10(11) (2018), 574.
40.
WangJ.-C. and ChenT.-Y., Likelihood-based assignment methods for multiple criteria decision analysis based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, FO & DM14(4) (2015), 425–457.
41.
WeiG.W.WeiC. and GaoH., Multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued bipolar fuzzy information and their application to emerging technology commercialization evaluation, IEEE Access6 (2018), 60930–60955.
42.
LiY.ChuX.ChuD.GengX. and WuX., An integrated approach to evaluate module partition schemes of complex products and systems based on interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Int J Computer Integrated Manufacturing27(7) (2014), 675–689.
43.
WuL.WeiG.GaoH. and WeiY., Some interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy dombi hamy mean operators and their application for evaluating the elderly tourism service quality in tourism destination, Mathematics6(12) (2018), 294.
44.
ChenL.-H. and TuC.-C., Dominance-based ranking functions for interval-valued intuitionistic fuzzy sets, IEEE Trans Cybernetics44(8) (2014), 1269–1282.
45.
WangF.ZhangC. and XiaZ., Equivalence of the cut sets-based decomposition theorems and representation theorems on intuitionistic fuzzy sets and interval-valued fuzzy sets, Mathematical and Computer Modelling57(5-6) (2013), 1364–1370.
46.
BonferroniC., Sulle medie multiple di potenze, Bolletino Matematica Italiana5 (1950), 267–270.
47.
ZhuB.XuZ.S. and XiaM.M., Hesitant fuzzy geometric Bonferroni means, Information Sciences205 (2012), 72–85.
48.
LiangD.C.XuZ.S. and DarkoA.P., Projection model for fusing the information of pythagorean fuzzy multicriteria group decision making based on geometric bonferroni mean, Int J Intell Syst32(9) (2017), 966–987.
49.
TangX.Y. and WeiG.W., Dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean operators in multi-attribute decision making, Archives of Control Sciences29(2) (2019), 339–386.
50.
WeiG.W.WangR.WangJ.WeiC. and ZhangY., Methods for evaluating the technological innovation capability for the high-tech enterprises with generalized interval neutrosophic number bonferroni mean operators, IEEE Access7(1) (2019), 86473–86492.
51.
WeiG.W.ZhaoX.F.LinR. and WangH.J., Uncertain linguistic Bonferroni mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Applied Mathematical Modelling37 (2013), 5277–5285.
52.
LiuP.-D.ChenS.-M. and LiuJ.-L., Multiple attribute group decision making based on intuitionistic fuzzy interaction partitioned Bonferroni mean operators, Inf Sci411 (2017), 98–121.
53.
LiuP.WangS. and ChuY., Some intuitionistic linguistic dependent Bonferroni mean operators and application in group decision-making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems33(2) (2017), 1275–1292.
54.
LiuP. and LiH., Multiple attribute decision-making method based on some normal neutrosophic Bonferroni mean operators, Neural Computing and Applications28(1) (2017), 179–194.
55.
GouX.-J.XuZ.-S. and LiaoH.-C., Multiple criteria decision making based on Bonferroni means with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, Soft Comput21(21) (2017), 6515–6529.
56.
WangJ.WeiG.W. and WeiY., Models for green supplier selection with some 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic number bonferroni mean operators, Symmetry10(5) (2018), 131.
57.
BeliakovG.PraderaA. and CalvoT., Aggregation functions: A guide for practitioners, Springer, Berlin, 2007.
LiuX.D.ZhuJ.J.LiuG.D. and HaoJ.J., A multiple attribute decision making method based on uncertain linguistic Heronian mean, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2013, 597671.
60.
LiuP.D.LiuZ.M. and ZhangX., Some intuitionistic uncertain linguistic Heronian mean operators and their application to group decision making, Applied Mathematics and Computation230 (2014), 570–586.
61.
YuS.M.ZhouH.ChenX.H. and WangJ.Q., A multi-criteria decision-making method based on Heronian mean operators under a linguistic hesitant fuzzy environment, Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research32 (2015), Article ID 1550035.
