Accurate prediction of water table depth over long-term in arid agricultural areas are very much important for maintaining environmental sustainability. Because of intricate and diverse hydrogeological features, boundary conditions, and human activities researchers face enormous difficulties for predicting water table depth. A virtual study on forecast of water table depth using various neural networks is employed in this paper. Hybrid neural network approach like Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS), Recurrent Neural Network (RNN), Radial Basis Function Neural Network (RBFN) is employed here to appraisal water levels as a function of average temperature, precipitation, humidity, evapotranspiration and infiltration loss data. Coefficient of determination (R), Root mean square error (RMSE), and Mean square error (MSE) are used to evaluate performance of model development. While ANFIS algorithm is used, Gbell function gives best value of performance for model development. Whole outcomes establish that, ANFIS accomplishes finest as related to RNN and RBFN for predicting water table depth in watershed.
YanQ. and MaC., Application of integrated ARIMA and RBF network for groundwater level forecasting, Environmental Earth Sciences75(5) (2016), 396.
2.
SoleymaniS.A.GoudarziS.AnisiM.H.HassanW.H.IdrisM.Y.I.ShamshirbandS.NoorN.M. and AhmedyI., A novel method to water level prediction using RBF and FFA, Water Resources Management30(9) (2016), 3265–3283.
3.
AmuthaR. and PorchelvanP., Seasonal prediction of groundwater levels using ANFIS and radial basis neural network, International Journal of Geology, Earth and Environmental Sciences1(1) (2011), 98–108.
4.
YinJ.C.ZouZ.J. and XuF., Sequential learning radial basis function network for real-time tidal level predictions, Ocean Engineering57 (2013), 49–55.
5.
SamantarayS.SahooA. and GhoseD.K., June Assessment of Groundwater Potential Using Neural Network: A Case Study. In International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Communication, Springer, Singapore, 2019, pp. 655–664.
6.
DaliakopoulosI.N.CoulibalyP. and TsanisI.K., Groundwater level forecasting using artificial neural networks, Journal of hydrology309(1-4) (2005), 229–240.
7.
AffandiA.K. and WatanabeK., Daily groundwater level fluctuation forecasting using soft computing technique, Nature and Science5(2) (2007), 1–10.
8.
CoulibalyP.AnctilF.AravenaR. and BobéeB., Artificial neural network modeling of water table depth fluctuations, Water Resources Research37(4) (2001), 885–896.
9.
KrishnaB.SatyajiY.R. and VijayaT., Modelling groundwater levels in an urban coastal aquifer using artificial neural networks, Hydrological Processes: An International Journal22(8) (2008), 1180–1188.
10.
EmamgholizadehS.MoslemiK. and KaramiG., Prediction the groundwater level of bastam plain (Iran) by artificial neural network (ANN) and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system (ANFIS), Water Resources Management28(15) (2014), 5433–5446.
11.
SuryanarayanaC.SudheerC.MahammoodV. and PanigrahiB.K., An integrated wavelet-support vector machine for groundwater level prediction in Visakhapatnam, India, Neurocomputing145 (2014), 324–335.
12.
MoosaviV.VafakhahM.ShirmohammadiB. and BehniaN., A wavelet-ANFIS hybrid model for groundwater level forecasting for different prediction periods, Water Resources Management27(5) (2013), 1301–1321.
13.
JalalkamaliA. and JalalkamaliN., Groundwater modeling using hybrid of artificial neural network with genetic algorithm, African Journal of Agricultural Research6(26) (2011), 5775–5784.
14.
GüldalV., and TongalH., Comparison of recurrent neural network, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and stochastic models in Eğirdir Lake level forecasting, Water Resources Management24(1) (2010), 105–128.
15.
YararA.OnucyıldızM. and CoptyN.K., Modelling level change in lakes using neuro-fuzzy and artificial neural networks, Journal of Hydrology365(3-4) (2009), 329–334.
16.
ChangF.J. and ChangY.T., Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system for prediction of water level in reservoir, Advances in Water Resources29(1) (2006), 1–10.
17.
CoppolaE.A., Jr.RanaA.J.PoultonM.M.SzidarovszkyF. and UhlV.W., A neural network model for predicting aquifer water level elevations, Groundwater43(2) (2005), 231–241.
18.
SunY.WendiD.KimD.E. and LiongS.Y., Application of artificial neural networks in groundwater table forecasting – a case study in a Singapore swamp forest, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences20(4) (2016), 1405–1412.
19.
FiratM. and GüngörM., River flow estimation using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system, Mathematics and Computers in Simulation75(3-4) (2007), 87–96.
20.
SamantarayS.SahooA. and GhoseD.K., Assessment of runoff via precipitation using neural networks: watershed modelling for developing environment in arid region, Pertanika J Sci Technol27(4) (2019), 2245–2263.
21.
ChS. and MathurS., Modeling uncertainty analysis in flow and solute transport model using adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system and particle swarm optimization, KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering14(6) (2010), 941–951.
22.
KarabogaD. and KayaE., Adaptive network based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) training approaches: a comprehensive survey, Artificial Intelligence Review52(4) (2018), 1–31.
23.
SahooA.SamantarayS. and GhoseD.K., Stream flow forecasting in Mahanadi River Basin using artificial neural networks, Procedia Computer Science157 (2019), 168–174.
24.
NguyenP.K.T.ChuaL.H.C.TaleiA. and ChaiQ.H., Water level forecasting using neuro-fuzzy models with local learning, Neural Computing and Applications30(6) (2018), 1877–1887.
25.
SeoY.KimS.KisiO. and SinghV.P., Daily water level forecasting using wavelet decomposition and artificial intelligence techniques, Journal of Hydrology520 (2015), 224–243.
26.
GongY.ZhangY.LanS. and WangH., A comparative study of artificial neural networks, support vector machines and adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system for forecasting groundwater levels near Lake Okeechobee, Florida, Water Resources Management30(1) (2016), 375–391.
27.
AnsongM.O.YaoH-X. and HuangJ.S., Radial and sigmoid basis function neural networks in wireless sensor routing topology control in underground mine rescue operation based on particle swarm optimization, International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks9(9) (2013), 1–14.
28.
YuH.XieT.PaszczynskiS. and WilamowskiB.M., Advantages of radial basis function networks for dynamic system design, Industrial Electronics, IEEE Transactions, 58(12) (2011), 5438–5450.
29.
AqilM.KitaI.YanoA. and NishiyamaS., Neural networks for real time catchment flow modeling and prediction, Water Resour Manag21 (2007), 1781–1796.
30.
JangJ.S.R.SunC.T. and MizutaniE., Neuro-fuzzy and soft computing: a computational approach to learning and machine intelligence, Prentice-Hall, Eaglewood Cliffs, 1997, pp. 665–685.
31.
DasU.K.SamantarayS.GhoseD.K. and RoyP., Estimation of aquifer potential using BPNN, RBFN, RNN, and ANFIS. In Smart Intelligent Computing and Applications, Springer, Singapore, 2019, pp. 569–576.
32.
JangJ.S.R. and SunC.T., Neuro-fuzzy modeling and control, Proc IEEE83 (1995), 378–406.
