The demand for a providing QoS adaptive routing over IoT networks is always a challenge among current research community. This research work KHAI proposes a framework for QoS-adaptive routing approach, which incorporates Krill Herd optimization model over IoT network. Variable QoS user preference and handling differential service types over a scalable IoT network shows that challenge for designing an adaptive QoS is a must. Research survey suggest that major works have been carried out on bandwidth appreciable services and route management approaches. Hence QoS adaptive user defined services, which adapt to variable service priority levels based on user demand and network resource utilization is proposed in this research work. The performance analysis of proposed approach shows an improved throughput of 97.51 Mbps and minimal packet loss of 37.29% over a session in comparison to traditional computational approaches. Considering large scale of interconnected IoT devices, proposed approach delivers near optimal solution of throughput and adaptive utilization of network resources.
Al-FuqahaA.GuizaniM.MohammadiM.AledhariM. and AyyashM., Internet of things: A survey on enabling technologies, protocols and applications, IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials17(4) (2015), 2347–2376.
2.
SangaiahA.K. and ThangaveluA., Meenakshi sundaram venkatesan, cognitive computing for big data systems over IoT: Frameworks, tools and applications, Springer International Publishing (2018).
3.
BolajiA.L.BetarM.A.AwadallahM.A.KhaderA.T. and AbualigahL.M., A comprehensive review: Krill Herd algorithm (KH) and its applications, Applied Soft Computing49 (2016), 437–446.
4.
BavyaA.N.ArunkumarT. and AdalarasuK., A comprehensive survey on IoT technologies in health care system, Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology11(7) (2018), 3157–3162.
5.
PereraA.ZaslavskyP.ChristenC. and GeorgakopoulosD., Context aware computing for the internet of things: A survey, IEEE16(1) (2014), 414–454.
6.
WhiteG.NallurV. and ClarkeS., Quality of service approaches in IoT: A systematic mapping, Journal of Systems and Software132 (2017), 186–203.
7.
ParkK.KimY. and ChangJ., Semantic reasoning with contextual ontologies on sensor cloud environment, International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks (2014).
8.
AminL.GrunskeA. and ColmanA., An automated approach to forecasting QoS attributes based on linear and non-linear time series modeling, IEEE/ACM ASE, (2012), 130–139.
9.
AbualigaL.M.KhaderA.T. and HanandehE.S., A hybrid strategy for krill herd algorithm with harmony search algorithm to improve the data clustering, Intelligent Decision Technologies12(6) (2018), 1–12.
10.
AbualigaL.M.KhaderA.T. and HanandehE.S., Modified krill herd algorithm for global numerical optimization problems, Advances in Nature-Inspired Computing and Applications, (2019), 205–221.
11.
HanM. and LimJ.H., Design and implementation of smart home energy management systems based on Zigbee, Consumer Electronics, IEEE56(3) (2010), 1417–1425.
12.
TennenhouseD., Embedding the internet: Proactive computing, Communications of the ACM43(5) (2000), 43–43.
13.
TrivediN.GandomiA.H.JangirP.KumarA.JangirN. and TotlaniR., Adaptive krill herd algorithm for global numerical optimization, in: Advances in Computer and Computational Sciences, Springer, (2017), 517–525.
14.
SkarlatO.NardelliM.SchulteS.BorkowskiM. and LeitnerP., Optimized IoT service placement in the fog, Service Oriented Computing and Applications11(4) (2017), 427–443.
15.
ValenciaP.Juan Holgado-TerrizaA. and PatriciaP., A systematic method for building internet of agents applications based on the linked open data approach, Future Generation Computer Systems94 (2019), 250–271.
16.
JensiR. and JijiG.W., An improved krill herd algorithm with global exploration capability for solving numerical function optimization problems and its application to data clustering, Applied Soft Computing46 (2016), 230–245.
17.
AlbasheirS. and KadochM., Enhanced control for adaptive resource reservation of guaranteed services in LTE networks, IEEE Internet Things3(2) (2016), 179–189.
18.
YinbiaoS.LanctotP. and JianbinF., Internet of things: Wireless sensor networks, Geneva, Switzerland, Int Electrotech Commission, White Paper (2014).
19.
SaleemU.Najam HasanA. and ShahidA., Device centric throughput and QoS optimization for IoTsin a smart building using CRN-techniques, Sensors16(10) (2016), 1647.
20.
PadmavathiV.SaminathanR. and SelvamuthukumaranS., An opportunistic route prediction approach over IoT network for reactive QoS support and differential services, International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology11(8) (2020), 427–438.
21.
WangW.DeS.CassarG. and MoessnerK., Knowledge representation in the internet of things: semantic modelling and its applications, Automatika, Journal for Control, Measurement, Electronics, Computing and Communications54(4) (2013).
22.
WeiW. and BarnaghiP., Semantic annotation and reasoning for sensor data, Smart Sensing and Context (2009), 66–76.
23.
LiZ.BiJ. and ChenS., Traffic prediction-based fast rerouting algorithm for wireless multimedia sensor networks, International Journal Distributed Sensors Networks11 (2013), 1124–1130.
24.
LuY.ZhangD.ChenY.LiuX. and ZongP., Improvement of LEACH in wireless sensor networks based on balanced energy strategy, International Conference on Information and Automation16(8) (2012), 111–115.
25.
YeZ., Long-term QoS-aware cloud service composition using multivariate time series analysis, IEEE Trans Serv Comp9(3) (2016), 382–393.
26.
ZhengZ.ZhangY. and LyuM.R., Investigating QoS of real-world web services, IEEE Transactions on Services Computing7(1) (2014), 32–39.