62.
ChuY.C. and LiuP.D., Some two-dimensional uncertain linguistic Heronian mean operators and their application in multiple-attribute decision making, Neural Computing and Applications26 (2015), 1461–1480.
63.
LiuX.TaoZ.F.ChenH.Y. and ZhouL.G., A MAGDM method based on 2-tuple linguistic Heronian mean and new operational laws, International Journal of Uncertainty, Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems24 (2016), 593–627.
64.
YuD.J.LiD.F. and MerigóJ.M., Dual hesitant fuzzy group decision making method and its application to supplier selection, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics7 (2016), 819–831.
65.
WeiG.W.GaoH. and WeiY., Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy heronian mean operators in multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2018. doi: 10.1002/int.21985.
66.
MuirheadR.F., Some methods applicable to identities and inequalities of symmetric algebraic functions of n letters, Proceedings of the Edinburgh Mathematical Society21(3) (1902), 144–162.
67.
YagerR.R., On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making, IEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics18 (1988), 183–190.
68.
YagerR.R. and FilevD.P., Induced ordered weighted averaging operators, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics – Part B29 (1999), 141–150.
69.
ChiclanaF.HerreraF. and Herrera-ViedmaE., The ordered weighted geometric operator: Properties and application, in: Proc of 8th Int Conf on Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-based Systems, Madrid, 2000, pp. 985–991.
70.
XuZ.S. and DaQ.L., An overview of operators for aggregating information, International Journal of Intelligent System18 (2003), 953–969.
71.
WangJ.WeiG.W.WeiC. and WeiY., Dual hesitant q-rung orthopair fuzzy muirhead mean operators in multiple attribute decision making, IEEE Access7(1) (2019), 67139–67166.
72.
TangM.WangJ.LuJ.P.WeiG.W.WeiC. and WeiY., Dual hesitant pythagorean fuzzy heronian mean operators in multiple attribute decision making, Mathematics7(4) (2019), 344.
73.
WeiG.W., Pythagorean fuzzy hamacher power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Fundamenta Informaticae166(1) (2019), 57–85.
74.
WeiG.W., Picture fuzzy Hamacher aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Fundamenta Informaticae157(3) (2018), 271–320. doi: 10.3233/FI-2018-1628.
75.
WangJ.GaoH. and LuM., Approaches to strategic supplier selection under interval neutrosophic environment, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(2) (2019), 1707–1730.
76.
WangP.WeiG.W.WangJ.LinR. and WeiY., Dual hesitant q-rung orthopair fuzzy hamacher aggregation operators and their applications in scheme selection of construction project, Symmetry11(6) (2019), 771.
77.
WangJ.WeiG.W.LuJ.P.AlsaadiF.E.HayatT.WeiC. and ZhangY., Some q-rung orthopair fuzzy hamy mean operators in multiple attribute decision making and their application to enterprise resource planning systems selection, International Journal of Intelligent Systems34(10) (2019), 2429–2458.
78.
GaoH., Pythagorean fuzzy hamacher prioritized aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems35(2) (2018), 2229–2245.
79.
WeiG.W.WuJ.WeiC.WangJ. and LuJ.P., Models for MADM with 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic Dombi Bonferroni mean operators, IEEE Access7(1) (2019), 108878–108905.
80.
WangJ.LuJ.P.WeiG.W.LinR. and WeiC., Models for MADM with single-valued neutrosophic 2-tuple linguistic muirhead mean operators, Mathematics7(5) (2019), 442.
81.
WangJ.GaoH. and WeiG.W., Some 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic number Muirhead mean operators and their applications to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence31(3) (2019), 409–439.
82.
TangX.Y.WeiG.W. and GaoH., Models for multiple attribute decision making with interval-valued pythagorean fuzzy muirhead mean operators and their application to green suppliers selection, Informatica30(1) (2019), 153–186.
83.
TangX.Y. and WeiG.W., Multiple attribute decision-making with dual hesitant pythagorean fuzzy information, Cognitive Computation11(2) (2019), 193–211.
84.
MaclaurinC., A second letter to Martin Folkes, Esq.; concerning the roots of equations, with demonstration of other rules of algebra, Philos Trans Roy Soc London Ser A36 (1729), 59–96.
85.
WeiG.W. and LuM., Pythagorean fuzzy maclaurin symmetric mean operators in multiple attribute decision making, International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2017. doi: 10.1002/int.21911.
86.
QinJ.Q. and LiuX.W., 2-tuple linguistic Muirhead mean operators for multiple attribute group decision making and its application to supplier selection, Kybernetes45(1) (2017), 2–29.
87.
LiuP.D. and LiD.F., Some muirhead mean operators for intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and their applications to group decision making, PLoS ONE12(1) (2017), e0168767. doi: 10.1371/journal.
88.
DeliI. and agmanN., Intuitionistic fuzzy parameterized soft set theory and its decision making, Appl Soft Comput28 (2015), 109–113.
89.
LiZ.X. and LuM., Some novel similarity and distance and measures of Pythagorean fuzzy sets and their applications, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(2) (2019), 1781–1799.
90.
TangX.Y.WeiG.W. and GaoH., Pythagorean fuzzy muirhead mean operators in multiple attribute decision making for evaluating of emerging technology commercialization, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja32(1) (2019), 1667–1696.
91.
WeiG.W., 2-tuple intuitionistic fuzzy linguistic aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making, Iranian Journal of Fuzzy Systems16(4) (2019), 159–174.
92.
DengX.M. and GaoH., TODIM method for multiple attribute decision making with 2-tuple linguistic Pythagorean fuzzy information, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(2) (2019), 1769–1780.
93.
WangR., Research on the application of the financial investment risk appraisal models with some interval number muirhead mean operators, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(2) (2019), 1741–1752.
94.
MaZ.M. and XuZ.S., Symmetric pythagorean fuzzy weighted geometric_averaging operators and their application in multicriteria decision-making problems, International Journal of Intelligent Systems31 (2016), 1198–1219.
95.
WangJ.GaoH.WeiG.W. and WeiY., Methods for multiple-attribute group decision making with q-rung interval-valued orthopair fuzzy information and their applications to the selection of green suppliers, Symmetry11(1) (2019), 56.
96.
WeiG.W.WangJ.WeiC.WeiY. and ZhangY., Dual hesitant pythagorean fuzzy hamy mean operators in multiple attribute decision making, IEEE Access7(1) (2019), 86697–86716.
97.
DengX.M.WangJ. and WeiG.W., Some 2-tuple linguistic pythagorean heronian mean operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making, Journal of Experimental & Theoretical Artificial Intelligence31(4) (2019), 555–574.
98.
WangP.WangJ. and WeiG.W., EDAS method for multiple criteria group decision making under 2-tuple linguistic neutrosophic enviroment, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems37(2) (2019), 1597–1608.
99.
WeiG.W., The generalized dice similarity measures for multiple attribute decision making with hesitant fuzzy linguistic information, Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja32(1) (2019), 1498–1520.
100.
ChairaT., Enhancement of medical images in an Atanassov’s’t intuitionistic fuzzy domain using an alternative intuitionistic fuzzy generator with application to image segmentation, Journal of Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems27(3) (2014), 1347–1359
101.
ZhangS.Q.GaoH.WeiG.W.WeiY. and WeiC., Evaluation based on distance from average solution method for multiple criteria group decision making under picture 2-tuple linguistic environment, Mathematics7(3) (2019), 243.
102.
LuJ.P.TangX.Y.WeiG.W.WeiC. and WeiY., Bidirectional project method for dual hesitant Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute decision-making and their application to performance assessment of new rural construction, International Journal of Intelligent Systems34(8) (2019), 1920–1934.
103.
MerigóJ.M.CasanovasM. and MartínezL., Linguistic aggregation operators for linguistic decision making based on the Dempster-Shafer theory of Evidence, International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems18(3) (2010), 287–304.
